Gnomes Price Today & AI Analysis

GnomesSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 28, 2026

$0.0₅6639

-5.22% 24h

Contract

Live

6Quog29HQ5tA5BdnCv3FWpW8WEpdxCsxEpt2TGCZpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

665

Market cap

$6,189

At a $1M market cap, $GNOMES would be $0.001073 (162x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Gnomes a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

2.5%9 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Gnomes

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TwerkTwerking Duck$0.0₆2636+0.0%MC $263

AICASTAICast Memes$0.0₅3433+0.0%MC $3.0K

FROGEFROGE$0.0₅4357+0.3%MC $4.2K

HOLDHoldFast$0.0₅2614+0.0%MC $2.4K

SLABSlabDrop$0.0₅6579+0.0%MC $6.6K

ZECZcash$1,286+3.4%MC $132.33M

Gnomes: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-28 14:49 UTC

Holder addresses

701

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$55,898.96

How concentrated is Gnomes ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 701 addresses (2026-07-28 14:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Gnomes?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Gnomes liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-28 14:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $55,898.96. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-28 14:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 28, 02:49 PM UTC

FDV

$279,434

Liquidity

$55,898.96

Holders

701

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Gnomes (Gnomes) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with mint address 6Quog29HQ5tA5BdnCv3FWpW8WEpdxCsxEpt2TGCZpump. The token launched via a Discord community (discord.gg/uxento) and migrated to PumpSwap. It has experienced an explosive 1,381% 24h price surge, driven by a rapid influx of new holders — from 27 dormant holders to 701 in roughly 24 hours. However, sell pressure dominates heavily (68.2% sell volume), liquidity is thin at $55.9K, and top holder data is unavailable, making risk assessment difficult. The token is unverified, and its update authority is unknown.

Key points

Explosive 1,381% 24h price surge from a very low base (~$0.00003 to ~$0.0003)
Holder count surged from 27 (dormant for 30 days) to 701 in under 24 hours — 96% growth
Severe sell-side dominance: 68.2% sell pressure, 6,028 sells vs 3,719 buys in 24h
Extremely thin liquidity at $55.9K against $269.6K FDV — high slippage risk
No top holder data available, no sniper data, and unknown update authority — significant transparency gaps

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped ~1,381% in 24h and is showing signs of exhaustion. Candle [1] (most recent) shows a high of $0.000309 but closed at $0.000252, well below the high — a bearish wick. Sell pressure is 68.2% of volume. A retracement toward the $0.000075–$0.000130 range is likely in the near term.

Target low

$0.000075

Target high

$0.000309

Support: $0.000213 (candle [2] close), $0.000130 (candle [1] low), $0.000076 (candle [3] high/close)
Resistance: $0.000309 (candle [1] high — 24h peak), $0.000253 (candle [2] high), $0.000072 (candle [16] high, prior resistance)

Medium term · 3–14 days

bearish

Given the token's history of 30 days of complete dormancy (27 holders, zero activity) followed by a sudden pump, the medium-term outlook is bearish. These patterns are characteristic of coordinated pump-and-dump schemes. Without sustained buying interest, new utility, or community growth beyond the initial pump, price is likely to retrace significantly toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000007–$0.000015).

Catalysts

Sustained community growth beyond initial Discord pump
New exchange listings or integrations
Continued holder accumulation without sell-off
Broader Solana meme coin market rally

Bullish factors

1,381% 24h price surge demonstrates strong short-term momentum
Holder count grew 96% in 24h (27 → 701), showing new interest
1h price change of +110.9% and 6h change of +943.5% indicate very recent buying momentum
Trading on PumpSwap with 1,848 unique wallets in 24h shows broad participation

Bearish factors

68.2% sell pressure ($357K sells vs $166K buys) — sellers dominate
Token was completely dormant for 30+ days with only 27 holders before the pump
Liquidity of only $55.9K is extremely thin relative to FDV of $269.6K
No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Unverified contract and unknown update authority
Classic pump-and-dump pattern: long dormancy → sudden explosive pump → heavy selling

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, unknown update authority, no sniper data, extremely thin liquidity, and the highly speculative nature of this newly-pumped meme token. The 30-day dormancy followed by sudden activity is a major red flag that limits predictive reliability.

Gnomes call history

Full track record →

Jul 28bearish@ $0.000299

24h+76.8%

7d-71.4%

30d-95.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 6Quog2...pump
Total Supply: 933,279,240.37

Key Risks

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
68.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.38:1 in 24h
Critically thin liquidity ($55.9K) — severe exit liquidity risk
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — rug pull risk cannot be excluded

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 22-hour OHLC series reveals a dramatic pump starting around candle [21] (low of $0.0000067) and accelerating sharply through candles [2] and [1]. The token traded sideways/slightly declining from candles [22] through [11] (~$0.000015–$0.000044 range), then broke down further in candles [9]–[8] before a massive surge in candles [2]–[1]. Candle [2] (13:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000736, surged to $0.000253 high, and closed at $0.000214 — a massive bull candle. Candle [1] (14:00 UTC) opened at $0.000210, hit a high of $0.000309, but closed at $0.000252 — a bearish upper wick suggesting selling pressure at the top. Volume spiked dramatically in candles [2] ($143.9K) and [1] ($101.8K) vs. the prior 20 candles averaging ~$8.5K.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term trend is sharply upward due to the recent pump, but the medium-term (looking at the full 22-candle series) shows the token was in a downtrend from candle [22] through [21] before the sudden reversal. The medium-term context remains bearish given the prior 30-day dormancy.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

32%

Sell

68%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000213 (candle [2] close / recent consolidation)

Major support

$0.000076 (candle [3] high — prior breakout level)

Immediate resistance

$0.000253 (candle [2] high / candle [1] close area)

Major resistance

$0.000309 (candle [1] all-time high in this series)

The immediate support at $0.000213 corresponds to the close of the breakout candle [2]. A break below this level would likely accelerate selling toward $0.000076 (candle [3] high). Major resistance is the recent peak of $0.000309. Given the thin liquidity, price can move violently through these levels.

Notable patterns

Explosive pump candles [2] and [1] with volume 10–17x the prior average — climactic buying signal
Bearish upper wick on candle [1]: high $0.000309 vs close $0.000252 — rejection at highs
30+ day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
Higher highs and higher lows in candles [19]→[18]→[16] before the main pump acceleration
Candle [21] shows the absolute low of the series ($0.0000067) — the launch/accumulation bottom
Volume climax pattern: two consecutive candles with 10x+ average volume at price peak

Liquidity

$55,898.96

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at $55.9K on PumpSwap (pair ApYk52FHc7WKApkUcgvL2QxCHAeSPUHtsoG8vsngyRPR). The FDV of $269.6K is nearly 5x the available liquidity, meaning any significant sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading data reveals a deeply bearish market structure: sell volume ($357.1K) is 2.15x buy volume ($166.2K), and unique sellers (1,776) outnumber unique buyers (745) by 2.38x. Net flow is clearly outflow. Despite 1,848 unique wallets trading, the sell-side dominance suggests the pump is being distributed into. The 24h price change showing 0% in the analytics (vs. the 1,381% in the price section) may reflect a data discrepancy or measurement window difference. Total 24h volume of ~$523K against $55.9K liquidity represents ~9.4x liquidity turnover — extremely high and indicative of a volatile, speculative pump event.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

933,279,240.37

FDV

$279,433.65

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token has moved +1,381% in 24 hours from a base of ~$0.000015. Hourly candles show swings of 50–100%+ within single hours. This extreme volatility makes position sizing and stop-loss management nearly impossible.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $55.9K on a single PumpSwap pool. Any sell order above a few thousand dollars will incur severe slippage. Exit liquidity for larger positions is effectively nonexistent.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
68.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.38:1 in 24h
Critically thin liquidity ($55.9K) — severe exit liquidity risk
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — rug pull risk cannot be excluded
No top holder data — concentration risk is unquantifiable but likely very high
Original 27 holders accumulated at ~$0.000007 and are sitting on 40x+ gains
Unverified contract with no audit or transparency documentation
Token was completely inactive for 30+ days before the pump event

Mitigating factors

Token metadata is marked 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered
Launched via PumpFun's standard graduation path to PumpSwap — some structural legitimacy
1,848 unique wallets traded in 24h — broad participation reduces single-point manipulation risk somewhat
Social links (Twitter, website) exist — some community infrastructure present
Not flagged as spam by the data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk meme token trading. Any position should be considered a pure speculation with lottery-like risk/reward characteristics.

Gnomes is a high-risk, speculative meme token that has undergone a classic pump event after 30+ days of complete dormancy. The investment case is almost entirely momentum-driven with no fundamental value proposition. The token's Discord-launched community, thin liquidity, unknown authority status, and dominant sell pressure make this an extremely dangerous speculative vehicle. Any thesis must account for the very real possibility of a rapid and complete price collapse.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Sustained community momentum drives continued buying pressure, new holders continue to accumulate, and the token achieves viral spread beyond the initial Discord community. Price consolidates above $0.000200 and builds toward a new high above $0.000309.

Viral social media spread beyond the initial Discord community
Continued holder accumulation (currently +305/hour)
Broader Solana meme coin market rally providing tailwind
Early holders choosing to hold rather than distribute
New exchange listings or aggregator visibility

Base Case

Price retraces 50–70% from the $0.000309 peak to the $0.000090–$0.000150 range as early holders take profits. A small community of ~500–800 holders remains, with occasional low-volume trading. The token neither collapses completely nor sustains its pump-level prices.

Some early holders take partial profits but don't fully exit
New buyers continue to trickle in at lower prices, providing a floor
Liquidity remains thin but stable on PumpSwap
No authority-related rug pull occurs
Token maintains social media presence without going viral

Bear Case

High probability

The pump exhausts buying pressure, early holders (original 27 wallets with 40x+ gains) dump their positions into thin liquidity, price collapses back toward pre-pump levels of $0.000007–$0.000015, and the token returns to dormancy.

68.2% sell pressure already dominant in 24h window
Original 27 holders sitting on massive unrealized gains with strong incentive to sell
Critically thin liquidity ($55.9K) amplifies downside moves
No fundamental value or utility to sustain price
Unknown authority status could enable additional supply or account freezing
Historical pattern: 30-day dormancy suggests this is not the first pump attempt

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 28, 02:49 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-28 14:49 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Solana)
PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
22-hour OHLC candlestick data (hourly, USD)
Holder metrics and acquisition data
30-day historical holder series (daily)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
Sniper analysis data is unavailable — early buyer PnL and behavior cannot be assessed
Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed
Supply concentration metrics (top10/top100) show 0% which appears to be a data gap, not actual distribution
The 24h price change discrepancy (1,381% in price section vs 0% in analytics section) suggests possible data inconsistency
No audit, contract verification, or team information available
Token is extremely new to active trading — limited price history for technical analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly-launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gnomes a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Gnomes?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Gnomes ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 701 addresses (2026-07-28 14:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Gnomes?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Gnomes liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-28 14:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $55,898.96. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Gnomes (Gnomes)?

Is Gnomes a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk meme token trading. Any position should be considered a pure speculation with lottery-like risk/reward characteristics.

What are the key risks of holding Gnomes?

30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern • 68.2% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.38:1 in 24h • Critically thin liquidity ($55.9K) — severe exit liquidity risk