bigfoot Price Today & AI Analysis

BIGFOOTSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 25, 2026

$0.0₅2480

Contract

Live

3aa8X8UBWPUZmqNSCCKBknfpyyz3fZjHisYADdgcS9SZ

Chain

Solana

Holders

202

Market cap

$2,406

At a $1M market cap, $BIGFOOT would be $0.001031 (416x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is BIGFOOT a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 21

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.04%3 bundlers, 1 insider still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about BIGFOOT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

DIRECTFomoDirect$0.0₅2802-1.4%MC $2.7K

FOMOsFOMOs$0.0₅3024+1.2%MC $2.9K

GULLGULL$0.0₅3191+0.0%MC $3.2K

Paperclip1 Paperclip To A House$0.0₅2934+0.0%MC $2.9K

BTLBad Theory Labs$0.0₅3234+0.0%MC $3.2K

KimchiAura Final Boss$0.009780-53.1%MC $9.74M

bigfoot: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-25 02:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,174

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$45,066.66

How concentrated is bigfoot ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,174 addresses (2026-07-25 02:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling bigfoot?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is bigfoot liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-25 02:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $45,066.66. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-25 02:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 25, 02:17 AM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

$45,066.66

Holders

1,174

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

BIGFOOT (mint: 3aa8X8UBWPUZmqNSCCKBknfpyyz3fZjHisYADdgcS9SZ) is a newly launched Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 (decimals: 0), implying the entire supply is a single indivisible unit. The token has an extremely sparse metadata footprint — a one-word description ('xyz'), unverified contract, mutable metadata, and unknown update authority. It experienced a +202% price spike in the last 24 hours but is showing severe sell pressure (71.4% sell volume) and a -7.9% drop in the last 5 minutes. Holder data is deeply anomalous: the historical series shows a flat 25 holders for 30 days, yet the current snapshot reports 1,174 holders with +979 added in the last hour alone — a statistical impossibility that strongly suggests data manipulation, wash trading, or a data-feed exploit. Top holder data is unavailable and supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100, which is inconsistent with a supply of 1. Overall, this token exhibits multiple high-severity red flags and should be treated as extremely high risk.

Key points

Total supply of exactly 1 indivisible token — highly unusual tokenomics that make standard concentration metrics meaningless
Holder count jumped from 25 (flat for 30 days) to 1,174 in under 24 hours — anomalous and likely artificial
71.4% sell pressure with $270K in sell volume vs $108K buy volume in 24h despite a +202% price spike
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — token parameters can be changed at any time
Minimal metadata ('xyz' description, no whitepaper, single social link) consistent with a low-effort or disposable token

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is already showing a -7.9% drop in the last 5 minutes following a +202% spike. With 71.4% sell pressure, 5,520 sells vs 2,722 buys in 24h, and only $45K in total liquidity, the price is highly vulnerable to further sharp declines. The most recent hourly candle (Candle 1) closed at $0.0000303 — well below its open of $0.0000994 — indicating a strong bearish reversal. Short-term price action is likely to continue downward.

Target low

$0.000020

Target high

$0.000150

Support: $0.0000303 (Candle 1 close / recent low), $0.0000992 (Candle 1 open / Candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.000113 (Candle 2 high), $0.000188 (Candle 1 all-time high from available data)

Medium term · 1–30 days

bearish

Given the token's lack of utility, minimal metadata, anomalous holder data, and dominant sell pressure, sustained price appreciation is unlikely without a coordinated pump. The shallow liquidity pool ($45K) means even modest sell orders will cause significant price impact. No fundamental catalysts are evident.

Catalysts

Any coordinated social media campaign (Twitter link present but unverified)
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Whale accumulation (currently undetectable due to missing top holder data)

Bullish factors

+202% price gain in 24h demonstrates speculative demand exists
Active trading with 1,779 unique wallets in 24h
Listed on PumpSwap with an active pair

Bearish factors

71.4% sell pressure ($270K sells vs $108K buys)
Most recent candle closed sharply lower than open (bearish reversal)
-7.9% drop in last 5 minutes
Only $45K total liquidity — extremely shallow
Anomalous holder data undermines trust in all on-chain metrics
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority
No verifiable utility or project substance

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available, (2) anomalous and likely unreliable holder data, (3) missing top holder and sniper data, (4) a total supply of 1 making standard price models inapplicable, and (5) extreme volatility (+202% / -7.9% in minutes).

BIGFOOT call history

Full track record →

Jul 25bearish@ $0.000150

24h-96.9%

7d-98.5%

30d-98.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 3aa8X8...S9SZ
Total Supply: 1 (indivisible, 0 decimals)

Key Risks

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals makes all standard metrics unreliable
Anomalous holder data (flat 25 for 30 days → 1,174 in 24h) suggests manipulation or bot activity
71.4% sell pressure with $270K in sells vs $108K in buys — active distribution

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 2 (01:00 UTC): O=$0.0000303, H=$0.000113, L=$0.0000303, C=$0.000101 — a strong bullish candle with a long upper wick, closing near the high. Candle 1 (02:00 UTC): O=$0.0000994, H=$0.000188, L=$0.0000992, C=$0.0000303 — a severe bearish reversal candle (bearish engulfing / shooting star character) that opened near the prior close, spiked to a new high of $0.000188, then collapsed to close at $0.0000303, near the session low. This is a classic 'pump and dump' candle pattern — a sharp spike followed by a full retracement.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is decisively bearish based on the most recent candle's sharp close-to-low collapse. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of history and 30 days of flat holder activity prior to the current event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

29%

Sell

71%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000303 (Candle 1 close and low)

Major support

$0.0000992 (Candle 1 open / Candle 2 low — prior base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000101 (Candle 2 close / Candle 1 open area)

Major resistance

$0.000188 (Candle 1 all-time high from available data)

The $0.0000303 level is the most recent close and acts as immediate support. A break below this level would suggest further downside with no visible floor. The $0.000188 high is a major resistance level that would require significant buying pressure to reclaim.

Notable patterns

Bearish shooting star / bearish engulfing on Candle 1 — price spiked to $0.000188 then collapsed to $0.0000303 close
Pump-and-dump candle structure across the 2-hour window
High volume on bearish candle confirms distribution
No higher highs pattern — single spike with immediate reversal

Liquidity

$45,066.66

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $45K total on the PumpSwap pair (AyqRabJizmJtpjcFKx8quQJKGnM5miNvW5kBXiNN9y3P). With a fully diluted valuation of ~$149K and only $45K in liquidity, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 30%, which is low and means large trades will cause severe price impact. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $270K in sell volume vs $108K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$162K. Sellers outnumber buyers 2.1:1 (1,659 sellers vs 789 buyers). The market is in active distribution mode. Slippage risk is high — any position of meaningful size will move the price significantly given the shallow pool depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (indivisible, 0 decimals)

FDV

$149,630

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
+202% price spike in 24h followed by a -7.9% drop in 5 minutes and a bearish reversal candle closing near its low. Extreme intraday volatility with only 2 hours of OHLC data available.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $45K against a $149K FDV. High slippage risk on any meaningful position. Net outflow of ~$162K in 24h is draining the pool further.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals makes all standard metrics unreliable
Anomalous holder data (flat 25 for 30 days → 1,174 in 24h) suggests manipulation or bot activity
71.4% sell pressure with $270K in sells vs $108K in buys — active distribution
Extremely shallow liquidity ($45K) with high slippage risk
No top holder data available — insider concentration cannot be assessed
Minimal metadata ('xyz' description) consistent with a disposable/throwaway token
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown
Unverified contract with no whitepaper or substantive project documentation

Mitigating factors

Token is listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair
1,779 unique wallets traded in 24h, suggesting some genuine market interest
Not flagged as spam by the data provider
Twitter social link present (though unverified)

Suitable for

This token is unsuitable for the vast majority of investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and have independently verified on-chain data should consider any exposure. This is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep Solana DeFi experience.

BIGFOOT is a high-risk, low-substance meme token on Solana with a unique supply of 1 indivisible token. It experienced a speculative pump (+202% in 24h) but is already showing signs of reversal with dominant sell pressure (71.4%), a bearish reversal candle, and anomalous holder data that undermines confidence in all on-chain metrics. The token lacks verifiable utility, has mutable metadata with unknown authority, and exhibits multiple characteristics of a short-lived pump-and-dump vehicle.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum drives continued speculative buying, the Twitter presence gains traction, and the unique '1 supply' narrative attracts attention as a novelty. Price could revisit the $0.000188 high or beyond if a coordinated social campaign emerges.

Viral social media campaign on Twitter
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
Novelty of '1 total supply' narrative attracting speculative buyers
New liquidity injection into the PumpSwap pool

Base Case

The token experiences continued volatility with declining volume as the initial pump fades. Price stabilizes at a significantly lower level than the $0.000188 peak, with thin liquidity and sporadic trading activity. The token becomes dormant within days to weeks, similar to the 30-day flat period observed before the current pump.

No new catalysts emerge to sustain buying interest
Sell pressure gradually exhausts available buyers
Liquidity remains shallow, preventing large position entries or exits
No rug pull occurs but no development activity either

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity drains further, and the token price collapses toward zero. The anomalous holder data is exposed as artificial, further eroding confidence. The update authority executes a rug pull by modifying metadata or draining liquidity.

Continued 71.4% sell pressure draining liquidity
Mutable metadata enabling rug pull by unknown authority
Anomalous holder data discrediting the project
No utility or community substance to sustain price
Bearish technical reversal already underway

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 25, 02:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-25 02:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (Solana mint: 3aa8X8UBWPUZmqNSCCKBknfpyyz3fZjHisYADdgcS9SZ)
PumpSwap pair data (AyqRabJizmJtpjcFKx8quQJKGnM5miNvW5kBXiNN9y3P)
OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Top holder data entirely unavailable — whale/concentration analysis is severely limited
Sniper data unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
Holder metrics are anomalous (flat 25 for 30 days → 1,174 in 24h) and may be unreliable
Supply concentration metrics (0% for top 10/100) are inconsistent with a supply of 1 and likely broken
Update authority status is 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully quantified
Mint and freeze authority status unknown
Token description ('xyz') and metadata provide no substantive project information
Price data shows 0% change for 1h/6h/24h in one source but +202% in another — data inconsistency noted

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The anomalous data patterns observed in this token's metrics warrant heightened skepticism. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is bigfoot (BIGFOOT) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell bigfoot (BIGFOOT)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is bigfoot ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,174 addresses (2026-07-25 02:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling bigfoot?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is bigfoot liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-25 02:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $45,066.66. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for bigfoot (BIGFOOT)?

Is BIGFOOT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for the vast majority of investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and have independently verified on-chain data should consider any exposure. This is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep Solana DeFi experience.

What are the key risks of holding BIGFOOT?

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals makes all standard metrics unreliable • Anomalous holder data (flat 25 for 30 days → 1,174 in 24h) suggests manipulation or bot activity