two

two Price Today & AI Analysis

twoSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

Price

$0.042621

-47.45% 24h

Contract

Live
4UMfNn34DQVnhh6TphH4dGYYuJWuVskq5mKNZ4ZMpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,033

Market cap

$25,545

More tokens on Solana

mogmogmullet dog$0.000256+414.0%MC $250.1KCOLLECTCOLLECTGoCollect$0.002385-47.1%MC $2.36Mjizzjizzsmurf jizz$0.000442+780.1%MC $441.8KneetneetNotInEmploymentEducationTraining$0.0344-18.8%MC $34.39MRufoRufoChristopher Rufo$0.044208+185.1%MC $39.1Ke/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.0126+706.8%MC $12.43M

two: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-28 04:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,033

Top 10 supply share

16.42%

Reported liquidity

$7,877.00
How concentrated is two ownership?
As of 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.42% of supply. It reports 1,033 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling two?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $525,473.00 in buys and $523,188.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is two liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +130.31%, from $3,435.52 (2026-09-28 02:00 UTC) to $7,912.22 (2026-09-28 04:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-28 02:00 UTC$3,435.52
2026-09-28 03:00 UTC$23,825.64
2026-09-28 04:00 UTC$7,912.22

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about two

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 04:17 AM UTC

FDV

$25,545

Liquidity

$7,877.00

Holders

1,033

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

The token 'two' (4UMfNn...pump) is an extremely small-cap, highly volatile Solana token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$25.5K and total liquidity of only ~$7.88K. Price action over the last few observed hours has been extreme (candles show swings from ~$0.0000036 to $0.00034 and back within 3 hours), and the token is down ~47% over 24h and nearly 80% in the last hour alone at time of snapshot. Holder base is 1,033 addresses with top-10 wallets controlling ~16.4% of supply, though no historical trend or wallet classification data is available to confirm accumulation or distribution behavior. No sniper data, mint/freeze authority status, or contract verification data is available, which is a significant transparency gap for a token this small and volatile.

Key points

  • Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.88K) relative to FDV (~$25.5K), producing outsized price swings on modest volume
  • Hourly candles show near-100x intra-candle range (e.g., low $0.0000036 to high $0.0000298 in a single hour), indicating a very immature/illiquid or manipulated market
  • 24h buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.1%/49.9%) despite the steep price decline, suggesting price collapse may be driven by a few large trades against thin liquidity rather than broad sentiment shift
  • No mint/freeze authority, sniper, or holder-history data available — key risk inputs are simply unknown, not favorable

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Momentum is sharply negative in the immediate term: -79.8% over the last hour and -30% in the last 5 minutes at snapshot, following a massive spike-and-collapse pattern in the hourly candles. With liquidity this thin (~$7.88K), further violent moves in either direction are likely, but the dominant near-term trend is down from the recent spike highs.

Target low

$0.0000010

Target high

$0.0000450

Support

$0.0000036 (candle 1 open/low), $0.0000023 (candle 3 low)

Resistance

$0.0000298 (candle 1 high), $0.000342 (candle 2 high, likely a liquidity-driven spike outlier)

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

With FDV around $25.5K and liquidity under $8K, this token has no established medium-term trend data. Sustainability depends entirely on whether liquidity deepens and holder base grows beyond the current 1,033 addresses; absent that, medium-term price action is essentially unpredictable and should be treated as speculative.

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions to the PumpSwap pool
  • Growth or flight of the 1,033-holder base
  • Broader narrative traction around the 'dual-paired asset / NEAR' concept described in the token metadata
  • Potential listing/exposure events given active twitter/website social presence

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and a single 24h volume snapshot are available; there is no multi-day price history, no holder trend history, and no sniper/authority data. Extreme volatility and thin liquidity make any price projection highly speculative.

two call history

Full track record →

Sep 28bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
4UMfNn...pump
Total Supply
974,719,578.84 (formatted)

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.88K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action within the observed 3-hour candle window (up ~95x intra-hour, then collapsing >90%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like uncontrolled minting
  • No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk cannot be quantified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (02:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000358, spiked to a high of $0.0000298, then closed at $0.0000142 — a huge intra-candle rally that partially faded. Candle 2 (03:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000142, spiked violently to $0.000342 (roughly 24x the open) before closing at $0.000240 — a massive wick suggesting a brief illiquid pump. Candle 3 (04:00 UTC) opened at $0.000240, but collapsed to a low of $0.0000232 before closing near $0.0000262, essentially giving back nearly the entire prior candle's gain. This is a classic pump-and-dump/blow-off pattern on a thin-liquidity pair.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is a sharp downtrend following a parabolic spike-and-collapse over the last 2-3 hours. There is insufficient history to assess a genuine medium-term trend; price appears to be oscillating within a wide, unstable range rather than establishing directional structure.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000232 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000036 (candle 1 low/open)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000298 (candle 1 high)

Major resistance

$0.000342 (candle 2 high spike)

Support and resistance are derived purely from the 3 available hourly candles and should be treated as provisional given the extreme volatility and thin liquidity. The $0.000342 level appears to be a liquidity-vacuum spike rather than a durable resistance level tested by real demand.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic spike-and-collapse (candle 2 high of $0.000342 vs candle 3 close of $0.0000262, a >90% retracement)
  • Long upper wicks on candles 1 and 2 indicating rejection at highs
  • Long lower wick on candle 3 indicating a sharp flush followed by partial recovery

Liquidity

Liquidity

$7,877.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$7.88K against a 24h combined trading volume of over $1.05M (buy $525.47K + sell $523.19K) implies extremely high volume-to-liquidity turnover, meaning the pool is being repeatedly cycled through and is highly susceptible to slippage and large price impact from even moderately sized trades. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.1%/49.9%), and unique buyers (3,729) modestly exceed unique sellers (3,264), yet price still fell ~47% in 24h — a clear sign that thin liquidity depth, not aggregate sentiment, is driving price action. Slippage risk is high for any trade of meaningful size relative to the ~$7.88K pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

974,719,578.84 (formatted)

FDV

$25,545

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from a low of ~$0.0000036 to a high of ~$0.000342 and back down to ~$0.0000262 within a 3-hour window, with a -79.8% move in just the last hour and -47.45% over 24h. This is extreme, unpredictable volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$7.88K against ~$1.05M in 24h combined volume and an FDV of ~$25.5K, meaning the pool can be easily moved by modest trade sizes, producing high slippage and price instability.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control ~16.42% of supply per the current snapshot — a moderate but not extreme concentration. Top-100 concentration and any historical trend are unavailable, so this assessment is based on limited data.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.88K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action within the observed 3-hour candle window (up ~95x intra-hour, then collapsing >90%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like uncontrolled minting
  • No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk cannot be quantified
  • Unknown contract verification/spam-flag status adds further due-diligence uncertainty
  • No historical holder or concentration trend data, limiting ability to detect ongoing accumulation or distribution by large wallets

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($525.47K) and unique buyers (3,729) modestly exceed sell volume ($523.19K) and unique sellers (3,264), indicating some ongoing organic-looking buy-side interest
  • Top-10 concentration of ~16.42% is not egregiously high compared to many low-cap tokens
  • Token has active social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting some community/project effort beyond a bare contract deployment

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders capable of tolerating total loss of capital; entirely unsuitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking stable or predictable exposure given the combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unknown risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, contract verification).

'two' is a micro-cap Solana token (~$25.5K FDV, ~$7.88K liquidity) that has just experienced a violent pump-and-dump-style price cycle within a 3-hour window, currently down ~47% over 24h and ~80% in the last hour. The available data has significant gaps (no mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, no holder history), making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative position rather than a fundamentally analyzable investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If genuine buy-side demand continues (24h buyers 3,729 > sellers 3,264, buy volume slightly exceeding sell volume) and liquidity deepens, the token could stabilize and retrace part of its recent losses, especially if the underlying 'dual-paired asset via NEAR' narrative gains traction.

  • Sustained buyer count exceeding seller count in 24h data
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting ongoing project engagement
  • Extremely low FDV (~$25.5K) leaves room for outsized percentage gains on relatively small capital inflows

Base Case

Price likely continues to exhibit high volatility with no stable trend, oscillating based on thin-liquidity order flow rather than fundamental demand, until liquidity depth materially increases or the project demonstrates sustained organic volume.

  • Liquidity remains near current ~$7.88K levels in the near term
  • No major liquidity injection or listing catalyst occurs imminently
  • Holder base (~1,033 addresses) remains roughly static absent new information

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme thinness of liquidity (~$7.88K) and the observed pump-and-collapse candle pattern, further sharp downside or continued high volatility is likely, potentially compounded by unknown mint/freeze authority risk enabling further dilution or control by insiders.

  • Already down ~47% in 24h and ~80% in the last hour at time of snapshot
  • Extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume and FDV, enabling large price swings from small trades
  • Unknown authority status leaves open the possibility of minting/freezing abuse
  • No sniper or holder-history data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 04:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 04:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap pair price data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly candles were available, insufficient for robust technical analysis or trend confirmation
  • No sniper data was available at all
  • No mint/freeze authority or contract verification data was available
  • No historical holder count or concentration trend data — only a single current snapshot
  • No wallet classification data, so no notable/whale holders could be identified
  • 6h price change and native price/24h $ change were marked unknown in source data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in micro-cap and newly launched tokens, carry a high risk of total loss. Always conduct independent due diligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is two ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.42% of supply. It reports 1,033 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling two?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 04:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $525,473.00 in buys and $523,188.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is two liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +130.31%, from $3,435.52 (2026-09-28 02:00 UTC) to $7,912.22 (2026-09-28 04:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for two (two)?

Momentum is sharply negative in the immediate term: -79.8% over the last hour and -30% in the last 5 minutes at snapshot, following a massive spike-and-collapse pattern in the hourly candles. With liquidity this thin (~$7.88K), further violent moves in either direction are likely, but the dominant near-term trend is down from the recent spike highs. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000010 to $0.0000450.

Is two a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders capable of tolerating total loss of capital; entirely unsuitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking stable or predictable exposure given the combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unknown risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, contract verification).

What are the key risks of holding two?

Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.88K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Violent, pump-and-dump-like price action within the observed 3-hour candle window (up ~95x intra-hour, then collapsing >90%) • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like uncontrolled minting

← Back to all predictions

Track two