Debt

Debt Price Today & AI Analysis

Debt
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 19, 2026

4Do7pHhCid89bj1RqhV3GUAkrZhnE6acCFHMdcgxpump

$0.052911

FDV $2,902

LiveContract:4Do7pHhCid89bj1RqhV3GUAkrZhnE6acCFHMdcgxpumpChain:SolanaHolders:375Market cap:$2,902

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Debt

Report snapshotas of Jul 19, 05:17 AM
FDV

$96,375

Liquidity

$41,332

Holders

1,060

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Debt (DEBT) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: 4Do7pHhCid89bj1RqhV3GUAkrZhnE6acCFHMdcgxpump) with a total supply of ~1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$96.4K. The token has experienced an extraordinary 146% price spike in 24 hours, but the on-chain data reveals severe red flags: 76% sell pressure, $313K in sell volume vs $99K in buy volume, extremely shallow liquidity ($41.3K), and a deeply suspicious holder count anomaly — the historical series shows 82 holders flat for 30 days, yet the current metric reports 1,060 holders with +978 added in the last hour. No top holder data, no sniper data, no verified contract, and unknown update authority compound the risk profile significantly.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 146% 24h price pump with 76% sell-side dominance — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Holder count anomaly: 82 holders flat for 30 days then +978 in 1 hour is statistically implausible and suggests data manipulation or wash activity
Ultra-thin liquidity of $41.3K against $96.4K FDV creates extreme slippage risk
No top holder data available, no sniper data, no verified contract — near-zero transparency
Token is mutable=false but update authority is unknown, leaving authority risk unresolved

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just experienced a violent pump (+146% in 24h) but is already showing reversal signs: the most recent hourly candle (05:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001192, reached a high of $0.0001329, and closed lower at $0.0000940 — a bearish shooting-star/topping pattern. Sell pressure is 76% of volume. A retracement toward the candle [2] open of ~$0.0000307 or lower is plausible.

Target low$0.000020
Target high$0.000132
Support: $0.000075 (candle [1] low), $0.000021 (candle [2] low), $0.000010 (psychological floor)
Resistance: $0.000119 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000132 (candle [1] high), $0.000152 (candle [2] high — all-time visible high)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

With no fundamental utility, no verified contract, no description, and a 30-day flat holder base of 82 wallets prior to the suspicious spike, there is no organic growth narrative to sustain price. Liquidity is too thin to support price recovery after early buyers exit. Medium-term outlook is strongly bearish absent a new catalyst.

Catalysts
  • Any coordinated social media campaign could trigger another short-lived pump
  • Listing on a mid-tier CEX (highly speculative given current metrics)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally could provide temporary lift

Bullish factors

  • 146% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative demand exists
  • 2,301 buy transactions in 24h shows some buyer participation
  • 723 unique buyers in 24h indicates broad (if shallow) interest
  • Token is on PumpSwap, providing some DEX accessibility

Bearish factors

  • 76% sell pressure ($313K sells vs $99K buys) — sellers dominate overwhelmingly
  • Only $41.3K total liquidity — any meaningful exit will crater the price
  • 30-day flat holder base of 82 wallets prior to suspicious +978 spike
  • No verified contract, no description, unknown update authority
  • Price % change shown as 0% for 1h/6h/24h in analytics despite 146% 24h change — data inconsistency raises reliability concerns
  • Candle [1] shows a bearish close well below the high (shooting star pattern)
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (2) missing top holder data prevents understanding of supply distribution, (3) the holder count anomaly raises data reliability concerns, and (4) memecoin price action is inherently unpredictable and driven by social sentiment rather than fundamentals.

Debt call history

Full track record →
Jul 19bearish
24h-92.6%
7d-97.9%
30d

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (04:00 UTC): O=$0.0000307, H=$0.0001519, L=$0.0000208, C=$0.0001197 — an extremely wide-range bullish candle (volume $320K) representing the initial pump. Candle [1] (05:00 UTC): O=$0.0001192, H=$0.0001329, L=$0.0000750, C=$0.0000940 — a bearish candle that opened near the prior close, made a modest new high, then sold off sharply, closing near the lower third of its range. This is a classic bearish shooting-star / topping candle following the pump. Volume dropped from $320K to $70K, confirming fading momentum.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 24%Sell 76%

Short-term trend has turned bearish after the pump candle, with the follow-up candle showing a lower close and significant wick rejection at the highs. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles and 30 days of flat price history prior to this event.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000075 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000021 (candle [2] low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000119 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close area)
Major$0.000152 (candle [2] all-time visible high)

The $0.000075 level (candle [1] low) is the first line of defense. A break below this opens the path to $0.000021 (candle [2] low), which represents the pre-pump base. On the upside, $0.000119 is immediate resistance (prior close), and $0.000152 is the session high that would need to be reclaimed for bullish continuation.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish shooting star / topping candle at candle [1] following the pump
  • Volume climax at candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline — exhaustion pattern
  • Wide-range pump candle (candle [2] range: $0.0001312) followed by narrower bearish candle — momentum loss
  • Price closing in lower third of candle [1] range — bearish close confirmation

Total holders1,060
24h Δ+978
7d Δ+978
30d Δ+978
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The reported +978 holder spike correlates with the 146% price pump, but the historical data shows 82 holders flat for the entire 30-day period (June 19 – July 18, 2026) with zero net change on any day. This makes the sudden +978 addition in a single hour statistically implausible and highly suspicious. It is likely the result of wash trading, bot activity, or a data reporting anomaly rather than genuine organic holder growth.

CRITICAL ANOMALY: The historical holder series shows exactly 82 holders every single day for 30 consecutive days with zero net change. Then, in the most recent 1-hour window, 978 new holders are reported — an 1,193% increase in one hour. This pattern is not consistent with organic growth. Possible explanations include: (1) coordinated bot wallet creation to simulate demand, (2) a data pipeline error or lag in the holder tracking system, (3) airdrop or token distribution event not captured in the acquisition breakdown (which shows 0 airdrops). The distribution breakdown showing whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0 for all categories despite 1,060 reported holders further undermines data reliability. Investors should treat the holder count with extreme skepticism.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no results for the top 20 holders. The supply concentration metrics report top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. Combined with the holder anomaly (82 flat for 30 days, then +978 in 1 hour), the true distribution of this token's supply is opaque. The absence of whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus classifications for any of the reported 1,060 holders further confirms a data reliability issue. Without top holder data, concentration risk cannot be properly assessed and must be assumed high by default for a PumpFun token of this size and age.

Liquidity$41,330
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$99,090
Sell$313,310
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers723
Unique sellers1,952

Liquidity is critically shallow at $41.3K against a $96.4K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~43%, which sounds reasonable in isolation but is dangerously thin in absolute terms. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will experience significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $313.3K in sell volume vs $99.1K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$214.2K. The seller-to-buyer ratio of 2.7:1 (1,952 sellers vs 723 buyers) and transaction ratio of 3.2:1 (7,286 sells vs 2,301 buys) confirm this is a distribution event. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair: 4KrWS8fATR7oqK8oVV24horhi6QtoF9GKCKeWt1VssZN), which provides basic DEX access but no deep liquidity. Market health is poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,999.904207
FDV$96,374.78

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a standard PumpFun supply of ~1 billion tokens. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, preventing determination of whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a mild positive signal suggesting metadata cannot be changed, but this does not confirm authority renouncement. The token is unverified (verified contract: false) and has no description, no website, and only Twitter and Moralis social links. The FDV of $96.4K is micro-cap territory. Given the unknown authority status and unverified contract, rug risk from authorities must be classified as unknown — investors cannot confirm safety on this dimension.

Volatility
high

146% price swing in 24 hours with a bearish topping candle. The token has demonstrated extreme volatility with a candle [2] range spanning from $0.0000208 to $0.0001519 — a 7.3x intra-hour range. Ongoing 5m decline of -4.03% confirms continued volatility.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $41.3K on PumpSwap. Any position above a few hundred dollars will face severe slippage. The thin liquidity pool means a single large seller could collapse the price significantly.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable, making true concentration unknown. For a PumpFun token with 82 genuine holders over 30 days, concentration is almost certainly extreme. The reported 0% for top10 and top100 is a data gap, not a genuine distribution metric.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the 76% sell pressure, 7,286 sell transactions, and 1,952 unique sellers in 24h strongly suggest early participants are dumping. The pump-and-dump pattern is textbook.

Authority
medium

Update authority is unknown — cannot confirm mint or freeze authority renouncement. Token is mutable=false which provides some protection on metadata, but the overall authority picture is opaque. Unverified contract adds to this risk.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure (76%) with net outflow of ~$214K in 24h — active distribution phase
  • Holder count anomaly (+978 in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 82 holders) suggests manipulation or bot activity
  • No top holder data — true supply concentration is unknown and likely extreme
  • Ultra-thin liquidity ($41.3K) creates catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position
  • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority status — rug pull mechanism cannot be ruled out
  • Unverified contract with no description or utility — pure speculative memecoin
  • Bearish topping candle pattern following pump suggests price reversal is underway
  • Data inconsistencies (0% price change shown for 1h/6h/24h despite 146% 24h move) reduce analytical confidence

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable=false, limiting metadata manipulation
  • Listed on PumpSwap providing basic DEX liquidity and price discovery
  • 146% price gain shows speculative demand exists in the short term
  • 723 unique buyers in 24h indicates some distributed buying interest
  • Possible spam flag is false per metadata
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete capital loss. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only). This is NOT financial advice.

Debt (DEBT) is a high-risk PumpFun memecoin currently in what appears to be a classic pump-and-dump distribution phase. The 146% price spike is accompanied by overwhelming sell pressure (76%), a suspicious holder count anomaly, missing top holder data, unknown authority status, and critically thin liquidity. There is no fundamental utility, no verified contract, and no description. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices.

Bull case (low)

A coordinated social media campaign or broader Solana memecoin market rally drives a second wave of speculative buying, pushing the price back toward or above the $0.000152 session high. Early buyers who accumulated near $0.000021 (candle [2] low) could see significant returns if they exit before the inevitable distribution.

  • Viral social media momentum on Twitter (token has Twitter link)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • New whale accumulation at current depressed prices
  • Coordinated community building effort

Base case

Price consolidates in the $0.000050–$0.000095 range short-term as the initial pump fades, then gradually drifts lower over days/weeks as the original small holder base (82 wallets) provides no buying support and liquidity remains thin. The token joins the long tail of inactive PumpFun launches.

  • Sell pressure moderates but remains dominant
  • No new major catalyst or social media campaign emerges
  • Liquidity remains at current thin levels without withdrawal
  • The 82 original holders represent the genuine community base

Bear case (high)

The current distribution phase accelerates as early buyers continue to exit through the thin $41.3K liquidity pool. Price retraces to pre-pump levels near $0.000020–$0.000030 or lower. The holder anomaly resolves as bot wallets exit, leaving the original 82-holder base. Liquidity could be withdrawn entirely, effectively ending trading.

  • 76% sell pressure with 1,952 sellers vs 723 buyers continuing
  • Thin liquidity amplifying downward price impact of each sell
  • No fundamental utility or development activity to attract long-term holders
  • Holder count anomaly resolution as bot/wash wallets exit
  • Unknown authority risk — potential for rug pull

GeneratedJul 19, 05:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of candle [1] close (2026-07-19T05:00 UTC). Holder historical data current through 2026-07-18. Top holder data unavailable. Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint: 4Do7pHhCid89bj1RqhV3GUAkrZhnE6acCFHMdcgxpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair: 4KrWS8fATR7oqK8oVV24horhi6QtoF9GKCKeWt1VssZN)
  • Hourly OHLC price candles (2 candles available)
  • 30-day historical holder series (daily)
  • Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics
  • Token metadata including authority and mutability flags

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data entirely unavailable — supply concentration cannot be assessed
  • Sniper analysis data unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be quantified
  • Holder count anomaly (+978 in 1h after 30 days flat at 82) severely undermines holder metric reliability
  • Update/mint/freeze authority status unknown — rug risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Price % change fields show 0% for 1h/6h/24h despite 146% 24h move — possible data pipeline inconsistency
  • Supply distribution breakdown shows 0 for all categories (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) despite 1,060 reported holders — data reliability concern
  • No contract verification or audit available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed contains multiple anomalies and gaps that reduce analytical confidence. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,999.904207

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure (76%) with net outflow of ~$214K in 24h — active distribution phase
Holder count anomaly (+978 in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 82 holders) suggests manipulation or bot activity
No top holder data — true supply concentration is unknown and likely extreme
Ultra-thin liquidity ($41.3K) creates catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. What can be inferred from trading analytics: 7,286 sell transactions vs 2,301 buy transactions in 24h, with 1,952 unique sellers vs 723 unique buyers, strongly suggests early participants are distributing aggressively. The 3:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio is a hallmark of a distribution phase following a pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no results for this token.

Cannot be determined from sniper data (unavailable). However, the overwhelming sell-side dominance (76% sell volume, 1,952 sellers vs 723 buyers) strongly implies early buyers are taking profits or cutting losses en masse.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Debt (Debt)?

The token just experienced a violent pump (+146% in 24h) but is already showing reversal signs: the most recent hourly candle (05:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001192, reached a high of $0.0001329, and closed lower at $0.0000940 — a bearish shooting-star/topping pattern. Sell pressure is 76% of volume. A retracement toward the candle [2] open of ~$0.0000307 or lower is plausible. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000020 to $0.000132.

Is Debt a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for complete capital loss. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket only). This is NOT financial advice.

How are Debt holders trending?

Debt currently has 1,060 holders and is growing (24h: 978, 7d: 978, 30d: 978). CRITICAL ANOMALY: The historical holder series shows exactly 82 holders every single day for 30 consecutive days with zero net change. Then, in the most recent 1-hour window, 978 new holders are reported — an 1,193% increase in one hour. This pattern is not consistent with organic growth. Possible explanations include: (1) coordinated bot wallet creation to simulate demand, (2) a data pipeline error or lag in the holder tracking system, (3) airdrop or token distribution event not captured in the acquisition breakdown (which shows 0 airdrops). The distribution breakdown showing whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0 for all categories despite 1,060 reported holders further undermines data reliability. Investors should treat the holder count with extreme skepticism.

What does sniper activity look like for Debt?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Debt?

Extreme sell pressure (76%) with net outflow of ~$214K in 24h — active distribution phase • Holder count anomaly (+978 in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 82 holders) suggests manipulation or bot activity • No top holder data — true supply concentration is unknown and likely extreme

Track Debt