MATH

Math Street Price Today & AI Analysis

MATH
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 23, 2026

5pVQnFwVxrpS81bXCPxFfh1LHHbv3AcymbpazZnhpump

$0.057257

+1.99%

FDV $6,772

LiveContract:5pVQnFwVxrpS81bXCPxFfh1LHHbv3AcymbpazZnhpumpChain:SolanaHolders:473Market cap:$6,772

More tokens on Solana

GBULL

GBULL

The Ginger Bull

$0.0556315.7%
MC $5.5K
tolywifhat

tolywifhat

baby toly wif hat

$0.0574603.3%
MC $7.5K
HEKNITT

HEKNITT

HeKnitt

$0.0413564.0%
MC $13.4K
Oniichan

Oniichan

お兄ちゃん

$0.0525960.3%
MC $2.5K
SMIRKCAT

SMIRKCAT

Smirk Cat

$0.0540142.4%
MC $4.0K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.1664224.8%
MC $145.79M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about MATH

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 23, 11:17 AM
FDV

$61,211

Liquidity

$35,414

Holders

676

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Math Street (MATH) is a PumpSwap-listed Solana meme/utility token with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 and a fully diluted valuation of ~$61,211. The token has been dormant for at least 30 days (holding at 18 holders) before an explosive single-day surge to 676 holders (+658, +97% in 24h). Trading activity is heavily sell-dominated (78.8% sell pressure, $151.6K sell vs $40.9K buy volume in 24h), liquidity is extremely shallow at $35.4K, and top holder/concentration data is unavailable. The token is very early-stage, very high risk, and shows classic pump-and-dump warning signs.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive holder growth from 18 to 676 in a single day after 30 days of complete stagnation
Extreme sell-side dominance: 78.8% sell pressure with 3,309 sells vs 916 buys in 24h
Ultra-shallow liquidity of only $35.4K against a $61.2K FDV
No top holder data available, making concentration risk unquantifiable
Token has been dormant for 30+ days before sudden activity spike

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just experienced a violent intra-hour swing: candle [2] opened at $0.0000881, hit a high of $0.0001385, then collapsed to close at $0.0000309 — a near-80% intra-candle reversal. The most recent candle [1] recovered partially to $0.0000619 but remains well below the session high. The 5-minute price change is -22%, confirming continued selling pressure. With 78.8% sell pressure and only $35.4K in liquidity, further downside is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low$0.000024
Target high$0.000094
Support: $0.000024 (candle [2] low), $0.000031 (candle [1] open / candle [3] open)
Resistance: $0.000094 (candle [3] high), $0.0001385 (candle [2] all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

The token was completely dormant for 30 days at 18 holders before a sudden activity spike. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump. With sell pressure at 78.8%, shallow liquidity, and no verifiable fundamentals or top holder data, the medium-term outlook is bearish unless new catalysts emerge.

Catalysts
  • Sustained new holder accumulation beyond the initial 24h spike
  • Significant liquidity additions to the PumpSwap pool
  • Verifiable project development or partnership announcements
  • Broader Solana meme token market rally

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h price appreciation of +19.8%
  • Rapid holder growth from 18 to 676 (+97%) in 24h suggests viral interest
  • 1h price change of +30.8% shows short-term buying momentum
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair

Bearish factors

  • 78.8% sell pressure ($151.6K sell vs $40.9K buy volume in 24h)
  • 3,309 sells vs only 916 buys in 24h — sellers outnumber buyers 3.6:1
  • Intra-candle collapse from $0.0001385 high to $0.0000245 low in candle [2]
  • 5-minute price change of -22% at time of analysis
  • Only $35.4K total liquidity — extremely high slippage risk
  • 30 days of complete dormancy before sudden spike raises manipulation concerns
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk unknown
  • Unverified contract, update authority unknown
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, no sniper data, only 3 hourly OHLC candles available, extremely shallow liquidity, and the token's very short active trading history. The data is insufficient for reliable price modeling.

MATH call history

Full track record →
Jul 23bearish
24h-2.8%
7d-79.9%
30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (09:00): O=$0.0000309, H=$0.0000940, L=$0.0000309, C=$0.0000878 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, closing near the high. Candle [2] (10:00): O=$0.0000881, H=$0.0001385, L=$0.0000245, C=$0.0000309 — a massive bearish reversal candle (shooting star / bearish engulfing character) with an enormous upper wick, indicating a failed breakout and aggressive selling from the high. Candle [1] (11:00): O=$0.0000309, H=$0.0001225, L=$0.0000467, C=$0.0000619 — a recovery candle with a long upper wick, suggesting buyers stepped in but sellers remain active. The overall 3-candle pattern shows extreme volatility, a failed breakout at $0.0001385, and a current price well below that peak.

Trend

Short-term
sideways
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 21%Sell 79%

Short-term price action is highly volatile and directionless within a wide range ($0.0000245–$0.0001385). The medium-term context is a downtrend from the session high of $0.0001385, with the current price at $0.0000612 representing a ~56% decline from peak. The 30-day dormancy followed by a spike-and-dump pattern is characteristic of a downtrend resumption after a pump.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000031 (candle [1] open and candle [3] open — tested multiple times)
Major$0.000024–$0.000025 (candle [2] low — session floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000094 (candle [3] high)
Major$0.0001385 (candle [2] all-time high in available data)

The $0.000031 level has acted as both support and open price across multiple candles, making it a key pivot. A break below $0.000024 would signal further capitulation. Resistance at $0.000094 and $0.0001385 represents the failed breakout zone where heavy selling occurred.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / long upper wick on candle [2] — bearish reversal signal at session high
  • Failed breakout above $0.0001385 with immediate reversal — bull trap
  • Multiple candles opening at $0.0000309 — strong pivot/magnet level
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by declining volume — exhaustion pattern
  • Long lower wick on candle [3] — buyers defended $0.0000309 initially

Total holders676
24h Δ+658
7d Δ+658
30d Δ+658
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at 18 for the entire 30-day historical period (June 23 – July 22, 2026), with zero net change on any day. On July 23, holders exploded from 18 to 676 (+658, +97%) in a single day, perfectly coinciding with the price pump and high trading volume. This suggests the holder growth is directly correlated with the price spike and may represent speculative retail entry rather than organic community growth.

The holder trend is extremely anomalous. Thirty consecutive days of zero growth (stuck at 18 holders) followed by a single-day explosion to 676 holders is a textbook pump pattern. The 97% growth rate in 24h is not organic — it is almost certainly driven by the price action attracting speculative traders. The acquisition method breakdown (666 via swap, 10 via transfer) confirms these are active traders, not long-term holders. The sustainability of this holder growth is highly questionable given the dominant sell pressure.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available from the data source

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — no top 20 holders were returned, and supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is a data artifact rather than a true reading. This is a significant analytical gap. Given that the token had only 18 holders for 30 days before the pump, it is highly probable that those original 18 wallets hold a very concentrated share of supply. The distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' based on this inference. Without actual holder data, whale sentiment cannot be determined with confidence. The overwhelming sell pressure (78.8%) suggests at least some large holders are distributing.

Liquidity$35,410
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$40,860
Sell$151,640
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers367
Unique sellers1,198

Liquidity is critically shallow at $35.4K on PumpSwap (pair F3M756rbDnnWbQN5y6zSjCZvztvUf4ZoFMbFg4yd3mat). The FDV of $61.2K is only 1.73x the total liquidity, meaning any moderate sell order will cause severe price impact. The 24h sell volume of $151.6K is 4.3x the total liquidity pool — this level of throughput relative to pool size indicates extreme volatility and slippage. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): sellers outnumber buyers 3.3:1 by count (1,198 vs 367) and 3.7:1 by volume. Market health is poor. The token is effectively in a distribution phase with insufficient buy-side depth to absorb selling pressure.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 MATH
FDV$61,211

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a fixed supply of 1,000,000,000 MATH with a current FDV of ~$61,211. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is unverified, making it impossible to confirm whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token is marked as 'mutable: false', which is a mild positive signal suggesting metadata cannot be changed, but this does not address mint/freeze authority status. The token was launched on PumpSwap (pump.fun ecosystem), which typically auto-revokes mint authority upon bonding curve graduation, but this cannot be confirmed from the available data. The unverified contract and unknown authority status represent meaningful rug risk that cannot be dismissed. Investors should verify on-chain authority status before committing capital.

Volatility
high

The token swung from $0.0000245 to $0.0001385 and back within a single hour (candle [2]), representing a ~466% range. The 5-minute change of -22% at analysis time confirms extreme ongoing volatility. This is unsuitable for risk-averse investors.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $35.4K on a single PumpSwap pool. The 24h sell volume of $151.6K is 4.3x the pool size, indicating severe slippage risk. Any position of meaningful size cannot be exited without significant price impact.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable (0% reported for top 10 and top 100 — a data artifact). With only 18 holders for 30 days before the pump, supply is almost certainly highly concentrated among a small group of original wallets. This creates extreme dump risk.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the 30-day dormancy followed by a coordinated pump, combined with 78.8% sell pressure, strongly implies early holders are exiting. Risk is elevated to medium despite lack of direct sniper evidence.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The 'mutable: false' flag is a mild positive, but insufficient to clear authority risk. PumpSwap tokens often have renounced mint authority, but this is unconfirmed here.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure (78.8%) suggests active distribution by early holders
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($35.4K) makes large exits impossible without severe slippage
  • No top holder data — concentration risk is unquantifiable but likely very high
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug pull vector
  • Unverified contract with no audit trail
  • Token had only 18 holders for 30+ days — extremely thin organic community
  • 5-minute price already down 22% at time of analysis

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked 'mutable: false', reducing metadata manipulation risk
  • Listed on PumpSwap which has some baseline legitimacy in the Solana ecosystem
  • Rapid holder growth to 676 shows some market interest
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some project presence
  • Not flagged as spam by the data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics and pump-and-dump patterns. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

MATH presents as a very high-risk speculative token that has just experienced a classic pump event after 30 days of complete dormancy. The overwhelming sell pressure, shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and missing holder concentration data make this an extremely dangerous trade. Any investment thesis must be grounded in the reality that this token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump.

Bull case (low)

The holder spike and price action attract genuine community interest in the 'AI + cryptography' narrative. New liquidity is added to the pool, sell pressure normalizes, and the token establishes a higher base above $0.000031. A sustained social media campaign drives further holder growth and price discovery toward the $0.000094–$0.0001385 resistance zone.

  • Viral social media traction on Twitter/website driving new organic holders
  • Liquidity additions to the PumpSwap pool reducing slippage risk
  • Broader Solana meme token market rally lifting all boats
  • Genuine project development announcements creating fundamental demand

Base case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000031–$0.000062 range short-term as the initial pump excitement fades. Holder count plateaus around 700–800. Trading volume declines significantly. Without new catalysts, the token slowly bleeds value over the following weeks as early holders continue to exit into any price strength.

  • Sell pressure moderates from 78.8% to 55–65% as early holders finish distributing
  • No significant new liquidity is added to the pool
  • No major project announcements or social media catalysts emerge
  • Holder count growth slows dramatically after the initial 24h spike
  • Price gravitates toward the $0.000031 pivot level as a base

Bear case (high)

The original 18 holders (who held through 30 days of dormancy) continue distributing into the retail buying wave. Sell pressure remains above 70%, liquidity is drained, and the price collapses back toward or below the $0.000024 session low. The token returns to dormancy with a larger but disillusioned holder base.

  • Continued 78.8% sell pressure from early holders exiting
  • Insufficient new buy volume to absorb distribution ($40.9K buys vs $151.6K sells)
  • Shallow $35.4K liquidity pool unable to support price at current levels
  • No verifiable utility or development progress to sustain speculative interest
  • Classic pump-and-dump pattern with 30-day dormancy setup

GeneratedJul 23, 11:17 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-07-23T11:00 UTC. OHLC data covers only the most recent 3 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers 30 days but shows zero change until the most recent 24h period.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: 5pVQnFwVxrpS81bXCPxFfh1LHHbv3AcymbpazZnhpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (F3M756rbDnnWbQN5y6zSjCZvztvUf4ZoFMbFg4yd3mat)
  • Hourly OHLC candles (3 candles, 2026-07-23 09:00–11:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Holder metrics and acquisition breakdown
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily, 2026-06-23 to 2026-07-22)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper analysis returned no data — early buyer behavior cannot be directly assessed
  • Mint and freeze authority status is unknown — rug risk cannot be fully evaluated
  • Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement
  • Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data artifacts, not true readings
  • Token has only ~24h of meaningful trading history, making trend analysis unreliable
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximate

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on decentralized exchanges, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. This token exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 MATH

Key Risks

•Extreme sell pressure (78.8%) suggests active distribution by early holders
•30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
•Critically shallow liquidity ($35.4K) makes large exits impossible without severe slippage
•No top holder data — concentration risk is unquantifiable but likely very high

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for MATH. Smart money signals must be inferred from trading analytics alone. The 24h data shows 1,198 unique sellers vs 367 unique buyers, with sell volume ($151.6K) nearly 4x buy volume ($40.9K). This strongly suggests early holders and/or insiders are distributing into retail buying interest generated by the holder spike. The dormancy-to-pump pattern is a classic early-buyer exit strategy.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

Likely distributing — the 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden price spike and overwhelming sell pressure (78.8%) suggests early holders (the original 18) are selling into new retail entrants. No sniper data is available to confirm this directly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Math Street (MATH)?

The token just experienced a violent intra-hour swing: candle [2] opened at $0.0000881, hit a high of $0.0001385, then collapsed to close at $0.0000309 — a near-80% intra-candle reversal. The most recent candle [1] recovered partially to $0.0000619 but remains well below the session high. The 5-minute price change is -22%, confirming continued selling pressure. With 78.8% sell pressure and only $35.4K in liquidity, further downside is the most probable short-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000024 to $0.000094.

Is MATH a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics and pump-and-dump patterns. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

How are MATH holders trending?

Math Street currently has 676 holders and is growing (24h: 658, 7d: 658, 30d: 658). The holder trend is extremely anomalous. Thirty consecutive days of zero growth (stuck at 18 holders) followed by a single-day explosion to 676 holders is a textbook pump pattern. The 97% growth rate in 24h is not organic — it is almost certainly driven by the price action attracting speculative traders. The acquisition method breakdown (666 via swap, 10 via transfer) confirms these are active traders, not long-term holders. The sustainability of this holder growth is highly questionable given the dominant sell pressure.

What does sniper activity look like for MATH?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding MATH?

Extreme sell pressure (78.8%) suggests active distribution by early holders • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern • Critically shallow liquidity ($35.4K) makes large exits impossible without severe slippage

← Back to all predictions

Track MATH