C

Cluster Protocol Price Today & AI Analysis

CP
Base·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 2, 2026

$0.0455

-24.09%24h
LiveContract:0x001aad84c21a5cd4d696c56d44866e9703c43f77Chain:BaseHolders:526Market cap:$227.69MLiquidity:$525.10K

More tokens on Base

METAc

METAc

Meta Platforms Inc.

$593.952.2%
MC $2.28M
AERO

AERO

Aerodrome

$0.47070.9%
MC $926.70M
SETZ

SETZ

SETZ

$0.0536313481.1%
MC $363.1K
PLAY

PLAY

Play

$0.03756.5%
MC $187.71M
MORPHO

MORPHO

Morpho Token

$2.613.6%
MC $78.36M

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about CP

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Sep 2, 2026, 06:16 PM UTC
Market Cap

$227.69M

24h Volume

$2.01M

Liquidity

$525.10K

FDV

—

Holders

526

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

Cluster Protocol (CP) is a Base-chain token approximately 3.3 months old, currently trading at $0.0455 with a market cap of approximately $227.7 million — a figure that appears elevated relative to the token's thin holder base of 526 addresses and complete absence of publicly available project information. The token is experiencing a sharp 24% intraday decline on Velodrome, with total liquidity of $525,101 and nearly all circulating supply (5 billion tokens) already in the market. Top-10 holders control 89.1% of supply, and no project description, social presence, or security audit data is available, making independent due diligence extremely difficult.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 2, 2026, 06:16 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: bearish
Extremely high market cap-to-holder ratio: ~$227M market cap spread across only 526 holders implies very large average position sizes and structural fragility
Fully diluted valuation nearly equals market cap ($227,688,067 vs $227,688,062), indicating virtually all supply is already circulating with no future unlock pressure — but also no token sink or burn mechanism evident
Trading exclusively on Velodrome (Base), a DEX-only presence with no CEX listings or verifiable project documentation, limiting price discovery and institutional access

Cluster Protocol AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

Cluster Protocol (CP) has shed approximately 24% in the past 4 hours, a sharp and sustained decline that signals genuine selling pressure rather than noise. The 1-hour window shows sell transactions (697) now outnumbering buys (549), confirming the momentum has shifted intraday. With no OHLC-derived support levels available, the token is navigating price discovery without a clear technical floor.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

The combination of extreme top-holder concentration (89.1% in 10 wallets), a very small holder base of only 526 addresses, and a complete absence of project description or social presence creates a structurally weak medium-term setup. Without a verifiable use case, community, or fundamental catalyst, sustained price recovery is unlikely. The token would need significant new holder adoption and a credible project narrative to reverse the current trajectory.

Bullish Factors
  • +24-hour buy volume ($1,195,497) exceeds sell volume ($817,851) by roughly 46%, and buy transactions (3,832) outnumber sell transactions (2,758), suggesting a cohort of buyers is still actively accumulating despite the price decline
  • +Total liquidity of $525,101 on Velodrome provides a meaningful pool relative to the token's current price, reducing the risk of immediate liquidity collapse
Bearish Factors
  • -A 24% price decline sustained across both the 4-hour and 24-hour windows is a strong directional signal of distribution or panic selling, not a transient fluctuation
  • -The top 10 holders control 89.1% of supply across only 526 total holders — per-wallet data is unavailable, but this aggregate concentration means a small number of actors can exert outsized downward pressure
  • -No project description, no social links, and an 'Uncategorized' classification mean there is no verifiable fundamental value proposition to anchor buyer conviction

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

CP call history

Full track record →
Sep 2bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBase
Contract0x001a...3f77
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•Extreme holder concentration (89.1% in top 10 wallets) with only 526 total holders means a single large holder exiting could cause catastrophic price impact given the $525,101 liquidity pool
•Complete absence of project documentation, social presence, and category classification makes it impossible to assess fundamental value, team accountability, or development roadmap — this is a critical due diligence gap
•The 24% intraday decline combined with identical 4-hour and 24-hour transaction data suggests all trading activity is very recent, raising the possibility that this is a newly active speculative event rather than organic price discovery

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite buy transactions outnumbering sell transactions over 24 hours, the 24% price decline indicates that sell-side volume is hitting the order book at lower prices, driving the market down. The 1-hour window has flipped to sell-transaction dominance (697 sells vs 549 buys), suggesting the intraday momentum has turned decisively negative. The overall sentiment score reflects the tension between aggregate buy-transaction count and the reality of sustained price deterioration.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bearish
Medium-Term (30d):
Bearish

The 24% decline sustained across both the 4-hour and 24-hour windows establishes a clear short-term downtrend. No OHLC history is available to assess the medium-term trend from swing highs and lows, but the absence of any recovery attempt within the observed window and the shift to sell-transaction dominance in the most recent 1-hour period reinforce a bearish directional bias. Without historical price data, the depth and duration of this downtrend cannot be contextualized.

Momentum

Status:
Oversold

A 24% single-session decline typically pushes standard momentum oscillators (RSI, Stochastic) into oversold territory. However, oversold conditions in a token with extreme concentration and no fundamental anchor do not reliably signal reversal — they can persist or deepen if large holders continue to distribute. The 1-hour sell-transaction dominance suggests momentum has not yet stabilized.

Volume Analysis

Buy 59.4%Sell 40.6%

Volume Trend: Increasing

The volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 3.8x (total 24h volume ~$2.01M vs $525,101 liquidity) is very elevated, indicating intense trading activity relative to available pool depth. The fact that all 24-hour transaction data appears concentrated in the last 4 hours suggests a sudden burst of activity rather than sustained organic volume. High volume during a price decline is a classically bearish signal, as it indicates active selling rather than a low-volume drift.

Recent Price Action

Sharp vertical decline of 24% within a 4-hour window, with the 5-minute reading showing a minor 0.71% uptick — a potential dead-cat bounce or brief consolidation within the broader downmove. The 1-hour window's sell-transaction dominance (697 vs 549) suggests the brief uptick has not translated into sustained buying.

A sharp, high-volume decline of this magnitude in a low-holder-count, high-concentration token often reflects either coordinated large-holder selling or a loss of speculative confidence. The minor 5-minute recovery is insufficient to signal trend reversal and should be treated as noise within the dominant downtrend.

Overall Risk:
Very High
88/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A 24% intraday price decline on a token with only 526 holders and $525,101 in liquidity demonstrates extreme price sensitivity to order flow. The high volume-to-liquidity ratio (~3.8x) means individual large trades can move the price dramatically, and the low holder count provides no stabilizing retail base.

Liquidity
Medium

$525,101 in total liquidity is functional for small trades but creates meaningful slippage risk for any position exceeding a few thousand dollars. The concentration of liquidity in a single DEX (Velodrome on Base) with no CEX listings amplifies exit risk if the pool is withdrawn.

Concentration
High

The top 10 holders control 89.1% of supply. Per-wallet classification data is unavailable, so it cannot be determined how much of this is protocol/exchange wallets versus individual actors. Given the absence of any named protocol or exchange context, this concentration must be treated as a high risk until proven otherwise.

Smart Contract
Medium

No contract security data is available on this chain's data provider. This is an uninformed default rather than an assessment — the actual smart contract risk could be higher or lower. Independent contract review is strongly recommended before any significant exposure.

Regulatory
Medium

As an uncategorized Base-chain token with no verifiable project identity or jurisdiction, CP faces standard DeFi regulatory uncertainty. The lack of documentation makes it impossible to assess whether the token constitutes a security or falls under any specific regulatory framework.

Key Risks

  • •Extreme holder concentration (89.1% in top 10 wallets) with only 526 total holders means a single large holder exiting could cause catastrophic price impact given the $525,101 liquidity pool
  • •Complete absence of project documentation, social presence, and category classification makes it impossible to assess fundamental value, team accountability, or development roadmap — this is a critical due diligence gap
  • •The 24% intraday decline combined with identical 4-hour and 24-hour transaction data suggests all trading activity is very recent, raising the possibility that this is a newly active speculative event rather than organic price discovery

Mitigating Factors

  • •The token has survived 3.3 months since contract creation, which is beyond the typical window for immediate exit scams, though it does not preclude longer-term distribution schemes
  • •Buy volume ($1,195,497) exceeding sell volume ($817,851) over 24 hours indicates some genuine demand-side participation, even during a price decline

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of extremely concentrated, undocumented, low-holder-count tokens and who can afford to lose their entire position. It is not appropriate for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone relying on fundamental analysis to guide their decision.

Cluster Protocol presents a high-risk speculative profile with no verifiable fundamental value proposition, extreme supply concentration, and a sharp ongoing price decline. The investment thesis is almost entirely dependent on speculative momentum reversing, which requires catalysts that are not currently visible in the data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

A project announcement, whitepaper release, or CEX listing emerges that establishes a credible use case for CP, attracting new holders and converting the existing buy-transaction dominance into sustained price recovery. The 59.4% buy pressure and net positive volume flow provide a base for a short-squeeze-style recovery if large holders pause distribution.

  • +Emergence of verifiable project documentation or team identity that justifies the ~$227M market cap
  • +Expansion of the holder base well beyond 526 addresses through organic community growth or exchange listing
Base Case

The token stabilizes at a lower price level after the current sell-off exhausts immediate distribution pressure, trading in a volatile, low-volume range on Velodrome with no significant price appreciation. The holder base remains small and concentrated, and the token continues without a publicly documented use case.

  • •No major project announcement or exchange listing materializes in the near term
  • •The current liquidity pool on Velodrome remains intact and is not withdrawn by liquidity providers
Bear Case
High

The 24% decline continues as top-10 holders (controlling 89.1% of supply) distribute into the remaining buy pressure. With no project narrative to sustain speculative interest and a thin liquidity pool, the token experiences accelerating price deterioration as buyers exhaust and liquidity thins further.

  • -Continued selling by concentrated top holders into a shallow $525,101 liquidity pool with no fundamental demand floor
  • -Absence of any project catalyst or community infrastructure to attract new holders and replace exiting participants

Analysis Details

GeneratedSep 2, 2026, 06:16 PM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.0455376271554
Market Cap$227.69M
24h Volume$2.01M
Holders526
Liquidity$525.1K

Data Sources

Codex DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)
Daily OHLC price history
Aggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • •No OHLC price history is available, preventing computation of technical support/resistance levels, trend duration, or volatility metrics beyond the current session
  • •Holder growth history, holder size-tier distribution, and individual whale transaction data were unavailable for this analysis
  • •Contract security data (audit status, contract verification, honeypot detection) is not available on this chain's data provider
  • •No project description, social links, or team information is publicly associated with the token, making fundamental analysis impossible
  • •Smart-money cohort and profitable-trader data were unavailable, preventing assessment of informed capital flows

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track CP