Stonks Index Price Today & AI Analysis

SISolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

$0.0₅2066

Contract

Live

gqZNgVc8VEaaU6ngAeEEDA7wbmnXTrE98bws4NVidex

Chain

Solana

Holders

380

Market cap

$2,065

At a $1M market cap, $SI would be $0.001001 (484x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is SI a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about SI

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TITTYTroll Kitty$0.0₅2741+0.0%MC $2.7K

HoneyHoney$0.0₅2781+0.0%MC $2.8K

OTOMATOtomat$0.0₅2296+0.0%MC $2.3K

DarkDark Fantasy$0.0₅2755-0.9%MC $2.6K

misterbismister bis$0.0₅2638+0.0%MC $2.6K

PAWCATPAWCAT$0.000126+116.1%MC $124.8K

Stonks Index: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-17 17:46 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$8,711.00

How concentrated is Stonks Index ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Stonks Index?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Stonks Index liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-17 17:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $8,711.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-17 17:46 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 05:46 PM UTC

FDV

$37,218

Liquidity

$8,711.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Stonks Index (SI) is a micro-cap Solana token (FDV ~$37.2K) trading on a single thin Raydium CPMM liquidity pool ($8.71K). The token underwent an extreme parabolic spike of roughly 58x within a few hours, followed by a crash of approximately 84% from its peak, all within the most recent 10-hour candle window, and is currently down 10.39% over the trailing 24 hours at $0.0000372. Both holder distribution and sniper/early-buyer data are unavailable, and mint/freeze authority status is unconfirmed, leaving significant blind spots in the risk picture.

Key points

Extremely volatile price action: ~58x spike followed by an ~84% retracement within a single 10-hour window
Very shallow liquidity ($8.71K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$814.86K combined buy+sell), implying high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
Nearly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.4%/49.6%) and buyer/seller counts (2,659 vs 2,248), suggesting two-sided speculative activity rather than a purely one-sided dump
Critical data gaps: no holder/whale distribution data, no sniper data, and unknown mint/freeze/update authority status

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

With the token still in a confirmed downtrend, declining volume, and price sitting near recent lows ($0.0000372), the path of least resistance in the very short term is a continuation of consolidation-to-mild-downside, though a bounce toward $0.0000480 resistance is plausible given nearly balanced buy/sell volume in the last 24h.

Target low

$0.0000180

Target high

$0.0000550

Support: $0.0000286, $0.0000068
Resistance: $0.0000480, $0.000100

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Absent new catalysts, the token likely remains range-bound and highly volatile at these depressed levels relative to its intraday peak, with continued dependence on thin liquidity making sharp moves in either direction likely. Sustained recovery toward the $0.000399 peak would require substantial new buying interest and liquidity growth.

Catalysts

Any liquidity additions or removals from the Raydium pool
Social media/community-driven promotional activity given existing Twitter/website presence
Clarification of mint/freeze authority status (positive or negative)
Broader Solana meme-token market sentiment shifts

Bullish factors

Nearly balanced 24h buy pressure (50.4%) vs sell pressure (49.6%)
More unique buyers (2,659) than sellers (2,248) in the last 24h
Declining volume during the selloff could indicate seller exhaustion
Existing social presence (Twitter, website) that could support renewed speculative interest

Bearish factors

Token down ~84% from its intraday peak and -10.39% over the trailing 24h
Extremely shallow liquidity ($8.71K) increases downside slippage risk on any sell pressure
Confirmed downtrend with lower highs across recent candles
Unknown mint/freeze authority status raises rug-pull uncertainty
No confirmed holder or whale data to rule out concentrated selling pressure

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely limited data window (only 10 hourly candles), missing holder and sniper data, unconfirmed authority status, and the token's demonstrated extreme volatility, all of which make forward price projection highly uncertain.

SI call history

Full track record →

Sep 17bearish@ $0.0000372

24h-35.0%

7d-81.2%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: gqZNgV...idex
Total Supply: 999,999,691.38

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($8.71K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Token has already experienced a ~84% crash from its intraday high within the observed 10-hour candle window
Mint/freeze/update authority status unknown — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place
No holder or whale distribution data available to assess concentration risk directly

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 10 hourly candles the token staged an explosive rally from an open of $0.0000068 (candle 1) to an intraday high of $0.000399563 (candle 4), roughly a 58x spike within ~4 hours, before rolling over hard. Candle 2 shows a huge wick (low $0.0000217 to high $0.000164) indicative of violent volatility on a thin pool. Candles 4-6 show consolidation attempts near $0.00021-0.00028 with lower highs each candle (0.000399 -> 0.000354 -> 0.000348), a bearish topping pattern. From candle 7 onward the token is in a sharp downtrend, closing at $0.0000372 (candle 10), down roughly 84% from the candle-4 high and down 10.4% in the last 24h window alone. Candle 9 (open 0.0001, close 0.0000456) is a large bearish candle with a long lower wick, and candle 10 shows shrinking volume ($11.2K vs $189K at the peak), suggesting exhaustion of both buying and selling interest at these lower levels.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term (last few candles) and medium-term (full 10-candle window) trends are both firmly downtrend after an initial parabolic spike and rejection. Price is down roughly 84% from the intraday peak and continues to make lower highs and lower lows.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000286 (candle 10 low)

Major support

$0.0000068 (candle 1 open, near all-time low in this window)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000480 (candle 10 high / candle 9 open area)

Major resistance

$0.000399563 (candle 4 high, the parabolic peak)

Price is currently trading near the bottom of its recent range at $0.0000372, just above the immediate support formed by candle 10's low of $0.0000286. A break below this could expose the candle-1 open near $0.0000068 as a deeper support zone, though that print occurred during an anomalous initial spike and may not be a reliable technical level. On the upside, the $0.0000480 area (recent candle highs) is the first resistance, with the major resistance being the parabolic peak at $0.000399563 — a level that would require an extremely strong reversal (over 10x from current price) to retest.

Notable patterns

Parabolic spike and blow-off top (candles 1-4)
Lower highs across candles 4-6 (topping pattern)
Large bearish candle with long lower wick (candle 9)
Decreasing volume into the downtrend (possible exhaustion)
Extremely wide intra-candle ranges consistent with thin liquidity

Liquidity

$8,711.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $8.71K against a 24h traded volume of over $814K combined (buy+sell) implies an extremely high volume-to-liquidity ratio (~93x), meaning the pool is being churned repeatedly and any meaningfully sized trade will move price sharply. Buy volume ($411.08K, 50.4%) and sell volume ($403.78K, 49.6%) are nearly balanced, and buyer (2,659) vs seller (2,248) counts are also fairly even, suggesting broad two-sided retail/bot activity rather than a one-directional dump — but the shallow liquidity base means this balance is fragile and slippage on any but the smallest trades will be significant. This token trades on a single Raydium CPMM pair, offering no redundancy if liquidity is pulled.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,691.38

FDV

$37,218

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from $0.0000068 to $0.0003996 and back down to $0.0000372 within a 10-hour window — an intraday range exceeding 50x — indicating extreme volatility unsuitable for risk-averse participants.
Liquidityhigh
Only $8.71K total liquidity against daily volumes exceeding $800K combined; a single moderately sized trade could cause severe slippage or effectively drain the pool.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($8.71K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Token has already experienced a ~84% crash from its intraday high within the observed 10-hour candle window
Mint/freeze/update authority status unknown — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place
No holder or whale distribution data available to assess concentration risk directly
No sniper data available to assess bot-driven early buying/dumping behavior
Single-DEX (Raydium CPMM) listing with no liquidity redundancy
Very low FDV (~$37.2K) typical of extremely early-stage, high-risk speculative tokens

Mitigating factors

24h buy/sell volume and buyer/seller counts are roughly balanced (50.4%/49.6%, 2,659 buyers vs 2,248 sellers), suggesting no one-sided panic dump at the aggregate 24h level
Declining volume into the recent downtrend may indicate seller exhaustion rather than continued aggressive dumping
Token has visible social presence (Twitter, website) rather than zero external presence

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital. Not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to monitor extremely volatile positions in real time. Given unknown authority status and extreme volatility already realized, position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

Stonks Index (SI) is a micro-cap token (~$37.2K FDV) that just experienced a violent parabolic spike (~58x within hours) followed by an ~84% crash, all within a single 10-hour candle window, trading on a single, very thin ($8.71K) Raydium liquidity pool. The setup is characteristic of a high-volatility, low-liquidity speculative token with significant unknowns around authority renouncement, holder concentration, and sniper activity due to missing data. Any position should be treated as highly speculative.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Medium probability

If buy pressure re-accelerates (24h buy volume already slightly exceeds sell volume at 50.4%/49.6%) and the token stabilizes above recent support (~$0.0000286-0.0000372), a relief bounce toward the $0.0000480 resistance or higher could occur, especially if social media/community momentum (Twitter, website presence) drives renewed speculative interest.

Roughly balanced 24h buy/sell volume and buyer/seller counts suggest demand hasn't fully collapsed
Declining volume in the recent downtrend could indicate seller exhaustion near current levels
Existing social channels (Twitter, website) could be leveraged for renewed promotional pushes typical of meme/speculative tokens

Base Case

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Bear Case

Low probability

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 05:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-17 17:46 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
USD price and 24h/1h/5m price change data
Hourly OHLC candle data (10 most recent candles) from Raydium CPMM pair
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Liquidity pool data

Limitations

No holder count, growth, or distribution (whale) data was available — upstream holder endpoints were retired, so holderTrends and whaleMap sections are populated with placeholder zero/empty values and should not be relied upon
No sniper/early-buyer wallet data was available, so smart money signals could not be computed and are reported as unknown/zero
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, mutability, and contract verification status were all listed as unknown in source metadata, preventing a definitive rug-risk assessment from authorities
Only 10 hourly candles were provided, limiting the depth of technical/medium-term trend analysis
Token has an extremely small liquidity base ($8.71K), which increases price volatility and reduces the reliability of price-based technical levels
All figures reflect a single point-in-time snapshot and can change rapidly given the observed volatility

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, incomplete on-chain data (notably missing holder and sniper information) and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency tokens, especially low-liquidity micro-cap tokens like this one, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Stonks Index (SI) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Stonks Index (SI)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Stonks Index ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Stonks Index?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Stonks Index liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-17 17:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $8,711.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Stonks Index (SI)?

Is SI a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital. Not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to monitor extremely volatile positions in real time. Given unknown authority status and extreme volatility already realized, position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

What are the key risks of holding SI?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($8.71K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and manipulation risk • Token has already experienced a ~84% crash from its intraday high within the observed 10-hour candle window • Mint/freeze/update authority status unknown — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place