GULL

GULL Price Today & AI Analysis

GULLSolanaAnalysis as of May 30, 2026

Price

$0.052859

FDV $2,857

Contract

Live
3amA3FpLZ3yuCBqBQex2UCJ78bGZFyBuwTn9aQPhpump

Chain

Holders

128

Market cap

$2,857

More tokens on Solana

GULL: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-30 19:17 UTC

Holder addresses

853

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is GULL ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 853 addresses (2026-05-30 19:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling GULL?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is GULL liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-30 19:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about GULL

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of May 30, 07:17 PM UTC

FDV

$0

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

853

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GULL is a Solana-based meme token (mint: 3amA3FpLZ3yuCBqBQex2UCJ78bGZFyBuwTn9aQPhpump) inspired by the seagull, launched on PumpFun/PumpSwap. The token experienced a dramatic 206.96% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from ~$0.0000274 to ~$0.0001195. However, the token exhibits numerous red flags: reported total supply of '1' with wildly anomalous holder percentage figures (top holders showing trillions of percent), $0 reported liquidity, an unverified contract, mutable metadata with unknown update authority, and a holder base that jumped from 15 to 853 entirely within the last hour. The data contains significant inconsistencies suggesting either a very new launch with data pipeline issues or a token with deeply problematic tokenomics.

Key points

  • Explosive 206.96% 24h price pump on very thin liquidity
  • Holder count surged from 15 to 853 (+838) entirely within the last hour of data
  • Token dormant for 30 days at 15 holders before sudden activity spike
  • Traded on PumpSwap (PumpFun ecosystem) — typical meme/fair-launch venue
  • Supply/percentage data is anomalous — likely a decimal/formatting issue in the data feed

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

After a 206.96% pump in 24h, GULL faces significant short-term sell pressure. The most recent hourly candle (19:00 UTC) shows a close of $0.0001195 after reaching a high of $0.0001362, forming a potential shooting-star/bearish wick pattern. Sell volume (52.9%) slightly exceeds buy volume (47.1%), and unique sellers (1,625) marginally outnumber buyers (1,618). A retracement toward the $0.0000761–$0.0000992 range is likely.

Target low

$0.0000274

Target high

$0.0001362

Support

$0.0000992 (prior candle open), $0.0000761 (hourly candle low), $0.0000274 (prior day open/launch price)

Resistance

$0.0001195 (current price / recent close), $0.0001363 (hourly high), $0.0001488 (psychological extension)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without sustained buying pressure, community growth, or a catalyst, post-pump meme tokens on PumpSwap typically retrace 70–90% of their gains. The token was dormant for 30 days with only 15 holders before this spike, suggesting no organic community base. Snipers are largely in profit and represent a meaningful sell overhang.

Catalysts

  • Viral social media traction on Twitter/Telegram
  • Listing on a centralized exchange or aggregator
  • Sustained holder growth beyond the initial pump wave
  • Broader Solana meme season momentum

Bullish factors

  • 206.96% 24h price surge demonstrates strong initial demand
  • 4,125 buys vs 4,421 sells — relatively balanced trading activity
  • 2,093 unique wallets engaged in 24h — broad initial participation
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible trading venue
  • Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, website)

Bearish factors

  • $0 reported liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Token was dormant for 30 days with only 15 holders before pump
  • Sell volume (52.9%) exceeds buy volume (47.1%)
  • Most snipers are in profit and represent sell overhang
  • Unverified contract with mutable metadata and unknown update authority
  • Anomalous supply/percentage data raises data integrity concerns
  • No whale/shark/dolphin classification — distribution data unreliable

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, liquidity is reported as $0, supply/percentage data is anomalous, and the token appears to be only hours old in its current active phase. Predictions are highly speculative.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
3amA3F...pump
Total Supply
1 (formatted) — raw supply appears to be in the quadrillions based on holder balance figures; the '1' formatted supply with 0 decimals is anomalous and likely a data display issue

Key Risks

  • $0 reported liquidity with high slippage risk on PumpSwap
  • Token dormant for 30 days — pump appears entirely speculative with no organic growth
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update/mint/freeze authorities — rug risk
  • 15/20 snipers in profit representing significant sell overhang

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (18:00 UTC): O=$0.0000274, H=$0.0001149, L=$0.0000274, C=$0.0001081 — a massive bullish engulfing/launch candle with a 320% range from open to high, closing near the top. Volume: $509,568. Candle [1] (19:00 UTC): O=$0.0000992, H=$0.0001362, L=$0.0000761, C=$0.0001195 — a bearish upper-wick candle (shooting star characteristics) with the close below the high, suggesting fading momentum. Volume: $207,155 — a 59% drop in volume from the prior candle, confirming momentum deceleration.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically up given the 206.96% 24h gain, but the most recent candle shows a bearish upper wick and declining volume, signaling the initial pump impulse is losing steam. Medium-term trend is sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of history and 30 days of dormancy prior.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

47%

Sell

53%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000992 (19:00 candle open / prior close area)

Major support

$0.0000274 (18:00 candle open — launch price)

Immediate resistance

$0.0001195 (current price / 19:00 close)

Major resistance

$0.0001362 (19:00 candle high — all-time high)

The all-time high of $0.0001362 is the only meaningful resistance. Support at $0.0000992 (prior candle open) is the first line of defense; a break below $0.0000761 (19:00 candle low) would signal a deeper retracement toward the launch price of $0.0000274.

Notable patterns

  • Massive bullish engulfing launch candle (18:00 UTC) — 320% open-to-high range
  • Shooting star / bearish upper wick on 19:00 candle — rejection at highs
  • Volume climax followed by 59% volume contraction — classic pump exhaustion signal
  • Higher open on candle [1] vs candle [2] close — gap-up continuation, but fading
  • Only 2 candles available — pattern analysis is severely limited

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted) — raw supply appears to be in the quadrillions based on holder balance figures; the '1' formatted supply with 0 decimals is anomalous and likely a data display issue

FDV

$0.00 (reported — likely a calculation error due to the supply display anomaly)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    206.96% single-day price move on a newly active meme token with only 2 hours of price history. Extreme volatility is inherent to this asset class and stage.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • $0 reported liquidity with high slippage risk on PumpSwap
  • Token dormant for 30 days — pump appears entirely speculative with no organic growth
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update/mint/freeze authorities — rug risk
  • 15/20 snipers in profit representing significant sell overhang
  • Anomalous supply data suggests data integrity issues or intentional obfuscation
  • Unverified contract on a PumpFun-launched token
  • Sell volume exceeds buy volume (52.9% vs 47.1%) — net outflow
  • No whale/shark/dolphin classification data available — distribution opacity

Mitigating factors

  • Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, website) suggests some community effort
  • 2,093 unique wallets traded in 24h — broad initial participation
  • PumpSwap listing provides a standardized, accessible trading venue
  • The 206.96% pump demonstrates genuine market interest, however speculative
  • Most snipers have only partially exited, suggesting some belief in continued upside

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid entry/exit execution. Absolutely not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation.

GULL is a high-risk, speculative meme token in the earliest stages of its market lifecycle. It launched on PumpFun/PumpSwap and experienced a violent 206.96% pump after 30 days of complete dormancy. The token has no fundamental value proposition beyond meme/community appeal. The risk/reward profile is extremely asymmetric — potential for further short-term gains exists if momentum continues, but the probability of a sharp retracement is high given the sell overhang, thin liquidity, and absence of organic growth prior to the pump.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

GULL catches viral momentum on Solana social media (Twitter/Telegram), attracting a wave of new buyers that sustains and extends the pump. The holder base grows organically beyond the initial FOMO wave, liquidity deepens on PumpSwap, and the token graduates to a DEX with deeper liquidity. Price could extend to $0.0002–$0.0005 range in a sustained meme rally.

  • Viral social media campaign gaining traction on Crypto Twitter
  • Sustained holder growth well beyond the initial 853
  • Broader Solana meme season with elevated risk appetite
  • Influencer or KOL promotion driving FOMO
  • Successful PumpFun bonding curve graduation to Raydium/Orca

Base Case

GULL experiences a partial retracement of 40–60% from its peak ($0.0001362), stabilizing in the $0.0000550–$0.0000850 range as initial FOMO fades and a small community of holders remains. Trading activity gradually declines over 3–7 days. The token neither pumps further nor collapses entirely, slowly bleeding value as attention moves to newer meme tokens.

  • Buy and sell pressure remain roughly balanced (near current 47/53 split)
  • No major new catalyst or influencer promotion emerges
  • Snipers gradually exit over days rather than all at once
  • PumpSwap liquidity remains functional but shallow
  • Broader Solana meme market remains neutral

Bear Case

High probability

Sniper and early holder profit-taking overwhelms buy pressure. The token retraces 80–95% of its gains within 24–72 hours, returning toward the $0.0000274 launch price or lower. Thin liquidity amplifies the downside move. The token returns to dormancy with a small bag-holder community.

  • Snipers (15/20 in profit) aggressively taking profits
  • Sell volume already exceeding buy volume (52.9% vs 47.1%)
  • No organic community base — 30 days of zero growth prior to pump
  • Thin PumpSwap liquidity amplifying sell-side price impact
  • Mutable/unverified contract eroding trader confidence

Analysis details

Generated

May 30, 07:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-30 19:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • Hourly OHLC price feed (USD)
  • On-chain holder metrics and historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — likely a PumpSwap data feed issue, not literal zero liquidity
  • Total supply formatted as '1' with holder balances in trillions — decimal/formatting anomaly in data pipeline
  • All holder percentage figures are anomalous (showing values like '11228994596217000%') — relative rankings used instead
  • Sniper 'sniped' amounts and current balances are all 'unknown' — concentration calculation is estimated
  • Supply concentration figures (top10=26637311350503000%) are clearly erroneous — estimated from relative balance proportions
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot definitively assess mint/freeze authority status
  • Distribution classification (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus all = 0) appears to be a data pipeline error
  • Price % change for 1h, 6h, 24h all showing 0% despite clear price movement — likely a data feed lag issue
  • No order book depth data available for precise slippage estimation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. The data contains multiple anomalies that reduce analytical confidence. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is GULL ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 853 addresses (2026-05-30 19:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling GULL?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is GULL liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for GULL (GULL)?

After a 206.96% pump in 24h, GULL faces significant short-term sell pressure. The most recent hourly candle (19:00 UTC) shows a close of $0.0001195 after reaching a high of $0.0001362, forming a potential shooting-star/bearish wick pattern. Sell volume (52.9%) slightly exceeds buy volume (47.1%), and unique sellers (1,625) marginally outnumber buyers (1,618). A retracement toward the $0.0000761–$0.0000992 range is likely. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000274 to $0.0001362.

Is GULL a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid entry/exit execution. Absolutely not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation.

What are the key risks of holding GULL?

$0 reported liquidity with high slippage risk on PumpSwap • Token dormant for 30 days — pump appears entirely speculative with no organic growth • Mutable metadata with unknown update/mint/freeze authorities — rug risk

← Back to all predictions

Track GULL