TEMPO

Golden Tempo Price Prediction 2026

TEMPO
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 3, 2026

3wL2KuTsaDUX33VvpwCn7st7yxGhY6KKqPkZtMQzpump

$0.053442

+4.79%

FDV $3,441

LiveContract:3wL2KuTsaDUX33VvpwCn7st7yxGhY6KKqPkZtMQzpumpChain:SolanaHolders:702Market cap:$3,441

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about TEMPO

Report snapshotas of May 3, 03:47 AM
FDV

$116,621

Liquidity

$0

Holders

427

Snipers

31

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Golden Tempo (TEMPO) is a Solana memecoin deployed via j7tracker.io with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a current FDV of ~$116,621. The token has experienced an extraordinary 447.9% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from ~$0.0000213 to ~$0.0001166. However, this spike is accompanied by severe red flags: total on-chain liquidity is reported as $0.00, holders have dropped sharply from ~1,314 to 427 (a -67.5% decline), sell pressure dominates at 59.7%, and the top 10 wallets control 32.4% of supply. The token is unverified, the update authority is unknown, and the project description offers no substantive utility beyond a deployment tool reference.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 24h price surge of +447.9% on PumpSwap
Severe holder exodus: -887 holders in 24h (from ~1,314 to 427)
Zero reported on-chain liquidity despite active trading volume
Top 10 wallets hold 32.4% of supply; top 100 hold 89.1%
20 identified snipers with mixed PnL — majority at a loss or near breakeven

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The 447.9% pump is almost certainly a low-liquidity spike. With $0 reported liquidity, 59.7% sell pressure, and a massive holder exodus (-887 in 24h), the price is highly likely to retrace sharply. The most recent candle (03:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.0000388 vs the current price of $0.0001166, suggesting the current price may already be detached from recent OHLC data or reflects a very thin-book spike. Expect violent downside.

Target low$0.000008
Target high$0.000055
Support: $0.0000388 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open), $0.0000153 (candle [1] open / candle [3] open), $0.0000095 (candle [4] low)
Resistance: $0.0000555 (candle [3] high), $0.0001166 (current price — likely spike top)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Without genuine liquidity, a growing holder base, or any identifiable utility, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The 30-day holder history was completely flat at 1,314 before the recent crash to 427, suggesting the token was dormant and then experienced a coordinated pump-and-dump event. Recovery to prior levels would require new organic demand that is not currently evidenced.

Catalysts
  • Any new exchange listing or liquidity injection
  • Viral social media attention (Twitter/website links present)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally

Bullish factors

  • Extraordinary 24h momentum (+447.9%) could attract momentum traders
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis links)
  • 24h buy count (6,337) exceeds sell count (5,974), suggesting some buyer interest

Bearish factors

  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Holders collapsed from 1,314 to 427 (-67.5%) in 24h
  • 59.7% sell pressure by volume ($258.38K sells vs $174.49K buys)
  • More unique sellers (2,747) than buyers (2,411) in 24h
  • Top 100 wallets hold 89.1% of supply — extreme concentration
  • Update authority unknown — rug risk cannot be ruled out
  • Token deployed via generic tool (j7tracker.io) with no stated utility
  • 30-day holder history was completely flat before sudden collapse — suggests artificial activity
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to zero reported liquidity, anomalous OHLC data (candle L values appear inverted in candle [1]: L > H which may indicate data quality issues), extreme volatility, and a collapsing holder base. Price prediction in this environment is highly speculative.

Deep Analysis

Four hourly candles are available (00:00–03:00 UTC on 2026-05-03). Note: Candle [1] (03:00 UTC) appears to have an anomalous OHLC where L ($0.0000577) > H ($0.0000388), which may indicate a data quality issue or inverted field labeling. Taking candles at face value: Candle [4] (00:00) opened at $0.0000350 and closed lower at $0.0000153 — a bearish candle. Candle [3] (01:00) opened at $0.0000153, spiked to a high of $0.0000555, and closed at $0.0000391 — a bullish recovery with a long lower wick. Candle [2] (02:00) opened at $0.0000388, hit a high of $0.0000388, and closed at $0.0000153 — a strong bearish candle (shooting star / bearish engulf). Candle [1] (03:00) shows the highest volume (194,248 USD) with ambiguous OHLC due to suspected data inversion. The current price of $0.0001166 is significantly above all four candle ranges, suggesting the spike occurred after 03:00 UTC or the data is incomplete.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 40%Sell 60%

Short-term trend appears upward based on the 447.9% 24h price change, but the underlying candle structure (bearish candle [2], flat 30-day holder history) suggests this is a spike rather than a sustained uptrend. Medium-term trend is sideways-to-down given the 30-day dormancy and holder collapse.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000388 (recent candle close / open zone)
Major$0.0000095 (candle [4] low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000555 (candle [3] high)
Major$0.0001166 (current spike price)

The $0.0000388 level has acted as both support and resistance across multiple candles and represents the most significant near-term pivot. A break below this level would target the $0.0000095–$0.0000153 range. The current price of $0.0001166 is well above all recent candle highs and represents an extreme extension with no technical basis for support.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing pattern in candle [2] (02:00 UTC)
  • Long lower wick in candle [3] (01:00 UTC) suggesting intrabar buying but bearish close context
  • Volume climax in candle [1] — highest volume candle may mark a local top
  • Price spike to $0.0001166 far exceeds all 4-hour OHLC ranges — likely thin-book manipulation or data gap
  • 30-day flat holder base followed by sudden -67.5% holder drop — classic pump-and-dump signature

Total holders427
24h Δ-887
7d Δ-887
30d Δ-887
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Strongly inverse and anomalous: price surged +447.9% while holders collapsed by -887 (-67.5%). This divergence is a major red flag — typically price pumps attract new holders. The inverse relationship here strongly suggests a coordinated pump with mass exits, consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

The 30-day historical holder data shows a completely flat base of exactly 1,314 holders from 2026-04-03 through 2026-05-02 (zero net change every single day for 30 days). This is highly abnormal and suggests either data staleness, a dormant token, or artificial holder count maintenance. Then, within the most recent 24-hour period, holders collapsed from 1,314 to 427 — a loss of 887 holders (-67.5%). The 1-hour metric shows -1,159 holders (-270%), which may reflect a data anomaly or rapid wallet exits. The holder distribution shows 132 whales, 46 sharks, 167 dolphins, 54 fish, and 22 octopus-classified wallets, suggesting the remaining 427 holders are disproportionately large-balance accounts — consistent with a scenario where retail holders have exited and only larger wallets remain.

Top 10 hold32.40%
Top 100 hold89.10%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

8WDxqnNj2WUDXS3oqXrQsRuiuCaAyuf9qTgmd43XDdDv

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

11.26%

9GVbk3Xe4EWEgwwJD6WMLyW4fhngHm6R7eDC2wvBdomH

Individual whale

2.99%

VJSDW6S74YXR4rRR9P4xwhMvLZJQMhrUb8XMFirUsy1

Individual whale

2.80%

6eVwYPHtNtK8dhgNQnHCYx9nzqheQi6vXdSNGDin5KR1

Individual whale

2.56%

4qBgLA3vXnjkAAAzBB5wLN9AS9ckivNKppemB2P5ixCu

Individual whale

2.41%

The top holder (11.26%, address 8WDxqnNj2WUDXS3oqXrQsRuiuCaAyuf9qTgmd43XDdDv) matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data, classifying it as the DEX liquidity pool. Excluding the LP, the next 9 holders each control 2.03%–2.99% of supply — a suspiciously uniform distribution that may indicate coordinated wallet splitting. Holders #2 through #20 hold remarkably similar balances (ranging from ~14.3M to ~29.9M tokens), which is atypical of organic distribution and may suggest a single entity controlling multiple wallets. Top 100 wallets hold 89.1% of supply, leaving only 10.9% distributed among the remaining holders — extreme concentration. Overall sentiment is distributing given the massive holder exodus and dominant sell volume.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$174,490
Sell$258,380
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers2,411
Unique sellers2,747

Total liquidity is reported as $0.00, which is an extreme red flag. Despite $432,870 in 24h trading volume (buys + sells), the absence of reported liquidity suggests either the liquidity pool has been drained, the data feed is lagging, or the pool is structured in a way that obscures depth. Slippage risk is rated high — any meaningful sell order would likely move the price dramatically. Net flow is negative: sell volume ($258,380) exceeds buy volume ($174,490) by $83,890, and unique sellers (2,747) outnumber unique buyers (2,411). The FDV is also reported as $0.00 in the analytics section (contradicting the $116,621 from metadata), further suggesting data inconsistency or a liquidity pool that has been effectively emptied. Market health is poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 TEMPO
FDV$116,621.17

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is 1,000,000,000 TEMPO (1 billion), a standard memecoin supply. FDV is $116,621.17 at the current price of $0.0001166. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the token is marked as 'mutable: false', which is a mild positive (metadata cannot be changed). However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data — both are listed as unknown. The token was deployed via j7tracker.io, a generic deployment tool, with no stated utility, roadmap, or team information. The contract is unverified. The combination of unknown authorities, unverified contract, and generic deployment tool elevates rug risk to unknown-but-elevated. The 'possible spam: false' flag from the data provider offers minimal reassurance given the other red flags.

Volatility
high

447.9% price surge in 24h with zero liquidity. 5-minute price change of -1.99% and 1-hour change of +32.84% indicate extreme intraday volatility. The token can lose 80%+ of its value in minutes.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity reported as $0.00. Despite $432K+ in 24h volume, there is no confirmed liquidity depth. Any sell order of meaningful size will face catastrophic slippage.

Concentration
high

Top 10 wallets hold 32.4% of supply; top 100 hold 89.1%. Excluding the LP (11.26%), the next 9 holders each hold 2.03%–2.99% in suspiciously uniform amounts, suggesting possible multi-wallet control by a single entity.

SniperDump
low

Most of the 20 identified snipers have already sold their positions. Only 2 snipers (5NcMAfZBxw5VW5v3F9k5StPsNcP3sBZcLJoDFmuc3Mb9 with $100 balance and 5yeWDDsdSzqepSawsDKfxMqPfPLJwU9xrHBqbRAfc86d with $1 balance) retain any holdings. Sniper dump risk is therefore low at this point.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked mutable:false which is positive, but without confirmed renounced authorities, the risk of a rug pull via token manipulation cannot be fully excluded.

Key risks

  • Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position
  • Holder base collapsed 67.5% in 24h while price pumped — classic pump-and-dump signature
  • Top 100 wallets hold 89.1% of supply — extreme concentration
  • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority status
  • Unverified contract deployed via generic tool with no stated utility
  • 30-day flat holder history (exactly 1,314 every day) is highly anomalous and suggests artificial data or dormant token
  • Sell volume ($258K) and unique sellers (2,747) exceed buy volume ($174K) and buyers (2,411)

Mitigating factors

  • Sniper dump risk is low — most early snipers have already exited
  • Token marked as mutable:false (metadata immutable)
  • Not flagged as spam by data provider
  • Active social links (Twitter, website) suggest some community presence
  • 24h buy transaction count (6,337) slightly exceeds sell count (5,974)
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of low-liquidity memecoin speculation and are prepared to lose 100% of any capital deployed. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi and pump-and-dump dynamics.

TEMPO presents as a high-risk, low-liquidity Solana memecoin that has experienced a dramatic 447.9% price spike accompanied by a catastrophic 67.5% holder exodus. The on-chain data is consistent with a pump-and-dump event: 30 days of artificial dormancy at exactly 1,314 holders, followed by a coordinated pump and mass exit. The zero liquidity reading, extreme supply concentration (top 100 = 89.1%), and dominant sell pressure make this an extremely dangerous speculative instrument.

Bull case (low)

Viral social media momentum attracts a new wave of retail buyers, liquidity is injected into the PumpSwap pool, and the token sustains its price above $0.0001 with growing holder count.

  • Viral Twitter/social media campaign drives new buyer inflow
  • Liquidity provider adds depth to the PumpSwap pool
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifts all tokens
  • Community forms around the token and drives organic demand

Base case

Price retraces 60–80% from the spike high as sell pressure continues to dominate, settling in the $0.000020–$0.000040 range with low volume and a small residual holder base of 200–400 wallets.

  • Some buyers from the pump retain positions and provide floor support
  • No additional liquidity injection occurs
  • Social media attention fades within 24–48 hours
  • No coordinated second pump attempt

Bear case (high)

Liquidity remains at or near zero, remaining large holders (top 10 controlling 32.4%) begin selling, and the price collapses 80–95% back toward the $0.000009–$0.000015 range seen in recent candles.

  • Zero liquidity makes price collapse instantaneous upon any whale sell
  • Holder exodus continues as remaining holders realize losses
  • No utility, roadmap, or team transparency to anchor long-term value
  • Suspected pump-and-dump structure with coordinated wallet distribution
  • Snipers and early buyers have already exited, removing support

GeneratedMay 3, 03:47 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of approximately 2026-05-03T03:00–03:30 UTC. OHLC candles cover 2026-05-03T00:00–03:00 UTC (4 hourly candles). Holder history covers 2026-04-03 through 2026-05-02 (30 days daily). Sniper data covers first 1,000 blocks post-launch.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • On-chain holder metrics and distribution data
  • OHLC price candles (hourly, USD)
  • Sniper wallet analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Historical holder time series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data

Limitations

  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data feed issue or genuinely empty pool; cannot confirm
  • Candle [1] (03:00 UTC) has anomalous OHLC where L > H, suggesting possible data inversion or feed error
  • Sniper 'sniped' amounts and balances are largely 'unknown', limiting precise concentration calculation
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — rug risk cannot be fully quantified
  • The 30-day flat holder history (exactly 1,314 every day) is statistically implausible and may indicate data staleness or API caching issues
  • Current price ($0.0001166) is significantly above all 4 available OHLC candle ranges, suggesting either a data gap or the spike occurred outside the candle window
  • FDV reported as $0.00 in analytics section but $116,621 in metadata — data inconsistency unresolved
  • No team, roadmap, audit, or whitepaper data available for fundamental analysis

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly low-liquidity memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data presented contains anomalies and inconsistencies that reduce analytical confidence. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This report is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold TEMPO tokens.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 TEMPO

Key Risks

Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position
Holder base collapsed 67.5% in 24h while price pumped — classic pump-and-dump signature
Top 100 wallets hold 89.1% of supply — extreme concentration
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority status

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
Low risk

20 snipers were identified in the first 1,000 blocks. The majority have already sold their positions (balance listed as 'unknown' with sold amounts ranging from $3 to $3,146). PnL is mixed: 7 snipers are in profit (ranging from +0.3% to +82.5%), while 8 are at a loss (ranging from -12.3% to -40.9%), and 5 are near breakeven (0%–9.8%). The highest-profit sniper (1aDerPKk87xJHCAqTY5bGxF5Xet2MG476y4Zmq2WJ8Y) realized +82.5% on $1,153 sold. Sniper AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51 sold the most at $3,146 with only +8.2% profit, suggesting early entry at relatively high prices. The high sell-through rate among snipers indicates early buyers have largely exited, reducing the risk of a sudden coordinated sniper dump but also signaling that informed early participants did not hold.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.01%
PnL stateMixed
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
low

Sniper 5NcMAfZBxw5VW5v3F9k5StPsNcP3sBZcLJoDFmuc3Mb9 (also top holder #11 with 2.01% of supply, ~$100 balance) is the only sniper with a confirmed remaining balance. Most other snipers have sold out entirely.

Predominantly bearish — most snipers have fully exited their positions. The mixed PnL (8 of 20 at a loss) suggests the token did not perform as expected for early buyers, and those who profited did so with modest gains relative to the current spike price.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Golden Tempo (TEMPO)?

The 447.9% pump is almost certainly a low-liquidity spike. With $0 reported liquidity, 59.7% sell pressure, and a massive holder exodus (-887 in 24h), the price is highly likely to retrace sharply. The most recent candle (03:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.0000388 vs the current price of $0.0001166, suggesting the current price may already be detached from recent OHLC data or reflects a very thin-book spike. Expect violent downside. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000008 to $0.000055.

Is TEMPO a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of low-liquidity memecoin speculation and are prepared to lose 100% of any capital deployed. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi and pump-and-dump dynamics.

How are TEMPO holders trending?

Golden Tempo currently has 427 holders and is declining (24h: -887, 7d: -887, 30d: -887). The 30-day historical holder data shows a completely flat base of exactly 1,314 holders from 2026-04-03 through 2026-05-02 (zero net change every single day for 30 days). This is highly abnormal and suggests either data staleness, a dormant token, or artificial holder count maintenance. Then, within the most recent 24-hour period, holders collapsed from 1,314 to 427 — a loss of 887 holders (-67.5%). The 1-hour metric shows -1,159 holders (-270%), which may reflect a data anomaly or rapid wallet exits. The holder distribution shows 132 whales, 46 sharks, 167 dolphins, 54 fish, and 22 octopus-classified wallets, suggesting the remaining 427 holders are disproportionately large-balance accounts — consistent with a scenario where retail holders have exited and only larger wallets remain.

What does sniper activity look like for TEMPO?

Snipers hold roughly 2.01% of supply with PnL state "mixed" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding TEMPO?

Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position • Holder base collapsed 67.5% in 24h while price pumped — classic pump-and-dump signature • Top 100 wallets hold 89.1% of supply — extreme concentration

Track TEMPO