How concentrated is Twerking Duck ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 1,622 holder addresses (2026-05-16 04:47 UTC).

Are large holders selling Twerking Duck?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is Twerking Duck liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $35,935.02 (2026-05-16 04:47 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Twerking Duck Price Today & AI Analysis

TwerkSolanaAnalysis as of May 16, 2026

$0.0₅2239

Contract

Live

6MipUvJWiEmY6UjBcU832J7A4t4GiZ6D9atkhokopump

Chain

Solana

Holders

260

Market cap

$2,235

At a $1M market cap, $TWERK would be $0.001002 (447x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Twerk a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 9

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Twerk

3 free answers a day

Twerking Duck: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-05-16 04:47 UTC

Holder addresses

1,622

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$35,935.02

How concentrated is Twerking Duck ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 1,622 holder addresses (2026-05-16 04:47 UTC).
Are large holders selling Twerking Duck?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is Twerking Duck liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $35,935.02 (2026-05-16 04:47 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-16 04:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 16, 04:47 AM UTC

FDV

$117,471

Liquidity

$35,935.02

Holders

1,622

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Twerking Duck ($TWERK) is a Pump.fun-launched meme token on Solana with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a current FDV of ~$117K–$215K (varying by source). The token experienced an explosive 198% 24h price surge, driven by a sudden influx of 1,451 new holders in a single day after sitting dormant at 171 holders for at least 30 days. Trading activity is high but sell-pressure dominated (60.4% sell volume), liquidity is very shallow at $35.94K, and top-100 holders control 94.71% of supply — all hallmarks of a high-risk, speculative micro-cap meme token.

Key points

Explosive 198% 24h price pump after 30+ days of complete dormancy (171 holders flat)
Massive single-day holder surge: +1,451 holders (+89%) in 24h, all via swap acquisition
Extremely shallow liquidity ($35.94K) relative to 24h volume ($588K+), creating severe slippage risk
Top 10 holders control 34.83% of supply; top 100 control 94.71% — extreme concentration
20 snipers active at launch, majority already in significant profit (many 200–400%+ realized PnL), indicating elevated dump risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is showing severe short-term volatility. The most recent hourly candle (04:00 UTC) closed at $0.0001203 after opening at $0.0000341 — a massive intra-hour spike. The prior candle (03:00 UTC) saw a high of $0.0002870 and crashed to close at $0.0000341, a near-80% intra-hour collapse. The 1h price change is -44.76%, and sell pressure dominates at 60.4%. A retest of the $0.000026–$0.000034 support zone is likely in the near term.

Target low

$0.000026

Target high

$0.000150

Support: $0.000026 (candle [3] low), $0.000034 (candle [1] open / candle [3] open)
Resistance: $0.000150 (candle [3] high), $0.000287 (candle [2] all-time high in window)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without sustained buying catalysts, the token is likely to retrace significantly. Sniper wallets are largely in profit (200–400%+ realized PnL) and have already sold portions of their positions. The 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern. Continued holder growth could provide support, but the extreme supply concentration and shallow liquidity make a sustained rally unlikely without new catalysts.

Catalysts

Viral social media traction driving new retail buyers
Listing on a mid-tier CEX (unlikely given current metrics)
Broader Solana meme-coin market rally
Whale accumulation at lower price levels

Bullish factors

198% 24h price gain demonstrates strong momentum burst
+1,451 new holders in 24h shows rapid community growth
22,161 buy transactions in 24h indicates high retail interest
5m price change of +21.4% suggests very recent buying pressure

Bearish factors

60.4% sell volume dominance ($355K sells vs $232K buys)
1h price change of -44.76% — momentum already reversing
Sniper wallets with 200–400%+ realized PnL are likely to continue selling
Top 100 holders control 94.71% of supply — extreme dump risk
Liquidity of only $35.94K vs $588K+ daily volume creates catastrophic slippage
Token was completely dormant (171 holders, zero change) for 30+ days before this pump

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly OHLC candles are available, the token was dormant for 30+ days before a sudden pump, and key sniper data (sniped amounts, current balances) is largely unknown. The extreme volatility and shallow liquidity make price prediction highly unreliable.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 6MipUv...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 TWERK

Key Risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 94.71% — any coordinated sell-off would be catastrophic
Shallow liquidity ($35.94K) cannot absorb significant selling pressure
30+ days of dormancy followed by a single-day pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Snipers with 200–400%+ realized PnL are actively distributing into retail buyers

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (02:00 UTC): O=$0.0000341, H=$0.0001509, L=$0.0000268, C=$0.0001361 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting buyers stepped in at lows. Candle [2] (03:00 UTC): O=$0.0001378, H=$0.0002870, L=$0.0001146, C=$0.0000341 — a massive bearish engulfing / shooting star candle; price spiked to $0.000287 (all-time high in window) then collapsed ~88% to close near the open of candle [3]. This is a classic 'pump and dump' candle pattern. Candle [1] (04:00 UTC): O=$0.0000341, H=$0.0001203, L=$0.0000756, C=$0.0001203 — a bullish recovery candle closing at its high, but still well below candle [2]'s peak. The overall 3-candle pattern shows extreme volatility with a failed breakout at $0.000287.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term trend is indeterminate given only 3 candles and extreme volatility. The medium-term context (30+ days of dormancy at 171 holders followed by a single-day spike) suggests this is a pump event rather than an organic uptrend. The -44.76% 1h change confirms the immediate trend is bearish after the spike peak.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

40%

Sell

60%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000075 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000027 (candle [3] absolute low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000150 (candle [3] high / near candle [1] close)

Major resistance

$0.000287 (candle [2] high — session peak)

The $0.000034 level acts as a pivot, having been both the open of candles [1] and [3] and the close of candle [2]. A break below $0.000075 (candle [1] low) would target the $0.000027–$0.000034 zone. Reclaiming $0.000150 would be the first bullish signal; $0.000287 is the major resistance from the pump peak.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [2]: price spiked to $0.000287 then collapsed to close at $0.000034 — classic pump-and-dump candle
Bullish recovery candle [1] closing at its high ($0.000120), but on declining volume — weak conviction
Extreme intra-candle volatility: candle [2] range spans ~150% from low to high
Three-candle sequence shows classic pump-dump-partial recovery structure

Liquidity

$35,935.02

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $35.94K against a 24h trading volume of ~$588K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~16:1. This means any meaningful position size will experience severe slippage. Despite having more unique buyers (6,669) than sellers (2,992), sell volume dominates at $355.53K (60.4%) vs buy volume of $232.92K (39.6%), indicating that sellers are transacting in larger average sizes. The net outflow of ~$122.6K in 24h is a bearish signal. The FDV discrepancy between metadata ($117.47K) and trading analytics ($214.88K) suggests price has moved significantly during the analysis window. Trading on PumpSwap (pair HYsykp4xYvQpewPFEuTJxLn5jJehRsEjk7aMprUGtMLH) with such thin liquidity makes this token extremely susceptible to price manipulation in both directions.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 TWERK

FDV

$117,471 (metadata) / $214,880 (analytics — price-dependent)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
198% 24h gain followed by -44.76% in 1h. Candle [2] shows an ~88% intra-hour collapse from peak. Extreme price swings make position sizing and exit timing nearly impossible.
Liquidityhigh
Only $35.94K in liquidity against $588K+ daily volume. A 16:1 volume-to-liquidity ratio guarantees severe slippage on any meaningful trade. Large sells will crater the price.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 94.71% — any coordinated sell-off would be catastrophic
Shallow liquidity ($35.94K) cannot absorb significant selling pressure
30+ days of dormancy followed by a single-day pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Snipers with 200–400%+ realized PnL are actively distributing into retail buyers
No social links, unverified contract, unknown authority status — minimal transparency
Holder count already declining (-50 in last 1h) as early buyers exit
Sell volume exceeds buy volume by $122K in 24h despite more unique buyers

Mitigating factors

'Mutable: false' reduces metadata manipulation risk
Pump.fun launch mechanism typically includes authority renouncement
High unique buyer count (6,669) shows genuine retail interest
PumpSwap LP as top holder provides baseline liquidity
Meme token narrative ('Twerking Duck') has viral potential on social media

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and have the technical capability to monitor positions in real-time. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap meme token risks. Position sizes should be minimal relative to total portfolio.

Twerking Duck ($TWERK) is a high-risk, speculative meme token that experienced a classic pump event after 30+ days of dormancy. The investment case is almost entirely momentum-driven with no fundamental backing. The bull case requires sustained viral attention; the bear case (most likely) is a rapid retracement as snipers and early holders distribute into retail demand.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme traction drives sustained retail FOMO, new buyers absorb sniper selling, liquidity deepens, and the token establishes a higher price floor with a growing community.

Viral social media spread of the 'Twerking Duck' meme narrative
Continued holder growth beyond the initial pump cohort
Sniper selling absorbed by sufficient retail demand
Broader Solana meme-coin market tailwind
Influencer or KOL promotion driving new buyer waves

Base Case

Token experiences a partial retracement of 50–70% from pump peak over 24–72 hours, stabilizing at a new (lower) equilibrium with a small but active trading community. Long-term survival depends entirely on whether a genuine community forms.

Some retail buyers hold positions, providing a price floor above pre-pump levels
Sniper selling is gradual rather than immediate, preventing total collapse
Liquidity remains sufficient for small trades
No new major catalysts emerge in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

Sniper and whale distribution overwhelms thin liquidity, holder count reverses, price retraces 80–95% from pump peak back toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000034 or lower).

Snipers with 200–400%+ realized PnL continue selling remaining balances
Shallow $35.94K liquidity cannot support price at current levels
No social links or community infrastructure to sustain momentum
30-day dormancy pattern suggests no organic community existed pre-pump
Holder count already declining (-50 in last 1h)

Analysis details

Generated

May 16, 04:47 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-16 04:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Pump.fun mint)
Real-time price feed (PumpSwap pair HYsykp4xYvQpewPFEuTJxLn5jJehRsEjk7aMprUGtMLH)
3 hourly OHLC candles (2026-05-16 02:00–04:00 UTC)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data
30-day historical holder series (2026-04-16 to 2026-05-15)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
Sniper analysis (20 wallets, first 1,000 blocks)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Sniper sniped amounts and current balances are largely unknown, limiting precise concentration calculations
Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from provided metadata
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot assess rug risk from authorities definitively
No social media data available to assess community strength
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($117K) and analytics ($215K) suggests data was captured at different price points
30-day holder history shows only the pre-pump dormancy period; no granular intra-day data for the pump day
Token has no verified contract, limiting smart contract risk assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and never invest more than you can afford to lose. This analysis is based solely on the on-chain data provided and may not reflect the current market state.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Twerking Duck (Twerk) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 9, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Twerking Duck (Twerk)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 9, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Twerking Duck (Twerk)?

Is Twerk a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and have the technical capability to monitor positions in real-time. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap meme token risks. Position sizes should be minimal relative to total portfolio.

What are the key risks of holding Twerk?

Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 94.71% — any coordinated sell-off would be catastrophic • Shallow liquidity ($35.94K) cannot absorb significant selling pressure • 30+ days of dormancy followed by a single-day pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern