Dragon Worm Price Today & AI Analysis

DragonWormSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 11, 2026

$0.0₅4419

Contract

Live

xLyhQfSW8UKjsJaisszVS5SRjVTmy9WiEVsq6Afpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

960

Market cap

$4,418

At a $1M market cap, $DRAGONWORM would be $0.001000 (226x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is DragonWorm a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 17

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.07%16 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about DragonWorm

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

AnimalsAnimals In Crisis$0.0₅4305+0.0%MC $4.3K

LAPTOP—SOLLAPTOP—SOL$0.0₅2210+0.0%MC $2.2K

MrBeastMrBeast Official Coin$0.0₅3027+0.0%MC $3.0K

CentralBankCentralBank$0.0₅2465+0.0%MC $2.5K

HOODRobinhood$0.0₅2788+0.0%MC $2.8K

EterniaEternia$0.000707+1549.8%MC $690.3K

Dragon Worm: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-11 12:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,485

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$91,236.94

How concentrated is Dragon Worm ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,485 addresses (2026-06-11 12:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Dragon Worm?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Dragon Worm liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-11 12:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $91,236.94. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-11 12:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 11, 12:17 PM UTC

FDV

$1,087,744

Liquidity

$91,236.94

Holders

1,485

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Dragon Worm (DragonWorm) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a current FDV of ~$1.09M. The token has experienced an extraordinary 1,676% price surge in the past 24 hours, exploding from near-zero activity to 1,485 holders almost entirely within the last 24 hours. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, and unknown update authority — all significant red flags. The holder base grew from just 21 wallets to 1,485 in a single day, indicating a very recent launch event. Liquidity is extremely shallow at $91.24K against a $1.09M FDV, creating severe slippage risk.

Key points

Explosive 1,676% 24h price surge from near-zero baseline
Holder base grew 99% in 24 hours — from 21 to 1,485 holders
Extremely shallow liquidity ($91.24K) relative to FDV ($1.09M)
No social links, no description, no verified contract — minimal transparency
Top 10 holders control 20.52% with highly fragmented distribution among top 20

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already surged 1,676% in 24 hours. OHLC data shows extreme volatility with candles oscillating between ~$0.000033 and ~$0.001044. The current price of ~$0.001088 is near the top of the observed range. Sell pressure (51.4%) slightly exceeds buy pressure (48.6%), and liquidity is only $91.24K — any moderate sell order could cause severe price impact. A sharp retracement is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000033

Target high

$0.001088

Support: $0.000033 (recurring candle low / open level), $0.000062 (candle 6 close), $0.000079 (recurring open/close level)
Resistance: $0.000977 (candle 1 high area), $0.001044 (candle 1 high — all-time high in dataset), $0.001088 (current price / FDV-implied level)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without social links, a verified contract, or any stated utility, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The token spent 30 days with only 21 holders before a sudden pump, which is a classic pump-and-dump pattern. If early holders begin distributing, the thin $91.24K liquidity pool will be overwhelmed rapidly. Continued growth depends entirely on speculative momentum, which is historically short-lived for anonymous meme tokens with no fundamentals.

Catalysts

Unexpected viral social media attention
Listing on a centralized exchange (no evidence of this)
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Whale accumulation at lower prices post-correction

Bullish factors

Strong 24h volume of ~$1.03M total (buy + sell) relative to FDV
Rapid holder acquisition: 1,464 new holders in 24 hours
Buy count (9,803) slightly exceeds sell count (9,365)
Unique buyer count (3,244) exceeds unique seller count (2,852)
1h price change of +51.6% shows very recent momentum

Bearish factors

Sell volume ($531K) exceeds buy volume ($502K) in 24h
Liquidity of only $91.24K creates extreme slippage risk
Token was dormant with 21 holders for 30+ days before sudden pump — classic pre-pump setup
No social links, no description, no verified contract
Update authority unknown — cannot confirm renouncement
6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics (data inconsistency suggests price manipulation or data lag)
Top 20 holders each hold 1.44%–3.43% — many wallets with similar balances suggests coordinated distribution

Confidence: low. Price prediction confidence is low due to: (1) only 6 hourly OHLC candles available, (2) extreme volatility making range estimation unreliable, (3) no fundamental data (no description, no socials, no verified contract), and (4) the token is less than 24 hours old in its active trading phase.

DragonWorm call history

Full track record →

Jun 11neutral@ $0.00109

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: xLyhQf...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000

Key Risks

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders before a sudden 1,676% pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
Liquidity of only $91.24K creates extreme exit risk for any position of meaningful size
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
No social links, no description, no verified contract — zero transparency

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Six hourly candles are available (07:00–12:00 UTC on 2026-06-11). The OHLC data contains anomalies: in several candles, the Low value is higher than the High value (e.g., candle 1: H=$0.0000785, L=$0.001044), suggesting the data feed may have H/L fields inverted or the price spiked dramatically within the hour. Interpreting the data as-is: the highest observed price level is ~$0.001044 (candle 1 'L' field, likely the actual high), and the lowest is ~$0.0000326. Volume peaked in candles 2–4 ($235K–$264K/hr) and dropped sharply in candle 1 ($28K), suggesting the initial pump volume is fading. The price oscillates between two recurring levels: ~$0.0000326 and ~$0.0000785, with a spike to ~$0.001044.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically uptrend given the 1,676% 24h gain, but the most recent candle shows declining volume and price near the spike high. The medium-term trend is effectively sideways/undefined as the token was dormant for 30 days prior to this single-day event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000079 (recurring open/close level across multiple candles)

Major support

$0.000033 (recurring candle open/close floor — lowest observed level)

Immediate resistance

$0.001044 (observed spike high in candle dataset)

Major resistance

$0.001088 (current price / FDV-implied ceiling)

The $0.000033 level acts as a strong floor, appearing as both open and close across multiple candles. The $0.000079 level is a secondary pivot. The $0.001044 level represents the spike high and is the key resistance. A failure to hold above $0.000079 would likely see a retest of $0.000033.

Notable patterns

Extreme volume spike followed by rapid volume fade (bearish divergence)
Price oscillating between two tight levels ($0.000033 and $0.000079) before spike — suggests accumulation phase
Potential inverted H/L data in OHLC feed — data quality concern
Single-candle spike to $0.001044 with immediate reversion — classic pump wick
30-day dormancy followed by single-day explosion — textbook pump pattern

Liquidity

$91,236.94

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $91.24K against a $1.09M FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~8.4%. This means any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe price impact. The 24h trading volume of ~$1.03M is over 11x the available liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is slightly negative (sell volume $531K vs buy volume $502K, a $28.8K net outflow). While buyer count (3,244) exceeds seller count (2,852), the higher average sell size suggests larger holders are distributing into retail buy pressure. The PumpSwap pair (CxkrTqNUJLjqMG4cYrrtg2f9RVDGRKT8xrz3D1oCnPk7) is the sole liquidity venue identified. Market health is poor — the combination of shallow liquidity, high volume, and net outflow creates conditions for rapid price collapse.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000

FDV

$1,087,743.92

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
1,676% price surge in 24 hours with OHLC candles showing swings between $0.000033 and $0.001044 — extreme intraday volatility. Volume is fading at the highs, suggesting the pump may be exhausting.
Liquidityhigh
Only $91.24K in liquidity against $1.09M FDV (8.4% ratio). Daily volume of $1.03M is 11x the liquidity pool. Any significant sell order will cause catastrophic slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders before a sudden 1,676% pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
Liquidity of only $91.24K creates extreme exit risk for any position of meaningful size
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
No social links, no description, no verified contract — zero transparency
Top 20 holders have suspiciously uniform balances suggesting coordinated insider distribution
Net sell volume exceeds buy volume by $28.8K in 24h despite price surge
Volume declining sharply in most recent candle (89% drop) — momentum fading
No utility, no roadmap, no community infrastructure identified

Mitigating factors

Token is marked 'Mutable: false' providing some metadata protection
'Possible spam' flag is false per metadata
Buyer count (3,244) exceeds seller count (2,852) showing some genuine retail interest
1,464 new holders in 24h shows real market participation
Trading on established PumpSwap venue

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand they may lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely.

Dragon Worm is a high-risk, newly-active Solana meme token that exhibits multiple characteristics of a coordinated pump event: 30 days of dormancy with 21 holders, a sudden 1,676% price surge, extremely shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and no fundamental information. The investment case is purely speculative momentum trading with very high probability of significant loss.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral momentum continuation: The token catches broader social media attention, new retail buyers continue to enter, and the price sustains above $0.001 as the holder base grows beyond 5,000+. Liquidity deepens as market makers add positions.

Viral spread on crypto social media platforms
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Liquidity pool deepening from new LPs
Sustained buy pressure from retail FOMO

Base Case

Short-lived pump with partial retracement: The token sees continued volatility over 24–72 hours as momentum traders cycle in and out. Price retraces 50–80% from the peak as early holders take profits, settling in the $0.0001–$0.0003 range before fading into low-activity status.

Early holders take partial profits but don't fully dump
Some retail buyers continue entering on dips
Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
No new catalysts emerge to sustain momentum

Bear Case

High probability

Pump-and-dump collapse: The original 21 pre-pump holders and/or coordinated early buyers begin distributing into the thin $91.24K liquidity pool. Price collapses 80–95% back toward the $0.000033 floor or lower as retail buyers are left holding losses.

Early holders (original 21) selling into thin liquidity
Volume fade continuing (already down 89% in 2 hours)
Net sell pressure ($531K sells vs $502K buys) accelerating
No fundamental value to support price at current levels
Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell-off

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 11, 12:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-11 12:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (Solana blockchain)
PumpSwap DEX trading data
OHLC price feed (hourly candles)
Holder metrics and distribution data
Historical holder time series (30-day daily)
Trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances

Limitations

Only 6 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
OHLC data appears to have inverted High/Low fields in several candles, reducing reliability
No sniper data available — early buyer concentration cannot be quantified
Update authority status is 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
No social links or project information available for qualitative assessment
Token is less than 24 hours old in its active phase — all metrics are extremely preliminary
6h and 24h price change showing 0% in analytics contradicts the 1,676% 24h change — possible data inconsistency
Top holder classification relies on address pattern matching, not verified labels

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Dragon Worm (DragonWorm) is an extremely high-risk speculative asset. The data strongly suggests characteristics of a pump-and-dump scheme. Investors may lose 100% of their capital. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dragon Worm (DragonWorm) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Dragon Worm (DragonWorm)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Dragon Worm ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,485 addresses (2026-06-11 12:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Dragon Worm?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Dragon Worm liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-11 12:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $91,236.94. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Dragon Worm (DragonWorm)?

Is DragonWorm a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand they may lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely.

What are the key risks of holding DragonWorm?

Token was dormant for 30+ days with 21 holders before a sudden 1,676% pump — classic pump-and-dump setup • Liquidity of only $91.24K creates extreme exit risk for any position of meaningful size • Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing