IRAN

IRAN Price Today & AI Analysis

IRANSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

Price

$0.053315

-94.41% 24h

Contract

Live
oLRaSvPF6UcqjUmXK2X6oikCMBVpj1jfrTQ2rnLpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

67

Market cap

$3,296

More tokens on Solana

CLOUDCLOUDCloud$0.0817+25.6%MC $81.69MZACKZACKZACK$0.048338+177.8%MC $77.2KSPYXSPYXSP500 xStock$773.23+0.0%MC $73.64MBOLDCOINBOLDCOINBoldCoin$0.000118+519.7%MC $111.6KHODLHODLHODL$0.002431+33.7%MC $2.43Me/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.0126+706.8%MC $12.43M

IRAN: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-28 08:15 UTC

Holder addresses

67

Top 10 supply share

9.91%

Reported liquidity

$2,966.00
How concentrated is IRAN ownership?
As of 2026-09-28 08:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 9.91% of supply. It reports 67 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling IRAN?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 08:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $396,054.00 in buys and $400,981.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is IRAN liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -91.65%, from $35,570.38 (2026-09-27 10:00 UTC) to $2,969.00 (2026-09-28 03:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 08:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 10:00 UTC$35,570.38
2026-09-27 11:00 UTC$58,660.55
2026-09-27 12:00 UTC$12,807.38
2026-09-27 13:00 UTC$3,095.05
2026-09-27 14:00 UTC$2,857.69
2026-09-27 15:00 UTC$2,774.97
2026-09-27 21:00 UTC$2,968.89
2026-09-28 03:00 UTC$2,969.00

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about IRAN

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 08:16 AM UTC

FDV

$3,296

Liquidity

$2,966.00

Holders

67

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

IRAN is a micro-cap Solana meme token (pump.fun/PumpSwap origin) with a fully diluted valuation of only ~$3,296 and total liquidity of just ~$2.97K. The token has already suffered a ~94.4% price crash within 24 hours, with hourly candles showing a textbook pump-and-dump pattern: a rapid ~60x spike followed by an immediate collapse and subsequent flatlining with near-zero volume. Critical safety data — mint/freeze authority renouncement and sniper wallet activity — is entirely unavailable, and holder data is limited to a single snapshot of 67 addresses with top-10 concentration at 9.91%, with no historical trend or classification data to support deeper conclusions.

Key points

  • Extremely low liquidity (~$2.97K) relative to trading volume (~$797K combined 24h buy+sell), indicating a highly volatile, thinly-traded micro-cap market
  • Clear pump-and-dump candle signature with a ~60x intraday spike followed by a ~94% collapse and multi-hour trading stagnation
  • Complete absence of mint/freeze authority and sniper wallet data, leaving major rug-pull and dump-risk questions unanswered
  • Very small holder base of only 67 addresses based on the available snapshot

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

The most recent candles show price has flatlined at approximately $0.00000332 with multiple consecutive zero-volume hours after an extreme spike-and-crash sequence, suggesting the market has entered a low-liquidity, low-interest holding pattern. Absent a fresh liquidity or demand catalyst, further downside or continued stagnation is more likely than a sustained recovery.

Target low

$0.0000029

Target high

$0.0000045

Support

$0.0000029 (candles 6-11 low/close plateau), $0.0000027 (candle 4 low)

Resistance

$0.0000036 (candle 4-5 open/high zone), $0.0000062 (candle 3 close level)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

bearish

Without new liquidity, marketing catalysts, or authority-renouncement confirmation, the token is likely to continue trending toward illiquidity and marginal price action typical of abandoned pump.fun launches. A rebound is possible but would require significant new buy-side capital given the tiny ~$2.97K liquidity base.

Catalysts

  • Potential renewed social media attention (given the politically-themed name) that could reignite speculative buying
  • Any liquidity injection or CEX/DEX listing that improves depth
  • Continued absence of sell pressure if remaining holders choose to hold rather than exit

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($396.05K) was nearly equal to sell volume ($400.98K), showing some continued two-sided interest despite the crash
  • Buyer count (3,528) slightly exceeded seller count (3,080) in the 24h window
  • Extremely low FDV (~$3.3K) means small capital inflows could cause outsized percentage price moves

Bearish factors

  • Price already down ~94.4% in 24 hours with a clear pump-and-dump candle pattern
  • Multiple consecutive zero-volume candles suggest fading trading interest
  • Liquidity of only ~$2.97K provides minimal cushion against further sell pressure
  • Unknown authority status leaves open the possibility of further supply dilution or account freezing risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because of the extremely small liquidity/FDV base, the absence of mint/freeze authority verification, no sniper data, and only a single-snapshot holder count. The historical candle pattern (extreme spike then crash then flatline) is unusual and may not follow typical technical analysis patterns given how thin the market is.

IRAN call history

Full track record →

Sep 28bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
oLRaSv...pump
Total Supply
994,270,413.41 IRAN

Key Risks

  • Price collapsed ~94.4% in 24 hours with strong evidence of a pump-and-dump pattern in the OHLC data
  • Total liquidity of only ~$2.97K is barely larger than the token's ~$3.30K FDV, creating extreme slippage risk
  • Mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet exposure are completely unknown, removing typical rug-pull safeguards from consideration
  • Only 67 total holder addresses recorded, suggesting a very small and immature holder base

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 23 hourly candles, price experienced an explosive spike from ~$0.0000588 (candle 1 open) to a peak high of ~$0.00358 (candle 3 high) within roughly 2 hours, followed by an immediate and severe collapse down to the $0.0000027-0.0000006 range (candles 4-5), before stabilizing in a tight flat band around $0.0000029-$0.0000033 for the remaining ~15 hours (candles 6-23), several of which show zero trading volume entirely.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

The short-term trend (most recent ~12 candles) is essentially flat/sideways at a depressed price level, while the medium-term trend across the full 23-hour window is a sharp downtrend, with price down roughly 94% from the peak seen in candle 3.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000029 (flat plateau across candles 6-11)

Major support

$0.0000006 (candle 4 low, near session low)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000036 (candle 4/5 open/high area)

Major resistance

$0.0000062 (candle 3 close, pre-crash level)

The token is currently trading near its immediate support/resistance range of roughly $0.0000029-$0.0000033, well below both the local pump high of $0.00358 (candle 3) and even the more modest $0.0000062 level (candle 3 close). Any recovery would need to first reclaim the $0.0000036 zone before testing the much higher $0.0000062 resistance; a break below $0.0000027 support would open room toward the session's absolute low near $0.0000006.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off-top spike (candle 1-3): price surged nearly 60x intraday before crashing, a classic pump-and-dump signature
  • Sharp bearish reversal candle (candle 3 to candle 4): high of $0.00358 collapsing to a close of $0.0000036, an extreme upper-wick rejection
  • Flatline/doji sequence (candles 6-11 and 13-23): multiple consecutive candles with identical open/high/low/close and zero volume, indicating dried-up liquidity and trading inactivity

Liquidity

Liquidity

$2,966.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity is extremely thin at just $2.97K against a fully diluted valuation of only $3.30K, meaning the pool is barely deeper than the token's entire theoretical market cap. Despite this, 24h volume is surprisingly large ($396.05K buys vs $400.98K sells), implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of well over 100x — a hallmark of a highly volatile, likely bot/arbitrage-dominated micro-liquidity pool rather than organic trading. Sell volume slightly exceeds buy volume ($400.98K vs $396.05K, 50.3%/49.7% split) indicating a marginal net outflow bias. Buyer (3,528) and seller (3,080) counts are close, and buy/sell order counts (9,351 buys vs 5,484 sells) suggest many small buy transactions relative to fewer, possibly larger, sell transactions. With liquidity this shallow, even modest-sized trades can produce severe slippage and price impact, consistent with the collapse seen in the OHLC data.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

994,270,413.41 IRAN

FDV

$3,296

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token collapsed roughly 94.4% in 24 hours, with OHLC candles showing a spike from ~$0.0000588 to a high of ~$0.00358 within 2 hours (candle [3]) followed by an immediate crash to ~$0.0000006-0.000003 range and then complete price stagnation (flat candles with zero volume for many consecutive hours). This pattern is consistent with a pump-and-dump or thin-liquidity price discovery event.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$2.97K, barely above the ~$3.30K FDV, making the pool extremely susceptible to large price swings from modest trade sizes and high slippage on entry or exit.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only a current snapshot shows top-10 holders at 9.91% of supply among 67 total holder addresses; no top-100 concentration, no historical trend, and no wallet classification data are available, so true concentration risk (including potential insider or bundled wallets) cannot be reliably assessed and should not be treated as low risk simply because the raw top-10 percentage looks modest.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Price collapsed ~94.4% in 24 hours with strong evidence of a pump-and-dump pattern in the OHLC data
  • Total liquidity of only ~$2.97K is barely larger than the token's ~$3.30K FDV, creating extreme slippage risk
  • Mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet exposure are completely unknown, removing typical rug-pull safeguards from consideration
  • Only 67 total holder addresses recorded, suggesting a very small and immature holder base
  • Multiple consecutive hourly candles show zero trading volume, indicating the market may already be largely abandoned
  • Sell volume slightly exceeded buy volume in the 24h window (50.3% vs 49.7%), suggesting net distribution pressure even before considering the price crash

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration at 9.91% appears numerically modest versus many meme tokens, though this cannot be fully trusted given missing top-100 and classification data
  • Buyer and seller counts (3,528 vs 3,080) are relatively balanced, suggesting the sell-off was not solely driven by one or two dominant wallets in the visible activity

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant participants who fully understand they may lose their entire investment. It is not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate risk exposure given the extreme volatility, near-total lack of authority/sniper verification, and evidence of a severe price collapse.

IRAN is an extremely small-cap, high-volatility pump.fun-style token on Solana that has already experienced a catastrophic ~94.4% price decline within 24 hours, trading against only ~$2.97K of liquidity and a ~$3.30K FDV. Critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet activity — is entirely unavailable, and holder history cannot be assessed beyond a static snapshot of 67 addresses. Any thesis here is necessarily speculative and low-confidence given the data gaps.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A speculative rebound driven by renewed social/community interest or a low-liquidity short squeeze could produce sharp percentage price spikes, as already demonstrated in candles [1]-[3] where price moved 60x within two hours before collapsing.

  • Extremely low FDV (~$3.3K) means even small capital inflows could produce large percentage price moves
  • Buyer count (3,528) was not far below seller count (3,080) in the 24h window, showing some residual demand
  • Thin liquidity can amplify upside moves just as easily as downside moves if buy pressure returns

Base Case

The token likely continues to trade in an illiquid, low-volume, sideways-to-declining pattern typical of post-pump meme tokens that have lost initial speculative interest, with periodic volatility spikes on low volume.

  • No material new catalysts (listings, narrative shifts, verified authority renouncement) emerge in the near term
  • Liquidity remains thin, keeping the token vulnerable to outsized moves on small trade sizes
  • Holder base remains small (~67 addresses) without meaningful organic growth

Bear Case

High probability

Continued price stagnation or further decline as the token settles into an illiquid, largely abandoned state, evidenced by numerous consecutive zero-volume hourly candles following the crash.

  • Price already down ~94.4% in 24h with a clear blow-off-top-then-collapse candle pattern
  • Sell volume (50.3%) slightly exceeded buy volume (49.7%) even during the elevated-volume window
  • Liquidity of only ~$2.97K offers minimal support against further selling pressure
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and absent sniper data remove any assurance against further supply-side risks or coordinated dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 08:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 08:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price feed and 24h price change
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (23 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown, preventing a full rug-pull risk assessment
  • Holder data is a single current snapshot only (67 addresses, top-10 at 9.91%) with no historical growth/decline trend, wallet classification, or top-100 concentration figure
  • Extremely low liquidity (~$2.97K) and FDV (~$3.30K) make this a micro-cap token where standard technical and fundamental analysis carries reduced reliability
  • Multiple consecutive zero-volume candles suggest possible periods of illiquid or inactive trading that could distort computed pressure/trend metrics

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in micro-cap and newly launched tokens, carries a very high risk of complete capital loss. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is IRAN ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 08:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 9.91% of supply. It reports 67 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling IRAN?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 08:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $396,054.00 in buys and $400,981.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is IRAN liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -91.65%, from $35,570.38 (2026-09-27 10:00 UTC) to $2,969.00 (2026-09-28 03:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for IRAN (IRAN)?

The most recent candles show price has flatlined at approximately $0.00000332 with multiple consecutive zero-volume hours after an extreme spike-and-crash sequence, suggesting the market has entered a low-liquidity, low-interest holding pattern. Absent a fresh liquidity or demand catalyst, further downside or continued stagnation is more likely than a sustained recovery. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.0000029 to $0.0000045.

Is IRAN a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 92/100. This token is suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant participants who fully understand they may lose their entire investment. It is not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate risk exposure given the extreme volatility, near-total lack of authority/sniper verification, and evidence of a severe price collapse.

What are the key risks of holding IRAN?

Price collapsed ~94.4% in 24 hours with strong evidence of a pump-and-dump pattern in the OHLC data • Total liquidity of only ~$2.97K is barely larger than the token's ~$3.30K FDV, creating extreme slippage risk • Mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet exposure are completely unknown, removing typical rug-pull safeguards from consideration

← Back to all predictions

Track IRAN