JIGGLYPUFF

Jigglypuff Kingdom Price Today & AI Analysis

JIGGLYPUFF
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 30, 2026

AoKgjNMumZ2JjHFaGnrcKSnuTTRqrHWdKHhPMhzjpump

$0.041944

-6.92%

FDV $19,436

LiveContract:AoKgjNMumZ2JjHFaGnrcKSnuTTRqrHWdKHhPMhzjpumpChain:SolanaHolders:521Market cap:$19,436

More tokens on Solana

MIM

MIM

Magic Internet Money

$0.0418558.5%
MC $18.5K
BitBoy

BitBoy

The White Bull

$0.00011812.0%
MC $117.5K
LIMINAL

LIMINAL

Liminal Spaces

$0.05778514.0%
MC $7.8K
SHROOM

SHROOM

Shroom

$0.0433709.3%
MC $33.7K
Openhuman

Openhuman

Openhuman

$0.0596734.4%
MC $9.7K
TRUMP

TRUMP

OFFICIAL TRUMP

$2.6715.8%
MC $2.67B

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about JIGGLYPUFF

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 30, 03:19 PM
FDV

$98,710

Liquidity

$44,505

Holders

779

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Jigglypuff Kingdom (JIGGLYPUFF) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~999.9M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$98.7K (on-chain metadata) to ~$218K (trading analytics). The token is themed around a 'cute pink menace' collecting 1st Edition Jigglypuff Pokémon cards. As of analysis, the token is experiencing severe selling pressure with a 24h price decline of ~52.9%, extremely lopsided sell volume (73.4% sell vs 26.6% buy), and a current price of ~$0.0000987. Despite the price collapse, holder count has surged +281 (+36%) in 24h and +302 (+39%) in 7d, suggesting new buyers are entering at lower prices. Supply concentration is elevated with the top 10 holding 40.66% and top 100 holding 87.36%. No snipers were detected in the first 1000 blocks, which is a mild positive. The token carries very high risk overall.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
No sniper activity detected in first 1000 blocks — clean launch mechanics
Rapid holder growth (+36% in 24h, +39% in 7d) despite severe price decline
Mutable metadata is false, reducing certain manipulation vectors
PumpSwap-based liquidity pool with $44.5K total liquidity
Pokémon/nostalgia meme narrative with active social presence (Twitter, website)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has collapsed ~52.9% in 24h with sell pressure at 73.4% and 1,360 sells vs 801 buys. The most recent candle (15:00 UTC) closed at $0.0000987, near the session low of $0.0000954. Momentum is strongly bearish with no sign of reversal. Short-term price action is likely to remain under pressure unless buy volume dramatically increases.

Target low$0.000060
Target high$0.000145
Support: $0.0000954 (recent 24h low), $0.000080 (psychological round number), $0.000060 (extended downside target)
Resistance: $0.000145 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open), $0.000210 (candle [5] close / prior consolidation zone), $0.000287 (candle [4] close, recent swing high)

Medium term

neutral
7–30 days

Medium-term outlook depends on whether the meme narrative gains traction and whether the rapid holder growth translates into sustained demand. The 30-day holder trend was declining from ~629 to ~461 before the recent 24h surge, suggesting the token had been losing interest. A recovery above $0.000200 would be needed to signal a trend reversal.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media momentum around Pokémon/Jigglypuff narrative
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Whale accumulation at depressed prices
  • Listing on aggregators or influencer promotion

Bullish factors

  • No sniper activity — clean launch with no early dump risk from snipers
  • Holder count surging +36% in 24h and +39% in 7d, showing new interest
  • Meme narrative (Pokémon nostalgia) has proven viral potential in crypto
  • Price near multi-session lows may attract dip buyers
  • Mutable=false reduces certain rug vectors

Bearish factors

  • Severe 24h price decline of ~52.9% with no sign of reversal
  • Sell pressure dominates at 73.4% of 24h volume ($99.4K sells vs $36K buys)
  • Very thin liquidity at $44.5K — large orders will cause extreme slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 40.66% of supply — concentrated selling risk
  • 30-day holder trend was declining before the recent 24h spike
  • Unverified contract, update authority unknown
  • FDV of only ~$98.7K–$218K indicates extremely small market cap
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility (52.9% 24h drop), very thin liquidity ($44.5K), meme-driven price action with no fundamental valuation anchor, and the token's short observable history. The rapid holder surge in 24h is anomalous relative to the 30-day declining trend and may reflect speculative bottom-fishing rather than organic demand.

Deep Analysis

Reviewing the 24 hourly candles from 2026-05-29T16:00Z to 2026-05-30T15:00Z: The token traded in a relatively tight range of $0.000167–$0.000233 for the first ~20 candles (May 29 16:00 to May 30 11:00), then broke sharply higher in candle [4] (12:00 UTC, high $0.000325), followed by a rapid collapse over candles [3]–[1], closing at $0.0000987 — a new session low. The final three candles show a classic 'blow-off top and crash' pattern: a spike to $0.000325, a partial recovery to $0.000283, then a cascade down through $0.000144 and finally $0.0000987. Volume spiked dramatically in candles [4] ($8.9K), [3] ($13.2K), [2] ($40.7K), and [1] ($21.7K), confirming the sell-off was high-conviction. Earlier candles had very low volume ($169–$736), indicating thin trading before the pump.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 27%Sell 73%

Short-term trend is a sharp downtrend following a pump-and-dump pattern. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the 30-day holder decline and the price collapse from the recent spike high of $0.000325 to $0.0000987 — a ~70% retracement from the intraday peak.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000954 (candle [1] session low)
Major$0.000080 (psychological level below session low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000145 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open area)
Major$0.000210–$0.000215 (prior consolidation zone, candles [5]–[9])

The immediate support is the session low of $0.0000954 from candle [1]. A break below this opens the door to $0.000080 and lower. Immediate resistance is the $0.000144–$0.000145 zone where candle [1] opened and candle [2] closed. Major resistance sits at $0.000210–$0.000215, the prior multi-hour consolidation range. The $0.000287–$0.000325 zone represents the pump high and is very strong resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: tight consolidation ($0.000167–$0.000233) followed by spike to $0.000325 then crash to $0.0000987
  • High-volume bearish engulfing: candle [2] (high $0.000218, close $0.000144) engulfs prior candle range on 3x volume
  • Candle [1] shows long upper wick relative to body, confirming sellers dominate any bounce attempts
  • Volume climax in candle [2] ($40.7K) — highest volume candle — coincides with peak sell-off, possible capitulation signal
  • Prior candles [8], [12], [15], [16] show very low volume doji-like candles indicating lack of conviction before the pump

Total holders779
24h Δ+36
7d Δ+39
30d Δ+18
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Inverse correlation observed: holder count is growing rapidly (+36% in 24h, +39% in 7d) while price has collapsed ~52.9% in 24h. This suggests new buyers are entering at depressed prices (bottom-fishing), but the 30-day historical data shows the token was in a declining holder trend from ~629 (May 1) to ~461 (May 28) before the sudden 24h surge to 779. The acceleration in holder growth is very recent and coincides with the price crash, not a sustained organic trend.

The 30-day historical holder data reveals a persistent declining trend: from 629 holders on May 1 to a low of 455 on May 27, representing a -27.7% decline over ~27 days. The trend reversed sharply on May 29 (+18 holders, +3.8%) and accelerated dramatically in the most recent 24h period (+281 holders, +36%). This sudden reversal is anomalous and likely driven by the price spike and crash attracting speculative attention. The 7d growth of +302 (+39%) is almost entirely attributable to the last 24h surge. Caution is warranted: rapid holder growth during a price crash can indicate panic buying at lows, which may not be sustained. Distribution breakdown shows 260 dolphins, 216 fish, 121 whales, 81 octopus, and 57 sharks — a relatively broad distribution but with significant whale presence.

Top 10 hold40.66%
Top 100 hold87.36%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

Cf1pLNXzQ6ydSeTTR9akcEejdgjaXKfKfvKBt7G4iwLo

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address matches trading pair)

15.08%

Cbfzk3QwgPBoFyNRDH6gvaTXqHXZSf52QeQniTDKU1Ve

Individual whale / potential team wallet

8.19%

Agz2zSdrWM7zZet4sxjRoRVi81A7yosne5kf4qcRHt9Y

Individual whale

3.67%

GjXobpiEexQqqLkghB29AtcwyJRokbeGDSkz8Kn7GGr1

Individual whale

2.40%

EVKwJ8q93KUb1dPNkHUwY15kcu6Zsg54NL3ehK4jTPna

Individual whale

2.13%

The top 10 holders control 40.66% of supply and the top 100 control 87.36%, indicating a highly concentrated distribution. The largest holder (15.08%, address Cf1pLNXzQ6ydSeTTR9akcEejdgjaXKfKfvKBt7G4iwLo) matches the PumpSwap trading pair address, meaning this is the DEX liquidity pool — not a whale. Excluding the LP, the second-largest holder controls 8.19% of supply, which is a significant concentration. Holdings 3–10 range from 1.59% to 3.67% each. The 73.4% sell pressure and 610 unique sellers in 24h suggest the whale/shark cohort is actively distributing. The 30-day declining holder trend prior to the recent spike further supports a distribution narrative. Sentiment is classified as distributing based on the overwhelming sell volume and price action.

Liquidity$44,500
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$36,030
Sell$99,440
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers312
Unique sellers610

Total liquidity of $44.5K is extremely shallow for a token with $99.4K in 24h sell volume — meaning the liquidity pool is being significantly stressed. The sell-to-buy ratio is 2.76:1 ($99.4K sells vs $36K buys), and sellers outnumber buyers nearly 2:1 (610 vs 312 unique wallets). This creates a severe net outflow condition. Slippage risk is high: any order above a few hundred dollars will move the price materially given the $44.5K pool depth. The FDV discrepancy between metadata ($98.7K) and trading analytics ($218K) may reflect different price snapshots, consistent with the extreme intraday volatility. Market health is poor with the token in active price discovery to the downside.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,904,906.56
FDV$98,710.24 (metadata) / ~$218,090 (trading analytics at time of analysis)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.9M with 6 decimals, consistent with a standard PumpFun/PumpSwap launch. The metadata field 'mutable' is false, which means the token metadata cannot be changed — a mild positive reducing metadata manipulation risk. However, the update authority is listed as 'unknown', preventing a definitive assessment of mint and freeze authority status. Since we cannot confirm these are renounced, authority risk cannot be ruled out. The token is not verified and not flagged as spam. The FDV of ~$98.7K–$218K is extremely small, placing this firmly in micro-cap/nano-cap territory with commensurate risk. No vesting schedules, allocation breakdowns, or team wallet disclosures are available.

Volatility
high

52.9% price decline in 24h with a pump-and-dump pattern visible in hourly candles. Price swung from $0.000175 to $0.000325 and back to $0.0000987 within hours.

Liquidity
high

Only $44.5K in total liquidity against $99.4K in 24h sell volume. High slippage risk on any meaningful position size. Thin pool means price impact is severe.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 40.66% of supply; top 100 control 87.36%. Excluding the LP (holder #1 at 15.08%), a single wallet holds 8.19%. Concentrated supply creates significant dump risk.

SniperDump
low

Zero snipers detected in the first 1000 blocks — the cleanest possible sniper profile. No early bot accumulation to create future dump overhang from snipers.

Authority
medium

Update authority is unknown; mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced. Mutable=false is positive but does not fully mitigate authority risk without confirmed renouncement.

Key risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 52.9% 24h decline with pump-and-dump pattern
  • Very thin liquidity ($44.5K) creating high slippage and exit risk
  • Highly concentrated supply (top 10 = 40.66%, top 100 = 87.36%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority
  • Meme token with no fundamental value — entirely sentiment-driven
  • 30-day holder decline trend before recent anomalous spike
  • Micro-cap FDV (~$98.7K) with extreme manipulation susceptibility

Mitigating factors

  • Zero sniper activity in first 1000 blocks — clean launch
  • Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
  • Rapid holder growth (+36% in 24h) shows new demand at lower prices
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) suggests some community effort
  • Pokémon nostalgia meme narrative has demonstrated viral potential in crypto markets
  • Not flagged as spam by Moralis
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This is a high-risk meme token in active price decline with thin liquidity.

JIGGLYPUFF is a Pokémon-themed Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a clean launch (no snipers), active social presence, and a surging holder count — but it is currently in a severe downtrend following a pump-and-dump event, with extremely thin liquidity, concentrated supply, and unknown authority status. The investment case is purely speculative and narrative-driven.

Bull case (low)

The Pokémon/Jigglypuff meme narrative goes viral on Crypto Twitter, driving a wave of new buyers. The +36% holder growth in 24h accelerates further, liquidity deepens, and the token recovers toward prior consolidation levels ($0.000200–$0.000230) or the recent spike high ($0.000325). A broader Solana meme season amplifies the move.

  • Viral social media moment (influencer pickup, trending on CT)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Sustained holder accumulation at current depressed prices
  • Whale accumulation by new large buyers
  • Community-driven marketing and Pokémon card collection narrative gaining traction

Base case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000080–$0.000145 range as selling pressure exhausts itself near the session low. Holder count continues to grow modestly as bottom-fishers accumulate. Price trades sideways to slightly down over the next 7–14 days without a major catalyst, with occasional volatility spikes driven by low liquidity.

  • Sell pressure moderates as weak hands exit
  • New holders from the 24h surge hold their positions
  • No major whale dumps from the top 10 concentrated holders
  • Liquidity pool remains intact at ~$44.5K
  • No negative news or rug event

Bear case (high)

Selling pressure continues as concentrated holders exit, liquidity drains further, and the holder surge proves to be short-lived speculation. Price falls below the session low of $0.0000954 toward $0.000060 or lower. The token fades into obscurity as the meme narrative fails to gain sustained traction.

  • Continued 73%+ sell pressure with no catalyst for reversal
  • Whale/concentrated holder distribution overwhelming thin liquidity
  • Meme narrative fails to achieve viral escape velocity
  • Unknown authority status creates trust deficit
  • Micro-cap size makes token vulnerable to single-whale manipulation
  • 30-day declining holder trend reasserts itself after speculative spike

GeneratedMay 30, 03:19 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-30T15:00 UTC. Price and volume data is current to the most recent hourly candle.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Mint: AoKgjNMumZ2JjHFaGnrcKSnuTTRqrHWdKHhPMhzjpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (Cf1pLNXzQ6ydSeTTR9akcEejdgjaXKfKfvKBt7G4iwLo)
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (24 candles, May 29–30 2026)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks)
  • Moralis token metadata and social links

Limitations

  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — cannot confirm renouncement
  • Update authority listed as unknown — limits rug risk assessment
  • No sniper data available (0 snipers) — limits smart money analysis
  • Short observable price history (24 hourly candles) limits technical analysis depth
  • No vesting schedule, team allocation, or tokenomics documentation available
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($98.7K) and trading analytics ($218K) suggests price volatility during data collection
  • Holder acquisition method breakdown (swap=709, transfer=70) does not identify team/insider wallets
  • Meme token valuation is entirely sentiment-driven with no fundamental anchor

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price action does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,904,906.56

Key Risks

•Extreme price volatility — 52.9% 24h decline with pump-and-dump pattern
•Very thin liquidity ($44.5K) creating high slippage and exit risk
•Highly concentrated supply (top 10 = 40.66%, top 100 = 87.36%)
•Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper activity was detected in the first 1000 blocks of this token's launch, which is a notable positive compared to many PumpFun/PumpSwap launches where snipers capture 5–20%+ of supply. This eliminates the typical early-buyer dump risk from bot snipers. However, the absence of sniper data limits smart money signal analysis. The sharp pump-and-dump pattern in the most recent candles (candles [4]–[1]) suggests a whale or coordinated group executed a pump-and-exit, as evidenced by the volume spike to $40.7K in candle [2] during the sell-off. With 610 unique sellers vs 312 unique buyers in 24h, selling is broad-based.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

0 snipers detected in first 1000 blocks — no sniper concentration

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the pump-and-dump price action in the last 4 hours suggests early/whale holders who bought during the consolidation phase ($0.000175–$0.000233) may have exited profitably during the spike to $0.000325, leaving later buyers underwater.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Jigglypuff Kingdom (JIGGLYPUFF)?

The token has collapsed ~52.9% in 24h with sell pressure at 73.4% and 1,360 sells vs 801 buys. The most recent candle (15:00 UTC) closed at $0.0000987, near the session low of $0.0000954. Momentum is strongly bearish with no sign of reversal. Short-term price action is likely to remain under pressure unless buy volume dramatically increases. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000060 to $0.000145.

Is JIGGLYPUFF a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 8.7/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This is a high-risk meme token in active price decline with thin liquidity.

How are JIGGLYPUFF holders trending?

Jigglypuff Kingdom currently has 779 holders and is growing (24h: 36, 7d: 39, 30d: 18). The 30-day historical holder data reveals a persistent declining trend: from 629 holders on May 1 to a low of 455 on May 27, representing a -27.7% decline over ~27 days. The trend reversed sharply on May 29 (+18 holders, +3.8%) and accelerated dramatically in the most recent 24h period (+281 holders, +36%). This sudden reversal is anomalous and likely driven by the price spike and crash attracting speculative attention. The 7d growth of +302 (+39%) is almost entirely attributable to the last 24h surge. Caution is warranted: rapid holder growth during a price crash can indicate panic buying at lows, which may not be sustained. Distribution breakdown shows 260 dolphins, 216 fish, 121 whales, 81 octopus, and 57 sharks — a relatively broad distribution but with significant whale presence.

What does sniper activity look like for JIGGLYPUFF?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding JIGGLYPUFF?

Extreme price volatility — 52.9% 24h decline with pump-and-dump pattern • Very thin liquidity ($44.5K) creating high slippage and exit risk • Highly concentrated supply (top 10 = 40.66%, top 100 = 87.36%)

← Back to all predictions

Track JIGGLYPUFF