Mushu Price Today & AI Analysis

MUSHUSolanaAnalysis as of May 4, 2026

$0.003224

-1.41% 24h

Contract

Live

5Jr9hGmJgxBRjjF8XGcGgQzXUdsbpZNNMpigEv8Wpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

6,260

Market cap

$493,448

At a $1M market cap, $MUSHU would be $0.006534 (2.03x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is MUSHU a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 29

Caution

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Creator holds

24%

The creator holds a large share of the supply.
The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about MUSHU

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

EARNFIEARNFI$0.0₄3298+7.0%MC $32.2K

PMARCAPMARCA$0.0₄1050-17.0%MC $9.6K

ELONElon Coin$0.0₅5034-5.2%MC $4.8K

LABUBULABUBU$0.000339-2.4%MC $338.3K

ILYAnh Yêu Em$0.0₅2560-25.9%MC $2.5K

CATBOTCat Bot$0.0₄8268+34.8%MC $82.1K

Mushu: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-04 00:20 UTC

Holder addresses

3,623

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$279,315.60

How concentrated is Mushu ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,623 addresses (2026-05-04 00:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Mushu?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Mushu liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-04 00:20 UTC, reported liquidity was $279,315.60. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-04 00:20 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 4, 12:20 AM UTC

FDV

$1,204,997

Liquidity

$279,315.60

Holders

3,623

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

MUSHU (Mushu) is a Solana-based meme token themed around a Scottish Fold cat, trading at $0.00708 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$1.33M. The token has experienced a dramatic 110.5% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven by a sharp spike in the most recent candle (candle [1]) that pushed price from ~$0.00387 to a high of $0.00914 before settling at $0.00708. Total liquidity stands at $279.32K on Raydium. The holder base of 3,623 has been in a 30-day declining trend (-6.9%), though the last 24 hours show a +1.8% uptick coinciding with the price pump. No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks, which is a positive signal. The update authority is not a burn address, and the token is mutable=false, introducing some authority risk.

Key points

Zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks — no early sniper dump risk
110.5% 24h price surge with a single-candle spike to $0.00914 high
Mutable=false metadata reduces rug risk from metadata manipulation
Relatively broad distribution: top 10 hold 30.47%, top 100 hold 82.09%
30-day holder decline of -6.9% contrasts with the recent price pump

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

The token spiked 110.5% in 24h, reaching an intraday high of $0.00914 before pulling back to $0.00708. The 5-minute change is already -6.69%, suggesting the spike is fading. With sell pressure slightly dominant (51% sell vs 49% buy) and more unique sellers (94) than buyers (87), short-term retracement toward the $0.00387–$0.00413 range is likely unless fresh catalysts emerge.

Target low

$0.00335

Target high

$0.00914

Support: $0.00387 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.00335 (candles [7]–[8] range), $0.00314 (candle [19] low)
Resistance: $0.00708 (current price / candle [1] close), $0.00914 (candle [1] all-time recent high), $0.00413 (candle [3] high — now flipped support/resistance)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

The 30-day holder trend is declining (-251 holders, -6.9%), and the token has been trading in a tight $0.00314–$0.00413 range for most of the past 22 hours before the spike. Sustained upside requires new community catalysts or broader meme-cat narrative momentum. Without those, mean reversion toward pre-pump levels ($0.00335–$0.00413) is the base case.

Catalysts

Broader 'cat supercycle' or meme narrative gaining traction on Solana
New exchange listings or influencer attention
Holder base re-accumulation above 3,800+
Sustained buy volume exceeding $15K/day

Bullish factors

Zero snipers — no early-block dump overhang
110.5% 24h momentum may attract momentum traders
Mutable=false reduces metadata rug risk
Raydium listing provides on-chain liquidity access
No spam flag from metadata verification

Bearish factors

30-day holder decline of -251 (-6.9%) signals sustained disengagement
Spike occurred on only $6.2K volume — thin and easily reversible
51% sell pressure with more sellers than buyers in 24h
5-minute price already down -6.69% from spike peak
Update authority not renounced — residual authority risk
FDV of $1.33M is speculative for a meme token with declining holders

Confidence: low. The 110.5% pump in a single candle on relatively low volume ($6.2K in candle [1]) makes this highly volatile and difficult to predict. The spike appears to be a thin-liquidity event rather than broad demand. The 5-minute negative return and sell-side dominance suggest the move may be exhausting. Low confidence is warranted given the meme nature, thin liquidity, and lack of fundamental catalysts.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 5Jr9hG...pump
Total Supply: 170,109,843.93 MUSHU

Key Risks

Thin liquidity ($279K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and large slippage on exits
30-day holder decline of -6.9% (-251 holders) indicates sustained community atrophy
The 110.5% pump occurred on only ~$6.2K volume — easily reversible with minimal selling pressure
Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 22-hour OHLC series reveals a prolonged consolidation phase between ~$0.00314 and ~$0.00413 (candles [2]–[22]), followed by a dramatic breakout candle [1] that opened at $0.00387, spiked to a high of $0.00914 (a 136% intrabar move), and closed at $0.00708. This is a classic thin-liquidity pump candle with an extremely long upper wick relative to the body, suggesting significant selling pressure at the highs. Candles [2]–[22] show very low volume (ranging from $1 to $917), confirming the pre-pump period was illiquid and range-bound. Candle [1] volume of $6,227 dwarfs all prior candles combined, indicating the pump was a concentrated event.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward due to the 110.5% 24h surge, but the medium-term (prior 21 candles) was a flat sideways grind between $0.00314–$0.00413. The spike candle has a massive upper wick, which is a bearish reversal signal at the top of a move.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00387 (candle [1] open, candle [2] close)

Major support

$0.00314 (candle [19] low — 22-hour range floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.00708 (candle [1] close — current price)

Major resistance

$0.00914 (candle [1] high — spike peak)

The $0.00387 level is critical near-term support as it represents the open of the pump candle and the prior session's close. A break below this would signal the pump has fully reversed. The $0.00914 spike high is strong resistance given the long upper wick. The $0.00314–$0.00335 zone (candles [19]–[20] lows) represents the broader consolidation floor.

Notable patterns

Long upper wick / shooting star on candle [1] — bearish reversal signal at spike high
22-candle sideways consolidation ($0.00314–$0.00413) preceding the breakout
Volume climax on candle [1] — single-candle volume exceeds all prior 21 candles combined
Doji-like candles [21] and [22] with zero range — extremely illiquid pre-pump period
Candle [2] shows a bearish close (open $0.00406, close $0.00387) immediately before the pump candle, suggesting the pump originated in candle [1]'s window

Liquidity

$279,315.60

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $279.32K on Raydium is shallow relative to the FDV of $1.33M (liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~21%). This means large trades will cause significant price impact. The 110.5% pump on only $6.2K of volume in candle [1] confirms the thin liquidity — a relatively small buy order can move price dramatically in either direction, creating high slippage risk for both entries and exits. The 24h net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $10.19K vs buy volume $9.78K), with more unique sellers (94) than buyers (87) and more sell transactions (403) than buy transactions (369). This slight sell-side dominance, combined with the post-spike -6.69% 5-minute decline, suggests the market is in mild distribution mode following the pump. The pair trades on Raydium (HXH2Wp1NQ2iCo2RV5hQzmcirh7tvjsGWYKchY8ZjbbR7), which provides on-chain transparency but no centralized order book depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

170,109,843.93 MUSHU

FDV

$1,204,997 (metadata) / $1.33M (trading analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
110.5% 24h price surge on thin volume ($6.2K in the pump candle) demonstrates extreme volatility. The token can move 100%+ in a single hour on minimal volume, making position sizing and stop-loss management extremely difficult.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $279.32K is shallow. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~21% means large exits will cause severe slippage. A whale selling even 2–3% of supply could crash the price significantly.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Thin liquidity ($279K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and large slippage on exits
30-day holder decline of -6.9% (-251 holders) indicates sustained community atrophy
The 110.5% pump occurred on only ~$6.2K volume — easily reversible with minimal selling pressure
Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
Meme token with no clear utility beyond 'cat supercycle' narrative — entirely sentiment-driven
Top holder at 11.21% represents significant single-wallet concentration risk
Historical pattern: Apr 27 spike (+268 holders) reversed within 2 days (-273 holders combined Apr 28–29)

Mitigating factors

Zero snipers in first 1,000 blocks — no sniper dump overhang
Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
Verified contract, not flagged as spam
Raydium listing provides transparent on-chain liquidity
Broad base of 3,623 holders with 488 octopus/small wallets
No master edition — standard SPL token structure

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant speculators with small position sizes relative to their portfolio. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking fundamental value, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. This is a meme token with no utility, declining holder trends, thin liquidity, and a recent pump that shows early signs of reversal.

MUSHU is a Solana meme token riding the 'cat supercycle' narrative with a recent 110.5% pump. The zero-sniper launch is a genuine positive, and the mutable=false metadata adds a layer of safety. However, the 30-day holder decline, thin liquidity, pump-on-minimal-volume dynamics, and non-renounced update authority make this a high-risk speculative play. The investment thesis is entirely momentum and narrative-driven — there is no fundamental value proposition beyond community sentiment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The 'cat supercycle' narrative gains broader traction on Solana, attracting influencer attention and new capital. The holder base re-accelerates above 4,000+, volume sustains above $50K/day, and the token retests and breaks the $0.00914 spike high, targeting $0.015–$0.02 on a broader meme rally.

Broader meme-cat narrative momentum on Solana (e.g., viral social media moment)
Influencer or KOL promotion driving new buyer inflow
Sustained daily volume exceeding $50K+
Holder count recovering above 4,000 and accelerating
Broader Solana meme season with rising SOL price

Base Case

Price retraces 30–50% from the spike high, settling in the $0.00387–$0.00500 range. Holder count stabilizes around 3,500–3,700. The token trades with occasional volume spikes tied to broader meme market sentiment but lacks sustained momentum to break to new highs without a significant catalyst.

Sell pressure moderates as profit-takers exhaust their positions
The Raydium liquidity pool remains intact and is not withdrawn
No major negative events (authority actions, rug, etc.)
Broader Solana market remains stable or mildly bullish

Bear Case

High probability

The pump fully reverses as profit-takers exit into thin liquidity. Holders continue declining, volume dries up, and price returns to or below pre-pump levels ($0.00314–$0.00387). The token enters a prolonged low-activity phase similar to the 22-hour consolidation seen before the pump.

Sell pressure already dominant (51% sell, 94 sellers vs 87 buyers)
5-minute price already -6.69% from spike peak
30-day holder decline trend reasserts itself
Thin liquidity amplifies downside moves
No new catalysts or utility to sustain momentum

Analysis details

Generated

May 4, 12:20 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-04 00:20 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority)
Raydium AMM pair data (HXH2Wp1NQ2iCo2RV5hQzmcirh7tvjsGWYKchY8ZjbbR7)
Hourly OHLC candle data (22 candles, USD-denominated)
24h trading analytics (volume, buyers, sellers, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data (3,623 holders)
Top 20 holder wallet data with balances
30-day historical holder series (daily)
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)

Limitations

Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — inferred from context only
Top holder (11.21%) classification is uncertain without additional on-chain investigation (could be LP pool, treasury, or individual)
Sniper data shows zero snipers but methodology (first 1,000 blocks only) may miss later-block strategic buyers
No order book depth data — slippage estimates are approximations based on liquidity pool size
Social sentiment data not available — 'moralis' social links referenced but not provided
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($1.20M) and trading analytics ($1.33M) — likely reflects price movement between data pulls
22 hourly candles provide limited medium-term technical context
No wallet labeling data available for top holders — classifications are inferred

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mushu (MUSHU) a scam?

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own. The creator holds a large share of the supply. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Oct 29, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Mushu (MUSHU)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 29, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Mushu ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,623 addresses (2026-05-04 00:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Mushu?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Mushu liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-04 00:20 UTC, reported liquidity was $279,315.60. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Mushu (MUSHU)?

Is MUSHU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.5/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant speculators with small position sizes relative to their portfolio. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking fundamental value, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. This is a meme token with no utility, declining holder trends, thin liquidity, and a recent pump that shows early signs of reversal.

What are the key risks of holding MUSHU?

Thin liquidity ($279K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and large slippage on exits • 30-day holder decline of -6.9% (-251 holders) indicates sustained community atrophy • The 110.5% pump occurred on only ~$6.2K volume — easily reversible with minimal selling pressure