How concentrated is two ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 16.42% of supply, out of 1,033 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling two?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC, DEX buys were $525,473.00 and sells $523,188.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is two liquidity falling?

Liquidity rose 130.31%, from $3,435.52 (2026-09-28 02:00 UTC) to $7,912.22 (2026-09-28 04:00 UTC).

two Price Today & AI Analysis

twoSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

$0.0₅1955

Contract

Live

4UMfNn34DQVnhh6TphH4dGYYuJWuVskq5mKNZ4ZMpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

322

Market cap

$1,904

At a $1M market cap, $TWO would be $0.001027 (525x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is two a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 12

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about two

3 free answers a day

two: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,033

Top 10 supply share

16.42%

Reported liquidity

$7,877.00

How concentrated is two ownership?: As of 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 16.42% of supply, out of 1,033 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling two?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC, DEX buys were $525,473.00 and sells $523,188.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is two liquidity falling?: Liquidity rose 130.31%, from $3,435.52 (2026-09-28 02:00 UTC) to $7,912.22 (2026-09-28 04:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-28 02:00 UTC	$3,435.52
2026-09-28 03:00 UTC	$23,825.64
2026-09-28 04:00 UTC	$7,912.22

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-28 04:16 UTCBuy · $1.175hrA8TDY…i7VcjzWallet G7V7pGzd…WqjEUU
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCBuy · $0.402fv1H7QD…E26sY5Wallet 7Q4EJwJA…CnKjMP
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCBuy · $3.275tWdfTBq…8CfmRgWallet GWh4k8sA…W4Q4Rk
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCBuy · $19.57571AWTFf…VUEX4gWallet DAx7L8ha…BfwvSt
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCSell · $1.782HRRRDtd…XSC4ReWallet 6xBJdo94…dLE4zJ
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCSell · $16.64334y4BUW…ih36wpWallet 9tRJgtrx…mtr6G1
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCBuy · $29.22498aMBNT…HJpQPdWallet 73SVzo4D…ySfroZ
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCBuy · $0.358zXBB6nj…tCTrefWallet 8oov3NEN…jkgTAY
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCBuy · $21.04646f9b3K…mJwnqJWallet DZ8TpsPz…zicnJs
2026-09-28 04:16 UTCSell · $3.645yoSMGyX…R7fmxQWallet FYZEv5Jy…DgeJFw

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 04:17 AM UTC

FDV

$25,545

Liquidity

$7,877.00

Holders

1,033

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

The token 'two' (4UMfNn...pump) is an extremely small-cap, highly volatile Solana token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$25.5K and total liquidity of only ~$7.88K. Price action over the last few observed hours has been extreme (candles show swings from ~$0.0000036 to $0.00034 and back within 3 hours), and the token is down ~47% over 24h and nearly 80% in the last hour alone at time of snapshot. Holder base is 1,033 addresses with top-10 wallets controlling ~16.4% of supply, though no historical trend or wallet classification data is available to confirm accumulation or distribution behavior. No sniper data, mint/freeze authority status, or contract verification data is available, which is a significant transparency gap for a token this small and volatile.

Key points

Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.88K) relative to FDV (~$25.5K), producing outsized price swings on modest volume
Hourly candles show near-100x intra-candle range (e.g., low $0.0000036 to high $0.0000298 in a single hour), indicating a very immature/illiquid or manipulated market
24h buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.1%/49.9%) despite the steep price decline, suggesting price collapse may be driven by a few large trades against thin liquidity rather than broad sentiment shift
No mint/freeze authority, sniper, or holder-history data available — key risk inputs are simply unknown, not favorable

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Momentum is sharply negative in the immediate term: -79.8% over the last hour and -30% in the last 5 minutes at snapshot, following a massive spike-and-collapse pattern in the hourly candles. With liquidity this thin (~$7.88K), further violent moves in either direction are likely, but the dominant near-term trend is down from the recent spike highs.

Target low

$0.0000010

Target high

$0.0000450

Support: $0.0000036 (candle 1 open/low), $0.0000023 (candle 3 low)
Resistance: $0.0000298 (candle 1 high), $0.000342 (candle 2 high, likely a liquidity-driven spike outlier)

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

With FDV around $25.5K and liquidity under $8K, this token has no established medium-term trend data. Sustainability depends entirely on whether liquidity deepens and holder base grows beyond the current 1,033 addresses; absent that, medium-term price action is essentially unpredictable and should be treated as speculative.

Catalysts

Any liquidity additions to the PumpSwap pool
Growth or flight of the 1,033-holder base
Broader narrative traction around the 'dual-paired asset / NEAR' concept described in the token metadata
Potential listing/exposure events given active twitter/website social presence

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and a single 24h volume snapshot are available; there is no multi-day price history, no holder trend history, and no sniper/authority data. Extreme volatility and thin liquidity make any price projection highly speculative.

two call history

Full track record →

Sep 28bearish@ $0.0000262

24h-85.1%

7d-87.5%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4UMfNn...pump
Total Supply: 974,719,578.84 (formatted)

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.88K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action within the observed 3-hour candle window (up ~95x intra-hour, then collapsing >90%)
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like uncontrolled minting
No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk cannot be quantified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (02:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000358, spiked to a high of $0.0000298, then closed at $0.0000142 — a huge intra-candle rally that partially faded. Candle 2 (03:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000142, spiked violently to $0.000342 (roughly 24x the open) before closing at $0.000240 — a massive wick suggesting a brief illiquid pump. Candle 3 (04:00 UTC) opened at $0.000240, but collapsed to a low of $0.0000232 before closing near $0.0000262, essentially giving back nearly the entire prior candle's gain. This is a classic pump-and-dump/blow-off pattern on a thin-liquidity pair.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is a sharp downtrend following a parabolic spike-and-collapse over the last 2-3 hours. There is insufficient history to assess a genuine medium-term trend; price appears to be oscillating within a wide, unstable range rather than establishing directional structure.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000232 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000036 (candle 1 low/open)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000298 (candle 1 high)

Major resistance

$0.000342 (candle 2 high spike)

Support and resistance are derived purely from the 3 available hourly candles and should be treated as provisional given the extreme volatility and thin liquidity. The $0.000342 level appears to be a liquidity-vacuum spike rather than a durable resistance level tested by real demand.

Notable patterns

Parabolic spike-and-collapse (candle 2 high of $0.000342 vs candle 3 close of $0.0000262, a >90% retracement)
Long upper wicks on candles 1 and 2 indicating rejection at highs
Long lower wick on candle 3 indicating a sharp flush followed by partial recovery

Liquidity

$7,877.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$7.88K against a 24h combined trading volume of over $1.05M (buy $525.47K + sell $523.19K) implies extremely high volume-to-liquidity turnover, meaning the pool is being repeatedly cycled through and is highly susceptible to slippage and large price impact from even moderately sized trades. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.1%/49.9%), and unique buyers (3,729) modestly exceed unique sellers (3,264), yet price still fell ~47% in 24h — a clear sign that thin liquidity depth, not aggregate sentiment, is driving price action. Slippage risk is high for any trade of meaningful size relative to the ~$7.88K pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

974,719,578.84 (formatted)

FDV

$25,545

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from a low of ~$0.0000036 to a high of ~$0.000342 and back down to ~$0.0000262 within a 3-hour window, with a -79.8% move in just the last hour and -47.45% over 24h. This is extreme, unpredictable volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only ~$7.88K against ~$1.05M in 24h combined volume and an FDV of ~$25.5K, meaning the pool can be easily moved by modest trade sizes, producing high slippage and price instability.
Concentrationmedium
Top-10 holders control ~16.42% of supply per the current snapshot — a moderate but not extreme concentration. Top-100 concentration and any historical trend are unavailable, so this assessment is based on limited data.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.88K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action within the observed 3-hour candle window (up ~95x intra-hour, then collapsing >90%)
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like uncontrolled minting
No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk cannot be quantified
Unknown contract verification/spam-flag status adds further due-diligence uncertainty
No historical holder or concentration trend data, limiting ability to detect ongoing accumulation or distribution by large wallets

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($525.47K) and unique buyers (3,729) modestly exceed sell volume ($523.19K) and unique sellers (3,264), indicating some ongoing organic-looking buy-side interest
Top-10 concentration of ~16.42% is not egregiously high compared to many low-cap tokens
Token has active social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting some community/project effort beyond a bare contract deployment

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders capable of tolerating total loss of capital; entirely unsuitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking stable or predictable exposure given the combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unknown risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, contract verification).

'two' is a micro-cap Solana token (~$25.5K FDV, ~$7.88K liquidity) that has just experienced a violent pump-and-dump-style price cycle within a 3-hour window, currently down ~47% over 24h and ~80% in the last hour. The available data has significant gaps (no mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, no holder history), making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative position rather than a fundamentally analyzable investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If genuine buy-side demand continues (24h buyers 3,729 > sellers 3,264, buy volume slightly exceeding sell volume) and liquidity deepens, the token could stabilize and retrace part of its recent losses, especially if the underlying 'dual-paired asset via NEAR' narrative gains traction.

Sustained buyer count exceeding seller count in 24h data
Active social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting ongoing project engagement
Extremely low FDV (~$25.5K) leaves room for outsized percentage gains on relatively small capital inflows

Base Case

Price likely continues to exhibit high volatility with no stable trend, oscillating based on thin-liquidity order flow rather than fundamental demand, until liquidity depth materially increases or the project demonstrates sustained organic volume.

Liquidity remains near current ~$7.88K levels in the near term
No major liquidity injection or listing catalyst occurs imminently
Holder base (~1,033 addresses) remains roughly static absent new information

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme thinness of liquidity (~$7.88K) and the observed pump-and-collapse candle pattern, further sharp downside or continued high volatility is likely, potentially compounded by unknown mint/freeze authority risk enabling further dilution or control by insiders.

Already down ~47% in 24h and ~80% in the last hour at time of snapshot
Extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume and FDV, enabling large price swings from small trades
Unknown authority status leaves open the possibility of minting/freezing abuse
No sniper or holder-history data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 04:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 04:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
PumpSwap pair price data
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Unhosted holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly candles were available, insufficient for robust technical analysis or trend confirmation
No sniper data was available at all
No mint/freeze authority or contract verification data was available
No historical holder count or concentration trend data — only a single current snapshot
No wallet classification data, so no notable/whale holders could be identified
6h price change and native price/24h $ change were marked unknown in source data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in micro-cap and newly launched tokens, carry a high risk of total loss. Always conduct independent due diligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is two a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 12, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell two?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 12, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for two (two)?

Is two a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders capable of tolerating total loss of capital; entirely unsuitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking stable or predictable exposure given the combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unknown risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, contract verification).

What are the key risks of holding two?

Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.88K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action within the observed 3-hour candle window (up ~95x intra-hour, then collapsing >90%) • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like uncontrolled minting