SMIRKCAT

Smirk Cat Price Today & AI Analysis

SMIRKCAT
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 11, 2026

Fjc4SdpzXBdmSchmnpAtCLwpS8VobzSAVrMmy5YNpump

$0.054264

-0.33%

FDV $4,263

LiveContract:Fjc4SdpzXBdmSchmnpAtCLwpS8VobzSAVrMmy5YNpumpChain:SolanaHolders:392Market cap:$4,263

More tokens on Solana

ARGENTINA

ARGENTINA

Argentina

$0.0537180.3%
MC $3.7K
ballish

ballish

ballish

$0.0555382.4%
MC $5.5K
QUAKE

QUAKE

Quake

$0.0539010.6%
MC $3.8K
MATH

MATH

Math Street

$0.0560101.4%
MC $5.6K
SOLS

SOLS

Solana Supercycle

$0.0596753.4%
MC $9.6K
TRUMP

TRUMP

OFFICIAL TRUMP

$2.531.4%
MC $2.53B

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about SMIRKCAT

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 11, 02:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$59,678

Holders

1,063

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

SMIRKCAT (Smirk Cat) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: Fjc4SdpzXBdmSchmnpAtCLwpS8VobzSAVrMmy5YNpump) with a total supply of 1 token (decimals: 0), currently trading at ~$0.000236 on PumpSwap. The token exhibits extreme anomalies: a total supply of 1 indivisible unit, a reported FDV of $278K vs. a price data FDV of $0.00, 96% holder growth in 24h (from 47 to 1,063 holders), a 218% 24h price surge, and massively skewed sell pressure (76.7% sell vs. 23.3% buy). The top-10/top-100 holder concentration is reported as 0%, which is internally inconsistent with a supply of 1 and is a strong data anomaly. The contract is unverified, mutable, and the update authority is unknown. These combined signals indicate an extremely high-risk, likely manipulated or experimental token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of exactly 1 indivisible token (0 decimals) — highly unusual and creates severe data inconsistencies
96% holder growth in 24 hours (47 → 1,063 holders) after 30 days of complete stagnation at 47 holders
Extreme sell pressure: 76.7% sell volume ($371K) vs. 23.3% buy volume ($113K) in 24h
218% 24h price surge despite overwhelming sell dominance — suggests coordinated price manipulation
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — maximum rug risk from authority perspective
OHLC candle data shows price values inconsistent with the reported current price, suggesting data feed anomalies

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has surged 218% in 24h and 358% in the last hour alone, driven almost entirely by sell-side volume ($371K sells vs. $113K buys). This divergence — price up while sells dominate — is a hallmark of wash trading or coordinated pump activity. With only $59.68K in total liquidity against $483K in combined 24h volume, the market is extremely thin. A sharp reversion is highly probable once pump momentum exhausts.

Target low$0.000022
Target high$0.000447
Support: $0.000027 (candle [3] low), $0.000022 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.000041 (candle [1] high / candle [2] open), $0.000045 (candle [3] high — recent peak)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The token sat dormant at 47 holders for 30 consecutive days before an abrupt spike. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump. With mutable authority, no verified contract, overwhelming sell pressure, and razor-thin liquidity, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a credible use case or community emerges.

Catalysts
  • Unexpected viral meme adoption (low probability)
  • Liquidity injection by a major market maker
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all tokens

Bullish factors

  • 218% 24h price surge demonstrates short-term momentum
  • Rapid holder growth from 47 to 1,063 in 24h shows sudden community interest
  • Listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair

Bearish factors

  • 76.7% sell pressure ($371K) vastly outweighs buy pressure ($113K) in 24h
  • Only $59.68K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • 30 days of zero activity (47 holders, no change) before sudden spike — classic pump setup
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk is very high
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental tokenomic absurdity
  • Unverified contract, no description, no on-chain social proof
  • OHLC data inconsistencies suggest possible data feed manipulation or errors
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severe data inconsistencies (total supply of 1 with 1,063 holders and 0% concentration), OHLC values that do not align with the reported current price, unknown update authority, and the absence of sniper data. The token's mechanics are opaque and the data feed appears unreliable.

SMIRKCAT call history

Full track record →
Jul 11bearish
24h-71.0%
7d-95.6%
30d-98.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Three hourly candles are available (00:00–02:00 UTC on 2026-07-11). NOTE: The OHLC values (~$0.000022–$0.000045) are inconsistent with the reported current price of ~$0.000236, suggesting a data feed discrepancy or that the price spike occurred after the last candle close. Within the available candles: Candle [3] (00:00): O=$0.0000316, H=$0.0000447, L=$0.0000273, C=$0.0000447 — bullish close at the high. Candle [2] (01:00): O=$0.0000407, H=$0.0000407, L=$0.0000221, C=$0.0000316 — bearish engulfing / shooting star pattern, closed below open. Candle [1] (02:00): O=$0.0000316, H=$0.0000407, L=$0.000263 (anomalous — L > H, likely a data error), C=$0.0000407 — data integrity issue in this candle. Volume spiked dramatically in candle [2] ($266K) vs candle [3] ($170K) and candle [1] ($28K), suggesting the bulk of activity occurred in the 01:00 hour.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 23%Sell 77%

Short-term trend is nominally upward based on the 218% 24h price gain, but the medium-term context is 30 days of complete stagnation followed by a sudden spike — this is not organic trend development. The candle data itself shows a bearish reversal in candle [2] after candle [3]'s bullish close.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000027 (candle [3] low)
Major$0.000022 (candle [2] low — recent floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000045 (candle [3] high — recent peak in OHLC data)
Major$0.000236 (current reported price — if accurate, represents a major extension above OHLC range)

The OHLC data and the reported current price are significantly misaligned (~5x difference), making reliable level identification difficult. If the current price of $0.000236 is accurate, it represents a massive extension above the recent OHLC range, with no established resistance above. Support would be the OHLC range ($0.000022–$0.000045). This discrepancy is itself a major red flag.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish engulfing / shooting star in candle [2] after bullish candle [3]
  • Volume climax in candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline — exhaustion signal
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden price explosion — classic pump-and-dump setup
  • OHLC low > high in candle [1] — data integrity error suggesting possible feed manipulation
  • Price reported at ~$0.000236 while OHLC candles show range of $0.000022–$0.000045 — severe data discrepancy

Total holders1,063
24h Δ+96
7d Δ+96
30d Δ+96
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth and price surge are simultaneous and abrupt, both occurring within the last 24 hours after 30 days of complete stagnation. This correlation is suspicious — it suggests a coordinated event (pump campaign, bot activity, or airdrop-style distribution) rather than organic growth. The 96% holder growth in a single day (from 47 to 1,063, a gain of +1,016 holders) is extreme.

The historical holder data shows exactly 47 holders every single day from 2026-06-11 through 2026-07-10 — 30 consecutive days of zero net change. Then, within the last 24 hours, holders surged by +1,016 (+96%) to reach 1,063. This is not organic growth; it is a sudden, coordinated event. The acquisition method breakdown (1,052 via swap, 11 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) suggests most new holders bought in via DEX swaps during the pump. The distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top10/top100 concentration of 0% are internally inconsistent with a token that has 1,063 holders and a total supply of 1 — this is a data reporting anomaly, likely due to the unusual tokenomics (1 token, 0 decimals).

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

No top holders data available

Data unavailable — top holders endpoint returned no results

0.00%

No top holder data is available from the data feed. The reported top10 and top100 concentration of 0% is internally inconsistent with a token having a total supply of 1 indivisible unit — logically, whoever holds that 1 token holds 100% of supply. This is almost certainly a data reporting failure caused by the unusual tokenomics (total supply = 1, decimals = 0). The true distribution is unknown but by definition extremely concentrated. The 'distribution health' is marked as very_concentrated to reflect this reality. Investors should treat the 0% concentration figures as a data artifact, not a sign of healthy distribution.

Liquidity$59,680
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$112,560
Sell$371,160
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers558
Unique sellers1,890

Liquidity is critically shallow at $59.68K on PumpSwap (pair: HSecGj5LTHcFuRnw5XrkbCt1srWSVmCQbHvVCN68oqRY). The 24h combined volume of ~$483.7K represents approximately 8.1x the total liquidity pool — an extreme ratio indicating severe slippage risk for any meaningful position. The net flow is strongly negative: $371K in sells vs. $113K in buys, a 3.3:1 ratio. Unique sellers (1,890) outnumber unique buyers (558) by 3.4:1. This is a clear distribution event — many wallets are selling into a thin market. The FDV of $278K vs. liquidity of $59.68K means the market cap is ~4.7x the available liquidity, making large exits extremely costly. Any significant sell order will cause catastrophic price impact.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (indivisible, 0 decimals)
FDV$278,110 (per trading analytics; metadata reports $0.00 — discrepancy noted)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

SMIRKCAT has a total supply of exactly 1 token with 0 decimal places — this is an extremely unusual tokenomic structure that makes fractional ownership impossible in the traditional sense. The contract is unverified, mutable (mutable: true), and the update authority is listed as 'unknown'. A mutable contract with an unknown update authority represents maximum authority risk — the creator could potentially alter token metadata or parameters. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The FDV discrepancy ($0.00 in metadata vs. $278K in trading analytics) further undermines data reliability. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address (Fjc4SdpzXBdmSchmnpAtCLwpS8VobzSAVrMmy5YNpump) confirms this was launched via PumpFun. No description, no verified contract, and no disclosed team information compound the risk profile.

Volatility
high

218% 24h price surge and 358% 1h gain with no fundamental backing. Extreme volatility is confirmed by the price action and the massive divergence between buy and sell volumes.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $59.68K against $483K in 24h volume (8.1x turnover). Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage. Exit liquidity is critically limited.

Concentration
high

Total supply of 1 indivisible token means true ownership is by definition 100% concentrated. The reported 0% top-10/top-100 concentration is a data artifact. Top holder data is unavailable, making true distribution assessment impossible.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump, combined with 76.7% sell pressure and 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio, strongly implies early holders are dumping into new buyers. Risk is elevated even without confirmed sniper data.

Authority
high

Contract is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. This represents maximum rug-pull risk from an authority perspective — the creator retains unknown powers over the token.

Key risks

  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental tokenomic absurdity and data inconsistencies
  • 30 days of zero activity followed by sudden pump — textbook pump-and-dump pattern
  • 76.7% sell pressure ($371K) vs. 23.3% buy pressure ($113K) — active distribution event
  • Only $59.68K liquidity against $483K 24h volume — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • No verified contract, no description, no team disclosure
  • OHLC data inconsistencies suggest possible data feed issues or manipulation
  • Holder concentration data (0%) is internally inconsistent — true distribution unknown

Mitigating factors

  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair — some baseline liquidity exists
  • Rapid holder growth (47 → 1,063) shows genuine market interest, however short-lived
  • No confirmed sniper activity from available data
  • Possible spam flag is 'false' per metadata
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the extreme risks of micro-cap meme tokens, pump-and-dump dynamics, and thin liquidity markets. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. The overwhelming evidence points to a coordinated pump event with active distribution. This is NOT financial advice.

SMIRKCAT presents as a high-risk, likely manipulated micro-cap meme token with no verifiable fundamentals. The token's unusual structure (supply of 1, 0 decimals), 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and unknown authority status combine to create a profile consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. There is no credible bull case beyond short-term momentum trading, and even that carries extreme risk given the thin liquidity.

Bull case (low)

Short-term momentum continuation: If the viral meme narrative gains traction on social media and new buyers continue to enter, the price could sustain elevated levels briefly. The 1,063 new holders in 24h demonstrate that the token can attract attention.

  • Viral meme adoption on Twitter/X or Telegram
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Influencer promotion driving new buyer inflow
  • Thin liquidity amplifying any buy pressure

Base case

Continued volatility with gradual price decay: The token experiences continued high volatility over the next 24–72 hours as remaining momentum traders cycle in and out, followed by a gradual return toward pre-pump price levels as sell pressure overwhelms thin buy-side liquidity.

  • No major new catalysts emerge
  • Liquidity remains at current levels (~$59.68K)
  • Sell pressure continues to dominate (>60% sell volume)
  • No authority-based intervention (rug pull) occurs in the short term

Bear case (high)

Rapid collapse: The pump exhausts, early holders complete their distribution, and the token returns to or below pre-pump levels (~$0.000022–$0.000045 per OHLC data, or lower). With $371K already sold vs. $113K bought, the distribution is well advanced. Liquidity could be withdrawn entirely.

  • Overwhelming sell pressure (76.7%) continues as early holders exit
  • Liquidity withdrawal by the pool creator
  • No fundamental value or use case to sustain price
  • Mutable contract — potential for authority-based rug pull
  • 30-day dormancy pattern suggests this is a recycled or abandoned token being pumped

GeneratedJul 11, 02:17 AM
Data freshnessOHLC data current to 2026-07-11T02:00:00Z; holder data current to 2026-07-11 (intraday); price data reflects snapshot at time of query
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (USD)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Trading volume and wallet analytics (24h)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental data inconsistencies across all metrics (concentration, FDV, holder distribution)
  • Top holders data unavailable — whale map cannot be properly constructed
  • Sniper data unavailable — smart money analysis is limited to aggregate trading metrics
  • OHLC candle values are inconsistent with the reported current price (~5x discrepancy), suggesting data feed issues
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — authority risk cannot be fully quantified
  • FDV reported as $0.00 in metadata but $278K in trading analytics — data source conflict
  • Historical holder data shows 30 days of identical values (47 holders) which may indicate data collection gaps rather than true stagnation
  • The 24h price change metrics (5m: 0%, 6h: 0%, 24h: 0%) conflict with the reported 218% 24h change — data inconsistency

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors, delays, or inconsistencies. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk of total loss. Never invest more than you can afford to lose. The analyst has no position in this token.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (indivisible, 0 decimals)

Key Risks

•Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
•Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental tokenomic absurdity and data inconsistencies
•30 days of zero activity followed by sudden pump — textbook pump-and-dump pattern
•76.7% sell pressure ($371K) vs. 23.3% buy pressure ($113K) — active distribution event

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader trading data paints a concerning picture: 7,123 sells vs. 2,105 buys in 24h, with 1,890 unique sellers vs. 558 unique buyers. This 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio suggests that whoever accumulated early is aggressively distributing. The 30-day dormancy period followed by a sudden holder explosion (47 → 1,063) is consistent with a coordinated distribution event.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Cannot be determined from sniper data. However, the extreme sell-to-buy ratio (76.7% sell pressure) and the pattern of 30 days of stagnation followed by a sudden spike strongly suggest early holders are distributing into new buyers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Smirk Cat (SMIRKCAT)?

The token has surged 218% in 24h and 358% in the last hour alone, driven almost entirely by sell-side volume ($371K sells vs. $113K buys). This divergence — price up while sells dominate — is a hallmark of wash trading or coordinated pump activity. With only $59.68K in total liquidity against $483K in combined 24h volume, the market is extremely thin. A sharp reversion is highly probable once pump momentum exhausts. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000022 to $0.000447.

Is SMIRKCAT a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the extreme risks of micro-cap meme tokens, pump-and-dump dynamics, and thin liquidity markets. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. The overwhelming evidence points to a coordinated pump event with active distribution. This is NOT financial advice.

How are SMIRKCAT holders trending?

Smirk Cat currently has 1,063 holders and is growing (24h: 96, 7d: 96, 30d: 96). The historical holder data shows exactly 47 holders every single day from 2026-06-11 through 2026-07-10 — 30 consecutive days of zero net change. Then, within the last 24 hours, holders surged by +1,016 (+96%) to reach 1,063. This is not organic growth; it is a sudden, coordinated event. The acquisition method breakdown (1,052 via swap, 11 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) suggests most new holders bought in via DEX swaps during the pump. The distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top10/top100 concentration of 0% are internally inconsistent with a token that has 1,063 holders and a total supply of 1 — this is a data reporting anomaly, likely due to the unusual tokenomics (1 token, 0 decimals).

What does sniper activity look like for SMIRKCAT?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding SMIRKCAT?

Mutable contract with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates fundamental tokenomic absurdity and data inconsistencies • 30 days of zero activity followed by sudden pump — textbook pump-and-dump pattern

← Back to all predictions

Track SMIRKCAT