JIGGLYPUFF

Jigglypuff Kingdom Price Today & AI Analysis

JIGGLYPUFFSolanaAnalysis as of May 30, 2026

Price

$0.057536

+2.77% 24h

Contract

Live
AoKgjNMumZ2JjHFaGnrcKSnuTTRqrHWdKHhPMhzjpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

501

Market cap

$7,535

At a $1M market cap, $JIGGLYPUFF would be $0.001000 (133x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about JIGGLYPUFF

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Solana

SKSSKSSKS Cartoon$0.043177+1.3%MC $31.7KPygoscelisPygoscelisPygoscelis kerguelensis$0.054588-9.6%MC $4.4Kbullievebullievebullieve$0.055378-9.9%MC $5.4KBODUKEBODUKEBo Duke$0.055547-14.7%MC $5.5KHOMEHOMEPumpfun is home$0.058837-14.0%MC $8.7KSINSSINSSuper Intelligence Name Service$0.041310-98.2%MC $11.3K

Jigglypuff Kingdom: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-30 15:19 UTC

Holder addresses

779

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$44,504.51
How concentrated is Jigglypuff Kingdom ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 779 addresses (2026-05-30 15:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Jigglypuff Kingdom?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Jigglypuff Kingdom liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-30 15:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $44,504.51. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-30 15:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 30, 03:19 PM UTC

FDV

$98,710

Liquidity

$44,504.51

Holders

779

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Jigglypuff Kingdom (JIGGLYPUFF) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~999.9M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$98.7K (on-chain metadata) to ~$218K (trading analytics). The token is themed around a 'cute pink menace' collecting 1st Edition Jigglypuff Pokémon cards. As of analysis, the token is experiencing severe selling pressure with a 24h price decline of ~52.9%, extremely lopsided sell volume (73.4% sell vs 26.6% buy), and a current price of ~$0.0000987. Despite the price collapse, holder count has surged +281 (+36%) in 24h and +302 (+39%) in 7d, suggesting new buyers are entering at lower prices. Supply concentration is elevated with the top 10 holding 40.66% and top 100 holding 87.36%. No snipers were detected in the first 1000 blocks, which is a mild positive. The token carries very high risk overall.

Key points

  • No sniper activity detected in first 1000 blocks — clean launch mechanics
  • Rapid holder growth (+36% in 24h, +39% in 7d) despite severe price decline
  • Mutable metadata is false, reducing certain manipulation vectors
  • PumpSwap-based liquidity pool with $44.5K total liquidity
  • Pokémon/nostalgia meme narrative with active social presence (Twitter, website)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has collapsed ~52.9% in 24h with sell pressure at 73.4% and 1,360 sells vs 801 buys. The most recent candle (15:00 UTC) closed at $0.0000987, near the session low of $0.0000954. Momentum is strongly bearish with no sign of reversal. Short-term price action is likely to remain under pressure unless buy volume dramatically increases.

Target low

$0.000060

Target high

$0.000145

Support

$0.0000954 (recent 24h low), $0.000080 (psychological round number), $0.000060 (extended downside target)

Resistance

$0.000145 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open), $0.000210 (candle [5] close / prior consolidation zone), $0.000287 (candle [4] close, recent swing high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

Medium-term outlook depends on whether the meme narrative gains traction and whether the rapid holder growth translates into sustained demand. The 30-day holder trend was declining from ~629 to ~461 before the recent 24h surge, suggesting the token had been losing interest. A recovery above $0.000200 would be needed to signal a trend reversal.

Catalysts

  • Viral social media momentum around Pokémon/Jigglypuff narrative
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Whale accumulation at depressed prices
  • Listing on aggregators or influencer promotion

Bullish factors

  • No sniper activity — clean launch with no early dump risk from snipers
  • Holder count surging +36% in 24h and +39% in 7d, showing new interest
  • Meme narrative (Pokémon nostalgia) has proven viral potential in crypto
  • Price near multi-session lows may attract dip buyers
  • Mutable=false reduces certain rug vectors

Bearish factors

  • Severe 24h price decline of ~52.9% with no sign of reversal
  • Sell pressure dominates at 73.4% of 24h volume ($99.4K sells vs $36K buys)
  • Very thin liquidity at $44.5K — large orders will cause extreme slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 40.66% of supply — concentrated selling risk
  • 30-day holder trend was declining before the recent 24h spike
  • Unverified contract, update authority unknown
  • FDV of only ~$98.7K–$218K indicates extremely small market cap

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility (52.9% 24h drop), very thin liquidity ($44.5K), meme-driven price action with no fundamental valuation anchor, and the token's short observable history. The rapid holder surge in 24h is anomalous relative to the 30-day declining trend and may reflect speculative bottom-fishing rather than organic demand.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
AoKgjN...pump
Total Supply
999,904,906.56

Key Risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 52.9% 24h decline with pump-and-dump pattern
  • Very thin liquidity ($44.5K) creating high slippage and exit risk
  • Highly concentrated supply (top 10 = 40.66%, top 100 = 87.36%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Reviewing the 24 hourly candles from 2026-05-29T16:00Z to 2026-05-30T15:00Z: The token traded in a relatively tight range of $0.000167–$0.000233 for the first ~20 candles (May 29 16:00 to May 30 11:00), then broke sharply higher in candle [4] (12:00 UTC, high $0.000325), followed by a rapid collapse over candles [3]–[1], closing at $0.0000987 — a new session low. The final three candles show a classic 'blow-off top and crash' pattern: a spike to $0.000325, a partial recovery to $0.000283, then a cascade down through $0.000144 and finally $0.0000987. Volume spiked dramatically in candles [4] ($8.9K), [3] ($13.2K), [2] ($40.7K), and [1] ($21.7K), confirming the sell-off was high-conviction. Earlier candles had very low volume ($169–$736), indicating thin trading before the pump.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term trend is a sharp downtrend following a pump-and-dump pattern. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the 30-day holder decline and the price collapse from the recent spike high of $0.000325 to $0.0000987 — a ~70% retracement from the intraday peak.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

27%

Sell

73%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000954 (candle [1] session low)

Major support

$0.000080 (psychological level below session low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000145 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open area)

Major resistance

$0.000210–$0.000215 (prior consolidation zone, candles [5]–[9])

The immediate support is the session low of $0.0000954 from candle [1]. A break below this opens the door to $0.000080 and lower. Immediate resistance is the $0.000144–$0.000145 zone where candle [1] opened and candle [2] closed. Major resistance sits at $0.000210–$0.000215, the prior multi-hour consolidation range. The $0.000287–$0.000325 zone represents the pump high and is very strong resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: tight consolidation ($0.000167–$0.000233) followed by spike to $0.000325 then crash to $0.0000987
  • High-volume bearish engulfing: candle [2] (high $0.000218, close $0.000144) engulfs prior candle range on 3x volume
  • Candle [1] shows long upper wick relative to body, confirming sellers dominate any bounce attempts
  • Volume climax in candle [2] ($40.7K) — highest volume candle — coincides with peak sell-off, possible capitulation signal
  • Prior candles [8], [12], [15], [16] show very low volume doji-like candles indicating lack of conviction before the pump

Liquidity

Liquidity

$44,504.51

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $44.5K is extremely shallow for a token with $99.4K in 24h sell volume — meaning the liquidity pool is being significantly stressed. The sell-to-buy ratio is 2.76:1 ($99.4K sells vs $36K buys), and sellers outnumber buyers nearly 2:1 (610 vs 312 unique wallets). This creates a severe net outflow condition. Slippage risk is high: any order above a few hundred dollars will move the price materially given the $44.5K pool depth. The FDV discrepancy between metadata ($98.7K) and trading analytics ($218K) may reflect different price snapshots, consistent with the extreme intraday volatility. Market health is poor with the token in active price discovery to the downside.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,904,906.56

FDV

$98,710.24 (metadata) / ~$218,090 (trading analytics at time of analysis)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    52.9% price decline in 24h with a pump-and-dump pattern visible in hourly candles. Price swung from $0.000175 to $0.000325 and back to $0.0000987 within hours.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $44.5K in total liquidity against $99.4K in 24h sell volume. High slippage risk on any meaningful position size. Thin pool means price impact is severe.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 52.9% 24h decline with pump-and-dump pattern
  • Very thin liquidity ($44.5K) creating high slippage and exit risk
  • Highly concentrated supply (top 10 = 40.66%, top 100 = 87.36%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority
  • Meme token with no fundamental value — entirely sentiment-driven
  • 30-day holder decline trend before recent anomalous spike
  • Micro-cap FDV (~$98.7K) with extreme manipulation susceptibility

Mitigating factors

  • Zero sniper activity in first 1000 blocks — clean launch
  • Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
  • Rapid holder growth (+36% in 24h) shows new demand at lower prices
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) suggests some community effort
  • Pokémon nostalgia meme narrative has demonstrated viral potential in crypto markets
  • Not flagged as spam by Moralis

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This is a high-risk meme token in active price decline with thin liquidity.

JIGGLYPUFF is a Pokémon-themed Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a clean launch (no snipers), active social presence, and a surging holder count — but it is currently in a severe downtrend following a pump-and-dump event, with extremely thin liquidity, concentrated supply, and unknown authority status. The investment case is purely speculative and narrative-driven.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The Pokémon/Jigglypuff meme narrative goes viral on Crypto Twitter, driving a wave of new buyers. The +36% holder growth in 24h accelerates further, liquidity deepens, and the token recovers toward prior consolidation levels ($0.000200–$0.000230) or the recent spike high ($0.000325). A broader Solana meme season amplifies the move.

  • Viral social media moment (influencer pickup, trending on CT)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Sustained holder accumulation at current depressed prices
  • Whale accumulation by new large buyers
  • Community-driven marketing and Pokémon card collection narrative gaining traction

Base Case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000080–$0.000145 range as selling pressure exhausts itself near the session low. Holder count continues to grow modestly as bottom-fishers accumulate. Price trades sideways to slightly down over the next 7–14 days without a major catalyst, with occasional volatility spikes driven by low liquidity.

  • Sell pressure moderates as weak hands exit
  • New holders from the 24h surge hold their positions
  • No major whale dumps from the top 10 concentrated holders
  • Liquidity pool remains intact at ~$44.5K
  • No negative news or rug event

Bear Case

High probability

Selling pressure continues as concentrated holders exit, liquidity drains further, and the holder surge proves to be short-lived speculation. Price falls below the session low of $0.0000954 toward $0.000060 or lower. The token fades into obscurity as the meme narrative fails to gain sustained traction.

  • Continued 73%+ sell pressure with no catalyst for reversal
  • Whale/concentrated holder distribution overwhelming thin liquidity
  • Meme narrative fails to achieve viral escape velocity
  • Unknown authority status creates trust deficit
  • Micro-cap size makes token vulnerable to single-whale manipulation
  • 30-day declining holder trend reasserts itself after speculative spike

Analysis details

Generated

May 30, 03:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-30 15:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Mint: AoKgjNMumZ2JjHFaGnrcKSnuTTRqrHWdKHhPMhzjpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (Cf1pLNXzQ6ydSeTTR9akcEejdgjaXKfKfvKBt7G4iwLo)
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (24 candles, May 29–30 2026)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks)
  • Moralis token metadata and social links

Limitations

  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — cannot confirm renouncement
  • Update authority listed as unknown — limits rug risk assessment
  • No sniper data available (0 snipers) — limits smart money analysis
  • Short observable price history (24 hourly candles) limits technical analysis depth
  • No vesting schedule, team allocation, or tokenomics documentation available
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($98.7K) and trading analytics ($218K) suggests price volatility during data collection
  • Holder acquisition method breakdown (swap=709, transfer=70) does not identify team/insider wallets
  • Meme token valuation is entirely sentiment-driven with no fundamental anchor

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price action does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Jigglypuff Kingdom ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 779 addresses (2026-05-30 15:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Jigglypuff Kingdom?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Jigglypuff Kingdom liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-30 15:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $44,504.51. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Jigglypuff Kingdom (JIGGLYPUFF)?

The token has collapsed ~52.9% in 24h with sell pressure at 73.4% and 1,360 sells vs 801 buys. The most recent candle (15:00 UTC) closed at $0.0000987, near the session low of $0.0000954. Momentum is strongly bearish with no sign of reversal. Short-term price action is likely to remain under pressure unless buy volume dramatically increases. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000060 to $0.000145.

Is JIGGLYPUFF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This is a high-risk meme token in active price decline with thin liquidity.

What are the key risks of holding JIGGLYPUFF?

Extreme price volatility — 52.9% 24h decline with pump-and-dump pattern • Very thin liquidity ($44.5K) creating high slippage and exit risk • Highly concentrated supply (top 10 = 40.66%, top 100 = 87.36%)

← Back to all predictions

Questions about JIGGLYPUFF?