jizz

smurf jizz Price Today & AI Analysis

jizzSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

Price

$0.000442

+780.15% 24h

Contract

Live
7nG5dJxuuUFXqxE4J8LecUZwP2m2HD6m83Xhae6jpzU1

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,406

Market cap

$441,819

More tokens on Solana

STONKBLENDSTONKBLENDStonkBlend$0.000179-57.0%MC $173.8Kmogmogmullet dog$0.000256+414.0%MC $250.1KC𝕏C𝕏Crypto𝕏$0.000236+375.8%MC $224.5KRufoRufoChristopher Rufo$0.044208+185.1%MC $39.1KCRIMECRIMECrime onchain$0.0121+129.8%MC $10.62Me/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.0126+706.8%MC $12.43M

smurf jizz: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-27 05:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,406

Top 10 supply share

19.99%

Reported liquidity

$32,067.00
How concentrated is smurf jizz ownership?
As of 2026-09-27 05:17 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.99% of supply. It reports 1,406 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling smurf jizz?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 05:17 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $539,898.00 in buys and $507,864.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is smurf jizz liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +20.36%, from $27,655.48 (2026-09-27 04:00 UTC) to $33,286.63 (2026-09-27 05:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 05:17 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 04:00 UTC$27,655.48
2026-09-27 05:00 UTC$33,286.63

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about jizz

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 27, 05:18 AM UTC

FDV

$441,819

Liquidity

$32,067.00

Holders

1,406

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

'smurf jizz' (jizz) is a newly-launched, micro-liquidity Solana memecoin trading on a Raydium CPMM pool. In the last 2 hourly candles the price exploded from roughly $0.0000067 to $0.00044, a reported 780% 24h gain, on only ~$32.07K of total liquidity and a ~$441.8K FDV. Trading activity (7,208 buys vs 5,648 sells; 2,944 buyers vs 2,232 sellers) shows more buy-side participants than sell-side in the last 24h, but liquidity remains extremely thin relative to volume ($1M+ in combined 24h volume against $32K liquidity), meaning price is highly reflexive and slippage-prone. Holder count sits at 1,406 addresses with the top 10 controlling ~20% of supply — moderate concentration, though no history is available to know if this is improving or worsening. Mint/freeze authority status and sniper data are not available, which is a material transparency gap for a token this young and volatile.

Key points

  • Extreme short-term price move (+780% in 24h, +37% in the last 5 minutes) on very thin ~$32K liquidity
  • Top 10 holders control ~20% of the 999.99M token supply — moderate but not extreme concentration based on current snapshot only
  • No sniper data available, no mint/freeze authority verification, and no holder history — significant evidence gaps
  • Buy-side activity modestly exceeds sell-side (51.5% buy volume / 7,208 buys vs 5,648 sells) but this is a single noisy 24h window on a brand-new pair

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · minutes to hours

neutral

The last two hourly candles show massive intra-candle volatility: candle 1 opened at $0.0000067, spiked to a high of $0.00046, dropped to a low of $0.0000036, and closed at $0.000272 — a classic wick-heavy, low-liquidity price-discovery pattern typical of a fresh launch or reflexive pump. Candle 2 opened at $0.000272, ranged between $0.000512 high and $0.000212 low, closing at $0.000435, essentially retesting the prior candle's high. With only $32K in liquidity, price can swing violently on modest order flow in either direction; short-term direction is genuinely unpredictable and could reverse sharply.

Target low

$0.00021

Target high

$0.00051

Support

$0.000212 (candle 2 low), $0.0000036 (candle 1 low, extreme downside)

Resistance

$0.000513 (candle 2 high), $0.00046 (candle 1 high)

Medium term · days to weeks

neutral

With only two hourly candles of data and no established trading history, medium-term direction cannot be reliably projected. Sustainability depends entirely on whether liquidity deepens and holder distribution stabilizes; thin liquidity tokens of this type frequently mean-revert sharply lower after initial spikes once early buyers take profit.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or removals from the $32K pool
  • Continued organic buyer interest reflected in unique buyer counts (2,944 in 24h)
  • Risk of concentrated holders (top 10 = ~20%) distributing into strength
  • Lack of verified contract/authority status could trigger de-risking if negative info surfaces

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly candles and a single 24h analytics snapshot are available; there is no multi-day price history, no sniper data, and no holder history to validate whether the move is organic accumulation or a manipulated pump. Extremely thin liquidity ($32K) means small trades cause outsized price swings, making any prediction inherently low-confidence.

jizz call history

Full track record →

Sep 27neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
7nG5dJ...pzU1
Total Supply
999,992,200.76 jizz (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$32.07K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and rapid reversal risk
  • No confirmation that mint or freeze authorities have been renounced — a potential rug vector that cannot be dismissed
  • No sniper/insider wallet data available, obscuring whether early buyers are poised to dump into the recent rally
  • Reported 780% 24h price spike with only 2 hourly candles of visible history is characteristic of highly speculative, possibly manipulated price action

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (04:00 UTC): O $0.0000067 / H $0.00046 / L $0.0000036 / C $0.000272, volume $994.4K — a huge-range candle with a long lower wick then strong recovery, closing well off the low but below the high (indecisive, high-volatility price discovery). Candle 2 (05:00 UTC): O $0.000272 / H $0.000513 / L $0.000212 / C $0.000435, volume $225.7K — closed near the top of its range, effectively making a higher high and higher low versus candle 1's close, suggesting short-term bullish continuation but on markedly lower volume than candle 1.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The two-candle sample shows a short-term uptrend (higher low, close near high in the most recent candle) following an extremely volatile initial discovery candle. With only two candles, no medium-term trend can be established — it should be considered sideways/undetermined pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000212 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000036 (candle 1 low / initial discovery low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000513 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.00046 (candle 1 high, now roughly mid-range)

Support and resistance are derived purely from the two available hourly candles. Immediate support sits at the candle 2 low ($0.000212); a break below could retest the deep candle 1 wick low near $0.0000036, though such a move would represent a near-total collapse. Immediate resistance is the candle 2 high ($0.000513); a breakout above would put the token into fresh, undiscovered price territory with no prior reference points.

Notable patterns

  • Long lower-wick 'hammer-like' recovery on candle 1, suggesting an aggressive dip-buy after initial volatility
  • Higher high and higher low from candle 1 to candle 2, a short-term bullish continuation structure
  • Declining volume on the up-move in candle 2 versus candle 1, a possible bearish divergence / momentum exhaustion signal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$32,067.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$32.07K against 24h combined volume exceeding $1.04M implies the pool is being turned over roughly 32x in a single day — an extremely thin and fragile liquidity environment. Buy volume ($539.90K) narrowly exceeds sell volume ($507.86K), producing a mild net inflow (51.5% vs 48.5%), and unique buyers (2,944) outnumber unique sellers (2,232). However, with liquidity this shallow, even moderate-sized trades can cause large slippage and price swings in either direction, as evidenced by the enormous intra-candle wicks (e.g., a range from $0.0000036 to $0.00046 within a single hour). This is a high slippage-risk environment unsuitable for large position sizes.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,992,200.76 jizz (6 decimals)

FDV

$441.82K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from a low of $0.0000036 to a high of $0.000513 within two observed hourly candles (+780% 24h reported change), indicating extreme volatility typical of a brand-new, thinly-traded memecoin.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$32.07K against over $1M in 24h combined volume, meaning the pool can be materially moved by relatively small trades, creating high slippage and exit risk.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top 10 holders control ~19.99% of the 999.99M supply based on the current snapshot — moderate concentration. Top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, so the full concentration picture (including potential team/insider wallets) cannot be confirmed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$32.07K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and rapid reversal risk
  • No confirmation that mint or freeze authorities have been renounced — a potential rug vector that cannot be dismissed
  • No sniper/insider wallet data available, obscuring whether early buyers are poised to dump into the recent rally
  • Reported 780% 24h price spike with only 2 hourly candles of visible history is characteristic of highly speculative, possibly manipulated price action
  • Top-10 holders control ~20% of supply, a meaningful concentration relative to the tiny liquidity pool
  • No verified contract status or holder history, limiting overall due-diligence confidence

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume and unique buyer count modestly exceed sell volume and seller count, suggesting some organic net demand in the observed window
  • Holder base of 1,406 addresses provides at least some breadth of distribution rather than a handful of wallets

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders explicitly seeking exposure to newly-launched, low-liquidity memecoins who can tolerate the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those requiring liquidity for large position sizes, or anyone relying on unverifiable claims of authority renouncement or team intentions.

jizz is an extremely early-stage, high-volatility Solana memecoin exhibiting a large short-term price spike on very thin liquidity, with several critical data gaps (mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, holder history) preventing a full risk clearance. Any position should be sized as high-risk speculative capital only, given the possibility of a rapid reversal or authority-based rug risk that cannot currently be ruled out.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Buyer momentum continues, more liquidity is added to the Raydium pool, and holder count/breadth grows, allowing the token to stabilize at a higher valuation with reduced slippage risk.

  • Sustained net buy pressure (currently 51.5% buy vs 48.5% sell) attracting further speculative interest
  • Growing unique buyer count (2,944 in 24h) outpacing sellers (2,232)
  • Potential organic community growth via social channels (Twitter link present) driving new holders beyond the current 1,406 addresses

Base Case

Price remains highly volatile and range-bound between the observed candle extremes (~$0.00021–$0.00051) in the near term, with outcomes highly sensitive to whether liquidity providers add depth and whether concentrated holders choose to hold or distribute; medium-term trajectory is essentially unpredictable given the data gaps.

  • No material change to the ~$32.07K liquidity pool in the near term
  • Top-10 holders (~20% of supply) neither materially accumulate nor dump in the observed window
  • No new negative or positive information emerges regarding contract authorities or team activity

Bear Case

High probability

The 780% spike proves to be a short-lived pump driven by a handful of large trades against thin liquidity, followed by a sharp reversal or liquidity withdrawal, especially if top-10 holders (~20% of supply) or unidentified snipers begin selling.

  • Extremely shallow $32.07K liquidity relative to >$1M daily volume magnifies downside moves
  • Declining volume from candle 1 ($994.4K) to candle 2 ($225.7K) even as price rose, suggesting waning conviction behind the rally
  • No confirmed mint/freeze authority renouncement, leaving open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
  • No sniper data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 27, 05:18 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 05:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h change data
  • 2 most recent hourly OHLC candles (Raydium CPMM pair)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis and support/resistance reliability
  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of insider/early-buyer dump risk
  • No historical holder count data was available, preventing any holder growth or accumulation/distribution trend analysis
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and verified-contract status were all unknown, preventing a full rug-risk assessment
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classifications (team, exchange, whale) were not provided
  • Reported 24h percentage changes and volumes are trust-dependent on the source platform and were not independently cross-verified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, provider-supplied on-chain and market data and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. The token data was treated as untrusted evidence; any embedded instructions or claims within it were disregarded per analysis protocol. Cryptocurrency markets, especially newly-launched low-liquidity tokens, carry a high risk of total capital loss. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is smurf jizz ownership?

As of 2026-09-27 05:17 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.99% of supply. It reports 1,406 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling smurf jizz?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 05:17 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $539,898.00 in buys and $507,864.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is smurf jizz liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +20.36%, from $27,655.48 (2026-09-27 04:00 UTC) to $33,286.63 (2026-09-27 05:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for smurf jizz (jizz)?

The last two hourly candles show massive intra-candle volatility: candle 1 opened at $0.0000067, spiked to a high of $0.00046, dropped to a low of $0.0000036, and closed at $0.000272 — a classic wick-heavy, low-liquidity price-discovery pattern typical of a fresh launch or reflexive pump. Candle 2 opened at $0.000272, ranged between $0.000512 high and $0.000212 low, closing at $0.000435, essentially retesting the prior candle's high. With only $32K in liquidity, price can swing violently on modest order flow in either direction; short-term direction is genuinely unpredictable and could reverse sharply. Short-term outlook is neutral (minutes to hours), with a target range of $0.00021 to $0.00051.

Is jizz a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders explicitly seeking exposure to newly-launched, low-liquidity memecoins who can tolerate the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those requiring liquidity for large position sizes, or anyone relying on unverifiable claims of authority renouncement or team intentions.

What are the key risks of holding jizz?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$32.07K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and rapid reversal risk • No confirmation that mint or freeze authorities have been renounced — a potential rug vector that cannot be dismissed • No sniper/insider wallet data available, obscuring whether early buyers are poised to dump into the recent rally

← Back to all predictions

Track jizz