DragonWorm

Dragon Worm Price Today & AI Analysis

DragonWorm
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 11, 2026

xLyhQfSW8UKjsJaisszVS5SRjVTmy9WiEVsq6Afpump

$0.053937

-0.93%

FDV $3,936

LiveContract:xLyhQfSW8UKjsJaisszVS5SRjVTmy9WiEVsq6AfpumpChain:SolanaHolders:991Market cap:$3,936

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about DragonWorm

Report snapshotas of Jun 11, 12:17 PM
FDV

$1,087,744

Liquidity

$91,237

Holders

1,485

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Dragon Worm (DragonWorm) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a current FDV of ~$1.09M. The token has experienced an extraordinary 1,676% price surge in the past 24 hours, exploding from near-zero activity to 1,485 holders almost entirely within the last 24 hours. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, and unknown update authority — all significant red flags. The holder base grew from just 21 wallets to 1,485 in a single day, indicating a very recent launch event. Liquidity is extremely shallow at $91.24K against a $1.09M FDV, creating severe slippage risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Neutral
Explosive 1,676% 24h price surge from near-zero baseline
Holder base grew 99% in 24 hours — from 21 to 1,485 holders
Extremely shallow liquidity ($91.24K) relative to FDV ($1.09M)
No social links, no description, no verified contract — minimal transparency
Top 10 holders control 20.52% with highly fragmented distribution among top 20

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term

neutral
24h-7d

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Target lowunknown
Target highunknown
Support:
Resistance:

Medium term

neutral
30d-90d

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Catalysts

Bullish factors

Bearish factors

Confidence: low. No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

DragonWorm call history

Full track record →
Jun 11neutral
24h
7d
30d

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Six hourly candles are available (07:00–12:00 UTC on 2026-06-11). The OHLC data contains anomalies: in several candles, the Low value is higher than the High value (e.g., candle 1: H=$0.0000785, L=$0.001044), suggesting the data feed may have H/L fields inverted or the price spiked dramatically within the hour. Interpreting the data as-is: the highest observed price level is ~$0.001044 (candle 1 'L' field, likely the actual high), and the lowest is ~$0.0000326. Volume peaked in candles 2–4 ($235K–$264K/hr) and dropped sharply in candle 1 ($28K), suggesting the initial pump volume is fading. The price oscillates between two recurring levels: ~$0.0000326 and ~$0.0000785, with a spike to ~$0.001044.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 49%Sell 51%

Short-term trend is technically uptrend given the 1,676% 24h gain, but the most recent candle shows declining volume and price near the spike high. The medium-term trend is effectively sideways/undefined as the token was dormant for 30 days prior to this single-day event.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000079 (recurring open/close level across multiple candles)
Major$0.000033 (recurring candle open/close floor — lowest observed level)
Resistance
Immediate$0.001044 (observed spike high in candle dataset)
Major$0.001088 (current price / FDV-implied ceiling)

The $0.000033 level acts as a strong floor, appearing as both open and close across multiple candles. The $0.000079 level is a secondary pivot. The $0.001044 level represents the spike high and is the key resistance. A failure to hold above $0.000079 would likely see a retest of $0.000033.

Notable patterns

  • Extreme volume spike followed by rapid volume fade (bearish divergence)
  • Price oscillating between two tight levels ($0.000033 and $0.000079) before spike — suggests accumulation phase
  • Potential inverted H/L data in OHLC feed — data quality concern
  • Single-candle spike to $0.001044 with immediate reversion — classic pump wick
  • 30-day dormancy followed by single-day explosion — textbook pump pattern

Total holders1,485
24h Δ+99
7d Δ+99
30d Δ+99
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is perfectly correlated with the price pump — both occurred simultaneously within the last 24 hours. The token had exactly 21 holders for the entire 30-day historical period (May 12 – June 10, 2026) with zero net change daily. On June 11, 1,464 new holders were added (99% growth), coinciding with the 1,676% price surge. This simultaneous holder and price explosion is characteristic of a viral pump event rather than organic growth.

The holder history is stark: 21 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero change, then 1,464 new holders in a single day. This is not organic growth — it is a sudden pump event. The 1h metric shows +27 holders (+1.80%), suggesting the pump is still attracting new participants. Distribution breakdown shows 182 whales, 174 sharks, 241 dolphins, 60 fish, and 41 octopus — a surprisingly whale-heavy distribution for a token this new, which may indicate that early buyers (the original 21) hold large positions classified as whales. Acquisition is almost entirely via swap (1,477 of 1,485 holders), confirming this is a trading-driven event.

Top 10 hold20.52%
Top 100 hold69.72%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

CxkrTqNUJLjqMG4cYrrtg2f9RVDGRKT8xrz3D1oCnPk7

DEX Liquidity Pool (PumpSwap pair address matches trading pair)

3.43%

oMHLoucsY1RQBUJM5g287JjArtNrxdD7aWKLin4kUrY

Individual whale / early holder

2.08%

A8nvFw2s5su5g3X2gD6YQxegKxBvxigfTypSTNQQa4F5

Individual whale / early holder

2.02%

Gh5CrbxF116QBpTRNYjU4noW1HEbNLahpFjdDL7Egkc8

Individual whale / early holder

1.98%

GhA8SoXSYieW9pdiftRdbf1LF1HZpApMDUgPzVKrySWe

Individual whale / early holder

1.95%

The top 10 holders control 20.52% of supply, and the top 100 control 69.72% — indicating moderate-to-high concentration. The #1 holder (CxkrTqNUJLjqMG4cYrrtg2f9RVDGRKT8xrz3D1oCnPk7 at 3.43%) matches the PumpSwap trading pair address, classifying it as the DEX liquidity pool. Holders #2–#20 each hold between 1.44% and 2.08%, with remarkably similar balances (ranging from ~14.4M to ~20.8M tokens). This uniformity across 19 wallets is suspicious and may indicate coordinated wallet distribution by insiders or a bot-driven distribution mechanism. The 182 'whale' classifications in the distribution data, combined with the 30-day dormancy period, suggests the original 21 holders are sitting on large, profitable positions.

Liquidity$91,240
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$502,210
Sell$531,050
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers3,244
Unique sellers2,852

Liquidity is critically shallow at $91.24K against a $1.09M FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~8.4%. This means any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe price impact. The 24h trading volume of ~$1.03M is over 11x the available liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is slightly negative (sell volume $531K vs buy volume $502K, a $28.8K net outflow). While buyer count (3,244) exceeds seller count (2,852), the higher average sell size suggests larger holders are distributing into retail buy pressure. The PumpSwap pair (CxkrTqNUJLjqMG4cYrrtg2f9RVDGRKT8xrz3D1oCnPk7) is the sole liquidity venue identified. Market health is poor — the combination of shallow liquidity, high volume, and net outflow creates conditions for rapid price collapse.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000
FDV$1,087,743.92

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is 1 billion tokens with 6 decimals, standard for Solana meme tokens. The FDV is $1.09M at the current price of $0.001088. Update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the token is marked as 'Mutable: false' — the immutability flag provides some protection against metadata changes, but without confirmed authority renouncement, mint and freeze authority status cannot be verified. The token is not a master edition and is not verified. No description or social links are provided, which is a significant transparency deficit. The 'Mutable: false' flag is a mild positive, but the unknown authority status means rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed. Investors should treat this as high authority risk until proven otherwise.

Volatility
high

1,676% price surge in 24 hours with OHLC candles showing swings between $0.000033 and $0.001044 — extreme intraday volatility. Volume is fading at the highs, suggesting the pump may be exhausting.

Liquidity
high

Only $91.24K in liquidity against $1.09M FDV (8.4% ratio). Daily volume of $1.03M is 11x the liquidity pool. Any significant sell order will cause catastrophic slippage.

Concentration
medium

Top 10 hold 20.52%, top 100 hold 69.72%. The top 20 non-LP holders each hold 1.44%–2.08% with suspiciously uniform balances, suggesting coordinated wallet distribution. The original 21 pre-pump holders represent a significant hidden concentration risk.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the 30-day dormancy with 21 holders followed by a sudden pump is a classic pre-coordinated pump pattern. The original 21 holders are almost certainly in massive profit and represent the primary dump risk.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown' — mint and freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed. Token is unverified with no social links or description. The 'Mutable: false' flag provides limited reassurance without confirmed authority data.

Key risks

  • Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders before a sudden 1,676% pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
  • Liquidity of only $91.24K creates extreme exit risk for any position of meaningful size
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
  • No social links, no description, no verified contract — zero transparency
  • Top 20 holders have suspiciously uniform balances suggesting coordinated insider distribution
  • Net sell volume exceeds buy volume by $28.8K in 24h despite price surge
  • Volume declining sharply in most recent candle (89% drop) — momentum fading
  • No utility, no roadmap, no community infrastructure identified

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked 'Mutable: false' providing some metadata protection
  • 'Possible spam' flag is false per metadata
  • Buyer count (3,244) exceeds seller count (2,852) showing some genuine retail interest
  • 1,464 new holders in 24h shows real market participation
  • Trading on established PumpSwap venue
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand they may lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely.

Dragon Worm is a high-risk, newly-active Solana meme token that exhibits multiple characteristics of a coordinated pump event: 30 days of dormancy with 21 holders, a sudden 1,676% price surge, extremely shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and no fundamental information. The investment case is purely speculative momentum trading with very high probability of significant loss.

Bull case (low)

Viral momentum continuation: The token catches broader social media attention, new retail buyers continue to enter, and the price sustains above $0.001 as the holder base grows beyond 5,000+. Liquidity deepens as market makers add positions.

  • Viral spread on crypto social media platforms
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Liquidity pool deepening from new LPs
  • Sustained buy pressure from retail FOMO

Base case

Short-lived pump with partial retracement: The token sees continued volatility over 24–72 hours as momentum traders cycle in and out. Price retraces 50–80% from the peak as early holders take profits, settling in the $0.0001–$0.0003 range before fading into low-activity status.

  • Early holders take partial profits but don't fully dump
  • Some retail buyers continue entering on dips
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
  • No new catalysts emerge to sustain momentum

Bear case (high)

Pump-and-dump collapse: The original 21 pre-pump holders and/or coordinated early buyers begin distributing into the thin $91.24K liquidity pool. Price collapses 80–95% back toward the $0.000033 floor or lower as retail buyers are left holding losses.

  • Early holders (original 21) selling into thin liquidity
  • Volume fade continuing (already down 89% in 2 hours)
  • Net sell pressure ($531K sells vs $502K buys) accelerating
  • No fundamental value to support price at current levels
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell-off

GeneratedJun 11, 12:17 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-06-11T12:00:00Z. OHLC data covers 6 hourly candles (07:00–12:00 UTC). Holder data reflects real-time snapshot. Historical holder data covers May 12 – June 10, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana blockchain)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading data
  • OHLC price feed (hourly candles)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder time series (30-day daily)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances

Limitations

  • Only 6 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • OHLC data appears to have inverted High/Low fields in several candles, reducing reliability
  • No sniper data available — early buyer concentration cannot be quantified
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • No social links or project information available for qualitative assessment
  • Token is less than 24 hours old in its active phase — all metrics are extremely preliminary
  • 6h and 24h price change showing 0% in analytics contradicts the 1,676% 24h change — possible data inconsistency
  • Top holder classification relies on address pattern matching, not verified labels

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Dragon Worm (DragonWorm) is an extremely high-risk speculative asset. The data strongly suggests characteristics of a pump-and-dump scheme. Investors may lose 100% of their capital. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000

Key Risks

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders before a sudden 1,676% pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
Liquidity of only $91.24K creates extreme exit risk for any position of meaningful size
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
No social links, no description, no verified contract — zero transparency

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for Dragon Worm. The token's behavior — 30 days of dormancy with exactly 21 holders, followed by a sudden 1,676% pump — is consistent with a coordinated early-buyer setup, but this cannot be confirmed from the provided data. The 21 pre-existing holders prior to the pump event are the closest proxy to 'early buyers' and represent a significant concentration risk if they begin distributing into the current liquidity.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

The 21 wallets that held the token during the 30-day dormancy period are likely early buyers or insiders. Their current PnL state is unknown, but given the 1,676% price increase, they are almost certainly in significant profit and represent the primary distribution risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DragonWorm a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand they may lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely.

How are DragonWorm holders trending?

Dragon Worm currently has 1,485 holders and is growing (24h: 99, 7d: 99, 30d: 99). The holder history is stark: 21 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero change, then 1,464 new holders in a single day. This is not organic growth — it is a sudden pump event. The 1h metric shows +27 holders (+1.80%), suggesting the pump is still attracting new participants. Distribution breakdown shows 182 whales, 174 sharks, 241 dolphins, 60 fish, and 41 octopus — a surprisingly whale-heavy distribution for a token this new, which may indicate that early buyers (the original 21) hold large positions classified as whales. Acquisition is almost entirely via swap (1,477 of 1,485 holders), confirming this is a trading-driven event.

What does sniper activity look like for DragonWorm?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding DragonWorm?

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders before a sudden 1,676% pump — classic pump-and-dump setup • Liquidity of only $91.24K creates extreme exit risk for any position of meaningful size • Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing

Track DragonWorm