GENIUS

The Genius Bull Price Today & AI Analysis

GENIUS
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 11, 2026

3RZhwmcD2y1pq9roatMvaXxWR5VadTgxF6AL7TCLpump

$0.051989

FDV $1,989

LiveContract:3RZhwmcD2y1pq9roatMvaXxWR5VadTgxF6AL7TCLpumpChain:SolanaHolders:209Market cap:$1,989

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about GENIUS

Report snapshotas of Jul 11, 11:19 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$34,735

Holders

443

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

GENIUS (The Genius Bull) is a micro-cap meme token on Solana launched via PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 (likely 1 with 0 decimals, suggesting a fractional/novelty token structure). The token has an FDV of ~$53.85K and total liquidity of only $34.73K. It experienced a sharp 54.7% price spike in the last 24 hours, but sell pressure dominates heavily at 75% of volume ($80.81K sells vs $26.88K buys). The holder data is highly anomalous: the historical series shows only 13 holders for the entire prior 30-day period, then a sudden +430 holder jump (97% growth) within the last hour/24h, suggesting a coordinated or artificial holder inflation event. Top holder data is unavailable, and sniper data is absent. The token description references 'supply control initiated' and a 10% send to a named influencer — both are manipulation-signal language. The contract is unverified, mutable, and update authority is unknown. Overall risk is very high.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Anomalous holder explosion: 13 holders for 30 days, then +430 in a single hour — a major manipulation signal
Extreme sell pressure: 75% of 24h volume is sells ($80.81K), with 1,687 sell transactions vs 662 buys
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — highly unusual tokenomics, likely a novelty/fractional structure
Token description contains 'supply control initiated' — a red-flag phrase suggesting coordinated control
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk cannot be ruled out
No top holder data available, no sniper data available — critical transparency gaps

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is in a sharp post-pump retracement. The most recent candle (hour 1) opened at $0.0000749, hit a high of $0.0001045, but closed at $0.0000539 — a bearish close well below the open, forming a shooting-star/bearish engulfing pattern. The prior candle (hour 2) showed extreme volatility from $0.0000201 to $0.0001097. With 75% sell pressure and a -16.6% move in the last 5 minutes, the short-term bias is strongly bearish. Price targets reflect the recent low range.

Target low$0.000020
Target high$0.000075
Support: $0.000050 (current close), $0.000020 (candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.000075 (candle 1 open), $0.000110 (candle 2 high / all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

With shallow liquidity ($34.73K), dominant sell pressure, anomalous holder data, and no verified fundamentals, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Unless a genuine community or influencer catalyst materializes, the token is likely to retrace toward or below its pre-pump levels. The 'supply control' language in the description raises the risk of a coordinated dump.

Catalysts
  • Any genuine influencer endorsement (unverified claim in description)
  • Liquidity addition that deepens the pool
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Reversal of the anomalous holder inflation if organic buyers accumulate

Bullish factors

  • 54.7% price gain in 24 hours shows speculative momentum exists
  • 662 buy transactions in 24h indicates some retail interest
  • 327 unique buyers in 24h suggests broader-than-expected participation
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible entry/exit

Bearish factors

  • 75% sell pressure ($80.81K sells vs $26.88K buys) — sellers dominate
  • Bearish shooting-star candle pattern on most recent hourly close
  • -16.6% price drop in last 5 minutes at time of analysis
  • Only $34.73K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • Anomalous +430 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of stagnation at 13 holders
  • Unverified contract, mutable metadata, unknown update authority
  • 'Supply control initiated' language in description is a manipulation red flag
  • FDV of $53.85K with near-zero liquidity depth relative to market cap
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly candles of OHLC data available, (2) anomalous and likely unreliable holder metrics, (3) no top holder or sniper data to assess distribution, (4) total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates unusual price mechanics, and (5) the token exhibits multiple manipulation signals.

GENIUS call history

Full track record →
Jul 11bearish
24h-85.7%
7d-96.2%
30d-96.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle 2 (older, 22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000330, H=$0.0001097, L=$0.0000201, C=$0.0000729 — a massive bullish spike candle with a very long upper wick, suggesting a pump-and-partial-dump. Candle 1 (most recent, 23:00 UTC): O=$0.0000749, H=$0.0001045, L=$0.0000498, C=$0.0000539 — opened near candle 2's close, pushed higher briefly, then closed near the low of the candle. This is a classic bearish shooting-star / bearish engulfing structure, confirming distribution at the highs. Volume dropped sharply from $74,365 (candle 2) to $20,669 (candle 1), indicating fading momentum.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 25%Sell 75%

Short-term trend has turned bearish after the pump peak. The close of candle 1 ($0.0000539) is well below the high of $0.0001097 seen in candle 2. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of data and 30 days of dormancy prior.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000050 (candle 1 low / current close area)
Major$0.000020 (candle 2 absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000075 (candle 1 open / candle 2 close)
Major$0.000110 (candle 2 high — all-time high in available data)

The $0.000050 level is the immediate support, coinciding with the candle 1 low and current price. A break below this opens the path to $0.000020, the candle 2 wick low. On the upside, $0.000075 is the first resistance (prior close), and $0.000110 is the major resistance at the pump high. Given the bearish candle structure, a retest of $0.000020 is more probable than a reclaim of $0.000110 in the near term.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting-star / bearish engulfing on candle 1 (23:00 UTC) — bearish reversal signal
  • Massive upper wick on candle 2 (22:00 UTC) — classic pump-and-dump wick, indicating sellers overwhelmed buyers at the high
  • Volume climax on candle 2 followed by sharp volume decline on candle 1 — exhaustion pattern
  • Price closed near candle 1 low — bearish close, sellers in control
  • Gap-up open on candle 1 relative to candle 2 open — momentum gap, now fading

Total holders443
24h Δ+430
7d Δ+430
30d Δ+430
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The +430 holder spike occurred simultaneously with the 54.7% price pump, suggesting the holder growth is directly correlated with the pump event. However, the historical data shows zero holder growth for the entire prior 30-day period (flat at 13 holders from June 11 to July 10), making this spike highly suspicious rather than organic.

The holder data is deeply anomalous. For the entire 30-day historical window (June 11 – July 10, 2026), the token had exactly 13 holders with zero net change on every single day. Then, within a single hour on July 11, 430 new holders appeared — a 97% growth rate. This pattern is a major red flag: it is inconsistent with organic adoption and is more consistent with (a) bot-driven wallet creation to simulate holder growth, (b) an airdrop or coordinated distribution event, or (c) a data artifact. The acquisition breakdown shows 419 via swap and 24 via transfer, with zero airdrops — suggesting the 430 new holders transacted on-chain, but the simultaneity and scale relative to 30 days of dormancy is highly suspicious. The supply concentration data shows top10=0% and top100=0%, which combined with 'No top holders available' suggests a data gap or unusual token structure (total supply of 1 with 0 decimals may be causing indexer issues).

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — indexer returned empty list

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data artifact rather than a genuine reflection of distribution — a token with total supply of 1 and 0 decimals creates unusual indexing behavior. The token description claims '10% supply sent to ANSEM' (a known crypto influencer), which if true would mean a single wallet holds 10% of supply. However, this cannot be verified from the available data. Given the total supply of 1 with 0 decimals, the token may be structured as a single indivisible unit, making traditional whale/concentration analysis inapplicable. Distribution health is flagged as very_concentrated due to the opacity and the description's claim of directed supply allocation. Investors should treat the lack of holder transparency as a significant risk factor.

Liquidity$34,730
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$26,880
Sell$80,810
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers327
Unique sellers700

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $34.73K on a single PumpSwap pool (7X4YWMTue5bMAD4J8MBxt9xiriKdQhuduE85gpwHkMqs). The FDV of $53.85K is only ~55% backed by liquidity, meaning any moderate sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $80.81K in sells vs $26.88K in buys — a net outflow of approximately $53.93K. There are more than twice as many sellers (700) as buyers (327), and sell transactions (1,687) outnumber buy transactions (662) by 2.5x. This is a clear distribution market. The 24h volume of ~$107.7K is very high relative to the $34.73K liquidity pool, indicating the pool has been churned multiple times and is at risk of being drained. Slippage risk is high for any position larger than a few hundred dollars.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (with 0 decimals)
FDV$53,854

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics of GENIUS are highly unusual. The total supply is 1 with 0 decimals, meaning the token is a single indivisible unit. This is an extremely atypical structure for a meme token and may cause issues with standard DEX pricing, holder indexing, and concentration metrics (explaining the 0% top10/top100 concentration readings). The FDV is $53,854 at current price. The contract is unverified, metadata is mutable, and the update authority is listed as 'unknown' — meaning the creator could potentially alter token metadata. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The token description states 'Supply control initiated,' which is a red-flag phrase suggesting the creator may be actively managing supply or distribution. The claim that '10% supply sent to ANSEM' cannot be verified on-chain from this data. Overall authority risk is flagged as unknown but should be treated as high given the mutable, unverified contract.

Volatility
high

The token pumped 54.7% in 24 hours and then dropped -16.6% in 5 minutes. The two available OHLC candles show a range from $0.0000201 to $0.0001097 — a 5.5x swing within 2 hours. Extreme volatility is inherent to this token's trading behavior.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $34.73K on a single PumpSwap pool. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will incur severe slippage. The pool has been churned by $107K+ in 24h volume, risking depletion.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable. The total supply of 1 with 0 decimals means a single entity could hold the entire supply. The description claims 10% was sent to a named influencer. Concentration risk cannot be properly assessed but must be assumed high given the opacity.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available. However, the token had only 13 holders for 30 days before the pump, suggesting a small group of early holders who are now in a position to dump into retail buyers. The 75% sell pressure confirms active distribution.

Authority
high

The contract is unverified, metadata is mutable, and update authority is unknown. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The 'supply control initiated' language in the description is a direct manipulation signal. The token could be altered or rugged by the creator.

Key risks

  • Anomalous +430 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of dormancy — likely artificial/manipulated
  • 75% sell pressure with net outflow of ~$53.93K in 24 hours — active distribution
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($34.73K) — high slippage and rug-pull risk
  • Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority
  • 'Supply control initiated' in description — explicit manipulation signal
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — unusual structure causing data anomalies and opacity
  • No top holder data, no sniper data — critical transparency gaps
  • Unverifiable claim of 10% supply sent to influencer — potential false marketing
  • Token is not verified and flagged as potentially mutable — metadata rug risk

Mitigating factors

  • Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
  • 327 unique buyers in 24h suggests some genuine retail interest
  • PumpSwap listing provides on-chain verifiable trading
  • Social links (telegram, twitter, website) exist — some level of public presence
Suitable for: This token is NOT suitable for most investors. It may only be considered by highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of monitoring positions in real-time. The combination of manipulation signals, shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and anomalous holder data makes this an extremely high-risk asset. This is NOT financial advice.

GENIUS is a micro-cap meme token exhibiting multiple red flags: a suspicious holder spike, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, unverified/mutable contract, and manipulation-signal language in its description. The only speculative bull case rests on meme momentum and an unverified influencer narrative. The bear case — a coordinated pump-and-dump — is well-supported by the on-chain data.

Bull case (low)

If the influencer narrative (ANSEM association) gains traction on social media and drives genuine retail FOMO, the token could see another speculative pump. A broader Solana meme coin rally could also lift the token temporarily.

  • Verified influencer endorsement or acknowledgment by ANSEM
  • Viral social media momentum on Twitter/Telegram
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Liquidity addition deepening the pool and reducing slippage

Base case

The pump fades, sell pressure continues to dominate, and the token price drifts back toward the pre-pump range ($0.000020–$0.000033). The token remains a low-liquidity, high-volatility meme token with occasional speculative spikes but no sustained value creation.

  • No major influencer catalyst materializes
  • Liquidity remains shallow and does not grow significantly
  • Early holders continue to distribute gradually
  • Retail interest fades as the pump narrative loses momentum
  • No fundamental utility or development is added to the token

Bear case (high)

The token is a coordinated pump-and-dump. The 13 early holders distribute their holdings into the artificial retail demand generated by the pump, the holder count inflated by bots collapses, and the price returns to near zero. The shallow liquidity means even small sell pressure causes catastrophic price decline.

  • 75% sell pressure already dominant — distribution is actively occurring
  • Only 13 holders for 30 days prior to pump — concentrated early holder base now exiting
  • Anomalous +430 holder spike is likely artificial, masking true distribution
  • Mutable contract with unknown authority — potential for metadata manipulation or rug
  • 'Supply control initiated' language confirms coordinated supply management
  • Shallow $34.73K liquidity cannot absorb sustained selling

GeneratedJul 11, 11:19 PM
Data freshnessPrice and candle data current as of 2026-07-11T23:00 UTC. Historical holder data current through 2026-07-10. Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authorities)
  • PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data
  • OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — whale map cannot be properly constructed
  • Sniper data unavailable — early buyer PnL and concentration unknown
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates indexing anomalies in concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%)
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status unconfirmable
  • Holder spike of +430 in 1 hour is anomalous and may reflect data artifacts or bot activity
  • Price % change fields for 1h, 6h, 24h all show 0% despite 54.7% 24h change — possible data inconsistency
  • The token description contains unverifiable claims (ANSEM supply allocation) that cannot be confirmed on-chain from this data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. All data is sourced from on-chain and third-party providers and may contain errors or gaps. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (with 0 decimals)

Key Risks

Anomalous +430 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of dormancy — likely artificial/manipulated
75% sell pressure with net outflow of ~$53.93K in 24 hours — active distribution
Extremely shallow liquidity ($34.73K) — high slippage and rug-pull risk
Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the on-chain trading analytics reveal a heavily sell-dominated market: 1,687 sell transactions vs 662 buys, 700 unique sellers vs 327 unique buyers, and 75% sell pressure by volume. This pattern is consistent with early holders or coordinated wallets distributing into retail buying interest generated by the price pump. The anomalous +430 holder spike in a single hour (after 30 days at 13 holders) may indicate bot-driven wallet creation to simulate organic growth — a known manipulation tactic.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — cannot assess sniper concentration or PnL state.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The 30-day historical holder data shows only 13 holders existed prior to the pump event, suggesting early holders are a very small, concentrated group who may now be distributing into the pump.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for The Genius Bull (GENIUS)?

The token is in a sharp post-pump retracement. The most recent candle (hour 1) opened at $0.0000749, hit a high of $0.0001045, but closed at $0.0000539 — a bearish close well below the open, forming a shooting-star/bearish engulfing pattern. The prior candle (hour 2) showed extreme volatility from $0.0000201 to $0.0001097. With 75% sell pressure and a -16.6% move in the last 5 minutes, the short-term bias is strongly bearish. Price targets reflect the recent low range. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000020 to $0.000075.

Is GENIUS a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is NOT suitable for most investors. It may only be considered by highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of monitoring positions in real-time. The combination of manipulation signals, shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and anomalous holder data makes this an extremely high-risk asset. This is NOT financial advice.

How are GENIUS holders trending?

The Genius Bull currently has 443 holders and is growing (24h: 430, 7d: 430, 30d: 430). The holder data is deeply anomalous. For the entire 30-day historical window (June 11 – July 10, 2026), the token had exactly 13 holders with zero net change on every single day. Then, within a single hour on July 11, 430 new holders appeared — a 97% growth rate. This pattern is a major red flag: it is inconsistent with organic adoption and is more consistent with (a) bot-driven wallet creation to simulate holder growth, (b) an airdrop or coordinated distribution event, or (c) a data artifact. The acquisition breakdown shows 419 via swap and 24 via transfer, with zero airdrops — suggesting the 430 new holders transacted on-chain, but the simultaneity and scale relative to 30 days of dormancy is highly suspicious. The supply concentration data shows top10=0% and top100=0%, which combined with 'No top holders available' suggests a data gap or unusual token structure (total supply of 1 with 0 decimals may be causing indexer issues).

What does sniper activity look like for GENIUS?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding GENIUS?

Anomalous +430 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of dormancy — likely artificial/manipulated • 75% sell pressure with net outflow of ~$53.93K in 24 hours — active distribution • Extremely shallow liquidity ($34.73K) — high slippage and rug-pull risk

Track GENIUS