How concentrated is o ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 19.78% of supply, out of 1,459 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling o?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC, DEX buys were $604,775.00 and sells $553,852.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is o liquidity falling?

Liquidity rose 115.30%, from $25,612.08 (2026-09-26 19:00 UTC) to $55,143.99 (2026-09-26 21:00 UTC).

o Price Today & AI Analysis

oSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

$0.0₅4577

-9.85% 24h

Contract

Live

2bX5CKZ7SHvacmMQFq7nBjQMmpPFbCZkpA7367du9Wa2

Chain

Solana

Holders

942

Market cap

$4,573

At a $1M market cap, $O would be $0.001001 (219x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is o a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 9

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

1%Every buy and sell · can be raised

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about o

3 free answers a day

o: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,459

Top 10 supply share

19.78%

Reported liquidity

$49,232.00

How concentrated is o ownership?: As of 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 19.78% of supply, out of 1,459 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling o?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC, DEX buys were $604,775.00 and sells $553,852.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is o liquidity falling?: Liquidity rose 115.30%, from $25,612.08 (2026-09-26 19:00 UTC) to $55,143.99 (2026-09-26 21:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-26 19:00 UTC	$25,612.08
2026-09-26 20:00 UTC	$42,146.28
2026-09-26 21:00 UTC	$55,143.99

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-26 21:17 UTCSell · $58.395dZekj21…Do2eGcWallet 6aT9WR2U…tcYLSC
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCBuy · $120.883bnbgry5…ihWCMFWallet 65tuz56q…hDB3Ax
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCBuy · $4.663WrUjMVu…BWaQkFWallet 7JCe3GHw…BgdG8k
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCSell · $139.793PFGGt8h…MnFxvEWallet 5KXDF6Qn…DiK6tD
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCBuy · $97.542cLTLLgv…7sKPhiWallet 8M8hX3Rh…Xcar9N
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCSell · $447.054btyBK5r…rMEpWoWallet 2vPHdjQS…kxytWN
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCBuy · $1.902Gj5GifC…SL5BUKWallet 7R3kGuDj…EhBU7U
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCBuy · $11.914G2nCpa5…wK39BzWallet 3ooN7mcU…ezK3zH
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCBuy · $4.90ccBF1T98…FNXrKMWallet 2LE7i5Sp…UTGZqw
2026-09-26 21:17 UTCBuy · $69.703H4bg2nm…pxQZKFWallet 7JCe3GHw…BgdG8k

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 09:19 PM UTC

FDV

$972,904

Liquidity

$49,232.00

Holders

1,459

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Token 'o' (mint 2bX5CKZ7...9Wa2) is a micro-cap Solana token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pair (JCkhLmbn...QTYVe) with a current price of $0.000973 and a reported 24h gain of ~1962%. This move is corroborated by the last three hourly candles, which show price rocketing from ~$0.0000086 to ~$0.00118 within a 3-hour window on extremely thin liquidity (~$49.2K total). FDV sits at ~$972.9K against a ~1B token supply. Holder count is 1,459 addresses with top-10 wallets holding ~19.8% of supply, but no historical holder data, wallet classification, or sniper coverage is available, severely limiting due-diligence depth. Metadata fields (verification, update authority, mutability) are all unknown, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the data provided — this is a material gap, not a clean bill of health.

Key points

Explosive, likely unsustainable short-term price action (+330% in 1h, +1962% in 24h) on very thin liquidity (~$49.2K)
No sniper data available — early-buyer dumping risk cannot be assessed at all
Holder aggregates are a single snapshot (1,459 holders, top-10 = 19.8%) with no history, so accumulation/distribution trend is unknown
Mint/freeze authority status and contract verification are unknown, meaning rug-pull mechanics cannot be ruled out

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price has parabolically expanded from ~$0.0000086 to ~$0.00118 over just 3 hourly candles on very low liquidity ($49.2K), a pattern typical of low-liquidity pump events that often mean-revert sharply. Near-term direction is highly uncertain and could swing violently in either direction depending on whether buy pressure (currently 52.2% vs 47.8% sell) persists.

Target low

$0.0003

Target high

$0.0015

Support: $0.000688 (candle [3] open / candle [2] close), $0.000285 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open), $0.0000086 (candle [1] open, extreme low)
Resistance: $0.00119 (candle [3] high), $0.000785 (candle [2] high)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Absent sustained new demand and given the extremely shallow liquidity pool ($49.2K) relative to a $972.9K FDV, medium-term risk skews toward a sharp pullback or liquidity drain once initial buying momentum fades. Lack of verified authorities, sniper visibility, and holder history adds further downside tail risk.

Catalysts

Continued organic buy volume vs. rapid profit-taking by early/large holders
Any liquidity additions/removals in the thin Raydium CPMM pool
Potential mint/freeze authority actions (unknown status) that could dilute or freeze holder positions
Social/twitter-driven attention sustaining or fading

Bullish factors

Slightly positive net buy pressure over 24h (52.2% buy vs 47.8% sell, ~5,340 buys vs 4,756 sells)
More unique buyers (2,531) than sellers (1,669) in the 24h window
Strong short-term momentum with higher highs across the last 3 candles

Bearish factors

Total liquidity is extremely shallow ($49.2K) relative to FDV (~$972.9K), implying high slippage and fragile price support
Parabolic +1962% 24h move on thin liquidity is a classic setup for a sharp reversal/rug-style dump
No sniper data available to gauge early-buyer dump risk
Mint/freeze authority and contract verification status are all unknown, leaving rug/dilution risk unassessed

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and a single holder/liquidity snapshot are available; there is no multi-day price history, no sniper data, and authority status is unconfirmed. The extreme, likely anomalous 24h price change (+1962%) combined with tiny liquidity makes any forward projection highly speculative.

o call history

Full track record →

Sep 26neutral@ $0.000973

24h—

7d—

30d-99.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 2bX5CK...9Wa2
Total Supply: 999,998,184.07

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$49.2K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1962% 24h, +330% 1h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on thin pools
Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status, leaving supply inflation and account-freeze risks unverified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (2026-09-26 19:00-21:00 UTC). Candle [1]: O 0.00000864, H 0.000342, L 0.00000864, C 0.000285 — a huge-range bullish candle off an extreme low, closing well off its high. Candle [2]: O 0.000285, H 0.000785, L 0.000147, C 0.000688 — another wide-range bullish candle with a large upper wick, showing continued buying but some rejection at highs. Candle [3]: O 0.000688, H 0.00119, L 0.000688, C 0.000978 — a strong bullish candle closing near its high with no lower wick, indicating aggressive buying into the close. The sequence shows consecutive higher highs and higher lows, but each candle has substantial volatility (ranges of 20-100x within the hour), consistent with a low-liquidity pump rather than stable trend formation.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term (last 3 hours) price action is a strong uptrend with sequential higher highs and higher lows. However, with only 3 candles of data, no medium-term trend can be reliably established; it is classified as sideways/undetermined pending more history.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate resistance

$0.00119

Major resistance

$0.00119

Immediate support sits at the candle [3] open of $0.000688, which also served as candle [2]'s close. Major support is the extreme low of $0.0000086 seen at the start of candle [1] — a level that, if retested, would represent a near-total collapse of the recent rally. Immediate and current major resistance is the candle [3] high of $0.00119, which has not yet been decisively broken. Given only 3 candles, these levels are provisional and could shift quickly.

From the report of Sep 26, 2026. The price has since moved through 2 of its levels, so they are not shown.

Notable patterns

Sequential higher highs and higher lows across all 3 candles (short-term uptrend)
Large upper wick on candle [2] indicating rejection/selling at $0.000785 before recovering
Candle [3] closes near its high with a full-bodied bullish candle and no lower wick, signaling strong buying into the most recent hour
Declining hourly volume despite rising price (volume: $377K → $647K → $269K) — a possible bearish momentum divergence

Liquidity

$49,232.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just ~$49.2K is extremely shallow relative to both the 24h trading volume (~$1.16M combined buy+sell) and the ~$972.9K FDV, implying that even moderately sized trades can move price substantially — consistent with the observed intraday price swings of hundreds of percent. 24h buy volume ($604.77K, 52.2%) modestly exceeds sell volume ($553.85K, 47.8%), and unique buyers (2,531) outnumber unique sellers (1,669), pointing to a net inflow bias over the day. However, with liquidity this thin, this volume figure itself should be treated cautiously as it can be inflated by repeated small trades or wash-like activity on a single CPMM pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,998,184.07

FDV

$972.90K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +1962% and 1h change of +330% on a token with only 3 hourly candles of visible history indicates extreme volatility; such moves are frequently followed by sharp reversals in low-liquidity environments.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only ~$49.2K against an FDV of ~$972.9K and 24h volume of ~$1.16M combined, meaning the pool can be easily drained or manipulated, producing high slippage on even modest trade sizes.
Concentrationmedium
Top-10 holders control ~19.78% of supply based on the single available snapshot; top-100 concentration and holder history are unavailable, so the full concentration picture (and whether it is worsening or improving) cannot be determined.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$49.2K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1962% 24h, +330% 1h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on thin pools
Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status, leaving supply inflation and account-freeze risks unverified
No historical holder data available, preventing any trend analysis of accumulation or distribution
Single-pair dependency (one Raydium CPMM pool) with no diversification of liquidity venues

Mitigating factors

24h unique buyers (2,531) exceed unique sellers (1,669), and buy volume modestly exceeds sell volume (52.2% vs 47.8%), suggesting net demand for now
Top-10 concentration of ~19.78% is not extreme in isolation, though it cannot be fully contextualized without top-100 or historical data

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital. The combination of extreme volatility, very shallow liquidity, and multiple unknown/unverifiable risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) makes this unsuitable for conservative or medium-risk investors, and position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

Token 'o' has shown an extreme, low-liquidity-driven price surge (+1962% 24h) with modestly positive net buy pressure, but the analysis is hamstrung by multiple critical data gaps: no sniper data, no holder history, and unknown mint/freeze authority status. Given the shallow $49.2K liquidity pool against a $972.9K FDV, this profile is consistent with either a genuine early-stage speculative rally or a pump/manipulation pattern — the available data cannot distinguish between the two with confidence.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy pressure continues to outweigh sell pressure (currently 52.2%/47.8%) and more liquidity is added to the Raydium pool, price could continue trending upward from current levels (~$0.00097) toward and beyond the recent high of ~$0.00119, especially if social attention (Twitter) drives sustained new buyer inflow.

Sustained net-positive buyer/seller ratio (2,531 buyers vs 1,669 sellers in 24h)
Additional liquidity provisioning reducing slippage and attracting larger buyers
Continued social media momentum around the token's Twitter presence

Base Case

Price likely remains highly volatile and range-bound between the recent extremes (roughly $0.0003–$0.0015) in the near term, with elevated risk of a sharp correction as the initial pump loses momentum, absent verifiable fundamentals (authorities, sniper behavior, holder trends) to support a sustained re-rating.

No major new liquidity or authority-related developments occur in the short term
Current buy/sell ratio (~52/48) persists without a strong swing in either direction
Broader thin-liquidity, low-cap token market conditions remain a key driver of price rather than fundamental adoption

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow liquidity, parabolic candle structure, and declining hourly volume trend ($377K→$647K→$269K) despite rising price, the token could suffer a rapid reversal or liquidity drain, potentially falling back toward or below the candle [1] open of ~$0.0000086 if early holders or unknown large wallets exit.

Extremely thin liquidity ($49.2K) unable to absorb large sell orders without severe price impact
Unknown mint/freeze authority status raising rug-pull or dilution risk
No visibility into sniper/early-buyer positioning, who may be poised to dump
Volume declining even as price rises, a bearish momentum divergence

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 09:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 21:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
USD price and 24h/1h/5m % change feed
3 most recent hourly OHLCV candles (Raydium CPMM pair JCkhLmbn7116hzixaDs1uR7ckiJ1c4sm1hNNwpBQTYVe)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buys/sells counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Unhosted holder aggregates snapshot (holder count, top-10 supply share)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly candles were provided, insufficient for robust medium/long-term technical analysis
No sniper data was available at all, preventing any assessment of early-buyer/sniper dump risk
No holder history (24h/7d/30d) exists; holder growth figures in this report are placeholders (0) and not measured values
Top-100 holder concentration was not provided (set to 0 placeholder), limiting whale distribution assessment
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown, leaving rug-pull risk partially unassessable
Extreme reported 24h price change (+1962%) could reflect illiquid-market noise or data artifacts rather than a stable repricing

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Solana micro-cap tokens with shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, and incomplete data coverage carry very high risk, including potential total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and verify on-chain authority status before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is o a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 9, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell o?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 1% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 9, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for o (o)?

Is o a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital. The combination of extreme volatility, very shallow liquidity, and multiple unknown/unverifiable risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) makes this unsuitable for conservative or medium-risk investors, and position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

What are the key risks of holding o?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$49.2K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1962% 24h, +330% 1h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on thin pools • Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk