WODL

Happy Penguin Price Today & AI Analysis

WODLSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 25, 2026

Price

$0.000413

+710.57% 24h

Contract

Live
6BZY2BgeqVKEYCTgU9Q9oUwx6bDqv32djy6WGaXTci1i

Chain

Solana

Holders

679

Market cap

$412,910

More tokens on Solana

COINxCOINxCoinbase xStock$198.73+0.0%MC $27.06MHYPERCATHYPERCATHYPERCAT$0.002163+28.8%MC $2.12MarcarcAI Rig Complex$0.0736-7.8%MC $73.61MGETFGETFGrand Exchange-Traded Fund$0.001032+761.1%MC $1.03MAPEAPEApeCoin$0.1460-9.0%MC $504.5KRAYRAYRaydium$2.1+5.4%MC $1.16B

Happy Penguin: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-25 15:15 UTC

Holder addresses

679

Top 10 supply share

33.88%

Reported liquidity

$29,702.00
How concentrated is Happy Penguin ownership?
As of 2026-09-25 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 33.88% of supply. It reports 679 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Happy Penguin?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-25 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $426,943.00 in buys and $398,328.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Happy Penguin liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +47.69%, from $20,664.38 (2026-09-25 12:00 UTC) to $30,518.56 (2026-09-25 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-25 15:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 12:00 UTC$20,664.38
2026-09-25 13:00 UTC$43,016.23
2026-09-25 14:00 UTC$39,704.19
2026-09-25 15:00 UTC$30,518.56

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about WODL

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 25, 03:16 PM UTC

FDV

$412,910

Liquidity

$29,702.00

Holders

679

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Happy Penguin (WODL) is a Solana meme token trading on Raydium CPMM with a current price of $0.000413, up 710.6% over 24 hours but down 42.1% in the last hour following a parabolic spike to $0.00138 and sharp reversal. The token has extremely shallow liquidity ($29.70K), a small holder base (679 addresses), top-10 holder concentration of 33.88%, and critical unresolved data gaps around mint/freeze authority status and sniper activity.

Key points

  • Extreme, recent parabolic price spike (37x+ within a single hour) followed by a sharp ~70% retracement from the peak, visible directly in the 4 hourly candles provided
  • Very shallow $29.70K liquidity pool against $825K+ combined 24h volume and $412.91K FDV, creating high slippage/manipulation potential
  • Top-10 holders control 33.88% of the 1B total supply across only 679 holder addresses, though no historical or classification data exists to assess whether this is concerning insider concentration or organic distribution
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and sniper activity are all unknown/unavailable, leaving major due-diligence gaps unresolved rather than cleared

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Short-term momentum has turned negative, with price down 42.1% in the last hour and 9.6% in the last 5 minutes following a parabolic spike to $0.00138 and subsequent breakdown. Absent a fresh catalyst or renewed buy-side volume, continuation toward the $0.000340 immediate support level or lower is plausible.

Target low

$0.000200

Target high

$0.000700

Support

$0.000340, $0.000198

Resistance

$0.000700, $0.00138

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the extremely limited price history (only 4 hourly candles observed) and the token's brand-new, thin-liquidity, high-volatility profile. The 24h change remains massively positive, but the sharp intra-day reversal suggests the initial pump may not be sustainable without continued fresh demand; sustained holder growth, deepening liquidity, and confirmed authority safety could support stabilization, while lack thereof could see the token retrace most gains.

Catalysts

  • Whether liquidity is added/deepened beyond the current $29.70K
  • Confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority status via independent on-chain verification
  • Continued social/community momentum on Twitter and the project website
  • Behavior of top-10 holders (33.88% of supply) - concentrated selling could sharply depress price

Bullish factors

  • 24h price is still up 710.6% despite the recent pullback
  • 24h buy volume ($426.94K) and buyer count (1,293) modestly exceed sell volume ($398.33K) and seller count (840)
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) may support continued community-driven demand

Bearish factors

  • Sharp reversal from $0.00138 high to $0.000414, a ~70% pullback from peak within hours
  • Declining volume on each candle since the spike, indicating fading buyer interest
  • Extremely shallow $29.70K liquidity magnifies downside moves
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves rug/dilution risk unresolved
  • 33.88% supply concentration in top 10 holders with no visibility into their intentions

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to an extremely short price history window (only 4 hourly candles), unknown authority/rug status, no sniper data, no holder history/trend data, and very shallow liquidity that makes price highly susceptible to manipulation or large single-wallet moves. Any prediction here is directional and speculative rather than a reliable quantitative forecast.

WODL call history

Full track record →

Sep 25bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
6BZY2B...ci1i
Total Supply
1,000,000,000 WODL

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow $29.70K liquidity pool relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • Extreme volatility: +710% 24h but -42% in the last hour alone, suggesting a pump-and-dump or highly speculative trading pattern
  • Top-10 holders control 33.88% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their trading intent

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 4 hourly candles are available (2026-09-25 12:00-15:00 UTC). Candle [1] opened at $0.00000544 and closed at $0.000206, already a ~37x move within the hour with high $85K volume. Candle [2] extended sharply, opening at $0.000206, spiking to a high of $0.00138 (the highest point in the dataset) before closing at $0.000824, on the largest volume of the set ($601K). Candle [3] opened at $0.000824, made a lower high of $0.000893, and closed lower at $0.000700 on reduced volume ($137K), the first sign of momentum fading. Candle [4] continued the decline, opening at $0.000700 and closing at $0.000414 with a low of $0.000340, on the lowest volume of the four candles ($46K), confirming a clear downtrend after the initial spike.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) the token is still up 710.6% from its starting point, but short-term price action across the last two-to-three hourly candles shows a clear downtrend, with each candle printing lower highs and lower closes (from $0.00138 peak down to $0.000414), and the most recent 1h and 5m changes are -42.1% and -9.6% respectively, confirming active short-term selling pressure following the initial pump.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000340 (candle [4] low)

Major support

$0.00000439–$0.000198 (candle [1] low/early range, pre-spike levels)

Immediate resistance

$0.000700–$0.000706 (candle [3]/[4] open/high zone)

Major resistance

$0.00138 (candle [2] high, the all-time high in this dataset)

Price is currently trading around $0.000413, just below the immediate resistance zone of $0.000700-$0.000706 formed by candles [3] and [4]. Major resistance sits at the $0.00138 spike high from candle [2], which would require more than a 3x move from current levels to retest. On the downside, immediate support is the $0.000340 low from candle [4]; a break below that risks a retracement toward the pre-spike range near $0.0000044-$0.000198, though such a full round-trip would be an extreme move.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic spike (candle [2] high of $0.00138) followed by sharp reversal - classic pump-and-dump / blow-off top shape
  • Sequential lower highs and lower closes across candles [2]-[4], forming a short-term downtrend after the spike
  • Declining volume on each subsequent candle after the volume peak, suggesting exhaustion of buying interest
  • Long upper wicks on candles [2] and [3] relative to their closes, indicating rejection at higher prices

Liquidity

Liquidity

$29,702.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $29.70K is extremely shallow relative to a 24h trading volume of over $825K combined (buy+sell), implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of roughly 27x in a single day. This mismatch is characteristic of a low-depth pool experiencing intense speculative churn, where even modest trade sizes can move price dramatically (evidenced by the 42% 1h price drop and 9.5% 5m drop despite 24h price being up 710%). Buy volume ($426.94K, 51.7%) slightly exceeds sell volume ($398.33K, 48.3%), producing a modest net inflow, and buyer count (1,293) exceeds seller count (840), suggesting more distinct participants are buying than selling, though this does not guarantee net accumulation by any single actor. Slippage risk is high given the shallow $29.7K liquidity base on a Raydium CPMM pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 WODL

FDV

$412.91K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price is up 710.6%, but 1h price is down 42.1% and 5m is down 9.6%. Candle data shows the price spiking from ~$0.0000054 to a high of ~$0.00138 within a single hour before retracing to ~$0.000414, an extreme boom-bust pattern indicative of a very thinly traded, highly volatile market.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $29.70K against 24h volume exceeding $825K combined, and against an FDV of $412.91K. This shallow liquidity means large trades or a coordinated exit could cause severe price impact and high slippage.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holders control 33.88% of total supply among only 679 total holder addresses. Top-100 concentration and any wallet classification/behavioral history are unavailable, so the full concentration picture and whether these are insiders, exchanges, or organic holders cannot be assessed - this is a genuine data gap, not a mitigating factor.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow $29.70K liquidity pool relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • Extreme volatility: +710% 24h but -42% in the last hour alone, suggesting a pump-and-dump or highly speculative trading pattern
  • Top-10 holders control 33.88% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their trading intent
  • No sniper data, no holder history, and no verified-contract confirmation, leaving major due-diligence gaps
  • Only 679 holders total, a small and potentially fragile holder base for a token with this trading volume

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer count (1,293) modestly exceeds seller count (840), and buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume, suggesting some organic net demand in the most recent 24h window
  • Token has active social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting at least surface-level community engagement
  • Trading is occurring on a recognizable venue (Raydium CPMM), a standard and widely-used AMM

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the potential for total loss. It is not suitable for conservative investors or those seeking stable exposure, given shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, unresolved authority risk, and significant data gaps around sniper activity and holder history.

WODL (Happy Penguin) is a newly-surging Solana meme token that spiked over 700% in 24 hours before undergoing a sharp intra-hour reversal, all within an extremely shallow liquidity environment and with major data gaps around authority permissions, sniper activity, and holder history. The setup resembles a high-risk speculative pump with unclear sustainability rather than a fundamentally-grounded investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side demand reaccelerates - supported by the current modest 24h buyer surplus (1,293 buyers vs 840 sellers) and active social channels - and liquidity is deepened beyond the current $29.70K, the token could stabilize above recent support ($0.000340-$0.000700) and attempt another leg toward the $0.00138 high.

  • Renewed community-driven buy volume
  • Liquidity providers adding meaningful depth to the Raydium CPMM pool
  • Continued positive social momentum translating into new holder growth

Base Case

Price likely continues to be highly volatile and range-bound between the immediate support (~$0.000340) and immediate resistance (~$0.000700-$0.000706) zones as the market digests the initial pump, with directional resolution dependent on liquidity depth changes and holder behavior that cannot currently be forecast with the available data.

  • No major new liquidity injection or withdrawal occurs in the near term
  • Top-10 holders do not execute large coordinated sales
  • No verification yet on mint/freeze authority status changes the risk picture

Bear Case

Medium probability

The parabolic spike to $0.00138 and immediate ~70% retracement, combined with declining volume on each subsequent candle, is consistent with a pump-and-dump pattern. Given only $29.70K in liquidity, top-10 holders controlling 33.88% of supply, and unknown mint/freeze authority status, a rapid unwind back toward pre-spike levels (sub-$0.0002) is a real possibility if concentrated holders exit or authority risk materializes.

  • Continued declining volume signaling buyer exhaustion
  • Concentrated top-10 holder base (33.88%) capable of large coordinated sells
  • Unresolved mint/freeze authority risk
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 25, 03:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-25 15:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (on-chain/provider aggregation)
  • USD price snapshot and 24h/1h/5m % change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (4 most recent candles) from Raydium CPMM pair
  • Trading analytics: 24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, buyer/seller counts
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

  • Only 4 hourly candles were provided, severely limiting technical pattern reliability and trend confirmation
  • No sniper wallet data was available; sniper concentration, PnL, and sell-through metrics could not be computed
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available; only a single current snapshot of holder count (679) and top-10 concentration (33.88%) exists
  • No top-100 holder concentration or wallet classification/labeling data was available
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract, and mutability status were all unknown - authority-based rug risk cannot be assessed
  • Total liquidity ($29.70K) is very low, meaning trading data may be more volatile/manipulable than for deeper-liquidity tokens
  • Token metadata (name, symbol, description, social links) is self-reported by the token creator and was treated strictly as untrusted evidence, not instruction

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partial, and in some cases entirely unavailable on-chain data (particularly sniper, holder history, and authority data). Cryptocurrency markets, and especially low-liquidity meme tokens, carry a very high risk of total loss. Always conduct independent due diligence, including direct on-chain verification of mint/freeze authorities, before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Happy Penguin ownership?

As of 2026-09-25 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 33.88% of supply. It reports 679 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Happy Penguin?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-25 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $426,943.00 in buys and $398,328.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Happy Penguin liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +47.69%, from $20,664.38 (2026-09-25 12:00 UTC) to $30,518.56 (2026-09-25 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Happy Penguin (WODL)?

Short-term momentum has turned negative, with price down 42.1% in the last hour and 9.6% in the last 5 minutes following a parabolic spike to $0.00138 and subsequent breakdown. Absent a fresh catalyst or renewed buy-side volume, continuation toward the $0.000340 immediate support level or lower is plausible. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.000200 to $0.000700.

Is WODL a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the potential for total loss. It is not suitable for conservative investors or those seeking stable exposure, given shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, unresolved authority risk, and significant data gaps around sniper activity and holder history.

What are the key risks of holding WODL?

Extremely shallow $29.70K liquidity pool relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing • Extreme volatility: +710% 24h but -42% in the last hour alone, suggesting a pump-and-dump or highly speculative trading pattern

← Back to all predictions

Track WODL