Paperclip

1 Paperclip To A House Price Prediction 2026

Paperclip
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 25, 2026

3b9JRgey1gzcYpkM3FhvLPjXcVbS7cPwbJCwrn1opump

$0.052250

-4.62%

FDV $2,249

LiveContract:3b9JRgey1gzcYpkM3FhvLPjXcVbS7cPwbJCwrn1opumpChain:SolanaHolders:189Market cap:$2,249

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Paperclip

Report snapshotas of Jun 25, 02:17 AM
FDV

$43,364

Liquidity

$31,156

Holders

589

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Paperclip (symbol: Paperclip, mint: 3b9JRgey1gzcYpkM3FhvLPjXcVbS7cPwbJCwrn1opump) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with a total supply of ~1B tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$43.4K. The token is extremely early-stage and high-risk, characterized by very thin liquidity ($31.16K), overwhelming sell pressure (79.3% of 24h volume), a dramatic 1-hour price drop of -61.78% following an 81% 24h spike, and a holder base that was flat at 52 for 30 days before a sudden surge to 589 in the last 24 hours. Top holder data and sniper data are unavailable, severely limiting concentration and smart-money analysis. The token's description references a third-party deployment tool (j7tracker.io), and update authority is listed as unknown — both are caution flags.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme sell pressure: 79.3% of 24h volume is sells ($588.54K sell vs $154.09K buy)
Holder count was completely flat at 52 for 30 days, then spiked +537 in 24h — highly anomalous
Very shallow liquidity at $31.16K against a $43.36K FDV — nearly 1:1 ratio indicating extreme slippage risk
Price surged +81% in 24h but then crashed -61.78% in the most recent 1-hour candle
Top holder and concentration data unavailable — opacity is itself a risk signal

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The most recent hourly candle shows a -61.78% price collapse from the intraday high, with sell pressure at 79.3% of all 24h volume. The token is in active distribution. With only $31.16K in liquidity and 10,257 sell transactions vs 2,347 buy transactions in 24h, further downside is the most likely near-term outcome. The 5-minute change of +0.5% is a minor bounce within a strong downtrend.

Target low$0.000015
Target high$0.000044
Support: $0.0000246 (hourly candle 2 low), $0.0000184 (hourly candle 1 low)
Resistance: $0.0000437 (hourly candle 2 high / current price area), $0.0000301 (hourly candle 1 close)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The token was dormant for 30 days at 52 holders before a sudden pump-and-dump pattern emerged. With no verified contract, unknown update authority, thin liquidity, and overwhelming sell pressure, sustained medium-term appreciation is unlikely without a significant catalyst. The FDV of $43.4K is already near the total liquidity, leaving little room for organic price discovery.

Catalysts
  • Unexpected viral social media attention
  • Listing on a mid-tier CEX (very unlikely at this FDV)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats

Bullish factors

  • Price is up +81% over 24h, showing some demand exists
  • 429 unique buyers in 24h suggests some genuine interest
  • Holder count grew from 52 to 589 in 24h (+1,036%), indicating rapid new adoption
  • 5-minute price change is slightly positive (+0.5%), hinting at a micro-bounce

Bearish factors

  • 79.3% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($588.54K sells vs $154.09K buys)
  • 10,257 sell transactions vs only 2,347 buy transactions in 24h
  • Most recent hourly candle shows -61.78% price drop
  • Liquidity is only $31.16K — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • Holder count was flat at 52 for 30 consecutive days — suggests artificial pump
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Update authority is unknown — rug risk cannot be ruled out
  • Deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io) — unverified contract
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (2) top holder data is entirely missing, (3) sniper data is unavailable, (4) the token is extremely new with a 30-day dormant period followed by a single-day spike — making pattern-based prediction unreliable. The data is sufficient to identify bearish signals but not to set precise price targets.

Paperclip call history

Full track record →
Jun 25bearish
24h-91.8%
7d-93.7%
30d-94.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (01:00 UTC): O=$0.0000252, H=$0.0000301, L=$0.0000184, C=$0.0000301 — a bullish candle with a wide range and high volume ($661,852). Candle 2 (02:00 UTC): O=$0.0000299, H=$0.0000437, L=$0.0000246, C=$0.0000437 — another bullish close candle with lower volume ($71,536). However, the 1h price change of -61.78% reported in analytics suggests a sharp reversal occurred after candle 2 closed, meaning the current price has likely fallen significantly from the $0.0000437 high. The two candles show 'higher highs and higher lows' within the window, but the post-candle collapse invalidates the short-term uptrend.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 21%Sell 79%

Short-term trend is a sharp downtrend following a spike high. The 30-day historical holder data shows the token was completely dormant (flat at 52 holders) for the entire prior month, indicating no sustained medium-term trend — effectively sideways/dead prior to the current pump event.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000246 (candle 2 low)
Major$0.0000184 (candle 1 low — the lowest observed price in the data window)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000301 (candle 1 high / candle 2 open area)
Major$0.0000437 (candle 2 high — intraday peak)

The intraday high of $0.0000437 is the key resistance level and likely the distribution peak. The candle 1 low of $0.0000184 represents the most significant support in the available data. Given the -61.78% 1h drop reported in analytics, price may already be testing or below the $0.0000246 immediate support.

Notable patterns

  • Two consecutive bullish candles (higher highs, higher lows) followed by a sharp post-candle reversal — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Volume exhaustion: volume dropped ~89% from candle 1 to candle 2 while price continued higher — bearish divergence
  • Wide-range candles with closes at the high suggest short-term buying pressure, but the subsequent -61.78% 1h collapse negates this
  • The 30-day flat holder count followed by a single-day spike is consistent with coordinated pump activity

Total holders589
24h Δ+91
7d Δ+91
30d Δ+91
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at 52 for all 30 days of historical data prior to June 25, 2026. The +537 holder increase (+91%) occurred entirely within the last 24 hours, coinciding with the +81% price spike. This is a highly anomalous pattern — the correlation between price and holder growth is artificially compressed into a single event rather than reflecting organic growth. The -220 holder drop in the last hour (-37%) while price fell -61.78% confirms holders are exiting rapidly alongside the price collapse.

The historical holder data reveals a deeply concerning pattern: exactly 52 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change on any day. This is statistically improbable for an organically active token and suggests the token was dormant or artificially held at a fixed state. The sudden +537 holder surge in 24h is consistent with a coordinated pump event attracting retail participants. The subsequent -220 holder loss in just 1 hour (-37%) indicates rapid capitulation. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure (91%), confirming all growth occurred in a single day. This is NOT a sign of healthy, sustained community growth.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

Top holder data unavailable — no on-chain holder breakdown provided

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which likely reflects a data gap rather than genuine decentralization. Without holder breakdown data, it is impossible to assess whale concentration, identify team/treasury wallets, or evaluate distribution health. This opacity is itself a significant risk factor. The distribution health is flagged as 'very_concentrated' as a precautionary assessment given the unknown state — the 30-day flat holder count at 52 suggests a very small, potentially coordinated group controlled the token prior to the pump. Investors should treat the lack of holder data as a red flag.

Liquidity$31,160
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$154,090
Sell$588,540
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers429
Unique sellers2,308

Liquidity is critically shallow at $31.16K against a $43.36K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~72%, which sounds high but in absolute terms means any trade above a few hundred dollars will cause significant slippage. The 24h sell volume of $588.54K is 18.9x the total liquidity pool, indicating the pool has been churned many times over and is likely severely imbalanced. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): 2,308 unique sellers vs only 429 unique buyers, and sell volume is 3.8x buy volume. The market is in active distribution. The PumpSwap pair (6St2xkK5PzfzeNMQgnwEsiDJ3CDE1urQfDkoZr25NV9j) is the sole liquidity venue, meaning there is no alternative exit route if this pool dries up.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,976.1
FDV$43,364.19

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1 billion tokens (999,999,976.1), a standard PumpFun issuance. The FDV is $43,364.19 at the current price of $0.0000434. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is not verified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data — both are listed as 'unknown'. The token is marked as 'mutable: false', which is a mild positive (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed authority renouncement, the risk of mint or freeze actions cannot be ruled out. The token was deployed via https://j7tracker.io, a third-party tool — this does not inherently indicate malice but adds an unverified layer to the deployment. The 'possible spam' flag is false per the data, but the unverified contract and unknown authorities are significant concerns.

Volatility
high

Price spiked +81% in 24h then crashed -61.78% in a single hour. With only $31.16K in liquidity, price is extremely sensitive to individual trades. The token exhibits pump-and-dump volatility characteristics.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $31.16K on a single PumpSwap pool. Sell volume in 24h ($588.54K) is 18.9x the liquidity pool size. Any significant sell order will cause catastrophic slippage. There is no alternative exit venue.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable, preventing concentration assessment. The 30-day flat holder count at exactly 52 holders suggests a very small, potentially coordinated group controlled the token prior to the pump. This opacity is treated as high concentration risk by default.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available. However, the trading pattern — 10,257 sells vs 2,347 buys, $588.54K sell volume vs $154.09K buy volume, and -220 holders in 1 hour — is strongly consistent with early buyers (potential snipers/insiders) dumping into retail demand.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The contract is unverified. The token was deployed via a third-party tool (j7tracker.io). These factors collectively represent high authority/rug risk.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 79.3% of 24h volume is sells, with 10,257 sell transactions vs 2,347 buys
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($31.16K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — rug pull cannot be ruled out
  • 30-day dormant holder count (flat at 52) followed by single-day pump — classic manipulation pattern
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk is unquantifiable
  • Unverified contract deployed via third-party tool
  • -220 holders lost in 1 hour (-37%) alongside -61.78% price drop — active capitulation underway
  • No sniper data — early buyer behavior is opaque

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered
  • 429 unique buyers in 24h suggests some genuine retail interest
  • FDV is very low ($43.4K) — absolute loss exposure is limited for small positions
  • 'Possible spam' flag is false per data provider
  • Token is on PumpSwap, a known DEX with some baseline legitimacy
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme coin dynamics and pump-and-dump patterns. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only). This is NOT financial advice.

Paperclip is a high-risk, low-liquidity Solana meme token exhibiting classic pump-and-dump characteristics. The token was dormant for 30 days at 52 holders before a coordinated single-day pump attracted 537 new holders and drove an 81% price spike. The subsequent -61.78% 1-hour collapse, 79.3% sell pressure, and -220 holder loss in 1 hour indicate active distribution. Without verified authorities, top holder data, or sniper analysis, the risk profile is extremely high. Any investment thesis must be purely speculative and short-duration.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum: The 'paperclip to a house' concept (referencing the famous internet bartering experiment) gains viral traction on social media, driving a second wave of retail FOMO. New buyers absorb the sell pressure, liquidity deepens, and the token achieves a higher FDV.

  • Viral social media campaign on Twitter/X or TikTok
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Influencer promotion driving retail FOMO
  • Liquidity addition by project team or whales

Base case

Gradual bleed: The initial pump excitement fades, sell pressure continues to dominate, and the token slowly bleeds back toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000018–$0.000025 range based on candle lows). Liquidity remains thin and the token becomes illiquid with a small residual holder base.

  • No major new catalysts emerge
  • Sell pressure continues to outpace buying interest
  • Liquidity does not drain completely, allowing slow price discovery
  • Token avoids an outright rug pull

Bear case (high)

Complete collapse: Early holders and insiders continue distributing, liquidity drains from the PumpSwap pool, and the token returns to near-zero. The 30-day dormant period and unknown authorities suggest this was a coordinated pump with no long-term intent.

  • Continued overwhelming sell pressure (79.3% of volume)
  • Liquidity pool drainage as sellers exit
  • No verified team, roadmap, or utility
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority enabling potential rug
  • Holder count already falling -37% in 1 hour

GeneratedJun 25, 02:17 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-06-25T02:00 UTC. OHLC data covers the 2 most recent hourly candles. Historical holder data covers 30 days ending 2026-06-24.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana blockchain)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair: 6St2xkK5PzfzeNMQgnwEsiDJ3CDE1urQfDkoZr25NV9j)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell breakdown, unique wallets)
  • OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles available)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder acquisition breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)
  • Price feed (USD and WSOL-denominated)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration and whale analysis cannot be performed
  • Sniper analysis data is unavailable — early buyer behavior is opaque
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — rug risk cannot be quantified
  • Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data gaps rather than true decentralization
  • The 30-day historical holder series shows zero change for all 30 days prior to June 25 — this may reflect a data collection issue or genuine dormancy
  • Price change metrics show 6h and 24h as 0% while 24h % change is listed as 81% elsewhere — likely a data inconsistency in the analytics feed
  • No verified contract — on-chain code cannot be audited

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. All data is sourced from third-party providers and may contain errors or gaps. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,976.1

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure: 79.3% of 24h volume is sells, with 10,257 sell transactions vs 2,347 buys
Critically shallow liquidity ($31.16K) — high slippage and exit risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — rug pull cannot be ruled out
30-day dormant holder count (flat at 52) followed by single-day pump — classic manipulation pattern

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals must be inferred from aggregate trading analytics alone. The 24h trading pattern — 10,257 sells vs 2,347 buys, $588.54K sell volume vs $154.09K buy volume, and a -61.78% 1h price drop after an 81% spike — is consistent with early buyers (potentially insiders or snipers) distributing into retail demand. However, this cannot be confirmed without sniper-level data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — concentration cannot be determined.

Likely distributing: the overwhelming sell pressure (79.3% of volume) and 4.4:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio strongly suggest early holders are exiting into the price spike. The holder count drop of -220 in the last hour (-37%) further confirms rapid exit behavior.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for 1 Paperclip To A House (Paperclip)?

The most recent hourly candle shows a -61.78% price collapse from the intraday high, with sell pressure at 79.3% of all 24h volume. The token is in active distribution. With only $31.16K in liquidity and 10,257 sell transactions vs 2,347 buy transactions in 24h, further downside is the most likely near-term outcome. The 5-minute change of +0.5% is a minor bounce within a strong downtrend. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000015 to $0.000044.

Is Paperclip a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme coin dynamics and pump-and-dump patterns. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only). This is NOT financial advice.

How are Paperclip holders trending?

1 Paperclip To A House currently has 589 holders and is growing (24h: 91, 7d: 91, 30d: 91). The historical holder data reveals a deeply concerning pattern: exactly 52 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change on any day. This is statistically improbable for an organically active token and suggests the token was dormant or artificially held at a fixed state. The sudden +537 holder surge in 24h is consistent with a coordinated pump event attracting retail participants. The subsequent -220 holder loss in just 1 hour (-37%) indicates rapid capitulation. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure (91%), confirming all growth occurred in a single day. This is NOT a sign of healthy, sustained community growth.

What does sniper activity look like for Paperclip?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Paperclip?

Extreme sell pressure: 79.3% of 24h volume is sells, with 10,257 sell transactions vs 2,347 buys • Critically shallow liquidity ($31.16K) — high slippage and exit risk • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority — rug pull cannot be ruled out

Track Paperclip