Tiles

Internet Tiles Price Prediction 2026

Tiles
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 17, 2026

3tHpmEypJDxuQQuBWk4JptDPXMZXCSRxHXrTVUG1pump

$0.052487

FDV $2,484

LiveContract:3tHpmEypJDxuQQuBWk4JptDPXMZXCSRxHXrTVUG1pumpChain:SolanaHolders:180Market cap:$2,484

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Tiles

Report snapshotas of May 17, 03:50 PM
FDV

$33,388

Liquidity

$15,069

Holders

340

Snipers

42

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Internet Tiles (Tiles) is a Solana memecoin launched on PumpSwap (mint: 3tHpmEypJDxuQQuBWk4JptDPXMZXCSRxHXrTVUG1pump). At ~$0.0000334, the token has a fully diluted valuation of ~$33–35K and total liquidity of only $15.07K. The token was dormant for nearly a month (39 holders from mid-April through May 15) before an explosive single-day holder surge to 420 on May 16 (+381, +91%). It is now at 340 holders, suggesting significant churn. Sell pressure dominates heavily (71.5% sell volume vs 28.5% buy volume), and the price has declined sharply from an intraday high near $0.000102 to the current ~$0.0000334 — a drawdown of ~67% from peak. The token carries very high risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive single-day holder acquisition: +381 holders (+91%) on May 16, from a flat base of 39 over the prior month
Extremely low liquidity ($15.07K) relative to FDV ($33–35K), creating severe slippage risk
Heavy sell dominance: 71.5% sell volume ($166.56K) vs 28.5% buy volume ($66.37K) in 24h
Top 10 holders control 45.22% of supply; top 100 control 95.57%, indicating extreme concentration
20 snipers active in first 1000 blocks, majority in profit — elevated dump risk from early buyers

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

Price has collapsed ~67% from the intraday high of ~$0.000102 (candle [20] low) reached during the May 16 pump. Current price ~$0.0000334 is attempting a minor recovery (+25.9% in 1h, +35.7% in 6h) but remains well below the peak. With 71.5% sell pressure, shallow liquidity of $15.07K, and net holder count declining (-7 in 24h), the short-term bias is bearish. Any bounce is likely to be sold into.

Target low$0.0000167
Target high$0.0000484
Support: $0.0000217 (candle [5] low), $0.0000231 (candle [23] low / candle [24] low cluster), $0.0000167 (candle [5] intraday low — extreme support)
Resistance: $0.0000484 (candle [12] close / candle [11] open area), $0.0000566 (candle [12] high / candle [16] high area), $0.0000803 (candle [19] high), $0.0001020 (candle [20] all-time high in dataset)

Medium term

bearish
3–14 days

The token was completely dormant for ~28 days before a single-day pump-and-dump event on May 16. With no described utility, no verified contract, no description, and a tiny FDV of ~$33K, sustained medium-term appreciation requires continuous new buyer inflow that is not evidenced in the data. Sniper profits are being realized, and the holder base is already shrinking post-pump.

Catalysts
  • Renewed social media attention via Twitter/website could attract new buyers
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally could lift all small caps
  • Whale accumulation at current depressed prices (not yet evidenced)
  • Potential listing or partnership announcement (no evidence in current data)

Bullish factors

  • 1h price recovery of +25.9% and 6h recovery of +35.7% suggest short-term buying interest
  • Holder base grew from 39 to 420 in a single day, showing viral potential
  • 1,303 buy transactions in 24h indicates active participation
  • Sniper [19] realized +211.4% PnL, sniper [10] +188.3% — early buyers validated the pump thesis

Bearish factors

  • 71.5% sell volume dominance ($166.56K sells vs $66.37K buys)
  • Price down -14.2% over full 24h period despite short-term bounces
  • Holder count declining: -7 (-2.1%) in 24h after peak of 420
  • Liquidity of only $15.07K — any meaningful sell order causes severe slippage
  • Token was dormant for ~28 days prior to pump, suggesting no organic development
  • Top 10 holders control 45.22%; top 100 control 95.57% — extreme concentration risk
  • No contract verification, no token description, update authority unknown
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely small market cap (~$33K FDV), near-zero liquidity ($15.07K), lack of any described utility or verified contract, and the highly speculative memecoin nature. Price action is driven entirely by sentiment and momentum, making reliable prediction impossible. The 24h candle data shows extreme volatility (price ranged from ~$0.0000167 to ~$0.000102 — a 6x range in 24 hours).

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC dataset (hourly candles, May 16 16:00 UTC through May 17 15:00 UTC) reveals a classic pump-and-dump pattern. Price surged from ~$0.0000389 (candle [24] close) through a peak of ~$0.000102 (candle [20] low field appears anomalous — the high of candle [20] was $0.0000659 and candle [19] high was $0.0000803, with candle [20] showing an unusual low of $0.000102 suggesting a data inversion or spike). The dominant pattern is: sharp pump in candles [22]–[19] (May 16 18:00–21:00 UTC), followed by a sustained downtrend through candles [18]–[5] (May 16 22:00 – May 17 11:00 UTC), with a partial recovery in candles [2]–[1] (May 17 14:00–15:00 UTC). Candle [9] (07:00 UTC May 17) shows a long upper wick (H: $0.0000405, C: $0.0000250) — a bearish shooting star. Candle [12] (04:00 UTC) shows a strong bullish engulfing with a wide range (O: $0.0000327, H: $0.0000566, C: $0.0000487) but was subsequently sold off. The most recent candle [1] shows a recovery attempt (O: $0.0000278, H: $0.0000357, C: $0.0000334).

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 29%Sell 72%

Short-term and medium-term trends are both bearish. The token peaked in the $0.000067–$0.000102 range during the May 16 pump and has been making lower highs and lower lows since. The most recent candles show a tentative bounce from the $0.0000167–$0.0000217 support zone, but the overall structure remains a downtrend from the pump peak.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000217 (candle [5] low / candle [4] close area)
Major$0.0000167 (candle [5] absolute low — extreme support / near-zero floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000357 (candle [1] high / candle [3] high area)
Major$0.0000566 (candle [12] high / candle [16] high — prior consolidation zone)

The key support cluster sits between $0.0000167 and $0.0000231, established by the lows of candles [5], [23], and [24]. Immediate resistance is the $0.0000357–$0.0000405 zone (candle [1] high, candle [9] high). A break above $0.0000566 would be needed to signal any meaningful trend reversal. The $0.000067–$0.000102 zone represents the pump range and acts as heavy overhead resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: explosive volume spike (candle [21]: $90,940) followed by sustained price decline and volume collapse
  • Bearish shooting star at candle [9]: high of $0.0000405 with close at $0.0000250 — long upper wick rejection
  • Bearish engulfing sequence: candles [18]→[17]→[16] show consecutive lower closes from $0.0000657 to $0.0000539 to $0.0000355
  • Tentative recovery candles [2]→[1]: consecutive higher closes ($0.0000279 → $0.0000334) — potential dead-cat bounce
  • Volume exhaustion: 99.4% volume collapse from pump peak ($90,940) to most recent candle ($575)
  • Lower highs pattern: $0.0000803 (candle [19]) → $0.0000566 (candle [12]) → $0.0000405 (candle [9]) → $0.0000357 (candle [1])

Total holders340
24h Δ-2.1
7d Δ+89
30d Δ+89
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder growth was perfectly correlated with the price pump: the token had exactly 39 holders for the entire period from April 17 through May 15 (28 days of zero growth), then exploded to 420 holders on May 16 (+381, +91%) coinciding with the price pump to ~$0.000067–$0.000102. Since the pump, holders have declined to 340 (-80 from peak, -7 in the last 24h), tracking the price decline. This confirms the holder surge was pump-driven, not organic.

The holder history is stark: 39 holders for 28 consecutive days (April 17 – May 15) with zero net change, followed by a single-day explosion of +381 holders (+91%) on May 16 coinciding with the price pump. Current holders stand at 340, down from the peak of 420 — a loss of 80 holders (-19%) since the peak. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical (+301, +89%) because all growth occurred in a single day. The 24h trend is now negative (-7, -2.1%), and the 1h shows +8 which may reflect the current short-term price bounce. Distribution breakdown: whales=100, sharks=38, dolphins=81, fish=68, octopus=26. The high whale count (100) relative to total holders (340) — nearly 29% of all holders classified as whales — is concerning and consistent with the extreme supply concentration data.

Top 10 hold45.22%
Top 100 hold95.57%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

Dk2QeqDaGTdvLzFECXyPA6rj79L3MLadSUW3AvKNjY7D

DEX liquidity pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the PRICE section (Dk2QeqDaGTdvLzFECXyPA6rj79L3MLadSUW3AvKNjY7D on PumpSwap), holding 22.17% of supply as liquidity

22.17%

2hLxyynC7xVphGvMxxxANwHuwFXNZKi8PwJZdxitNXbo

Individual whale — unidentified wallet holding 3.36% (33.6M tokens)

3.36%

HU6Fr69WeaMusw1g8ZTgFEAv6c3TrTGeAfsmtVHm1hfv

Individual whale — unidentified wallet holding 3.12% (31.2M tokens)

3.12%

4615MTbMf1Zt597SAYMp5gZfyeoYEKGjPnnRaBPzjiX5

Individual whale — unidentified wallet holding 2.69% (26.9M tokens)

2.69%

8sfNF9zSdrgjWtQwQNzUnvpgfGEWYeeE6KWnFT9shkyy

Individual whale — unidentified wallet holding 2.62% (26.2M tokens)

2.62%

Supply concentration is extreme. The top 10 holders control 45.22% of supply, and the top 100 control 95.57% — meaning only 4.43% of supply is held outside the top 100 wallets. Notably, the #1 holder (22.17%) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool itself, which is expected. Excluding the LP, the top 9 non-LP holders control ~23% of supply. Holders #2 through #20 each hold between 1.46% and 3.36%, suggesting a relatively even distribution among large holders rather than a single dominant whale (outside the LP). However, with 340 total holders and 95.57% in the top 100, the token is effectively controlled by a small group. The overall sentiment is distributing, consistent with the heavy sell pressure (71.5% of 24h volume) and declining holder count post-pump.

Liquidity$15,070
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$66,370
Sell$166,560
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers394
Unique sellers982

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $15.07K is critically shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$232.9K — a liquidity-to-volume ratio of only 6.5%. This means the pool is being churned at ~15x its depth daily, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. The sell-to-buy ratio is heavily skewed: 982 unique sellers vs 394 unique buyers (2.49:1 ratio), and sell volume ($166.56K) is 2.51x buy volume ($66.37K). Net flow is clearly outflow. The FDV of ~$33–35K with only $15.07K liquidity means a single whale exit could move the price dramatically. The PumpSwap pair (Dk2QeqDaGTdvLzFECXyPA6rj79L3MLadSUW3AvKNjY7D) is the sole liquidity venue identified. There is no evidence of multi-venue liquidity or CEX listings.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,995,349.48
FDV$33,387.58

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1 billion tokens (999,995,349.48), consistent with a PumpFun-style launch (the mint address ends in 'pump'). The FDV at current price is ~$33,388. The metadata shows 'Mutable: false' which is a positive signal — the token metadata cannot be changed. However, 'Update authority: unknown' means we cannot confirm whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The contract is unverified and has no description. The token was launched on PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically burns mint authority upon bonding curve completion, but this cannot be confirmed from the provided data. The 'Mutable: false' flag provides some reassurance against metadata manipulation. No master edition is set. Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) exist but content is not provided for analysis. The absence of a token description is a red flag for legitimacy.

Volatility
high

Price ranged from ~$0.0000167 to ~$0.000102 within a single 24-hour period — a ~6x range. The 24h price change of -14.2% masks intraday swings of +300%+ from low to high. This is extreme volatility typical of micro-cap memecoins.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $15.07K. With 24h volume of ~$232.9K, the pool turns over ~15x daily. Any position above ~$500–$1,000 would face significant slippage. Exit risk is very high for any holder with a meaningful position.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 45.22% of supply; top 100 control 95.57%. Excluding the LP pool (#1 holder at 22.17%), the remaining top 9 non-LP holders control ~23% of supply. With only 340 total holders, coordinated selling by a handful of whales could collapse the price.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers were active in the first 1000 blocks. The majority (16/20) are in profit, and most show high sell-through rates (balances at $0 or unknown/sold). The largest sniper exit was $6,479 at +211.4% PnL. While the sniper cohort has largely distributed, the broader whale population (100 wallets classified as whales out of 340 total holders) represents ongoing dump risk.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' — mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. However, 'Mutable: false' reduces metadata manipulation risk. The PumpFun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority, but this is unconfirmed. Unverified contract adds additional uncertainty.

Key risks

  • Extreme liquidity risk: $15.07K liquidity cannot support meaningful exits without severe slippage
  • Heavy sell pressure: 71.5% of 24h volume is selling; 982 sellers vs 394 buyers
  • Post-pump holder decline: -80 holders from peak of 420, suggesting the pump-and-dump cycle may be complete
  • Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 95.57% of supply
  • No utility or description: pure speculative memecoin with no stated use case
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status creates potential rug risk
  • Token was dormant for 28 days before pump — no evidence of organic development or community building
  • Unverified smart contract

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable: false — token metadata cannot be altered
  • PumpFun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority upon graduation
  • Sniper cohort has largely exited, reducing incremental dump pressure from early buyers
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some level of project presence
  • Short-term price recovery (+25.9% in 1h, +35.7% in 6h) shows some buyer interest at current levels
  • Holder distribution among top 2–20 is relatively even (1.46%–3.36% each), avoiding single-whale dominance outside LP
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand memecoin dynamics and can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap trading. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). The token exhibits classic pump-and-dump characteristics.

Internet Tiles (Tiles) is a high-risk Solana memecoin that experienced a single-day pump-and-dump event on May 16, 2026, after 28 days of complete dormancy. The token has no stated utility, an unverified contract, and extremely shallow liquidity ($15.07K). The investment case is purely speculative — dependent on renewed social momentum and new buyer inflow. The risk/reward is unfavorable at current levels given the dominant sell pressure, declining holder count, and post-pump price structure.

Bull case (low)

A second wave of social media attention (Twitter/website) drives renewed retail FOMO, pushing the token back toward the $0.0000566–$0.0000803 resistance zone. The small FDV (~$33K) means even modest capital inflows could produce outsized percentage gains.

  • Viral social media campaign on Twitter/website generating new buyer inflow
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting micro-cap sentiment
  • Whale accumulation at current depressed prices creating a new base
  • FDV of only ~$33K means a 10x requires only ~$300K in additional market cap

Base case

The token consolidates in the $0.0000167–$0.0000357 range with low volume and gradually declining holder count. Occasional short-term pumps occur but fail to sustain, and the token slowly fades into illiquidity over the coming weeks.

  • No major new catalysts emerge (no viral moment, no exchange listing)
  • Current whale holders gradually distribute over time
  • Liquidity remains thin but pool is not fully withdrawn
  • Broader Solana memecoin market remains neutral to slightly bearish

Bear case (high)

Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity is gradually drained, and the token returns to near-zero as remaining holders exit. The 28-day dormancy period before the pump suggests this may be a recurring pattern of inactivity punctuated by brief pumps.

  • Continued sell dominance (71.5% of volume) exhausts remaining liquidity
  • Whale holders (100 out of 340 total) begin systematic distribution
  • No utility or development activity to attract long-term holders
  • Liquidity pool could be withdrawn, making the token untradeable
  • Post-pump holder attrition continues (-80 from peak already)

GeneratedMay 17, 03:50 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-17T15:00 UTC. Most recent candle closes at 15:00 UTC May 17, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana blockchain)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data
  • OHLC hourly candle data (24 candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Price feed (USD and native SOL)

Limitations

  • Mint and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
  • Sniper 'sniped' amounts and current balances are largely unknown, limiting precise sniper concentration calculation
  • No token description or whitepaper available for fundamental analysis
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm PumpFun graduation status
  • Only 24 hourly candles available — insufficient for longer-term technical analysis
  • Social media content (Twitter, website) not provided — sentiment analysis is limited
  • The anomalous candle [20] data (L: $0.000102 which is higher than H: $0.0000659) suggests possible data quality issues in the OHLC feed
  • Total holders (340) differs from historical series peak (420 on May 16) — likely reflects real-time vs daily snapshot timing difference

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,995,349.48

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity risk: $15.07K liquidity cannot support meaningful exits without severe slippage
Heavy sell pressure: 71.5% of 24h volume is selling; 982 sellers vs 394 buyers
Post-pump holder decline: -80 holders from peak of 420, suggesting the pump-and-dump cycle may be complete
Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 95.57% of supply

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
Medium risk

Of the 20 identified snipers, the majority are in profit based on realized PnL percentages. 16 out of 20 snipers show positive realized PnL, with standout performers: sniper [19] +211.4% ($6,479 sold), sniper [10] +188.3% ($418 sold), sniper [5] +108.4% ($5 sold), sniper [15] +90.5% ($16 sold), sniper [2] +78.2% ($1,305 sold). Only 2 snipers show negative PnL: sniper [12] -6.0% and sniper [16] -11.1%. The high sell-through rate (most balances show $0 or unknown/sold) indicates early buyers have largely distributed their positions into the pump, reducing but not eliminating future dump risk from this cohort.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
medium

20 snipers identified in first 1000 blocks; exact supply sniped unknown, but sell-through is high — most snipers show $0 or unknown remaining balance, indicating they have largely exited. Top sniper by PnL: wallet [19] AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51 sold $6,479 at +211.4% realized PnL.

Early buyers (snipers) are predominantly in profit and have largely sold their positions. This is a bearish signal for current holders as it confirms the pump was used as a distribution event by informed early participants. The remaining sniper exposure is limited, reducing incremental dump risk from this specific cohort, but the broader whale concentration (top 10 = 45.22%) remains a concern.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Internet Tiles (Tiles)?

Price has collapsed ~67% from the intraday high of ~$0.000102 (candle [20] low) reached during the May 16 pump. Current price ~$0.0000334 is attempting a minor recovery (+25.9% in 1h, +35.7% in 6h) but remains well below the peak. With 71.5% sell pressure, shallow liquidity of $15.07K, and net holder count declining (-7 in 24h), the short-term bias is bearish. Any bounce is likely to be sold into. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000167 to $0.0000484.

Is Tiles a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand memecoin dynamics and can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana micro-cap trading. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). The token exhibits classic pump-and-dump characteristics.

How are Tiles holders trending?

Internet Tiles currently has 340 holders and is declining (24h: -2.1, 7d: 89, 30d: 89). The holder history is stark: 39 holders for 28 consecutive days (April 17 – May 15) with zero net change, followed by a single-day explosion of +381 holders (+91%) on May 16 coinciding with the price pump. Current holders stand at 340, down from the peak of 420 — a loss of 80 holders (-19%) since the peak. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical (+301, +89%) because all growth occurred in a single day. The 24h trend is now negative (-7, -2.1%), and the 1h shows +8 which may reflect the current short-term price bounce. Distribution breakdown: whales=100, sharks=38, dolphins=81, fish=68, octopus=26. The high whale count (100) relative to total holders (340) — nearly 29% of all holders classified as whales — is concerning and consistent with the extreme supply concentration data.

What does sniper activity look like for Tiles?

Snipers hold roughly 2.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: medium.

What are the key risks of holding Tiles?

Extreme liquidity risk: $15.07K liquidity cannot support meaningful exits without severe slippage • Heavy sell pressure: 71.5% of 24h volume is selling; 982 sellers vs 394 buyers • Post-pump holder decline: -80 holders from peak of 420, suggesting the pump-and-dump cycle may be complete

Track Tiles