XWH

Xi Wif Hat Price Today & AI Analysis

XWHSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 6, 2026

Price

$0.048629

+11.33% 24h

Contract

Live
7AJ1KjzjstMnQGzZk1HAKx2atmvvRqWvmRbdYmnviryq

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,608

Market cap

$86,079

Ask Unhosted AI about XWH

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Solana

GREGGREGGreg16676935420$0.041215-10.9%MC $11.7KPIEPIEAlpie$0.7466-2.6%MC $354.6KELONELONElon Coin$0.000168+0.1%MC $168.3KTHUNKERTHUNKERTung Thunker$0.041620-20.5%MC $15.7KPAWSINUPAWSINUUNISWAP$0.057770-4.5%MC $7.8KAgencyAgencyAgency$0.0184+697.8%MC $17.72M

Xi Wif Hat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-06 23:18 UTC

Holder addresses

1,684

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$60,138.47
How concentrated is Xi Wif Hat ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,684 addresses (2026-07-06 23:18 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Xi Wif Hat?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Xi Wif Hat liquidity falling?
As of 2026-07-06 23:18 UTC, reported liquidity was $60,138.47. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-06 23:18 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 6, 11:18 PM UTC

FDV

$181,703

Liquidity

$60,138.47

Holders

1,684

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Xi Wif Hat (XWH) is an unverified Solana meme token (mint: 7AJ1KjzjstMnQGzZk1HAKx2atmvvRqWvmRbdYmnviryq) with a total supply of ~997.6M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$181.7K. The token has experienced an explosive 24h price surge of ~159–172% (depending on the window), trading at $0.000182 at time of analysis. Liquidity is extremely thin at $60.14K, and supply concentration is severe — the top holder alone controls 32.24% of supply and the top 10 collectively hold 56.75%. Holder growth was essentially flat for most of the past 30 days before a sudden spike of +75 in the last 24 hours, coinciding with the price pump. No sniper data is available. The token is unverified, has no description, and its update authority is neither renounced nor a known burn address, adding governance risk.

Key points

  • Explosive 24h price pump of ~159–172% with thin $60.14K liquidity, amplifying both upside and downside volatility
  • Extreme supply concentration: top holder at 32.24%, top 10 at 56.75%, top 100 at 93.57%
  • Holder base was completely stagnant for ~3 weeks before a sudden +75 holder spike in the last 24h, directly correlated with the price pump
  • Unverified contract with non-renounced update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM), introducing governance and rug risk
  • No description, no verified socials — minimal project transparency

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

After a ~172% pump within 24 hours on very thin $60.14K liquidity, XWH is at high risk of a sharp mean-reversion. The 5-minute price change is already -19.44%, signaling early distribution. With the top 10 holders controlling 56.75% of supply and no fundamental catalyst identified, profit-taking by large holders could rapidly collapse the price. Immediate support is near the pre-pump level around $0.000069–$0.000070.

Target low

$0.000050

Target high

$0.000250

Support

$0.000069 (pre-pump base, candle low cluster), $0.000050 (psychological round number below base)

Resistance

$0.000182 (current price / 24h high area), $0.000250 (extension target if momentum continues)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

The 30-day holder history shows near-zero organic growth prior to this pump event, suggesting the token lacks sustained community interest. Without new catalysts, liquidity injections, or verified project development, the price is likely to retrace toward pre-pump levels or lower. The FDV of $181.7K on $60.14K liquidity implies a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~33%, which is fragile.

Catalysts

  • Whale distribution from the 32.24% top holder would be catastrophic for price
  • Any new meme cycle or viral social media moment could temporarily re-ignite interest
  • Liquidity removal from the Raydium pool would make the token untradeable
  • Broader Solana meme coin market sentiment shift

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h momentum: +158.96% price gain with 726 buys vs 723 sells (53% buy pressure)
  • Holder count growing: +75 in 24h (+4.5%) after weeks of stagnation, indicating new interest
  • Balanced buy/sell volume ($12.64K vs $11.22K) suggests not purely a dump event yet
  • Mutable=false metadata reduces one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

  • Extreme supply concentration: top holder at 32.24%, top 10 at 56.75% — single whale can crash price
  • Liquidity is critically shallow at $60.14K against $181.7K FDV
  • 5-minute price already down -19.44%, suggesting early distribution phase
  • 30-day holder stagnation prior to pump indicates no organic community growth
  • Unverified contract, no description, non-renounced update authority
  • Price pump appears to have no identifiable fundamental catalyst

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility (172% move in 24h), very thin liquidity ($60.14K), absence of sniper data, no verified project information, and the inherently unpredictable nature of meme token price action. The OHLC data provided covers only 3 candles with anomalous H/L values (candle [1] shows L > O, suggesting a data formatting issue), limiting technical reliability.

XWH call history

Full track record →

Jul 6bearish
24h-47.5%
7d-58.6%
30d-64.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
7AJ1Kj...iryq
Total Supply
997,602,488.648344

Key Risks

  • Single whale (32.24% holder) can single-handedly crash the price given $60.14K liquidity
  • Post-pump distribution: -19.44% already seen in 5 minutes, suggesting early profit-taking
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($60.14K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • 30-day holder stagnation prior to pump suggests no organic community — pump may be entirely manufactured

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles are available, limiting technical analysis. NOTE: Candle [1] (23:00 UTC) shows an anomalous structure where L ($0.000163) > O ($0.000070), which is technically impossible in standard OHLC notation — this likely indicates a data feed error where H and L values may be swapped. Treating the candle [1] high as ~$0.000163 and low as ~$0.000069. Candle [3] (19:00 UTC) is a doji with identical O/H/L/C at $0.000070 and negligible volume ($1.53), suggesting no activity. Candle [2] (22:00 UTC) shows a tight range between $0.000069–$0.000070 with moderate volume ($13.36K). The current price of $0.000182 is well above all three candle closes, indicating the major pump occurred outside or after these candle windows.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is sharply upward based on the 172% 24h price gain, but the 30-day holder stagnation and flat price history prior to this event suggest the medium-term trend was sideways. The pump appears to be an isolated spike rather than a sustained uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

53%

Sell

47%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000069–$0.000070 (candle cluster base, pre-pump consolidation zone)

Major support

$0.000050 (psychological level below pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000182 (current price, 24h high area)

Major resistance

$0.000250 (1.5x extension from current pump high)

The pre-pump consolidation zone around $0.000069–$0.000070 represents the most significant support level, as it was the price floor for multiple candles. A failure to hold $0.000069 would open downside toward $0.000050 or lower. Resistance above current price is undefined by historical data given the token is at multi-period highs.

Notable patterns

  • Doji at base ($0.000070) in candle [3] with near-zero volume — indicates accumulation or dormancy before pump
  • Explosive price gap between candle closes (~$0.000070) and current price ($0.000182) — classic pump pattern
  • Early -19.44% 5-minute retracement after 172% run — potential shooting star / exhaustion signal
  • Near-equal buy/sell transaction counts (726 vs 723) despite large price move — suggests wash trading or coordinated activity is possible

Liquidity

Liquidity

$60,138.47

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $60.14K on the Raydium pair (F6L22zNLPUV2uQjENLnBN89NUay1pyMXhVxa3HT3XUEz). The FDV-to-liquidity ratio is approximately 3:1 ($181.7K FDV vs $60.14K liquidity), meaning any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$23.86K represents ~39.7% of total liquidity, indicating high turnover relative to pool depth — a hallmark of pump-and-dump dynamics. Buy/sell balance is slightly positive (53% buy pressure, 98 unique buyers vs 94 unique sellers, 726 buys vs 723 sells), suggesting net inflow but by a very thin margin. The 111 unique wallets trading in 24h on a 1,684-holder base means ~6.6% of holders were active, which is elevated and consistent with a pump event. Slippage risk is high — any order above a few hundred dollars will move the price materially.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

997,602,488.648344

FDV

$181,702.51

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    172% price gain in 24 hours followed by -19.44% in 5 minutes. Extreme intraday volatility on a micro-cap meme token with $60.14K liquidity. Price can move 20–50% on small orders.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $60.14K on a single Raydium pool. Any significant sell order will cause severe slippage. Liquidity removal by the pool provider would render the token effectively untradeable.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Single whale (32.24% holder) can single-handedly crash the price given $60.14K liquidity
  • Post-pump distribution: -19.44% already seen in 5 minutes, suggesting early profit-taking
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($60.14K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • 30-day holder stagnation prior to pump suggests no organic community — pump may be entirely manufactured
  • Non-renounced update authority with unknown mint/freeze authority status
  • Unverified contract with no project description or transparent team
  • Top 100 holders control 93.57% — retail holders have minimal price influence

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • Buy/sell transaction counts nearly equal (726 vs 723), suggesting not a one-sided dump yet
  • 1,461 holders acquired via swap indicates genuine DEX participation
  • FDV of $181.7K is low enough that a genuine community could sustain it if interest persists
  • No sniper concentration confirmed (though data is absent, not confirmed zero)

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, those unfamiliar with DeFi/Solana mechanics, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump: thin liquidity, extreme concentration, sudden price spike after prolonged dormancy, and no verified project fundamentals.

XWH is a high-risk Solana meme token that has experienced a sharp, likely unsustainable pump of ~172% in 24 hours. The token was dormant for ~3 weeks prior, has critically thin liquidity, extreme supply concentration, and no verified fundamentals. The investment case is purely speculative momentum — there is no identifiable utility, team, or roadmap. The primary risk is a rapid post-pump collapse driven by whale distribution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum sustains buying pressure, new liquidity enters the Raydium pool, and the token attracts broader Solana meme coin community attention. The top holder does not sell, and the 75 new holders from the last 24h represent the beginning of a sustained growth trend.

  • Continued social media virality of the 'Xi Wif Hat' meme concept
  • New liquidity providers adding depth to the Raydium pool
  • Top whale (32.24%) holding or adding rather than distributing
  • Broader Solana meme season driving speculative capital into micro-caps

Base Case

Price partially retraces from the pump high, settling in a range between $0.000080–$0.000120 over the next 1–2 weeks as some holders take profits and others hold. Holder count stabilizes around 1,700–1,800. The token remains a low-liquidity micro-cap with occasional volatility spikes.

  • Top whale does not immediately dump full position
  • Some new holders from the pump event remain engaged
  • Raydium liquidity pool is maintained at current or slightly lower levels
  • No new major catalyst emerges to drive a second pump or a full collapse

Bear Case

High probability

The pump was coordinated by insiders or the top whale. Distribution begins immediately, the price retraces 80–95% within 48–72 hours back toward or below pre-pump levels ($0.000069). New FOMO buyers are left holding losses. Liquidity may also be removed.

  • Top holder (32.24%) begins selling into pump-driven liquidity
  • Thin $60.14K liquidity cannot absorb even moderate sell pressure
  • No fundamental catalyst to sustain price — pure speculation
  • Historical 30-day stagnation suggests no organic demand base
  • -19.44% already seen in 5 minutes post-pump peak

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 6, 11:18 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-06 23:18 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • Raydium DEX pair data (pair: F6L22zNLPUV2uQjENLnBN89NUay1pyMXhVxa3HT3XUEz)
  • Hourly OHLC price feed (3 candles provided)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • 30-day daily historical holder series
  • Top 20 holder wallet data

Limitations

  • Only 3 OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Candle [1] contains anomalous H/L values (L > O) suggesting a possible data feed error
  • No sniper/early buyer data available — smart money signals cannot be assessed
  • Wallet classifications for top holders are inferred, not verified — on-chain labels not provided
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
  • Update authority identity not verified against known protocol addresses
  • No social media data, trading history beyond 24h, or project documentation available
  • Token description is 'none' — no project context available for fundamental analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Xi Wif Hat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,684 addresses (2026-07-06 23:18 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Xi Wif Hat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Xi Wif Hat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-06 23:18 UTC, reported liquidity was $60,138.47. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Xi Wif Hat (XWH)?

After a ~172% pump within 24 hours on very thin $60.14K liquidity, XWH is at high risk of a sharp mean-reversion. The 5-minute price change is already -19.44%, signaling early distribution. With the top 10 holders controlling 56.75% of supply and no fundamental catalyst identified, profit-taking by large holders could rapidly collapse the price. Immediate support is near the pre-pump level around $0.000069–$0.000070. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–48 hours), with a target range of $0.000050 to $0.000250.

Is XWH a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, those unfamiliar with DeFi/Solana mechanics, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump: thin liquidity, extreme concentration, sudden price spike after prolonged dormancy, and no verified project fundamentals.

What are the key risks of holding XWH?

Single whale (32.24% holder) can single-handedly crash the price given $60.14K liquidity • Post-pump distribution: -19.44% already seen in 5 minutes, suggesting early profit-taking • Critically shallow liquidity ($60.14K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk

← Back to all predictions

Questions about XWH?