Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon Price Today & AI Analysis

BOSSAHURSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 20, 2026

$0.0₅2259

Contract

Live

41PG2jHAU3VFrwn98fZu1YzzS9wUmEUGRHGFYp2npump

Chain

Solana

Holders

102

Market cap

$2,258

At a $1M market cap, $BOSSAHUR would be $0.001000 (443x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is BOSSAHUR a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 18

Not rated

Nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. No scam rating yet.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about BOSSAHUR

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

GAPLAFederated States of Gapla$0.0₄1033+0.0%MC $10.3K

BROWSEMThe Brown Bull$0.0₅2230+0.0%MC $2.2K

GORENGGORENG$0.0₅2619+0.0%MC $2.6K

OCCAMOccam$0.0₅7799+0.0%MC $7.8K

WhiskerPuff Whisker$0.0₅2361+0.0%MC $2.4K

EterniaEternia$0.000247+475.7%MC $240.9K

Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-20 11:19 UTC

Holder addresses

659

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$42,178.19

How concentrated is Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 659 addresses (2026-07-20 11:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-20 11:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $42,178.19. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-20 11:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 20, 11:19 AM UTC

FDV

$106,392

Liquidity

$42,178.19

Holders

659

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bullish

BOSSAHUR (Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon) is an extremely early-stage Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (mint: 41PG2jHAU3VFrwn98fZu1YzzS9wUmEUGRHGFYp2npump). The token has a total supply of 1 billion, a fully diluted valuation of ~$106K, and only $42.18K in liquidity. It experienced a dramatic 75.37% price surge in the past 24 hours, accompanied by an explosive holder count jump from ~11 to 659 — essentially all within the last 24 hours. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, and unknown update authority. Distribution data (top holders, whale/shark/dolphin breakdown) is entirely unavailable, making deep on-chain risk assessment difficult. This is a very high-risk, ultra-early meme token.

Key points

Explosive 75.37% 24h price gain driven by a sudden viral meme narrative
Holder base grew from 11 to 659 (+98%) in under 24 hours — near-zero prior activity for 30 days
Extremely low liquidity ($42.18K) relative to 24h trading volume ($378.77K), creating severe slippage risk
No top holder data available, making concentration risk unquantifiable
No social links, no description, no verified contract — minimal transparency

AI Price Analysis

bullish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bullish

The token is in a sharp upward momentum phase, having gained 75.37% in 24h and printing a strong bullish candle in the most recent hour (open $0.0000966, close $0.0001064, high $0.0001132). The 5-minute price change of +12.2% confirms continued buying pressure. However, with only $42.18K in liquidity and a very thin order book, any large sell order could reverse gains rapidly.

Target low

$0.000082

Target high

$0.000132

Support: $0.000082 (hourly candle low, 11:00 UTC), $0.000036 (prior hourly open, 10:00 UTC)
Resistance: $0.000113 (hourly candle high, 11:00 UTC), $0.000132 (projected 1.2x extension of recent range)

Medium term · 3–14 days

bearish

Meme tokens with this profile — zero activity for 30 days, sudden viral spike, no fundamentals, no social presence, unknown authority — historically revert sharply after the initial pump. Without sustained community building, new catalysts, or liquidity deepening, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token sat dormant at 11 holders for 30 days before this event, suggesting no organic development.

Catalysts

Continued viral meme spread on social media could sustain momentum
Listing on a DEX aggregator or tracker could attract new buyers
Failure to build community or social presence will accelerate decline
Large early holder exits into thin liquidity would cause rapid price collapse

Bullish factors

75.37% 24h price gain with sustained buying pressure (50.6% buy vs 49.4% sell)
Holder count surged from 11 to 659 in under 24 hours — rapid community formation
2,445 buys vs 2,104 sells in 24h — more buy transactions than sell transactions
1,106 unique buyers vs 924 unique sellers — net new demand
5-minute price change of +12.2% confirms active momentum at time of analysis

Bearish factors

Only $42.18K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk for any meaningful position
Token was completely dormant (11 holders, zero change) for the entire 30-day historical period prior to this spike
No verified contract, no social links, no description — near-zero transparency
Top holder distribution data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown
FDV of $106K is very small; even minor sell pressure can cause outsized price drops
Unknown update authority — cannot confirm mutable/immutable status of key parameters

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (2) no top holder data to assess concentration or exit risk, (3) no sniper data, (4) unknown update authority, and (5) the token's 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day spike is a classic pump pattern with highly unpredictable follow-through.

BOSSAHUR call history

Full track record →

Jul 20bullish@ $0.000106

24h-98.3%

7d-98.4%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 41PG2j...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000

Key Risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($42.18K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and rapid drawdowns
30-day dormancy followed by a single-day pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
No top holder data — original 11 holders could dump into current liquidity at any time
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — rug pull mechanics cannot be ruled out

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (10:00 UTC): O=$0.0000361, H=$0.0001003, L=$0.0000361, C=$0.0000983 — a massive bullish candle with a 178% range from open to high, closing near the top. This is a strong breakout candle. Candle [1] (11:00 UTC): O=$0.0000966, H=$0.0001132, L=$0.0000820, C=$0.0001064 — a continuation candle that opened near the prior close, made a higher high ($0.0001132 vs $0.0001003), and closed above the open. This is a bullish continuation pattern. Volume declined from 172,261 (candle 2) to 116,689 (candle 1), suggesting some cooling of momentum but still elevated activity.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is clearly bullish based on the two available candles showing higher highs and higher closes. Medium-term trend is classified as sideways/unknown given the 30-day dormancy period prior to this spike — there is no meaningful price history to establish a medium-term trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000082 (low of the 11:00 UTC candle)

Major support

$0.000036 (open of the 10:00 UTC breakout candle — pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000113 (high of the 11:00 UTC candle)

Major resistance

$0.000132 (estimated 1.2x extension of the 11:00 candle range)

The $0.000082 level represents the most recent hourly low and is the first line of defense for bulls. A break below this would expose the $0.000036 pre-pump base. On the upside, $0.000113 is the immediate ceiling from the most recent candle high. These levels are derived from only 2 candles and should be treated with very low confidence.

Notable patterns

Breakout candle (10:00 UTC): Massive bullish engulfing-style candle with open equal to low — strong directional conviction
Higher high pattern: 11:00 UTC candle printed a higher high ($0.0001132) vs 10:00 UTC ($0.0001003) — short-term uptrend confirmation
Volume declining on continuation: Volume dropped ~32% on the second candle despite price making higher highs — mild bearish divergence
Extremely thin candle history: Only 2 data points available — all technical analysis carries very low statistical confidence

Liquidity

$42,178.19

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $42.18K against a 24h trading volume of ~$378.77K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 9:1. This means the pool is being turned over roughly 9 times per day, creating extreme slippage risk for any position of meaningful size. A trade of even $1,000–$2,000 would likely move the price by several percent. The net flow is marginally positive (inflow) with $191.48K in buys vs $187.29K in sells — a difference of only $4.19K, indicating the market is nearly balanced. There are 1,106 unique buyers vs 924 unique sellers, and 2,445 buy transactions vs 2,104 sell transactions, suggesting slightly more buy-side activity. The pair trades on PumpSwap (GTNYESrYktYUgkbe9CQu9yhftWQY1AcgFPUwmugM5aPJ). The extremely thin liquidity means this token is highly susceptible to price manipulation and rapid drawdowns.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000

FDV

$106,392

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
75.37% gain in 24 hours with a +12.2% move in the last 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles of price history available. Extreme volatility is inherent to this token's profile.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $42.18K against $378.77K in 24h volume (9:1 ratio). Any position above ~$500 faces significant slippage. A single large sell could collapse the price.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($42.18K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and rapid drawdowns
30-day dormancy followed by a single-day pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
No top holder data — original 11 holders could dump into current liquidity at any time
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — rug pull mechanics cannot be ruled out
No verified contract, no social links, no description — near-zero project transparency
FDV of only $106K means even small USD-denominated sells cause large percentage price drops
All 648 new holders acquired via swap in under 24h — highly speculative, momentum-driven crowd with low conviction

Mitigating factors

Token marked as 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be changed
Launched on PumpFun/PumpSwap which has some built-in anti-rug mechanisms
Buy/sell pressure is nearly balanced (50.6%/49.4%) — no obvious one-sided manipulation at this moment
1,106 unique buyers in 24h suggests broad participation rather than a single actor driving price
Possible spam flag is 'false' per metadata

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits in thin liquidity conditions. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks.

BOSSAHUR is a pure meme speculation play with no fundamentals, no verified contract, no social presence, and a 30-day dormancy history that makes the current pump appear event-driven rather than organically developed. The investment thesis is entirely momentum-based: either the viral meme narrative sustains and attracts more buyers into thin liquidity (producing outsized short-term gains), or the original holders and early entrants exit into the current pump (producing rapid and severe losses for late buyers). There is no middle ground for a token of this profile.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The meme narrative behind 'Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon' goes viral on social media (Twitter/X, TikTok, Telegram), driving a sustained wave of new buyers into the thin liquidity pool. Holder count continues to grow rapidly, FDV pushes toward $500K–$1M, and the token becomes a recognized meme coin in the Solana ecosystem for a short cycle.

Sustained viral social media momentum
Community formation and Telegram/Discord creation
Continued holder growth beyond the initial 24h spike
No large dumps from original 11 holders or early entrants

Base Case

The token experiences a partial retracement (30–50%) from the current pump high over the next 24–72 hours as momentum fades and early buyers take profits. It stabilizes at a lower price level with a small but active holder base of 200–400 wallets, trading at low volume until the next catalyst (if any).

Buying momentum slows as the initial viral event fades
Some but not all early holders exit, creating partial but not total price collapse
Liquidity remains thin, preventing large new positions from entering or exiting cleanly
No new major catalyst emerges in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

The initial pump exhausts buying momentum within hours. Original 11 holders and early swap buyers begin selling into thin liquidity ($42.18K pool). Price retraces 70–90% from current levels. Holder count stabilizes or declines as speculative traders exit. Token returns to dormancy.

Thin liquidity unable to absorb sell pressure from early holders
No social presence or community to sustain narrative
Classic pump-and-dump pattern matching 30-day dormancy + single-day spike
Unknown concentration risk from original 11 holders

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 20, 11:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-20 11:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority, mutability)
PumpSwap pair data (GTNYESrYktYUgkbe9CQu9yhftWQY1AcgFPUwmugM5aPJ)
OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Holder metrics (total holders, acquisition method, distribution categories)
Historical holder series (30-day daily data)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
No top holder data available — concentration and whale risk cannot be quantified
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and PnL state unknown
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
Supply concentration metrics (top10, top100) returned as 0% — likely a data gap, not genuine zero concentration
All holder distribution categories (whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus) returned as 0 — data unavailable
No social links or project description — fundamental analysis impossible
Token is extremely new with minimal price history — all predictions carry very low confidence

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. The data used is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party analytics providers and may contain errors or gaps. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Past price performance (including the 75.37% 24h gain) is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sell Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon (BOSSAHUR)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 659 addresses (2026-07-20 11:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-20 11:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $42,178.19. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Tung Tung Tung Agamemnon (BOSSAHUR)?

Is BOSSAHUR a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits in thin liquidity conditions. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks.

What are the key risks of holding BOSSAHUR?

Critically shallow liquidity ($42.18K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and rapid drawdowns • 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day pump is a classic pump-and-dump pattern • No top holder data — original 11 holders could dump into current liquidity at any time