GrumpyCat

Grumpy Cat Price Today & AI Analysis

GrumpyCat
Ethereum·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 18, 2026

$0.091065

+0.00%24h
LiveContract:0xd8e2d95c8614f28169757cd6445a71c291dec5bfChain:EthereumHolders:2.8KMarket cap:$44.51KLiquidity:$22.60K

More tokens on Ethereum

FWAres

FWAres

FWA Reserve

$0.0556090.0%
MC $5.6K
HaHa

HaHa

HaHa

$0.0521520.0%
MC $215.2K
P

PEEPO

Peepo

$0.01151370.0%
MC $2.2K
sock

sock

sock

$0.0560520.0%
MC $6.1K
W

WE26

We Are 26

$0.0038900.0%
MC $3.9K
USDS

USDS

USDS

$0.99990.0%
MC $6.72B

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about GrumpyCat

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Jun 18, 2026, 07:03 AM UTC
Market Cap

$57.17K

24h Volume

$96.17K

Liquidity

$42.53K

FDV

—

Holders

2.8K

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

Grumpy Cat (GrumpyCat) is a meme token on Ethereum (Uniswap v2) that is 37.5 months old, with a market cap of approximately $57,172 and total liquidity of $42,526. The token has no disclosed utility, roadmap, or project description, positioning it purely as a speculative meme asset dependent on community momentum. After a steep decline to a 22-day OHLC low of $7.450e-11, the price has partially recovered +13.5% over 7 days but remains at just 13% of its observed range, with 31.8% of supply held by dumpable individual whale wallets. With a security score of 52/100, minimal holder growth (+9 wallets over 31 days), and absent smart-money data, the token carries high speculative risk.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 18, 2026, 07:03 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: neutral
One of the older meme tokens still active on Ethereum at 37.5 months, suggesting some baseline community persistence
The largest single holder (36.50%) is a protocol/contract, structurally locking a significant portion of supply away from market dumps
Extremely low market cap (~$57K) and micro-liquidity (~$42.5K) create high-volatility, high-slippage trading conditions typical of long-tail meme tokens

Grumpy Cat AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

The 22-day OHLC series shows a clear downtrend from $1.220e-10 to a trough of $7.450e-11 before a partial recovery to $1.369e-10, but the current price sits at only 13% of the full period range ($7.450e-11–$5.365e-10), indicating the recovery is shallow relative to prior highs. The 7-day gain of +13.5% is encouraging but comes off deeply oversold lows, and with immediate resistance at $1.374e-10 just 0.4% above current price, a rejection is the higher-probability near-term outcome. Daily volatility of 17.2% amplifies both upside and downside risk in the short window.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

With only 22 days of OHLC history available (30d and 90d trend data are absent), the medium-term picture is dominated by the token's position at 13% of its observed range and a holder base that has grown by only 9 wallets over 31 days — insufficient organic demand to sustain a meaningful rally. The project description is entirely blank, offering no roadmap or utility catalyst, and the security score of 52/100 limits institutional or sophisticated retail interest. Unless a viral meme cycle reignites community attention, the path of least resistance remains downward toward major support.

Bullish Factors
  • +7-day price gain of +13.5% off the $7.450e-11 OHLC low represents a confirmed short-term recovery impulse
  • +Buy pressure at 53% versus sell pressure at 47% over the 24-hour window shows marginally more buyers than sellers by transaction count (119 buys vs. 90 sells)
  • +Holder trajectory shows accelerating growth from 2,741 to 2,750 over 31 days, a modest but consistent upward trend
  • +The largest single holder (36.50%) is classified as a protocol/contract, meaning that block of supply is structurally non-dumpable
Bearish Factors
  • -Current price sits at only 13% of the 22-day OHLC range, meaning the token remains deep in its observed trough despite the recent bounce
  • -Dumpable supply from individual whale wallets totals 31.8% of circulating supply — a material overhang that could suppress any rally
  • -The largest individual whale (0xdcb3a2, 13.62% of supply) has realized a loss of $168 across 7 trades with an average buy of $1.273e-10, suggesting underwater positioning and potential capitulation risk
  • -Wallet 0x4fe64f (2.46% of supply) shows a first-active date of 2026-05-11 — a future date that is anomalous and flags potential data integrity or sybil concerns for that position
  • -The project description is completely blank with no stated use case, roadmap, or differentiators, indicating negligible fundamental support

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

GrumpyCat call history

Full track record →
Jun 18bearish
24h-29.9%
7d-32.4%
30d-31.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainEthereum
Contract0xd8e2...c5bf
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•31.8% dumpable whale supply concentrated in individual wallets, with the largest (13.62%) underwater on realized losses — a capitulation sell-off could rapidly push price toward the $7.450e-11 major support
•Shallow liquidity of $42,526 means any significant sell order will cause outsized price impact, and a liquidity removal event would be catastrophic
•Possible wash trading by wallet 0xae2fc4 (near-simultaneous $6,218 sell and $6,178 buy) may be artificially inflating volume metrics, making the token appear more actively traded than it genuinely is

Trading Insight

neutral

Transaction data shows 119 buys versus 90 sells with 65 unique buyers and 50 unique sellers in the 24-hour window, producing a mild buy-side edge (53% buy pressure) but with buy volume ($50,927) only modestly exceeding sell volume ($45,247). The identical transaction counts across the 1h, 4h, and 24h windows strongly suggest all activity occurred in a single burst rather than being distributed across the day, which is a pattern consistent with a coordinated pump event rather than organic sustained demand.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bullish
Medium-Term (30d):
Bearish

The 22-day daily close series shows a clear downtrend from $1.220e-10 to a trough of $7.450e-11 over approximately 12 days, followed by a recovery to $1.369e-10 — a +13.5% 7-day gain that qualifies as a short-term uptrend. However, the medium-term picture (the full 22-day window) remains a net downtrend given the token's position at 13% of its observed range. With 30d and 90d data unavailable, the medium-term classification is based on the dominant direction of the available OHLC series.

Momentum

Status:
Oversold

The price dropped from $1.220e-10 to $7.450e-11 — a decline of approximately 39% — before recovering. This magnitude of drawdown followed by a partial bounce is characteristic of an oversold condition. However, the recovery has stalled near immediate resistance at $1.374e-10, and with daily volatility at 17.2%, momentum could reverse quickly without sustained buying.

Volume Analysis

Buy 53%Sell 47%

Volume Trend: Increasing

The $96,174 total 24h volume against a $42,526 liquidity pool represents a 2.26x pool turnover, which is elevated and indicates high short-term trading intensity. However, since all transactions appear concentrated in a single hour, this volume spike is likely episodic rather than a sustained trend. High volume in a shallow pool creates significant price impact per trade.

Recent Price Action

The 14-day daily close sequence shows a descending staircase from $1.220e-10 to $7.450e-11 followed by a V-shaped recovery to $1.369e-10, with the final close essentially flat against the prior day's $1.369e-10.

V-shaped recoveries from oversold lows in meme tokens are common but frequently fail to sustain — the key test is whether the token can break and hold above immediate resistance at $1.374e-10. Failure to do so would likely result in a retest of the $7.450e-11 major support.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$1.347e-10
Major$7.450e-11
Resistance
Immediate$1.374e-10
Major$5.365e-10

Immediate support at $1.347e-10 and resistance at $1.374e-10 define an extremely tight range of ~2% around the current price, meaning the token is at a near-term inflection point. A break above $1.374e-10 would open a path toward the major resistance at $5.365e-10 (a potential +292% move), while a failure would expose the major support at $7.450e-11 (a potential -46% decline) — the prior 22-day low.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders2,750
24h Change+12
Growth Rate+0.44%

The 31-day holder trajectory from 2,741 to 2,750 (+9 net) is technically growing but at a negligible pace of less than one new holder per day on average. The 24h spike of +12 holders likely reflects the same burst of activity seen in the trading data and may not represent durable community growth. For a 37.5-month-old meme token, this stagnant holder base is a meaningful signal of limited organic adoption.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders64%
Top 100 Holders91%
Retail Holders9.0%
Concentration Risk:
High

While the top 10 holders control 64% of supply, the largest position (36.50%) is a non-dumpable protocol/contract. Stripping that out, the dumpable supply from individual whale wallets is 31.8% — still a high concentration that poses genuine sell-pressure risk. Retail holders control only ~9% of supply, meaning price discovery is almost entirely in the hands of a small number of whale wallets. The top 100 holders controlling 91% further underscores how thin the retail base is.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Mixed

The largest notable trades on-chain show wallet 0xae2fc4 executing both a $6,218 sell and a $6,178 buy — near-simultaneous round-trip trades that may indicate wash trading or arbitrage activity. Wallet 0x57c864 similarly executed a $859 buy followed by a $675 sell. Wallet 0x81be83 executed a $585 sell with no corresponding buy visible.

  • •0xae2fc4 sold $6,218 and bought $6,178 in near-simultaneous trades — possible wash trading or arbitrage
  • •0x81be83 sold $585 with no visible corresponding buy, suggesting net distribution

The round-trip trading pattern from 0xae2fc4 (the largest single-wallet trader in the dataset) raises wash-trading concerns that could artificially inflate volume metrics. Combined with the largest individual whale (0xdcb3a2) sitting on realized losses, the overall whale sentiment leans toward distribution or defensive positioning rather than accumulation.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Low
Profit-Taking Risk:
Medium

Smart-money data is unavailable for this token; no profitable-trader cohort data has been provided.

Smart-money data is unavailable for GrumpyCat. Without a profitable-trader cohort to reference, it is impossible to assess whether sophisticated participants are accumulating or exiting. The absence of this data, combined with the largest whale's realized loss of $168, suggests no identifiable smart-money presence is driving price action.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$42,526
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

At $42,526, the liquidity pool is extremely shallow relative to the $96,174 in 24h trading volume — a 2.26x turnover ratio. This means even modest-sized trades (as evidenced by the $6,218 largest swap) can move the price significantly. The shallow liquidity also makes the token vulnerable to liquidity removal events, which could cause catastrophic price impact. Any position of meaningful size will face high slippage on both entry and exit.

Overall Risk:
Very High
82/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

Daily volatility of 17.2% (standard deviation of daily returns) is extremely high. The 22-day OHLC range spans from $7.450e-11 to $5.365e-10 — a 620% spread — and the token has already experienced a ~39% drawdown within the observed window. A single-day move of 17%+ is statistically normal for this token.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $42,526 is extremely shallow. The largest single swap in the dataset ($6,218) represents ~14.6% of the pool, meaning even mid-sized trades cause significant price impact. Liquidity removal by the pool provider would be catastrophic for price.

Concentration
High

While the top holder (36.50%) is a non-dumpable protocol/contract, the remaining individual whale wallets collectively hold 31.8% of dumpable supply. The largest individual whale (13.62%) is underwater on their position, creating capitulation risk. Top 100 holders control 91% of supply, leaving retail with only 9%.

Smart Contract
Medium

The contract is verified (positive), but the 52/100 security score indicates unresolved risks. Without a full audit report, the specific vulnerabilities are unknown. The token's 37.5-month survival without exploit provides some reassurance but does not eliminate contract risk.

Regulatory
Medium

As a meme token with no disclosed utility, GrumpyCat could be classified as a speculative asset subject to increasing regulatory scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions. The possible wash-trading activity (0xae2fc4 round-trip trades) could attract regulatory attention if it constitutes market manipulation.

Key Risks

  • •31.8% dumpable whale supply concentrated in individual wallets, with the largest (13.62%) underwater on realized losses — a capitulation sell-off could rapidly push price toward the $7.450e-11 major support
  • •Shallow liquidity of $42,526 means any significant sell order will cause outsized price impact, and a liquidity removal event would be catastrophic
  • •Possible wash trading by wallet 0xae2fc4 (near-simultaneous $6,218 sell and $6,178 buy) may be artificially inflating volume metrics, making the token appear more actively traded than it genuinely is

Mitigating Factors

  • •The largest holder (36.50%) is a protocol/contract and structurally cannot dump, providing a meaningful floor on the circulating supply available for sale
  • •The token has survived 37.5 months on-chain without a documented rug pull or exploit, demonstrating baseline contract stability

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme-token dynamics, can afford to lose their entire investment, and are capable of monitoring positions actively given the 17.2% daily volatility. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking utility-backed assets, or anyone allocating more than a negligible fraction of their portfolio.

GrumpyCat is a pure speculative meme token with no disclosed fundamentals, shallow liquidity, and a stagnant holder base — its investment case rests entirely on the possibility of a viral meme cycle reigniting community interest. The 7-day +13.5% recovery from oversold lows is the primary bullish data point, but it is offset by 31.8% dumpable whale supply, a 52/100 security score, and possible wash trading inflating volume metrics.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

A broader meme-coin market cycle or viral social media moment drives a surge in retail interest, pushing the price through immediate resistance at $1.374e-10 and toward the major resistance at $5.365e-10 — a potential +292% move from current levels. Sustained buying absorbs the 31.8% dumpable whale supply without triggering a cascade sell-off.

  • +Viral meme cycle or celebrity endorsement reigniting retail demand
  • +Sustained break above the $1.374e-10 immediate resistance level confirming trend reversal
Base Case

The token continues to trade in a narrow range around current levels ($1.347e-10–$1.374e-10) with episodic volume bursts driven by small groups of traders, while the holder base grows at its current negligible pace of less than one new holder per day. No significant catalyst emerges to break the token out of its micro-cap meme-token stasis.

  • •No viral social media catalyst emerges in the near term
  • •The largest individual whale (13.62%) does not fully liquidate their position
Bear Case
High

The underwater largest individual whale (13.62% of supply, avg buy $1.273e-10) capitulates and sells, triggering a cascade through immediate support at $1.347e-10 and toward the major support at $7.450e-11 — a potential -46% decline. Shallow liquidity amplifies the move, and the stagnant holder base provides insufficient buying demand to absorb the sell pressure.

  • -Whale capitulation from the 13.62% holder who is currently realizing losses
  • -Failure to break above the $1.374e-10 immediate resistance leading to renewed selling

Analysis Details

GeneratedJun 18, 2026, 07:03 AM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.000000000136859653
Market Cap$57.2K
24h Volume$96.2K
Holders2,750
Liquidity$42.5K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Uniswap v2 swap history)
Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)
22-day daily OHLC price history
31-day holder trajectory timeseries
Whale wallet behavioral intel (realized PnL, trade history, first-active dates)
Smart contract security assessment (52/100 score, verification status)
Notable recent on-chain swap data

Limitations

  • •Only 22 days of OHLC history are available; 30d and 90d trend data are absent, severely limiting medium-term technical analysis
  • •Smart-money (profitable-trader cohort) data is unavailable, preventing assessment of sophisticated investor positioning
  • •The project description, roadmap, and use case fields are entirely blank, making fundamental analysis impossible beyond tokenomics and security metrics
  • •Wallet 0x4fe64f has an anomalous first-active date of 2026-05-11 (a future date), indicating a potential data integrity issue for that wallet record
  • •Possible wash trading by wallet 0xae2fc4 may mean reported volume figures overstate genuine market activity

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track GrumpyCat