How concentrated is nearpad.tech ownership?

As of 2026-09-27 13:16 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 13.25% of supply, out of 1,912 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling nearpad.tech?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-27 13:16 UTC, DEX buys were $660,232.00 and sells $632,795.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is nearpad.tech liquidity falling?

Liquidity rose 43.63%, from $29,246.19 (2026-09-27 12:00 UTC) to $42,005.21 (2026-09-27 13:00 UTC).

nearpad.tech Price Today & AI Analysis

NEARPADSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

$0.0₅3687

-5.40% 24h

Contract

Live

6uPEdkU2xPg1iyfLzV1ssUwvve8nndA2sd6nBFrb1n58

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,865

Market cap

$3,426

At a $1M market cap, $NEARPAD would be $0.001076 (292x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is NEARPAD a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 11

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about NEARPAD

3 free answers a day

nearpad.tech: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-27 13:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,912

Top 10 supply share

13.25%

Reported liquidity

$31,811.00

How concentrated is nearpad.tech ownership?: As of 2026-09-27 13:16 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 13.25% of supply, out of 1,912 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling nearpad.tech?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-27 13:16 UTC, DEX buys were $660,232.00 and sells $632,795.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is nearpad.tech liquidity falling?: Liquidity rose 43.63%, from $29,246.19 (2026-09-27 12:00 UTC) to $42,005.21 (2026-09-27 13:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 13:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 12:00 UTC	$29,246.19
2026-09-27 13:00 UTC	$42,005.21

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-27 13:16 UTCBuy · $0.03JgU9ZL74…xPPgmbWallet DgWtSogR…eLcFim
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCSell · $48.693fV27m2B…YSHrkyWallet 8zACDZq7…PDsUdE
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCBuy · $127.27qkcLC7LE…fDs69nWallet 3kKFFRuR…wyCq1J
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCSell · $4.4932kHJUQd…3VCJavWallet 64F9q5er…GGJzWB
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCBuy · $60.6538K1zk8H…8G6tzTWallet E3gFTkmX…4qLH9R
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCBuy · $41.984iy9P9Re…GDhnexWallet EVS62rKL…9U3yqG
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCSell · $15.364hWmE5MJ…mxEiVzWallet 82vDRwse…kt6phB
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCBuy · $2.973czr9FEg…zAE662Wallet 77wwJcc6…BJJpqG
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCSell · $0.253XKCdM4F…ZrugeuWallet 8LngKMjY…tguPRD
2026-09-27 13:16 UTCBuy · $497.875PQzKYPL…xyoUeJWallet DkpGsbt4…jf1MtA

Report snapshot

as of Sep 27, 01:18 PM UTC

FDV

$392,535

Liquidity

$31,811.00

Holders

1,912

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

NEARPAD (6uPEdkU2xPg1iyfLzV1ssUwvve8nndA2sd6nBFrb1n58) is a micro-cap token trading on PumpSwap with an FDV of ~$392.5K and only $31.81K of total liquidity. The token has seen an extreme reported 24h price move (+710%) and an even more extreme 1h move (+2032%), which given the shallow liquidity pool and only two hourly candles of OHLC data available, likely reflects a very recent launch or a low-liquidity pump rather than sustainable price discovery. Holder count sits at 1,912 addresses with top-10 wallets controlling 13.25% of supply, but no historical holder data, wallet classification, or authority/renouncement data is available, which materially limits confidence in any structural risk read.

Key points

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.81K) relative to a $392.54K FDV, implying high slippage and fragility
24h price move of +710% and 1h move of +2032% signal extreme volatility / possible pump-and-dump dynamics rather than organic growth
Top-10 holder concentration is relatively low at 13.25% based on the current snapshot, though no historical trend data exists to confirm this is stable
No sniper data, no mint/freeze authority data, and no holder history are available — significant evidence gaps that prevent a full risk clearance

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

The token just posted a +2032% 1h move and +710% 24h move on very thin ($31.81K) liquidity, with the most recent 5m change already reversing (-8.77%). This pattern is characteristic of a low-liquidity spike that is highly prone to sharp mean-reversion or a fast unwind as early buyers take profit. Given the tiny liquidity base, further large swings (in either direction) are likely, but the balance of evidence (parabolic candle into a wick-heavy 13:00 candle with high H and lower close) favors near-term downside or high-volatility consolidation.

Target low

$0.00015

Target high

$0.00050

Support: $0.000201 (13:00 candle low), $0.0000138 (12:00 candle low / origin)
Resistance: $0.000568 (13:00 candle high), $0.000381 (12:00 candle high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles of history and no confirmed authority renouncement status, medium-term direction cannot be reliably forecast. Sustainability will depend heavily on whether liquidity deepens beyond the current $31.81K and whether buy pressure (currently a slim 51.1% vs 48.9% sell) persists.

Catalysts

Liquidity additions or removals on the PumpSwap pool
Continued organic holder growth beyond the current 1,912 addresses
Any confirmation (or refutation) of mint/freeze authority status
Broader memecoin/PumpSwap market sentiment

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles are available, there is no holder history, no sniper data, and no authority/renouncement confirmation. The extreme percentage price moves reported are also disproportionate to the shallow liquidity, raising data-quality and manipulation concerns. Any forecast is necessarily speculative.

NEARPAD call history

Full track record →

Sep 27bearish@ $0.000422

24h-83.0%

7d-97.3%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 6uPEdk...1n58
Total Supply: 929,837,758.607 NEARPAD

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.81K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+710% 24h, +2032% 1h) with signs of momentum rollover (-8.77% at 5m) and volume divergence
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unknown contract verification/spam status leave open the possibility of rug-pull mechanisms
No sniper coverage data, preventing assessment of concentrated early-buyer dump risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (12:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000139, spiked to a high of $0.000381, dipped to a low of $0.0000138 (near the open), and closed at $0.000342 on volume of ~$1.02M — a huge-range candle suggesting a violent initial pump from a very low base. Candle 2 (13:00 UTC) opened at $0.000342, pushed to a new high of $0.000568, fell sharply to $0.000201, and closed at $0.000417 on lower volume (~$398K) — a long-wicked, wide-range candle indicating strong two-way volatility and profit-taking after the spike.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The short-term trend across the two available candles is nominally up (close-to-close from $0.000342 to $0.000417), but the enormous intra-candle ranges and long wicks suggest this is a volatile spike rather than a controlled uptrend. With only two candles, no reliable medium-term trend can be established; it should be treated as sideways/undetermined pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000201 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000138 (candle 1 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000568 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000381 (candle 1 high)

Support and resistance are derived purely from the two available hourly candles. Immediate support at $0.000201 was tested and held within candle 2; a break below would open the door to a retest of the $0.0000138 origin. Immediate resistance at $0.000568 was the candle 2 high and was rejected, with price closing well below it at $0.000417.

Notable patterns

Long upper wick on candle 2 (high $0.000568 vs close $0.000417) suggesting rejection at highs
Wide-range candle 1 with close near the high off a near-zero low, typical of an initial pump
Volume divergence: higher price high in candle 2 accompanied by lower volume than candle 1

Liquidity

$31,811.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $31.81K against a 24h trading volume of over $1.29M (buys + sells combined) and an FDV of $392.54K implies a volume-to-liquidity ratio above 40x — extremely thin pool depth relative to trading activity, which means even modest trade sizes can cause significant slippage and price impact. Buy volume ($660.23K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($632.79K), and unique buyers (4,058) exceed unique sellers (3,170), producing a mild net inflow bias, but this is set against a backdrop of a likely low-liquidity pump where price can move violently on relatively small capital flows.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

929,837,758.607 NEARPAD

FDV

$392.54K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +710% and 1h change of +2032%, combined with a -8.77% 5m reversal, indicate extreme volatility and a likely unstable price discovery process.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $31.81K against 24h combined trading volume exceeding $1.29M, indicating a very thin pool prone to high slippage and rapid price swings from modest trade sizes.
Concentrationunknown
Top-10 holders control 13.25% of supply per the current snapshot, which appears moderate, but top-100 concentration, wallet classification, and historical concentration trends are unavailable, so a full concentration risk assessment cannot be made.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.81K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+710% 24h, +2032% 1h) with signs of momentum rollover (-8.77% at 5m) and volume divergence
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unknown contract verification/spam status leave open the possibility of rug-pull mechanisms
No sniper coverage data, preventing assessment of concentrated early-buyer dump risk
No historical holder data, preventing assessment of whether holder base is growing organically or is a snapshot of a fleeting pump

Mitigating factors

Top-10 holder concentration at 13.25% is not extreme on its face, based on the limited snapshot available
24h buy volume ($660.23K) and buyer count (4,058) modestly exceed sell volume ($632.79K) and seller count (3,170), suggesting some net demand at present
Holder base of 1,912 addresses suggests at least some distribution beyond a handful of wallets, though this is not confirmed to be organic

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the potential for total capital loss. The combination of shallow liquidity, extreme and possibly unsustainable price volatility, and multiple critical unknowns (authority status, sniper exposure, holder history) makes this unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term investors. Position sizing, if entered at all, should be minimal given the high slippage risk and thin liquidity.

NEARPAD presents a high-risk, high-volatility speculative setup typical of a newly launched, thinly-liquid PumpSwap token. The extreme reported price appreciation is not corroborated by deep liquidity or verified tokenomics safety, and critical data gaps (authorities, snipers, holder history) prevent a confident directional call. Any exposure should be treated as a small, high-risk speculative bet rather than a core position.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If genuine organic demand continues (buy volume and buyer count currently modestly exceed sell-side activity) and liquidity deepens from its current $31.81K base, the token could sustain elevated prices and attract further speculative inflows, especially if the 'pay holders through NEAR Protocol Intents' narrative gains traction and is marketed further via its existing Twitter/website presence.

Continued net positive buy/sell volume and buyer/seller count imbalance
Liquidity provision growth beyond the current $31.81K
Narrative/marketing traction around the stated NEAR Protocol Intents reward mechanism
Holder base growth beyond the current 1,912 addresses

Base Case

Price likely continues to exhibit high volatility with sharp swings in both directions as the thin liquidity pool struggles to absorb trading flow, without a clear sustained trend forming in the near term given the extremely limited data history (only two hourly candles).

Liquidity remains near current shallow levels ($31.81K) absent new LP inflows
No new sniper or authority information becomes available to change the risk profile
Trading activity continues to be dominated by short-term speculators given the token's recent, volatile price action

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic +2032% 1h and +710% 24h moves on only $31.81K of liquidity are classic hallmarks of a pump that reverses sharply once early buyers and any concentrated holders take profit; the -8.77% 5m reading and declining volume into the second candle's high already hint at fading momentum. Combined with unknown authority/rug risk, this could result in a rapid price collapse.

Extremely thin liquidity magnifying downside moves on exit
Volume divergence (lower volume on the second candle's higher high) suggesting waning buying interest
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open a potential rug/mint risk
Unknown sniper distribution could mean concentrated early holders are poised to dump
Lack of any verified contract or spam-flag clearance

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 27, 01:18 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 13:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
PumpSwap pair price data
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles only)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Unhosted holder aggregates snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
Sniper analysis feed (returned no data)

Limitations

Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis
No sniper data was available, preventing any sniper concentration or dump-risk assessment
No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available; only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration was provided
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and spam-flag status were all unknown, preventing a full tokenomics/rug-risk assessment
Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification data were not available
Reported percentage price changes (e.g., +2032% 1h) are extreme relative to the shallow liquidity and warrant caution regarding data reliability or potential manipulation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided at the time of analysis, which contains significant gaps (sniper data, holder history, authority status). Cryptocurrency investments, particularly in low-liquidity, newly-launched tokens, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is nearpad.tech (NEARPAD) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell nearpad.tech (NEARPAD)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for nearpad.tech (NEARPAD)?

Is NEARPAD a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the potential for total capital loss. The combination of shallow liquidity, extreme and possibly unsustainable price volatility, and multiple critical unknowns (authority status, sniper exposure, holder history) makes this unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term investors. Position sizing, if entered at all, should be minimal given the high slippage risk and thin liquidity.

What are the key risks of holding NEARPAD?

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.81K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+710% 24h, +2032% 1h) with signs of momentum rollover (-8.77% at 5m) and volume divergence • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unknown contract verification/spam status leave open the possibility of rug-pull mechanisms