o

o Price Today & AI Analysis

oSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

Price

$0.000973

+1962.51% 24h

Contract

Live
2bX5CKZ7SHvacmMQFq7nBjQMmpPFbCZkpA7367du9Wa2

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,459

Market cap

$972,904

More tokens on Solana

ETCHETCHEtch$0.049137+84.4%MC $86.3KPEACHYPEACHYPeachy Keenan$0.045222+6.2%MC $50.3KCOLLECTCOLLECTGoCollect$0.002796+80.5%MC $2.77MTSLAXTSLAXTesla xStock$381.19+1.1%MC $87.54MOUROCHATOUROCHATOUROBOROS$0.000105+111.1%MC $102.1KTRUMPTRUMPOFFICIAL TRUMP$2.15+2.8%MC $2.15B

o: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-26 21:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,459

Top 10 supply share

19.78%

Reported liquidity

$49,232.00
How concentrated is o ownership?
As of 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.78% of supply. It reports 1,459 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling o?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $604,775.00 in buys and $553,852.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is o liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +115.30%, from $25,612.08 (2026-09-26 19:00 UTC) to $55,143.99 (2026-09-26 21:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-26 19:00 UTC$25,612.08
2026-09-26 20:00 UTC$42,146.28
2026-09-26 21:00 UTC$55,143.99

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about o

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 09:19 PM UTC

FDV

$972,904

Liquidity

$49,232.00

Holders

1,459

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Token 'o' (mint 2bX5CKZ7...9Wa2) is a micro-cap Solana token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pair (JCkhLmbn...QTYVe) with a current price of $0.000973 and a reported 24h gain of ~1962%. This move is corroborated by the last three hourly candles, which show price rocketing from ~$0.0000086 to ~$0.00118 within a 3-hour window on extremely thin liquidity (~$49.2K total). FDV sits at ~$972.9K against a ~1B token supply. Holder count is 1,459 addresses with top-10 wallets holding ~19.8% of supply, but no historical holder data, wallet classification, or sniper coverage is available, severely limiting due-diligence depth. Metadata fields (verification, update authority, mutability) are all unknown, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the data provided — this is a material gap, not a clean bill of health.

Key points

  • Explosive, likely unsustainable short-term price action (+330% in 1h, +1962% in 24h) on very thin liquidity (~$49.2K)
  • No sniper data available — early-buyer dumping risk cannot be assessed at all
  • Holder aggregates are a single snapshot (1,459 holders, top-10 = 19.8%) with no history, so accumulation/distribution trend is unknown
  • Mint/freeze authority status and contract verification are unknown, meaning rug-pull mechanics cannot be ruled out

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price has parabolically expanded from ~$0.0000086 to ~$0.00118 over just 3 hourly candles on very low liquidity ($49.2K), a pattern typical of low-liquidity pump events that often mean-revert sharply. Near-term direction is highly uncertain and could swing violently in either direction depending on whether buy pressure (currently 52.2% vs 47.8% sell) persists.

Target low

$0.0003

Target high

$0.0015

Support

$0.000688 (candle [3] open / candle [2] close), $0.000285 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open), $0.0000086 (candle [1] open, extreme low)

Resistance

$0.00119 (candle [3] high), $0.000785 (candle [2] high)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Absent sustained new demand and given the extremely shallow liquidity pool ($49.2K) relative to a $972.9K FDV, medium-term risk skews toward a sharp pullback or liquidity drain once initial buying momentum fades. Lack of verified authorities, sniper visibility, and holder history adds further downside tail risk.

Catalysts

  • Continued organic buy volume vs. rapid profit-taking by early/large holders
  • Any liquidity additions/removals in the thin Raydium CPMM pool
  • Potential mint/freeze authority actions (unknown status) that could dilute or freeze holder positions
  • Social/twitter-driven attention sustaining or fading

Bullish factors

  • Slightly positive net buy pressure over 24h (52.2% buy vs 47.8% sell, ~5,340 buys vs 4,756 sells)
  • More unique buyers (2,531) than sellers (1,669) in the 24h window
  • Strong short-term momentum with higher highs across the last 3 candles

Bearish factors

  • Total liquidity is extremely shallow ($49.2K) relative to FDV (~$972.9K), implying high slippage and fragile price support
  • Parabolic +1962% 24h move on thin liquidity is a classic setup for a sharp reversal/rug-style dump
  • No sniper data available to gauge early-buyer dump risk
  • Mint/freeze authority and contract verification status are all unknown, leaving rug/dilution risk unassessed

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and a single holder/liquidity snapshot are available; there is no multi-day price history, no sniper data, and authority status is unconfirmed. The extreme, likely anomalous 24h price change (+1962%) combined with tiny liquidity makes any forward projection highly speculative.

o call history

Full track record →

Sep 26neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
2bX5CK...9Wa2
Total Supply
999,998,184.07

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$49.2K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1962% 24h, +330% 1h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on thin pools
  • Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status, leaving supply inflation and account-freeze risks unverified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (2026-09-26 19:00-21:00 UTC). Candle [1]: O 0.00000864, H 0.000342, L 0.00000864, C 0.000285 — a huge-range bullish candle off an extreme low, closing well off its high. Candle [2]: O 0.000285, H 0.000785, L 0.000147, C 0.000688 — another wide-range bullish candle with a large upper wick, showing continued buying but some rejection at highs. Candle [3]: O 0.000688, H 0.00119, L 0.000688, C 0.000978 — a strong bullish candle closing near its high with no lower wick, indicating aggressive buying into the close. The sequence shows consecutive higher highs and higher lows, but each candle has substantial volatility (ranges of 20-100x within the hour), consistent with a low-liquidity pump rather than stable trend formation.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term (last 3 hours) price action is a strong uptrend with sequential higher highs and higher lows. However, with only 3 candles of data, no medium-term trend can be reliably established; it is classified as sideways/undetermined pending more history.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000688

Major support

$0.0000086

Immediate resistance

$0.00119

Major resistance

$0.00119

Immediate support sits at the candle [3] open of $0.000688, which also served as candle [2]'s close. Major support is the extreme low of $0.0000086 seen at the start of candle [1] — a level that, if retested, would represent a near-total collapse of the recent rally. Immediate and current major resistance is the candle [3] high of $0.00119, which has not yet been decisively broken. Given only 3 candles, these levels are provisional and could shift quickly.

Notable patterns

  • Sequential higher highs and higher lows across all 3 candles (short-term uptrend)
  • Large upper wick on candle [2] indicating rejection/selling at $0.000785 before recovering
  • Candle [3] closes near its high with a full-bodied bullish candle and no lower wick, signaling strong buying into the most recent hour
  • Declining hourly volume despite rising price (volume: $377K → $647K → $269K) — a possible bearish momentum divergence

Liquidity

Liquidity

$49,232.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just ~$49.2K is extremely shallow relative to both the 24h trading volume (~$1.16M combined buy+sell) and the ~$972.9K FDV, implying that even moderately sized trades can move price substantially — consistent with the observed intraday price swings of hundreds of percent. 24h buy volume ($604.77K, 52.2%) modestly exceeds sell volume ($553.85K, 47.8%), and unique buyers (2,531) outnumber unique sellers (1,669), pointing to a net inflow bias over the day. However, with liquidity this thin, this volume figure itself should be treated cautiously as it can be inflated by repeated small trades or wash-like activity on a single CPMM pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,998,184.07

FDV

$972.90K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +1962% and 1h change of +330% on a token with only 3 hourly candles of visible history indicates extreme volatility; such moves are frequently followed by sharp reversals in low-liquidity environments.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$49.2K against an FDV of ~$972.9K and 24h volume of ~$1.16M combined, meaning the pool can be easily drained or manipulated, producing high slippage on even modest trade sizes.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control ~19.78% of supply based on the single available snapshot; top-100 concentration and holder history are unavailable, so the full concentration picture (and whether it is worsening or improving) cannot be determined.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$49.2K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1962% 24h, +330% 1h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on thin pools
  • Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status, leaving supply inflation and account-freeze risks unverified
  • No historical holder data available, preventing any trend analysis of accumulation or distribution
  • Single-pair dependency (one Raydium CPMM pool) with no diversification of liquidity venues

Mitigating factors

  • 24h unique buyers (2,531) exceed unique sellers (1,669), and buy volume modestly exceeds sell volume (52.2% vs 47.8%), suggesting net demand for now
  • Top-10 concentration of ~19.78% is not extreme in isolation, though it cannot be fully contextualized without top-100 or historical data

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital. The combination of extreme volatility, very shallow liquidity, and multiple unknown/unverifiable risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) makes this unsuitable for conservative or medium-risk investors, and position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

Token 'o' has shown an extreme, low-liquidity-driven price surge (+1962% 24h) with modestly positive net buy pressure, but the analysis is hamstrung by multiple critical data gaps: no sniper data, no holder history, and unknown mint/freeze authority status. Given the shallow $49.2K liquidity pool against a $972.9K FDV, this profile is consistent with either a genuine early-stage speculative rally or a pump/manipulation pattern — the available data cannot distinguish between the two with confidence.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy pressure continues to outweigh sell pressure (currently 52.2%/47.8%) and more liquidity is added to the Raydium pool, price could continue trending upward from current levels (~$0.00097) toward and beyond the recent high of ~$0.00119, especially if social attention (Twitter) drives sustained new buyer inflow.

  • Sustained net-positive buyer/seller ratio (2,531 buyers vs 1,669 sellers in 24h)
  • Additional liquidity provisioning reducing slippage and attracting larger buyers
  • Continued social media momentum around the token's Twitter presence

Base Case

Price likely remains highly volatile and range-bound between the recent extremes (roughly $0.0003–$0.0015) in the near term, with elevated risk of a sharp correction as the initial pump loses momentum, absent verifiable fundamentals (authorities, sniper behavior, holder trends) to support a sustained re-rating.

  • No major new liquidity or authority-related developments occur in the short term
  • Current buy/sell ratio (~52/48) persists without a strong swing in either direction
  • Broader thin-liquidity, low-cap token market conditions remain a key driver of price rather than fundamental adoption

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow liquidity, parabolic candle structure, and declining hourly volume trend ($377K→$647K→$269K) despite rising price, the token could suffer a rapid reversal or liquidity drain, potentially falling back toward or below the candle [1] open of ~$0.0000086 if early holders or unknown large wallets exit.

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($49.2K) unable to absorb large sell orders without severe price impact
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status raising rug-pull or dilution risk
  • No visibility into sniper/early-buyer positioning, who may be poised to dump
  • Volume declining even as price rises, a bearish momentum divergence

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 09:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 21:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m % change feed
  • 3 most recent hourly OHLCV candles (Raydium CPMM pair JCkhLmbn7116hzixaDs1uR7ckiJ1c4sm1hNNwpBQTYVe)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buys/sells counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates snapshot (holder count, top-10 supply share)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly candles were provided, insufficient for robust medium/long-term technical analysis
  • No sniper data was available at all, preventing any assessment of early-buyer/sniper dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d) exists; holder growth figures in this report are placeholders (0) and not measured values
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided (set to 0 placeholder), limiting whale distribution assessment
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown, leaving rug-pull risk partially unassessable
  • Extreme reported 24h price change (+1962%) could reflect illiquid-market noise or data artifacts rather than a stable repricing

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Solana micro-cap tokens with shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, and incomplete data coverage carry very high risk, including potential total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and verify on-chain authority status before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is o ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.78% of supply. It reports 1,459 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling o?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 21:17 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $604,775.00 in buys and $553,852.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is o liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +115.30%, from $25,612.08 (2026-09-26 19:00 UTC) to $55,143.99 (2026-09-26 21:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for o (o)?

Price has parabolically expanded from ~$0.0000086 to ~$0.00118 over just 3 hourly candles on very low liquidity ($49.2K), a pattern typical of low-liquidity pump events that often mean-revert sharply. Near-term direction is highly uncertain and could swing violently in either direction depending on whether buy pressure (currently 52.2% vs 47.8% sell) persists. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0003 to $0.0015.

Is o a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital. The combination of extreme volatility, very shallow liquidity, and multiple unknown/unverifiable risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) makes this unsuitable for conservative or medium-risk investors, and position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

What are the key risks of holding o?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$49.2K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1962% 24h, +330% 1h) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on thin pools • Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk

← Back to all predictions

Track o