SMIRKCAT

Smirk Cat Price Today & AI Analysis

SMIRKCATSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 11, 2026

Price

$0.054119

-2.91% 24h

Contract

Live
Fjc4SdpzXBdmSchmnpAtCLwpS8VobzSAVrMmy5YNpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

330

Market cap

$4,117

Ask Unhosted AI about SMIRKCAT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Solana

NAMINAMIBackpacknami-chan$0.053090-11.7%MC $3.1K棱角猫棱角猫A little cat worn down by life.$0.053676-6.8%MC $3.7KMarketCatMarketCatMarket Cat$0.055067-3.5%MC $4.9KSyraxSyraxThe Flying Dragon$0.053630-3.7%MC $3.5Klemonlemonlemon$0.052960-3.5%MC $2.9KRAYRAYRaydium$2.45-1.7%MC $1.36B

Smirk Cat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-11 02:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,063

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$59,677.77
How concentrated is Smirk Cat ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,063 addresses (2026-07-11 02:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Smirk Cat?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Smirk Cat liquidity falling?
As of 2026-07-11 02:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $59,677.77. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-11 02:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 11, 02:17 AM UTC

FDV

$0

Liquidity

$59,677.77

Holders

1,063

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

SMIRKCAT (Smirk Cat) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: Fjc4SdpzXBdmSchmnpAtCLwpS8VobzSAVrMmy5YNpump) with a total supply of 1 token (decimals: 0), currently trading at ~$0.000236 on PumpSwap. The token exhibits extreme anomalies: a total supply of 1 indivisible unit, a reported FDV of $278K vs. a price data FDV of $0.00, 96% holder growth in 24h (from 47 to 1,063 holders), a 218% 24h price surge, and massively skewed sell pressure (76.7% sell vs. 23.3% buy). The top-10/top-100 holder concentration is reported as 0%, which is internally inconsistent with a supply of 1 and is a strong data anomaly. The contract is unverified, mutable, and the update authority is unknown. These combined signals indicate an extremely high-risk, likely manipulated or experimental token.

Key points

  • Total supply of exactly 1 indivisible token (0 decimals) — highly unusual and creates severe data inconsistencies
  • 96% holder growth in 24 hours (47 → 1,063 holders) after 30 days of complete stagnation at 47 holders
  • Extreme sell pressure: 76.7% sell volume ($371K) vs. 23.3% buy volume ($113K) in 24h
  • 218% 24h price surge despite overwhelming sell dominance — suggests coordinated price manipulation
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — maximum rug risk from authority perspective
  • OHLC candle data shows price values inconsistent with the reported current price, suggesting data feed anomalies

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has surged 218% in 24h and 358% in the last hour alone, driven almost entirely by sell-side volume ($371K sells vs. $113K buys). This divergence — price up while sells dominate — is a hallmark of wash trading or coordinated pump activity. With only $59.68K in total liquidity against $483K in combined 24h volume, the market is extremely thin. A sharp reversion is highly probable once pump momentum exhausts.

Target low

$0.000022

Target high

$0.000447

Support

$0.000027 (candle [3] low), $0.000022 (candle [2] low)

Resistance

$0.000041 (candle [1] high / candle [2] open), $0.000045 (candle [3] high — recent peak)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The token sat dormant at 47 holders for 30 consecutive days before an abrupt spike. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump. With mutable authority, no verified contract, overwhelming sell pressure, and razor-thin liquidity, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a credible use case or community emerges.

Catalysts

  • Unexpected viral meme adoption (low probability)
  • Liquidity injection by a major market maker
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all tokens

Bullish factors

  • 218% 24h price surge demonstrates short-term momentum
  • Rapid holder growth from 47 to 1,063 in 24h shows sudden community interest
  • Listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair

Bearish factors

  • 76.7% sell pressure ($371K) vastly outweighs buy pressure ($113K) in 24h
  • Only $59.68K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • 30 days of zero activity (47 holders, no change) before sudden spike — classic pump setup
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk is very high
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental tokenomic absurdity
  • Unverified contract, no description, no on-chain social proof
  • OHLC data inconsistencies suggest possible data feed manipulation or errors

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severe data inconsistencies (total supply of 1 with 1,063 holders and 0% concentration), OHLC values that do not align with the reported current price, unknown update authority, and the absence of sniper data. The token's mechanics are opaque and the data feed appears unreliable.

SMIRKCAT call history

Full track record →

Jul 11bearish
24h-71.0%
7d-95.6%
30d-98.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
Fjc4Sd...pump
Total Supply
1 (indivisible, 0 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental tokenomic absurdity and data inconsistencies
  • 30 days of zero activity followed by sudden pump — textbook pump-and-dump pattern
  • 76.7% sell pressure ($371K) vs. 23.3% buy pressure ($113K) — active distribution event

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Three hourly candles are available (00:00–02:00 UTC on 2026-07-11). NOTE: The OHLC values (~$0.000022–$0.000045) are inconsistent with the reported current price of ~$0.000236, suggesting a data feed discrepancy or that the price spike occurred after the last candle close. Within the available candles: Candle [3] (00:00): O=$0.0000316, H=$0.0000447, L=$0.0000273, C=$0.0000447 — bullish close at the high. Candle [2] (01:00): O=$0.0000407, H=$0.0000407, L=$0.0000221, C=$0.0000316 — bearish engulfing / shooting star pattern, closed below open. Candle [1] (02:00): O=$0.0000316, H=$0.0000407, L=$0.000263 (anomalous — L > H, likely a data error), C=$0.0000407 — data integrity issue in this candle. Volume spiked dramatically in candle [2] ($266K) vs candle [3] ($170K) and candle [1] ($28K), suggesting the bulk of activity occurred in the 01:00 hour.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is nominally upward based on the 218% 24h price gain, but the medium-term context is 30 days of complete stagnation followed by a sudden spike — this is not organic trend development. The candle data itself shows a bearish reversal in candle [2] after candle [3]'s bullish close.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

23%

Sell

77%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000027 (candle [3] low)

Major support

$0.000022 (candle [2] low — recent floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000045 (candle [3] high — recent peak in OHLC data)

Major resistance

$0.000236 (current reported price — if accurate, represents a major extension above OHLC range)

The OHLC data and the reported current price are significantly misaligned (~5x difference), making reliable level identification difficult. If the current price of $0.000236 is accurate, it represents a massive extension above the recent OHLC range, with no established resistance above. Support would be the OHLC range ($0.000022–$0.000045). This discrepancy is itself a major red flag.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish engulfing / shooting star in candle [2] after bullish candle [3]
  • Volume climax in candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline — exhaustion signal
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden price explosion — classic pump-and-dump setup
  • OHLC low > high in candle [1] — data integrity error suggesting possible feed manipulation
  • Price reported at ~$0.000236 while OHLC candles show range of $0.000022–$0.000045 — severe data discrepancy

Liquidity

Liquidity

$59,677.77

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $59.68K on PumpSwap (pair: HSecGj5LTHcFuRnw5XrkbCt1srWSVmCQbHvVCN68oqRY). The 24h combined volume of ~$483.7K represents approximately 8.1x the total liquidity pool — an extreme ratio indicating severe slippage risk for any meaningful position. The net flow is strongly negative: $371K in sells vs. $113K in buys, a 3.3:1 ratio. Unique sellers (1,890) outnumber unique buyers (558) by 3.4:1. This is a clear distribution event — many wallets are selling into a thin market. The FDV of $278K vs. liquidity of $59.68K means the market cap is ~4.7x the available liquidity, making large exits extremely costly. Any significant sell order will cause catastrophic price impact.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (indivisible, 0 decimals)

FDV

$278,110 (per trading analytics; metadata reports $0.00 — discrepancy noted)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    218% 24h price surge and 358% 1h gain with no fundamental backing. Extreme volatility is confirmed by the price action and the massive divergence between buy and sell volumes.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $59.68K against $483K in 24h volume (8.1x turnover). Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage. Exit liquidity is critically limited.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental tokenomic absurdity and data inconsistencies
  • 30 days of zero activity followed by sudden pump — textbook pump-and-dump pattern
  • 76.7% sell pressure ($371K) vs. 23.3% buy pressure ($113K) — active distribution event
  • Only $59.68K liquidity against $483K 24h volume — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • No verified contract, no description, no team disclosure
  • OHLC data inconsistencies suggest possible data feed issues or manipulation
  • Holder concentration data (0%) is internally inconsistent — true distribution unknown

Mitigating factors

  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair — some baseline liquidity exists
  • Rapid holder growth (47 → 1,063) shows genuine market interest, however short-lived
  • No confirmed sniper activity from available data
  • Possible spam flag is 'false' per metadata

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the extreme risks of micro-cap meme tokens, pump-and-dump dynamics, and thin liquidity markets. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. The overwhelming evidence points to a coordinated pump event with active distribution. This is NOT financial advice.

SMIRKCAT presents as a high-risk, likely manipulated micro-cap meme token with no verifiable fundamentals. The token's unusual structure (supply of 1, 0 decimals), 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and unknown authority status combine to create a profile consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. There is no credible bull case beyond short-term momentum trading, and even that carries extreme risk given the thin liquidity.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Short-term momentum continuation: If the viral meme narrative gains traction on social media and new buyers continue to enter, the price could sustain elevated levels briefly. The 1,063 new holders in 24h demonstrate that the token can attract attention.

  • Viral meme adoption on Twitter/X or Telegram
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Influencer promotion driving new buyer inflow
  • Thin liquidity amplifying any buy pressure

Base Case

Continued volatility with gradual price decay: The token experiences continued high volatility over the next 24–72 hours as remaining momentum traders cycle in and out, followed by a gradual return toward pre-pump price levels as sell pressure overwhelms thin buy-side liquidity.

  • No major new catalysts emerge
  • Liquidity remains at current levels (~$59.68K)
  • Sell pressure continues to dominate (>60% sell volume)
  • No authority-based intervention (rug pull) occurs in the short term

Bear Case

High probability

Rapid collapse: The pump exhausts, early holders complete their distribution, and the token returns to or below pre-pump levels (~$0.000022–$0.000045 per OHLC data, or lower). With $371K already sold vs. $113K bought, the distribution is well advanced. Liquidity could be withdrawn entirely.

  • Overwhelming sell pressure (76.7%) continues as early holders exit
  • Liquidity withdrawal by the pool creator
  • No fundamental value or use case to sustain price
  • Mutable contract — potential for authority-based rug pull
  • 30-day dormancy pattern suggests this is a recycled or abandoned token being pumped

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 11, 02:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-11 02:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (USD)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Trading volume and wallet analytics (24h)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental data inconsistencies across all metrics (concentration, FDV, holder distribution)
  • Top holders data unavailable — whale map cannot be properly constructed
  • Sniper data unavailable — smart money analysis is limited to aggregate trading metrics
  • OHLC candle values are inconsistent with the reported current price (~5x discrepancy), suggesting data feed issues
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — authority risk cannot be fully quantified
  • FDV reported as $0.00 in metadata but $278K in trading analytics — data source conflict
  • Historical holder data shows 30 days of identical values (47 holders) which may indicate data collection gaps rather than true stagnation
  • The 24h price change metrics (5m: 0%, 6h: 0%, 24h: 0%) conflict with the reported 218% 24h change — data inconsistency

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors, delays, or inconsistencies. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk of total loss. Never invest more than you can afford to lose. The analyst has no position in this token.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Smirk Cat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,063 addresses (2026-07-11 02:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Smirk Cat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Smirk Cat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-11 02:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $59,677.77. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Smirk Cat (SMIRKCAT)?

The token has surged 218% in 24h and 358% in the last hour alone, driven almost entirely by sell-side volume ($371K sells vs. $113K buys). This divergence — price up while sells dominate — is a hallmark of wash trading or coordinated pump activity. With only $59.68K in total liquidity against $483K in combined 24h volume, the market is extremely thin. A sharp reversion is highly probable once pump momentum exhausts. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000022 to $0.000447.

Is SMIRKCAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the extreme risks of micro-cap meme tokens, pump-and-dump dynamics, and thin liquidity markets. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. The overwhelming evidence points to a coordinated pump event with active distribution. This is NOT financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding SMIRKCAT?

Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental tokenomic absurdity and data inconsistencies • 30 days of zero activity followed by sudden pump — textbook pump-and-dump pattern

← Back to all predictions

Questions about SMIRKCAT?