glippy

Glippy (Official) Price Prediction 2026

glippy
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 20, 2026

5NgDxD1en3YXvS9amAtgb15nc4oRfuGxomcAfu4wpump

$0.057199

+1.37%

FDV $7,193

LiveContract:5NgDxD1en3YXvS9amAtgb15nc4oRfuGxomcAfu4wpumpChain:SolanaHolders:1,419Market cap:$7,193

More tokens on Solana

CATE

CATE

Catecoin

$0.04000.9%
MC $38.59M
Doom

Doom

Doom

$0.00403013167.5%
MC $3.91M
KRIS

KRIS

KRIS

$0.05305299.4%
MC $3.0K
SKHY

SKHY

SK Hynix - Backpack Securities

$148.987.4%
MC $3.88M
CAGE

CAGE

Future Colosseum

$0.00259175.9%
MC $2.59M
MU

MU

Micron Technology - Backpack Securities

$868.719.8%
MC $6.85M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about glippy

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 20, 09:19 AM
FDV

$241,839

Liquidity

$53,139

Holders

1,248

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Glippy (glippy) is a Solana meme/utility token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$241K at time of analysis. The token experienced an extraordinary 566% price spike in 24 hours, but the on-chain data reveals severe red flags: extreme sell pressure (73.7% of volume), a massive discrepancy between reported holder counts (1,248 current vs. 22 historical), near-zero liquidity ($53K), and a 5-minute price drop of -20.7% at analysis time. The holder history shows 22 holders for 30 consecutive days with no change, then a sudden jump of +1,226 in the last hour — a highly anomalous pattern suggesting either a data artifact or coordinated activity. No top holder data, no sniper data, and unknown update authority compound the risk profile.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
566%+ 24h price spike followed by immediate -20.7% 5-minute reversal
Holder count jumped from 22 to 1,248 in a single hour after 30 days of zero growth — highly anomalous
Extreme sell pressure: 73.7% sell volume, 5,653 sells vs. 1,924 buys in 24h
Very shallow liquidity at $53.14K against $241K FDV — high slippage risk
No top holder data available, preventing whale concentration analysis
Token is mutable=false but update authority is unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is in a sharp post-pump reversal. The most recent hourly candle (09:00 UTC) opened at $0.000199, spiked to $0.000311, then crashed to close at $0.0000275 — a massive bearish engulfing/wick pattern. The 5-minute change at analysis time is -20.7%. With 73.7% sell pressure and only $53K in liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome.

Target low$0.000020
Target high$0.000100
Support: $0.0000247 (hourly candle low, 08:00 UTC), $0.0000183 (hourly candle low, 09:00 UTC)
Resistance: $0.000199 (09:00 open / 08:00 close), $0.000311 (09:00 hourly high — pump peak)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Unless new catalysts emerge (exchange listing, viral social media, product launch), the token is likely to retrace the majority of its pump gains. The 30-day holder stagnation at 22 wallets prior to the sudden spike suggests no organic community growth. Sell pressure dominates and liquidity is insufficient to support price recovery.

Catalysts
  • Genuine product launch or extension release could attract organic buyers
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally could lift all boats temporarily
  • Whale accumulation at depressed prices (not currently evidenced in data)

Bullish factors

  • 566% 24h price appreciation demonstrates speculative interest exists
  • 1,924 buy transactions in 24h shows some buyer participation
  • Mutable=false reduces one category of rug risk
  • Social links (Twitter, website) suggest some project presence

Bearish factors

  • 73.7% sell pressure — sellers vastly outnumber buyers (5,653 sells vs. 1,924 buys)
  • 5-minute price drop of -20.7% at analysis time signals active dumping
  • Hourly candle shows price crashed from $0.000311 high to $0.0000275 close — ~91% intra-candle drop
  • Only $53.14K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage for any meaningful trade
  • 30 days of zero holder growth (stuck at 22) prior to sudden spike is deeply suspicious
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Update authority unknown — cannot confirm authority renouncement
  • Unverified contract
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; (2) the holder data anomaly (22→1,248 in one hour) makes it impossible to assess true community size; (3) no top holder or sniper data available; (4) the token is extremely new to active trading, making price behavior highly unpredictable.

glippy call history

Full track record →
Jun 20bearish
24h+86.2%
7d-94.7%
30d-96.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (08:00 UTC): O=$0.0000275, H=$0.000210, L=$0.0000247, C=$0.000199 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting a pump from near-zero levels. Candle [1] (09:00 UTC): O=$0.000199, H=$0.000311, L=$0.0000183, C=$0.0000275 — a massive bearish reversal candle (shooting star / bearish engulfing equivalent) where price spiked to $0.000311 then collapsed to close at $0.0000275, erasing nearly all gains. This two-candle sequence is a classic pump-and-dump pattern: rapid markup followed by immediate distribution and collapse.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trendstable
Buy 26%Sell 74%

The short-term trend has reversed sharply bearish after the pump peak of $0.000311. The closing price of the most recent candle ($0.0000275) is near the session low, indicating strong downward momentum. With only 2 candles of data, medium-term trend is also assessed as bearish given the structural collapse.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000247 (08:00 candle low)
Major$0.0000183 (09:00 candle low — session floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000199 (09:00 open / 08:00 close — breakdown level)
Major$0.000311 (09:00 candle high — pump peak)

The pump peak at $0.000311 represents major resistance. The $0.000199 level (prior candle close) is now immediate resistance after the breakdown. Support is thin given shallow liquidity; the session lows of $0.0000183–$0.0000247 are the only identifiable floor levels from available data.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on 09:00 candle — classic distribution signal
  • Two-candle pump-and-dump sequence: rapid markup followed by immediate collapse
  • High volume on both candles with price ending near session lows — bearish volume confirmation
  • Lower close than open on most recent candle despite higher high — strong bearish reversal

Total holders1,248
24h Δ+1226
7d Δ+1226
30d Δ+1226
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The reported holder count jumped from 22 to 1,248 (+1,226, +98%) in a single hour, coinciding exactly with the 566% price spike. This correlation is suspicious rather than organic — it may reflect a data indexing artifact, bot wallets, or coordinated activity timed with the pump. Historically, 22 holders held steady for 30 consecutive days with zero net change, which is itself anomalous for any active token.

The holder data presents a major anomaly: for 30 consecutive days (May 21 – June 19, 2026), the holder count was exactly 22 with zero net change on every single day. Then, in the 1-hour window coinciding with the price pump, 1,226 new holders were added. This pattern is inconsistent with organic community growth. Possible explanations include: (1) the token was dormant/pre-launch for 30 days and just launched publicly; (2) data indexing lag that batch-updated; (3) coordinated wallet creation to simulate community growth. The acquisition breakdown (1,229 via swap, 19 via transfer) suggests most holders bought in during the pump event. No distribution data (whales/sharks/dolphins) is available, and top holder concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data gap rather than genuine equal distribution.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

No top holder data is available for Glippy. The reported top 10 and top 100 concentration of 0% is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of equal distribution — it is statistically impossible for 1,248 holders to each hold exactly equal shares of a 1B supply token. Without whale map data, concentration risk cannot be properly assessed. Given the token launched on PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump'), it is likely that early wallets hold significant supply. The distribution is classified as 'concentrated' as a conservative assumption given data unavailability and the PumpFun launch mechanism. Sentiment is 'mixed' given the extreme sell pressure observed in trading data.

Liquidity$53,140
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$104,110
Sell$291,260
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers701
Unique sellers1,630

Liquidity is critically shallow at $53.14K against a $241K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 22%, which is very low. Any trade of meaningful size will cause significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $291.26K in sell volume vs. $104.11K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$187K. Unique sellers (1,630) outnumber unique buyers (701) by 2.3:1. The total of 7,577 transactions (1,924 buys + 5,653 sells) in 24h on a token with only $53K liquidity indicates extreme volatility and wash-trading risk. The pair trades on PumpSwap (Ad5krvNLCkJcbGvSEu2Nht5TtyiZUE1BQ8r5ZzuD6bwE), which is a low-liquidity venue. Market health is poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000
FDV$241,838.50

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is 1,000,000,000 (1B) tokens with 6 decimals — a standard PumpFun launch configuration. The FDV at time of analysis is ~$241.8K. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, preventing assessment of mint and freeze authority status. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed authority renouncement, mint and freeze risks remain unknown. The token is not verified and the contract is unverified. The description claims 10% of supply for development and 90% for World Bicycle Relief — this allocation claim cannot be verified on-chain from the provided data and should be treated with skepticism given the adversarial data warning. The token launched via PumpFun (mint suffix 'pump'), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism before graduating to a DEX.

Volatility
high

566% 24h price spike followed by -91% intra-candle collapse and -20.7% in 5 minutes. Extreme volatility consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics.

Liquidity
high

Only $53.14K total liquidity against $241K FDV. High slippage risk on any trade. Net outflow of ~$187K in 24h further depletes liquidity.

Concentration
high

No top holder data available. PumpFun launch mechanism typically results in high early-wallet concentration. The 0% reported concentration for top 10/100 is a data gap, not genuine distribution.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but trading analytics show 5,653 sells vs. 1,924 buys — a 2.9:1 sell-to-buy ratio strongly suggesting early participants are dumping into retail buyers.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority renouncement. Token is mutable=false which partially mitigates metadata risk, but full authority status is unverifiable from provided data.

Key risks

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: 566% spike followed by immediate -91% intra-candle collapse
  • Extreme sell pressure: 73.7% of 24h volume is sells; 1,630 sellers vs. 701 buyers
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($53K) — large trades will cause severe slippage
  • 30-day holder stagnation at 22 wallets then sudden +1,226 in 1 hour — highly anomalous
  • No top holder data — cannot assess whale concentration or insider holdings
  • Unknown update authority — mint/freeze authority status unverifiable
  • Unverified contract on an unverified token
  • Charitable allocation claim (90% to World Bicycle Relief) is unverifiable on-chain

Mitigating factors

  • Token is mutable=false — metadata cannot be altered post-deployment
  • Social presence exists (Twitter, website, Moralis links)
  • 1,924 buy transactions in 24h shows some genuine buyer interest
  • PumpFun launch mechanism provides some initial price discovery structure
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for total loss. The combination of pump-and-dump price action, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder data, and unverifiable authority status makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

Glippy presents as a high-risk speculative token with characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump event. The 566% price spike, immediate reversal, extreme sell pressure, and anomalous holder data make this a very high risk profile. Any investment thesis must be grounded in pure speculation rather than fundamentals, as on-chain data does not support a sustainable price appreciation narrative at this time.

Bull case (low)

If Glippy represents a genuine AI-utility product (browser extension + MCP for AI discoverability) with real development activity, a successful product launch could attract organic users and buyers. A viral social media moment or influencer endorsement could reignite speculative interest. Recovery from the post-pump dip to the $0.000199 level would represent ~7x from the current close.

  • Genuine product launch with demonstrable utility (AI page analysis extension)
  • Viral social media traction on Twitter/crypto communities
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Whale accumulation at depressed post-pump prices

Base case

The token stabilizes at a significantly lower price than the pump peak ($0.000311) but above near-zero, finding a small community of holders. Price oscillates in a narrow range with low volume as speculative interest fades. FDV settles in the $20K–$80K range if any genuine utility narrative gains traction.

  • Some genuine buyers remain committed to the project narrative
  • Liquidity is not fully drained from the PumpSwap pool
  • Development team delivers at least a basic version of the described browser extension
  • No additional large-scale dumping from early wallets

Bear case (high)

The token continues its post-pump collapse, retracing to near-zero levels. Remaining holders sell into any minor bounces. Liquidity dries up as the PumpSwap pool is drained. The token becomes illiquid and effectively worthless, consistent with the majority of PumpFun launches.

  • Continued extreme sell pressure (73.7% of volume)
  • Shallow liquidity unable to absorb selling
  • No evidence of organic community growth prior to pump event
  • Unverifiable charitable allocation claim damages credibility if investigated
  • Post-pump holder fatigue and loss of speculative interest

GeneratedJun 20, 09:19 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers only 2 hourly candles (08:00–10:00 UTC June 20, 2026). Historical holder data covers May 21 – June 19, 2026 (30 days daily). Top holder and sniper data are unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, authority, supply)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (24h volume, buys/sells, liquidity)
  • Hourly OHLC price candles (2 candles available)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder data (unavailable — not provided)
  • Sniper analysis data (unavailable — not provided)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — severely limits technical analysis
  • No top holder data — whale concentration and insider holdings cannot be assessed
  • No sniper data — early buyer PnL and concentration cannot be quantified
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Holder count anomaly (22→1,248 in 1 hour) may reflect data indexing issues rather than real activity
  • Top 10/100 concentration reported as 0% — likely a data gap, not genuine equal distribution
  • Charitable allocation claim (90% to World Bicycle Relief) is unverifiable from provided data
  • Token name/description treated as untrusted creator-supplied data per analysis ground rules

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched tokens on decentralized exchanges, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed was provided externally and may contain inaccuracies, manipulation attempts, or data gaps. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000

Key Risks

•Pump-and-dump pattern: 566% spike followed by immediate -91% intra-candle collapse
•Extreme sell pressure: 73.7% of 24h volume is sells; 1,630 sellers vs. 701 buyers
•Critically shallow liquidity ($53K) — large trades will cause severe slippage
•30-day holder stagnation at 22 wallets then sudden +1,226 in 1 hour — highly anomalous

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for Glippy. Smart money signals cannot be assessed from sniper metrics. However, the broader trading data tells a concerning story: 5,653 sell transactions vs. 1,924 buy transactions in 24h, with 1,630 unique sellers vs. 701 unique buyers. This ratio suggests early participants are aggressively distributing to late buyers. The pump-and-dump candle pattern further supports the interpretation that informed/early participants sold into the price spike.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

Cannot be determined from sniper data (unavailable). Inferred from trading analytics: early buyers appear to be in distribution mode given the extreme sell-to-buy ratio of 2.9:1 by transaction count and 2.8:1 by volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Glippy (Official) (glippy)?

The token is in a sharp post-pump reversal. The most recent hourly candle (09:00 UTC) opened at $0.000199, spiked to $0.000311, then crashed to close at $0.0000275 — a massive bearish engulfing/wick pattern. The 5-minute change at analysis time is -20.7%. With 73.7% sell pressure and only $53K in liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000020 to $0.000100.

Is glippy a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for total loss. The combination of pump-and-dump price action, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder data, and unverifiable authority status makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

How are glippy holders trending?

Glippy (Official) currently has 1,248 holders and is growing (24h: 1226, 7d: 1226, 30d: 1226). The holder data presents a major anomaly: for 30 consecutive days (May 21 – June 19, 2026), the holder count was exactly 22 with zero net change on every single day. Then, in the 1-hour window coinciding with the price pump, 1,226 new holders were added. This pattern is inconsistent with organic community growth. Possible explanations include: (1) the token was dormant/pre-launch for 30 days and just launched publicly; (2) data indexing lag that batch-updated; (3) coordinated wallet creation to simulate community growth. The acquisition breakdown (1,229 via swap, 19 via transfer) suggests most holders bought in during the pump event. No distribution data (whales/sharks/dolphins) is available, and top holder concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data gap rather than genuine equal distribution.

What does sniper activity look like for glippy?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding glippy?

Pump-and-dump pattern: 566% spike followed by immediate -91% intra-candle collapse • Extreme sell pressure: 73.7% of 24h volume is sells; 1,630 sellers vs. 701 buyers • Critically shallow liquidity ($53K) — large trades will cause severe slippage

← Back to all predictions

Track glippy