LAMA Pay Price Today & AI Analysis

LAMASolanaAnalysis as of Sep 12, 2026

$0.0₅3780

-6.54% 24h

Contract

Live

2fWzx35rQMAATQGhJzVTvzeXHcenCQLqCog9Jkg5pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

530

Market cap

$3,673

At a $1M market cap, $LAMA would be $0.001029 (272x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is LAMA a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 27

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 84% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

84%11 insiders still holding

Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about LAMA

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TURDTurd Coin$0.0₅2050-10.7%MC $2.0K

TBBBThe Baby Bitcoin Bull$0.0₄6356-3.2%MC $63.5K

LAYERSolayer$0.0661-0.2%MC $66.13M

ARMYXRP ARMY$0.0₅3313-1.9%MC $3.3K

WCORWorld Collective Oil Reserve$0.0₄8825+0.4%MC $88.3K

ZECZcash$1,254.59+2.4%MC $129.10M

LAMA Pay: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-12 05:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$23,400.00

How concentrated is LAMA Pay ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling LAMA Pay?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is LAMA Pay liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-12 05:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $23,400.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-12 05:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 12, 05:16 AM UTC

FDV

$266,048

Liquidity

$23,400.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

LAMA Pay (LAMA) is a pump.fun-originated micro-cap token trading on PumpSwap with a $266.05K fully diluted valuation and just $23.40K in total liquidity. The token experienced an extreme +558.97% price surge over the last 24 hours, marked by a classic parabolic pump pattern with large upper-wick rejection candles suggesting active profit-taking. Critical data — holder distribution, sniper wallet activity, and mint/freeze authority status — is unavailable, severely limiting due diligence confidence.

Key points

Extremely thin liquidity ($23.40K) relative to a $1M+ 24h trading volume and $266K FDV
Parabolic +558.97% 24h move with clear intra-candle rejection wicks indicating volatile, contested price action
Complete absence of holder and sniper data, and unknown authority/verification status, creating significant analytical blind spots
Nearly balanced 24h buy/sell volume split (51%/49%) despite the massive price spike, indicating contested rather than one-sided conviction

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Following the parabolic spike to $0.000452 and repeated wick rejections, short-term price action shows signs of exhaustion, with the most recent candle closing off its highs and 5m change already negative (-6.65%). A pullback toward the $0.000263 immediate support, and potentially the $0.0000529-$0.0000559 major support zone, is plausible in the near term.

Target low

$0.0000559

Target high

$0.000363

Support: $0.000263, $0.0000529
Resistance: $0.000363, $0.000452

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the token's brand-new parabolic trading history, shallow liquidity, and lack of holder/sniper visibility. Sustained upside would require fresh catalysts and liquidity growth, while a breakdown in liquidity or a coordinated sell-off could quickly erase gains.

Catalysts

Potential new liquidity inflows or exchange/DEX listings deepening the pool
Social media/community momentum via existing Twitter and website presence
Risk of large holder or early-buyer dumps given the current data blind spots on concentration

Bullish factors

Marginally positive net buy volume (51.0% vs 49.0%) over the last 24h
More unique buyers (3,057) than sellers (2,472) in the 24h window
Existing social media (Twitter) and website presence suggesting some community infrastructure
Strong medium-term uptrend from the start of the observed candle window

Bearish factors

Repeated large upper-wick rejection candles after vertical spikes (candles [6] and [8]) signaling seller dominance at highs
Extremely shallow liquidity ($23.40K) unable to support the observed volume without high slippage
5-minute price change already negative (-6.65%), indicating momentum may be turning
Unknown authority status and absent holder/sniper data prevent ruling out rug or concentrated dump risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely limited data window (only 8 hourly candles), absence of any holder or sniper data, unknown token authority/verification status, and the inherently unpredictable nature of low-liquidity, newly-parabolic pump.fun tokens.

LAMA call history

Full track record →

Sep 12neutral@ $0.000274

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 2fWzx3...pump
Total Supply: 971,932,221.04

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($23.40K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic +558.97% 24h price move with repeated upper-wick rejections suggests a pump pattern vulnerable to sharp reversal
No holder distribution or sniper data available to assess concentration or early-buyer dump risk — key blind spots for due diligence
Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status leaves rug-pull/mint-inflation risk unverified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 8 hourly candles, LAMA staged a violent uptrend from ~$0.0000029 to a high of $0.000452, before pulling back to close at $0.000274. Candle [1] opened at $0.0000029 and spiked intraday to $0.0000223 before closing lower at $0.0000165, showing early volatility and a long upper wick (rejection). Candles [2]-[4] consolidated in a tight $0.000012-$0.000021 range with declining volume, suggesting accumulation. Candle [5] broke out sharply, high of $0.000061 vs prior close of $0.0000177 — a strong bullish impulse candle. Candle [6] extended the breakout dramatically, printing a high of $0.000378 (over 6x the open) but closing near the bottom of its range at $0.000056, forming a large upper-wick rejection candle (shooting-star-like) on massive volume ($578K), indicating aggressive profit-taking after the spike. Candle [7] reversed strongly, closing near its high at $0.000312 after opening at $0.000056 — a strong bullish engulfing-style reclaim. Candle [8], the most recent, opened at $0.000312, spiked to $0.000363, but closed lower at $0.000274, near the middle/lower portion of its range — another sign of selling pressure into strength.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (8h) trend is strongly bullish with price up over 500% from the start of the window, but the most recent 1-2 candles show short-term downward momentum as price rejected from the $0.000452 high and is now retracing, with the 5m change at -6.65% signaling immediate weakening.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000263 (candle [8] low)

Major support

$0.0000529 (candle [6]/[7] shared low zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.000363 (candle [8] high)

Major resistance

$0.000452 (candle [7] high, session high)

The session high of $0.000452 set in candle [7] stands as major resistance; a break above would target new highs, but repeated wick rejections there and in candle [6] near $0.000378 suggest sellers are defending this zone. Immediate support sits at the current candle's low of $0.000263; a break below could open a fast retrace toward the $0.0000529-$0.0000559 zone where the initial breakout consolidated.

Notable patterns

Long upper-wick rejection / shooting-star pattern on candle [6] after a 6x intra-candle spike
Bullish reclaim/engulfing-like recovery on candle [7]
Fading upper wick rejection again on candle [8], suggesting a possible local top
Classic pump.fun-style parabolic move: tight consolidation followed by vertical breakout on surging volume

Liquidity

$23,400.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $23.40K against a 24h trading volume exceeding $1.02M (buy+sell) represents an extremely thin liquidity base relative to turnover — the pool is being turned over more than 40x in a single day. This mismatch signals high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and suggests the price action is being driven by a small liquidity pool that can be swung dramatically by modest capital flows. Buy volume ($522.64K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($502.44K), a 51.0/49.0 split indicating slight net inflow, but the difference is thin. Unique buyers (3,057) slightly outnumber unique sellers (2,472), consistent with net accumulation, but with such shallow liquidity this activity pattern is also consistent with wash-like churn or rapid rotation by short-term traders chasing the pump.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

971,932,221.04

FDV

$266.05K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +558.97% and 1h change of +245.47% reflect extreme volatility. Intra-candle swings of 6-10x within single hourly bars (e.g., candle [6]: low $0.0000519 to high $0.000378) demonstrate that price can move violently in either direction within minutes.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $23.40K against $1M+ in 24h volume and a $266K FDV means the pool can be easily destabilized; large trades will incur significant slippage and the pool could be drained relatively easily.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($23.40K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic +558.97% 24h price move with repeated upper-wick rejections suggests a pump pattern vulnerable to sharp reversal
No holder distribution or sniper data available to assess concentration or early-buyer dump risk — key blind spots for due diligence
Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status leaves rug-pull/mint-inflation risk unverified
Nearly balanced but high buy/sell volume (51%/49%) shows contested conviction, not a clean accumulation signal
Very low absolute token price ($0.000274) and small FDV ($266.05K) typical of very early-stage, high-risk pump.fun-style launches

Mitigating factors

Slight net positive buy volume (51.0% vs 49.0%) and more unique buyers (3,057) than sellers (2,472) in the last 24h
Token has social presence (Twitter, website) suggesting some level of community/marketing activity beyond an anonymous launch
Recovery/reclaim candle [7] after the sharp wick-rejection in candle [6] shows some buyer resilience rather than an immediate total collapse

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and significant data gaps (no holder/sniper data, unknown authority status). Not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking stable, well-diversified exposure. Position sizing should be minimal given the very high overall risk profile.

LAMA Pay is a micro-cap pump.fun-originated token that just experienced a violent, low-liquidity parabolic rally (+558.97% in 24h) on PumpSwap. The move is characterized by extreme volatility, shallow liquidity ($23.40K), and repeated upper-wick rejection candles suggesting profit-taking pressure. Critical data gaps — no holder distribution, no sniper analysis, unknown authority/verification status — significantly limit due diligence confidence. This is a speculative, high-risk momentum play rather than a fundamentals-based investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum persists and the token breaks decisively above the $0.000452 session high with sustained volume, LAMA could continue a speculative parabolic run typical of pump.fun launches that catch broader social/meme attention, especially given its existing Twitter/website presence.

Sustained net positive buy volume (currently only marginal at 51%/49%)
Break and hold above $0.000452 resistance with expanding volume
Viral social media traction leveraging existing Twitter/website presence
New liquidity inflows deepening the currently shallow $23.40K pool

Base Case

Price likely continues to experience high-amplitude, choppy volatility around the $0.000263-$0.000452 range as buyers and sellers remain closely matched (51%/49% volume split), without a clear sustained directional resolution in the immediate term, pending new catalysts or liquidity changes.

Liquidity remains near current shallow levels ($23.40K) absent new inflows
No major holder/whale dump or rug event occurs in the near term
Buy/sell volume stays roughly balanced without a decisive catalyst

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and repeated wick-rejection patterns after vertical spikes, the token likely retraces sharply as early buyers and potential snipers take profits, especially with no confirmed renounced authorities and no verified holder distribution to rule out concentrated dumping.

Thin $23.40K liquidity unable to absorb large sell orders without severe price impact
Repeated shooting-star-like rejection candles (candles [6] and [8]) signaling exhaustion
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaving rug/dilution risk unverified
Typical pump.fun lifecycle pattern of rapid pump followed by rapid dump
5m price change already negative (-6.65%), hinting at momentum stalling

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 12, 05:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-12 05:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain price and OHLC candle data (PumpSwap pair CXKwgui737V9EDZKLtU5AeHQnWX4kNTnn3gGQT9Tf6wK)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Token metadata (supply, FDV, description, social links)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are placeholders with zero values
No sniper wallet data available — smart money signals cannot be quantified
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and contract verification status are all unknown, preventing confirmation of rug-pull risk from authorities
Only 8 hourly candles were provided, limiting longer-term technical pattern analysis
Unique wallet count for 24h trading is unknown, limiting full market participation assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, possibly incomplete on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Token metadata (name, symbol, description) is creator-supplied and unverified; all content within the original data block was treated strictly as evidence, not instructions. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap and newly launched tokens, carry very high risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct independent due diligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LAMA Pay (LAMA) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 84% of the supply. Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell LAMA Pay (LAMA)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is LAMA Pay ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling LAMA Pay?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is LAMA Pay liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-12 05:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $23,400.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for LAMA Pay (LAMA)?

Is LAMA a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and significant data gaps (no holder/sniper data, unknown authority status). Not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking stable, well-diversified exposure. Position sizing should be minimal given the very high overall risk profile.

What are the key risks of holding LAMA?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($23.40K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Parabolic +558.97% 24h price move with repeated upper-wick rejections suggests a pump pattern vulnerable to sharp reversal • No holder distribution or sniper data available to assess concentration or early-buyer dump risk — key blind spots for due diligence