P

Pikachu Price Today & AI Analysis

PIKACHUSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 21, 2026

Price

$0.062378

-99.69% 24h · FDV $23,782

Contract

Live
4wKVHjz6R1qsijKSRRpKCcWr8VZcekYNWPVPfzFnoZdQ

Chain

Solana

Holders

91

Market cap

$23,782

More tokens on Solana

trollinatrollinatrollina$0.056991-1.0%MC $6.8KEmbraceEmbraceEmbrace The Wave$0.055731+1.8%MC $5.7KWIGLETWIGLETWigger Piglet$0.041014+9.9%MC $9.7KMATCHMATCHMatchDay$0.053568-3.6%MC $3.6Khonsehonsehonse$0.041149-0.4%MC $11.1KANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

Pikachu: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-21 12:45 UTC

Holder addresses

91

Top 10 supply share

20.00%

Reported liquidity

$1.00
How concentrated is Pikachu ownership?
As of 2026-09-21 12:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.00% of supply. It reports 91 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Pikachu?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 12:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $29.00 in buys and $31.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Pikachu liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -100.00%, from $114,221.84 (2026-09-20 13:00 UTC) to $0.51 (2026-09-21 10:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-21 12:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-20 13:00 UTC$114,221.84
2026-09-20 14:00 UTC$137,192.60
2026-09-20 15:00 UTC$150,867.08
2026-09-20 16:00 UTC$108,770.48
2026-09-20 17:00 UTC$117,561.22
2026-09-20 18:00 UTC$6.04
2026-09-20 19:00 UTC$5.99
2026-09-20 21:00 UTC$15.57
2026-09-20 23:00 UTC$9.99
2026-09-21 00:00 UTC$5.24
2026-09-21 03:00 UTC$5.37
2026-09-21 09:00 UTC$0.50
2026-09-21 10:00 UTC$0.51

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about PIKACHU

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 21, 12:46 PM UTC

FDV

$23,782

Liquidity

$1.00

Holders

91

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

PIKACHU (4wKVHjz6R1qsijKSRRpKCcWr8VZcekYNWPVPfzFnoZdQ) is a Solana meme token trading on a Meteora DAMM pool that has experienced a near-total price collapse, down -99.69% over the past 24 hours to $2.378e-7. Total liquidity is reported at a mere $1.00 against a fully diluted valuation of ~$23.78K, and hourly candles show multiple zero-volume periods, indicating the market is effectively illiquid and possibly dying. No verified data exists for mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, or holder history, leaving major risk dimensions unresolved.

Key points

  • Extreme intraday price collapse (-99.69% in 24h) captured directly in OHLC data
  • Near-zero liquidity ($1.00) despite a nominal ~$23.78K FDV
  • Multiple flat, zero-volume hourly candles suggesting the pool is inactive/dying
  • Complete absence of authority, sniper, and holder-history data — an unusually opaque data profile even for a micro-cap meme token

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

The token has crashed from a local high near $0.00008 (candle 5) to $2.31e-7 (candle 24), a >99% decline, with volume drying up almost completely in the final third of the dataset (multiple zero-volume hourly candles). With liquidity at just $1.00, any further trades — buy or sell — could cause wild, discontinuous price swings unrelated to genuine demand.

Target low

0.0000001

Target high

0.0000010

Support

0.00000023 (last two candle closes), 0.0000000657 (candle 12-20 floor before final leg down)

Resistance

0.0000504 (candle 7-9 area), 0.0000801 (candle 5 high, cycle peak)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

bearish

Absent a fresh liquidity injection or renewed organic demand, the combination of near-zero liquidity ($1) and a >99% price collapse suggests the token is at high risk of becoming effectively worthless/untradeable. Any recovery would require significant new capital inflow that is not evidenced in the current data.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity re-injection into the Meteora DAMM pool
  • Renewed social/community interest (no social links currently listed)
  • Further sell pressure from any remaining holders could accelerate the decline toward zero

Bullish factors

  • Token is trading at an extremely low nominal price, meaning small absolute USD inflows could produce large percentage moves
  • 91 holder addresses still exist, suggesting some residual distribution of supply

Bearish factors

  • -99.69% 24h price change already realized
  • Total liquidity of only $1.00 — effectively no functioning market
  • Numerous zero-volume hourly candles indicating fading trading interest
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of further supply dilution or rug mechanics

Confidence: low. The dataset shows extreme volatility with many zero-volume candles, a $1 liquidity pool, and no data on authorities, snipers, or holder trends — all of which severely limit predictive reliability. Predictions here are directional observations from the available candle data, not high-confidence forecasts.

PIKACHU call history

Full track record →

Sep 21bearish
24h-2.8%
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
4wKVHj...oZdQ
Total Supply
99,999,997,282.33 PIKACHU

Key Risks

  • Price has already crashed -99.69% in 24 hours, with the token trading near zero ($2.38e-7)
  • Total liquidity is reported at only $1.00, meaning the market is effectively illiquid and the token may be nearly unsellable at any scale
  • Multiple hourly candles show zero trading volume, indicating a dead or dying market
  • Mint/freeze authority status is completely unknown — rug/mint-dump risk cannot be excluded

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the most recent 24 hourly candles, price rallied from ~0.0000310 to a peak of ~0.0000801 (candles 1-5), then suffered a violent breakdown starting candle 6, wicking down to 0.00000426 before partially recovering to 0.0000505. Candle 7 shows an extreme wick low of 1.37e-7 within a candle that closed at 0.0000108, indicating a severe flash-crash/wick event. Several subsequent candles (8, 10, 13-20) show zero volume and flat O=H=L=C, indicating no trading activity — effectively a dead tape. The final two candles (21-24) show another sharp leg down from 0.0000066 to 0.00000023, closing the sequence near all-time lows for this window.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both the most recent hours and the full 24-hour window show a decisive downtrend. The brief uptrend in candles 1-5 was fully reversed and then some, with price ending roughly 99.7% below its cycle peak.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

48%

Sell

52%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

0.00000023 (current price zone)

Major support

0.000000137 (candle 7 wick low, effective floor)

Immediate resistance

0.0000066 (candle 12-20 plateau)

Major resistance

0.0000801 (candle 5 cycle high)

The token has broken below every prior support level in succession — 0.0000505, 0.0000066, and now sits near 0.00000023. There is no evidence of basing or accumulation; each 'support' has been a temporary pause before the next leg down.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top / rapid rally followed by crash (candles 1-5 up, 6+ down)
  • Long lower-wick flash crash candle (candle 7, low of 1.37e-7 vs close of 0.0000108)
  • Multiple flat zero-volume 'dead' candles (8,10,13,14,16-20,23) indicating market inactivity
  • Stair-step breakdown pattern with repeated lower highs and lower lows

Liquidity

Liquidity

$1.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity in the Meteora DAMM pool is reported at just $1.00, an extraordinarily shallow pool relative to the ~$23.78K fully diluted valuation. 24h buy volume ($29.00, 48.3%) is slightly below sell volume ($31.00, 51.7%), producing a modest net outflow, with 29 buys vs 25 sells from 19 buyers and 17 sellers — very low absolute trade counts consistent with a largely abandoned market. With liquidity this thin, even these small dollar volumes are enough to move price by orders of magnitude, as evidenced by the -99.69% 24h price change and the zero-volume candles throughout the dataset. Slippage risk is high for any trade size beyond trivial amounts.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

99,999,997,282.33 PIKACHU

FDV

$23,782 (approx., based on $2.378e-7 price and ~100B supply)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price collapsed -99.69% over 24h, from ~$0.00008 to $0.00000023. Candles show a spike from ~0.00003 to 0.00008 (candles 1-5), then a catastrophic crash through candles 6-21 including multiple flat/zero-volume candles and a final leg down to 2.3e-7. This is extreme, near-total value destruction within a single day.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is reported at just $1.00 against a fully diluted valuation of ~$23.78K. This is an essentially illiquid market — any meaningful trade size would cause severe slippage or may not be fillable at all. Multiple hourly candles show zero volume, confirming the pool is largely dead.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 20.00% of supply across 91 total holder addresses per the current Codex snapshot. This is a single point-in-time figure with no historical trend data, so accumulation/distribution behavior cannot be assessed. No wallet classification (team, exchange, bot) is available, so this figure should be treated cautiously — it is not confirmation of healthy distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Price has already crashed -99.69% in 24 hours, with the token trading near zero ($2.38e-7)
  • Total liquidity is reported at only $1.00, meaning the market is effectively illiquid and the token may be nearly unsellable at any scale
  • Multiple hourly candles show zero trading volume, indicating a dead or dying market
  • Mint/freeze authority status is completely unknown — rug/mint-dump risk cannot be excluded
  • No sniper data available — early-buyer dumping behavior cannot be assessed
  • No holder history available — cannot confirm whether concentration is improving or worsening
  • FDV of ~$23.78K against $1 liquidity implies a massive, likely unbridgeable gap between paper valuation and actual exit liquidity

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 concentration of 20.0% across 91 holders is not extreme in isolation, though this must be weighed against the total absence of other supporting data
  • Small absolute FDV ($23.78K) limits the total notional at risk for any single investor

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative participants explicitly willing to lose their entire position; this token exhibits classic characteristics of a failed or dying micro-cap/meme launch (near-total price collapse, near-zero liquidity, unknown contract authorities, no sniper/holder history transparency). Not suitable for risk-averse or long-term holders.

PIKACHU shows all the hallmarks of a meme-coin that has already collapsed: a -99.69% 24h price crash, liquidity of only $1, and a market that has gone largely quiet (multiple zero-volume candles). Key risk data (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) is entirely unavailable, compounding the uncertainty. Any investment thesis here is almost entirely speculative and should assume total capital loss is the base-case risk.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A speculative rebound occurs if fresh liquidity is added to the Meteora pool and renewed retail/community interest returns, allowing the extremely low nominal price to produce outsized percentage gains from a tiny capital base.

  • Very low absolute unit price could enable large percentage rebounds on small dollar inflows
  • 91 addresses still hold tokens, meaning some distributed base remains that could re-engage
  • Meme-coin markets on Solana can occasionally see rapid revivals driven by social momentum (though no social links exist currently)

Base Case

The token remains in a largely dormant, illiquid state with sporadic, low-volume trades causing erratic price prints that are not reflective of genuine price discovery, effectively rendering it a non-functional market for most participants.

  • No material new liquidity is added to the Meteora DAMM pool
  • Trading activity remains sparse (as seen in the many zero-volume candles)
  • No new information emerges on mint/freeze authority status to change the risk profile

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues toward near-total value destruction as liquidity remains at $1, volume dries up further (as already seen in multiple zero-volume candles), and any remaining holders exit into an illiquid market, pushing price toward zero.

  • Liquidity of $1 makes the token nearly untradeable at any meaningful size
  • -99.69% collapse already realized with no signs of basing or reversal in the candle data
  • Complete lack of transparency on mint/freeze authority leaves open further dilution or freeze risk
  • No sniper or holder-history data to indicate any stabilizing force

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 21, 12:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-21 12:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price feed
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 most recent hours)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Meteora DAMM pool liquidity figure

Limitations

  • No sniper/early-buyer data available at all
  • No holder history — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration exists; growth rates and accumulation/distribution trends could not be assessed
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract, and mutability status are all unknown — no authority risk determination could be made
  • Total liquidity of $1.00 makes volume and price data extremely susceptible to distortion from trivial trade sizes
  • Several OHLC candles show zero volume, indicating potential data sparsity or a genuinely inactive market
  • No wallet classification or labeling data was available for whale/notable holder analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets, and especially micro-cap/meme tokens with sub-$10 liquidity, carry an extremely high risk of total capital loss. Always conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Pikachu ownership?

As of 2026-09-21 12:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.00% of supply. It reports 91 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Pikachu?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 12:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $29.00 in buys and $31.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Pikachu liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -100.00%, from $114,221.84 (2026-09-20 13:00 UTC) to $0.51 (2026-09-21 10:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pikachu (PIKACHU)?

The token has crashed from a local high near $0.00008 (candle 5) to $2.31e-7 (candle 24), a >99% decline, with volume drying up almost completely in the final third of the dataset (multiple zero-volume hourly candles). With liquidity at just $1.00, any further trades — buy or sell — could cause wild, discontinuous price swings unrelated to genuine demand. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of 0.0000001 to 0.0000010.

Is PIKACHU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 97/100. Suitable only for highly speculative participants explicitly willing to lose their entire position; this token exhibits classic characteristics of a failed or dying micro-cap/meme launch (near-total price collapse, near-zero liquidity, unknown contract authorities, no sniper/holder history transparency). Not suitable for risk-averse or long-term holders.

What are the key risks of holding PIKACHU?

Price has already crashed -99.69% in 24 hours, with the token trading near zero ($2.38e-7) • Total liquidity is reported at only $1.00, meaning the market is effectively illiquid and the token may be nearly unsellable at any scale • Multiple hourly candles show zero trading volume, indicating a dead or dying market

← Back to all predictions

Track PIKACHU