106TH MINUTE Price Today & AI Analysis

106SolanaAnalysis as of Jul 20, 2026

$0.0₅3257

-1.29% 24h

Contract

Live

72gYGsohKHmhdBeunDcMinNpL551PkTSWUWJZ1bZpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

195

Market cap

$3,256

At a $1M market cap, $106 would be $0.001000 (307x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is 106 a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 18

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about 106

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

BANGBangBros$0.0₅2829+0.3%MC $2.8K

JimhoodJimothy The Robin$0.0₅4730+1.1%MC $4.7K

StaccanaSolana Fork Staccana$0.000408-0.9%MC $407.0K

RAPEDOGRAPEDOG$0.0₅3070+1.0%MC $3.0K

jizzsmurf jizz$0.0₅4165-0.7%MC $4.2K

EterniaEternia$0.000247+475.7%MC $240.9K

106TH MINUTE: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-20 14:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,505

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$53,851.80

How concentrated is 106TH MINUTE ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,505 addresses (2026-07-20 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling 106TH MINUTE?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is 106TH MINUTE liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-20 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $53,851.80. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-20 14:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 20, 02:17 PM UTC

FDV

$194,706

Liquidity

$53,851.80

Holders

1,505

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

106TH MINUTE ($106) is a Solana meme token built around a football/soccer extra-time narrative, launched on PumpSwap (pair AFUg2CBh1TUjU1zXEsV87PRyTjTZroEaA9e96PxoEELH). The token has a total supply of 1 billion and a fully diluted valuation of ~$194.7K at the time of analysis. It is experiencing an explosive, very recent price surge (+123.96% in 24h, +159.8% in the last hour), but this spike appears to have occurred within the last few hours after roughly 30 days of complete dormancy (57 holders, zero net change from June 20 to July 19, 2026). The holder count jumped from 57 to 1,505 in approximately 24 hours — a 96% increase — suggesting a sudden viral or coordinated pump event. Liquidity is extremely shallow at $53.85K, top holder data is unavailable, and sniper data is absent. The contract is unverified and the update authority is unknown. This token carries very high risk.

Key points

Explosive 24h price surge of +123.96% following ~30 days of complete dormancy at 57 holders
Holder count exploded from 57 to 1,505 in under 24 hours (+96%), indicating a sudden viral or coordinated event
Extremely shallow liquidity of only $53.85K against a $194.7K FDV — severe slippage risk for any meaningful position
Meme token with no verified contract, unknown update authority, and zero top-holder transparency
Nearly balanced buy/sell pressure (48.7% buy vs 51.3% sell) despite the price spike, suggesting active distribution

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has surged +159.8% in the last hour alone after 30 days of dormancy. With only $53.85K in liquidity, sell pressure already slightly exceeding buy pressure (51.3% vs 48.7%), and 1,963 unique sellers vs 2,620 buyers in 24h, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp reversal. The two available OHLC candles show the most recent hourly candle (14:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000517, hit a high of $0.0000517, and closed lower at $0.0000447 — a bearish candle. The prior candle (13:00 UTC) closed at its high of $0.0000562. The current reported price of $0.0001947 is significantly above both candles, suggesting the data may reflect a very recent spike. Short-term direction is bearish given the pump-and-dump profile.

Target low

$0.000037

Target high

$0.000220

Support: $0.0000369 (candle 2 low), $0.0000379 (candle 1 low)
Resistance: $0.0000562 (candle 2 high / close), $0.0001947 (current spike high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Given the token's 30-day dormancy prior to this spike, the absence of any organic holder growth, extremely thin liquidity, and meme-only narrative with no verified fundamentals, medium-term price sustainability is very unlikely without continued external catalysts. If the pump subsides, the token could revert toward pre-pump levels near $0.000037–$0.000057.

Catalysts

Continued viral social media momentum around the football/soccer narrative
New liquidity injection or exchange listing (highly speculative)
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Absence of catalysts would likely result in price decay back to pre-pump range

Bullish factors

Strong 24h volume of $1.45M ($706.61K buy + $744.38K sell) relative to $53.85K liquidity indicates high interest
Rapid holder growth from 57 to 1,505 in 24h shows viral spread
Meme tokens with sports narratives can sustain momentum during relevant sporting events
Social links present (Telegram, Twitter, website) suggest some community infrastructure

Bearish factors

30 days of complete dormancy (57 holders, zero net change) before the spike — highly suspicious pump pattern
Sell volume ($744.38K) exceeds buy volume ($706.61K) in 24h — net outflow
Liquidity of only $53.85K is dangerously shallow for a $194.7K FDV token
No verified contract, unknown update authority, no top holder transparency
Price spike of +159.8% in 1h is unsustainable and typical of pump-and-dump schemes
Most recent hourly candle is bearish (closed below open)

Confidence: low. Only 2 OHLC candles are available, top holder data is missing, sniper data is unavailable, and the token has a very short active trading history. The extreme volatility (+159.8% in 1h) and shallow liquidity make price prediction highly unreliable.

106 call history

Full track record →

Jul 20bearish@ $0.000195

24h-98.6%

7d-98.7%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 72gYGs...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Critically shallow liquidity ($53.85K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
Unverified contract with unknown update authority

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle 1 (13:00 UTC, July 20 2026): O=$0.0000447, H=$0.0000562, L=$0.0000369, C=$0.0000562 — a bullish candle closing at its high with a lower wick, indicating buying pressure. Candle 2 (14:00 UTC): O=$0.0000517, H=$0.0000517, L=$0.0000379, C=$0.0000447 — a bearish candle where the open equals the high (no upper wick), closing below open with a lower wick, suggesting selling pressure emerged immediately. The current price of $0.0001947 is far above both candles, indicating a massive spike occurred after the 14:00 candle — this gap is not captured in the available OHLC data. Volume dropped sharply from 1,228,704 (13:00) to 223,504 (14:00), suggesting the initial surge volume is fading.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 24h price surge of +123.96%, but the medium-term (30-day) picture is flat/sideways — the token sat dormant at 57 holders with no price movement for the entire month prior to this spike. The uptrend is driven entirely by a sudden pump event, not organic accumulation.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000447 (candle 2 close)

Major support

$0.0000369 (candle 2 low — lowest point in available data)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000562 (candle 1 high/close)

Major resistance

$0.0001947 (current spike price — untested as resistance)

The available OHLC data only covers 2 hours, severely limiting technical level identification. The range $0.0000369–$0.0000562 represents the only confirmed price action. The current price of $0.0001947 is ~3.5x above the highest candle close, making it entirely uncharted territory with no established support. A retracement to the $0.0000369–$0.0000562 range is plausible if the pump reverses.

Notable patterns

Bearish candle at 14:00 UTC: open equals high (shooting star-like), closed below open — distribution signal
Volume climax followed by sharp volume decline (81.8% drop) — exhaustion pattern
Price gap between available OHLC data ($0.0000562 high) and current price ($0.0001947) — uncharted spike territory
30-day flat base followed by vertical spike — classic pump-and-dump setup
Sell volume exceeds buy volume (51.3% vs 48.7%) despite price being near highs — bearish divergence

Liquidity

$53,851.80

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $53.85K against a $194.71K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~27.7%. This means any moderately sized sell order will cause severe price impact. The 24h trading volume of ~$1.45M represents approximately 26.9x the total liquidity pool, indicating extreme turnover and very high slippage risk. Net flow is negative (sell volume $744.38K > buy volume $706.61K, a $37.77K net outflow), suggesting the market is in mild distribution mode despite the price spike. There are more unique buyers (2,620) than sellers (1,963), but sellers are transacting in larger average sizes ($379 avg sell vs $270 avg buy), which is a bearish signal. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair AFUg2CBh1TUjU1zXEsV87PRyTjTZroEaA9e96PxoEELH), a decentralized venue with no circuit breakers. Market health is poor — the combination of shallow liquidity, net outflow, and extreme volume-to-liquidity ratio creates a highly unstable trading environment.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

FDV

$194,705.89

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
+159.8% price move in 1 hour, +123.96% in 24h following 30 days of complete dormancy. Extreme volatility with no established price history makes position sizing nearly impossible.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $53.85K against $194.71K FDV. Volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~26.9x in 24h. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will experience severe slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Critically shallow liquidity ($53.85K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
Unverified contract with unknown update authority
Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Net sell volume exceeds buy volume despite price spike — distribution in progress
57 original holders likely in significant profit and may dump at any time
Meme token with no utility — price entirely dependent on social momentum

Mitigating factors

Token marked as mutable=false, suggesting metadata is locked
Social infrastructure present (Telegram, Twitter, website)
High 24h volume ($1.45M) shows genuine market interest
More unique buyers (2,620) than sellers (1,963) in 24h
Possible spam flag is false per data provider
FDV is small ($194.7K), limiting absolute loss exposure for small positions

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits in low-liquidity environments. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks.

106TH MINUTE ($106) is a high-risk meme token that has just experienced a violent pump after 30 days of dormancy. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative — there is no utility, no verified contract, no transparent holder data, and the token's entire value proposition rests on a football/soccer extra-time narrative and social momentum. The risk/reward profile is extremely asymmetric to the downside given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and classic pump-and-dump setup.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The token's football/soccer narrative goes viral during a relevant sporting event, driving sustained retail FOMO. New liquidity is added to the pool, holder count continues growing past 5,000+, and the FDV reaches $500K–$1M+ as seen with comparable meme tokens. Early community building via Telegram/Twitter creates a self-sustaining holder base.

Viral social media momentum tied to a real sporting event
Continued holder growth beyond the initial pump wave
Liquidity deepening through new LP providers
Broader Solana meme coin market tailwind

Base Case

The token experiences a partial retracement of 40–70% from the spike high over the next 24–72 hours as initial excitement fades. A small community of 1,000–2,000 holders remains, trading sideways at a reduced FDV of $50K–$100K. Without a new catalyst, the token gradually loses volume and liquidity.

Sell pressure continues to slightly exceed buy pressure
No major new liquidity injection
Social momentum fades without a specific sporting event catalyst
Original 57 holders partially distribute but don't fully exit simultaneously

Bear Case

High probability

The pump reverses within hours as the 57 original holders distribute their holdings into retail buyers. Liquidity is insufficient to absorb selling pressure, price crashes 80–95% back toward pre-pump levels ($0.000037–$0.000057 range). Holder count stabilizes or declines as disappointed buyers exit.

Net sell volume already exceeding buy volume ($744K vs $707K)
Critically shallow liquidity ($53.85K) amplifies downside moves
57 original holders sitting on large unrealized gains — strong incentive to sell
No verified contract or transparent tokenomics to anchor confidence
Historical precedent: 30-day dormancy pumps rarely sustain

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 20, 02:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-20 14:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, mutability)
PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair AFUg2CBh1TUjU1zXEsV87PRyTjTZroEaA9e96PxoEELH)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, July 20 2026)
Holder metrics and acquisition data
Historical holder series (30 days daily)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration and whale analysis cannot be performed
Sniper data is unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown
Contract is unverified — on-chain code cannot be audited
Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data gaps rather than real values
The token has only been actively trading for ~24 hours, making all trend analysis preliminary
Price data shows a significant gap between the latest OHLC candle high ($0.0000562) and the current reported price ($0.0001947) that is not explained by available candle data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from on-chain and DEX analytics and may be incomplete or delayed. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 106TH MINUTE (106) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell 106TH MINUTE (106)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is 106TH MINUTE ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,505 addresses (2026-07-20 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling 106TH MINUTE?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is 106TH MINUTE liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-20 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $53,851.80. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for 106TH MINUTE (106)?

Is 106 a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits in low-liquidity environments. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks.

What are the key risks of holding 106?

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern • Critically shallow liquidity ($53.85K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing