juhn

juhn Price Today & AI Analysis

juhn
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 15, 2026

757HeY3oyKhQCPbeTzcVX1PyTWzUvJwVfVUVvXsgpump

$0.053379

+5.37%

FDV $3,376

LiveContract:757HeY3oyKhQCPbeTzcVX1PyTWzUvJwVfVUVvXsgpumpChain:SolanaHolders:139Market cap:$3,376

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about juhn

Report snapshotas of Jul 15, 03:17 AM
FDV

$109,161

Liquidity

$43,063

Holders

726

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

juhn (JUHN) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with a micro-cap FDV of ~$109K and total liquidity of only $43K. The token experienced a dramatic price spike in the most recent 2-hour window — rising from ~$0.0000298 to a high of ~$0.000161 before retracing to ~$0.000109 — a +58% 24h gain. However, the data reveals severe structural red flags: 73.6% sell pressure, extremely shallow liquidity, a sudden holder explosion from 38 to 726 in under 24 hours (likely a bot/wash-trade artifact), zero top-holder data, and no sniper data. The token is unverified, update authority is unknown, and the contract is mutable-false but metadata authority is unclear. This is a very high risk speculative micro-cap.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 24h price pump of +58% from a very low base (~$0.0000299)
Holder count surged from 38 to 726 in <24h — highly anomalous, possible bot activity
Extremely shallow liquidity at $43K against $109K FDV — severe slippage risk
Overwhelming sell pressure: 73.6% of 24h volume is sells ($230.9K vs $82.9K buys)
No top-holder data and no sniper data available — significant transparency gap

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token pumped aggressively in candle [2] (open $0.0000325, high $0.000161) and is already retracing in candle [1] (close $0.000109 vs high $0.000158). With 73.6% sell pressure, 4,989 sells vs 2,147 buys, and only $43K liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. The 5-minute price change of -13.7% confirms active selling momentum.

Target low$0.000050
Target high$0.000160
Support: $0.000098 (candle [1] low), $0.0000298 (candle [2] low / launch base)
Resistance: $0.000158 (candle [1] open / recent high), $0.000161 (candle [2] all-time high)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without sustained buying interest, new utility, or community growth beyond the initial pump, the token is likely to retrace toward its pre-pump levels near $0.000030–$0.000050. The holder base was flat at 38 for 30 days prior to the pump, suggesting no organic community. Sell pressure dominance and thin liquidity make recovery difficult.

Catalysts
  • Renewed social media attention or viral moment
  • Whale accumulation at lower prices
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally

Bullish factors

  • 58% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative momentum
  • Holder count grew from 38 to 726 in <24h, indicating new attention
  • 1h price change of +17.8% shows some buying interest persisting
  • Low FDV of $109K leaves room for speculative upside if narrative catches

Bearish factors

  • 73.6% sell pressure ($230.9K sells vs $82.9K buys) strongly favors downside
  • Only $43K total liquidity — any meaningful sell order causes severe slippage
  • 5-minute price change of -13.7% shows active selling at time of analysis
  • Holder count was flat at 38 for 30 days — no organic pre-existing community
  • No top-holder transparency — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority — rug risk elevated
  • Token was dormant for 30 days before sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, top-holder data is missing, sniper data is unavailable, and the holder surge appears anomalous. The very thin liquidity means price can move violently in either direction with minimal capital. Confidence in any directional prediction is therefore low.

juhn call history

Full track record →
Jul 15bearish
24h-63.7%
7d-92.7%
30d-97.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (02:00 UTC): O=$0.0000325, H=$0.000161, L=$0.0000298, C=$0.000161 — a massive bullish candle with a very long lower wick, indicating a sharp pump from near-zero with strong close at the high. Volume was $213,611. Candle [1] (03:00 UTC): O=$0.000158, H=$0.000158, L=$0.0000984, C=$0.000109 — a bearish candle opening at the prior close, failing to make a new high (flat top), and closing well below the open with a long lower wick. Volume dropped to $38,417. This two-candle sequence is a classic 'pump and dump' or 'shooting star' reversal pattern: explosive up-candle followed by a bearish rejection candle with declining volume.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 26%Sell 74%

The short-term trend has turned bearish after the pump candle was followed by a rejection/distribution candle. The medium-term trend is sideways given the 30-day dormancy prior to the pump. There is no established uptrend structure.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000098 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000298 (candle [2] low — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000158 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)
Major$0.000161 (candle [2] all-time high)

The immediate support at $0.0000984 is the candle [1] low. A break below this level opens the path to the pre-pump base near $0.0000298–$0.0000325. Resistance is clustered at $0.000158–$0.000161, the zone where the pump peaked and where candle [1] opened before selling began.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump two-candle sequence: massive bullish candle followed by bearish rejection candle
  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing structure on candle [1] relative to candle [2]
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline — classic distribution signal
  • Flat top on candle [1] (H = O = $0.000158) indicating sellers immediately absorbed any buying at the open
  • Long lower wicks on both candles suggest volatile, thin-liquidity price action

Total holders726
24h Δ+688
7d Δ+688
30d Δ+688
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at 38 for the entire 30-day historical period (June 15 – July 14, 2026), then surged by +688 holders (+95%) in a single 24-hour window coinciding with the price pump. This is a near-perfect correlation between the price spike and holder surge, but the pattern is highly anomalous — organic holder growth does not typically jump 95% in one day from a 30-day flat base. This pattern is consistent with bot-generated wallets, airdrop farming, or wash trading rather than genuine retail adoption.

The historical holder data shows 38 holders with zero net change for 30 consecutive days (June 15 – July 14). On July 15, holders exploded to 726 (+688, +95% in 24h and 7d and 30d, since all growth occurred in this single day). This is a severe red flag. Legitimate meme token growth typically shows gradual accumulation. A flat-line followed by a vertical spike strongly suggests coordinated activity. The distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, 0 octopus — and top10/top100 concentration both show 0% — which is likely a data availability issue rather than a genuine even distribution. No top-holder data is available to verify.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no top-20 holders. The reported top10 and top100 concentration of 0% is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine even distribution across 726 holders. With only $43K in liquidity and a $109K FDV, it is statistically likely that a small number of wallets control a significant portion of supply. The 30-day dormancy at 38 holders followed by a sudden pump suggests the original 38 holders may be insiders or coordinated actors. Without top-holder data, concentration risk cannot be properly assessed and must be assumed high. Distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' as a conservative risk assumption given the data gap and token behavior.

Liquidity$43,060
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$82,890
Sell$230,900
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers647
Unique sellers1,457

Liquidity is critically shallow at $43K against a $109K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~39%, which sounds reasonable but in absolute terms means any sell order above a few thousand dollars will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of $313.8K ($82.9K buys + $230.9K sells) is 7.3x the total liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is strongly negative: sellers outnumber buyers 1,457 to 647 (2.25:1 ratio), and sell volume ($230.9K) is 2.79x buy volume ($82.9K). The token trades on PumpSwap (pair ABo2WbNtztBkrEZwu6BHwY7Y8RWtXmmmLWLThzMAGB2P), a permissionless AMM. Market health is poor — the token is in active distribution with overwhelming sell-side dominance.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,520.18
FDV$109,160.61

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1 billion tokens (999,999,520.18), a standard PumpFun launch supply. FDV is $109,160.61 at the current price of $0.000109. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is marked mutable=false, which is a positive signal but insufficient on its own. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data — these are critical unknowns for a PumpFun token. If mint authority has not been renounced, the creator could inflate supply. If freeze authority is active, wallets could be frozen. The token is unverified and not flagged as spam. The description ('matching pfp ideas for couples') is a generic meme concept with no utility. Rug risk from authorities is classified as 'unknown' due to insufficient metadata — investors should verify on-chain before trading.

Volatility
high

Price moved ~440% from low to high within a single hour (candle [2]: L=$0.0000298, H=$0.000161), then retraced 32% in the next hour. 5-minute change of -13.7% at analysis time. Extreme volatility typical of thin-liquidity meme pumps.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $43K. 24h volume of $313.8K is 7.3x the liquidity pool. Any meaningful position exit will cause severe slippage. A $5K sell order could move price by 10%+ given pool depth.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. The token was held by only 38 wallets for 30 days before the pump — these original holders likely hold a concentrated position. The sudden surge to 726 holders in 24h is anomalous and may not represent genuine distribution.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, but the pump-and-dump candle pattern, 73.6% sell pressure, and 4,989 sells vs 2,147 buys strongly suggest early holders or insiders are actively distributing into retail buying. The 30-day dormancy followed by a coordinated pump is a classic setup for a dump.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The contract is unverified. These unknowns represent material rug-pull risk vectors that cannot be dismissed without on-chain verification.

Key risks

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: 30-day dormancy at 38 holders followed by coordinated price spike and holder surge
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 73.6% of volume is sells, sellers outnumber buyers 2.25:1
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($43K) — severe slippage on any meaningful exit
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply inflation or wallet freezing
  • No top-holder transparency — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Anomalous holder surge (+688 in 24h from flat 30-day base) suggests bot/wash activity
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false on contract metadata is a minor positive signal
  • FDV of $109K is low, limiting absolute dollar loss for small positions
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline liquidity infrastructure
  • Social links (Twitter, Moralis) exist, suggesting some minimal community presence
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of pump-and-dump indicators, unknown authorities, missing holder data, and extreme sell pressure makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

juhn (JUHN) is a micro-cap PumpFun meme token that experienced a sharp speculative pump on July 15, 2026, after 30 days of complete dormancy. The token exhibits multiple classic pump-and-dump characteristics: coordinated price spike, overwhelming sell pressure, anomalous holder surge, thin liquidity, and missing transparency data. While the low FDV ($109K) theoretically allows for speculative upside, the structural evidence strongly favors continued distribution and price decline. Any investment thesis must be grounded in pure speculation rather than fundamentals.

Bull case (low)

If the pump attracts sustained social media attention and new retail buyers continue to enter, the token could retest its all-time high of $0.000161 or push higher. At $1M FDV (10x from current), early buyers from the pump would see significant gains. The low absolute FDV means even modest capital inflows can move price significantly.

  • Viral social media moment or influencer promotion
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Genuine community formation around the 'couples pfp' concept
  • Whale accumulation at current retracement levels

Base case

The token experiences a partial retrace to the $0.000060–$0.000090 range as initial pump excitement fades, then trades sideways with declining volume. It remains a low-liquidity, high-volatility micro-cap with occasional speculative spikes but no sustained trend. Most retail buyers from the pump are left holding losses.

  • Sell pressure gradually normalizes but remains dominant
  • Liquidity stays thin at $30K–$50K range
  • Holder count stabilizes around 500–800 as some early buyers exit
  • No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
  • Token avoids outright rug pull but delivers poor risk-adjusted returns

Bear case (high)

The pump fully reverses as insiders and early holders complete distribution. Price returns to pre-pump levels near $0.000030–$0.000050, representing a 55–73% decline from current price. Liquidity dries up as trading interest fades, making exit increasingly difficult. In the worst case, the token becomes illiquid and effectively worthless.

  • 73.6% sell pressure and 2.25:1 seller-to-buyer ratio continues
  • Original 38 holders (likely insiders) completing distribution into retail
  • Liquidity pool drainage as LPs exit
  • No fundamental utility or community to sustain price
  • Unknown authority risk materializes as rug pull

GeneratedJul 15, 03:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of candle [1] close (2026-07-15T04:00:00Z estimated). Historical holder data current through 2026-07-14. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles provided — severely limits technical analysis depth.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (Mint: 757HeY3oyKhQCPbeTzcVX1PyTWzUvJwVfVUVvXsgpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (ABo2WbNtztBkrEZwu6BHwY7Y8RWtXmmmLWLThzMAGB2P)
  • Hourly OHLC candles (2 candles available)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Holder metrics and 30-day historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top-holder data returned — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • No sniper data available — smart money signals are entirely absent
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be confirmed or dismissed
  • Anomalous holder surge (+688 in 24h) may reflect data artifacts, bots, or wash trading rather than genuine holders
  • Top10/Top100 concentration both show 0% — likely a data gap, not genuine even distribution
  • Supply distribution breakdown (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) all show 0 — data unavailable
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics despite 58% 24h change in price data — possible data inconsistency

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. On-chain data can be manipulated or incomplete — verify all claims independently.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,520.18

Key Risks

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30-day dormancy at 38 holders followed by coordinated price spike and holder surge
Overwhelming sell pressure: 73.6% of volume is sells, sellers outnumber buyers 2.25:1
Critically shallow liquidity ($43K) — severe slippage on any meaningful exit
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply inflation or wallet freezing

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. The absence of sniper data, combined with the token's dormancy for 30 days followed by a sudden pump, raises the possibility that the pump was orchestrated by insiders or bots rather than tracked smart money. The 73.6% sell pressure and 4,989 sells vs 2,147 buys suggest whoever pumped the token is actively distributing.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Unknown — no sniper or early buyer wallet data is available. The token was dormant at 38 holders for 30 days, suggesting early holders may have been waiting for a coordinated pump event. The sudden holder surge to 726 in <24h is anomalous and may reflect bot wallets or wash trading rather than genuine retail accumulation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for juhn (juhn)?

The token pumped aggressively in candle [2] (open $0.0000325, high $0.000161) and is already retracing in candle [1] (close $0.000109 vs high $0.000158). With 73.6% sell pressure, 4,989 sells vs 2,147 buys, and only $43K liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. The 5-minute price change of -13.7% confirms active selling momentum. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000050 to $0.000160.

Is juhn a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of pump-and-dump indicators, unknown authorities, missing holder data, and extreme sell pressure makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

How are juhn holders trending?

juhn currently has 726 holders and is growing (24h: 688, 7d: 688, 30d: 688). The historical holder data shows 38 holders with zero net change for 30 consecutive days (June 15 – July 14). On July 15, holders exploded to 726 (+688, +95% in 24h and 7d and 30d, since all growth occurred in this single day). This is a severe red flag. Legitimate meme token growth typically shows gradual accumulation. A flat-line followed by a vertical spike strongly suggests coordinated activity. The distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, 0 octopus — and top10/top100 concentration both show 0% — which is likely a data availability issue rather than a genuine even distribution. No top-holder data is available to verify.

What does sniper activity look like for juhn?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding juhn?

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30-day dormancy at 38 holders followed by coordinated price spike and holder surge • Overwhelming sell pressure: 73.6% of volume is sells, sellers outnumber buyers 2.25:1 • Critically shallow liquidity ($43K) — severe slippage on any meaningful exit

Track juhn