cbLTC

Coinbase Wrapped LTC Price Today & AI Analysis

cbLTCSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 25, 2026

Price

$72.83

-6.09% 24h

Contract

Live
cbLTC4T5NpzSUtQ7ekgEMZGaUPVJY1ko6BUikqa4gGf

Chain

Holders

3,817

Market cap

$606,883

More tokens on Solana

Coinbase Wrapped LTC: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-25 19:15 UTC

Holder addresses

3,817

Top 10 supply share

59.39%

Reported liquidity

$353,592.00
How concentrated is Coinbase Wrapped LTC ownership?
As of 2026-09-25 19:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 59.39% of supply. It reports 3,817 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Coinbase Wrapped LTC?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-25 19:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,511,039.00 in buys and $1,987,297.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Coinbase Wrapped LTC liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -19.87%, from $558,180.17 (2026-09-25 17:00 UTC) to $447,284.40 (2026-09-25 19:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-25 19:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 17:00 UTC$558,180.17
2026-09-25 18:00 UTC$480,456.08
2026-09-25 19:00 UTC$447,284.40

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about cbLTC

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 25, 07:16 PM UTC

FDV

$606,883

Liquidity

$353,592.00

Holders

3,817

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

Coinbase Wrapped LTC (cbLTC) is an SPL wrapped-asset token pegged to Litecoin, trading at $72.83 (24h -6.09%) against a total supply of 8,332.46 tokens and FDV of ~$606.9K. Liquidity sits at a thin $353.6K on a single Raydium CLMM pool. Holder base is 3,817 addresses with the top 10 controlling 59.39% of supply - a notably concentrated distribution for a wrapped-asset token. Mint/freeze authority status and sniper activity could not be verified from the data provided.

Key points

  • Wrapped-asset design (tracks LTC price) rather than an organic meme/utility token
  • Thin liquidity ($353.6K) relative to FDV ($606.9K), implying meaningful slippage risk for larger trades
  • High top-10 holder concentration (59.39%) despite a broad base of 3,817 holder addresses
  • No verifiable mint/freeze authority or contract verification status disclosed

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Recent hourly candles show a clear rejection from a local high near $80.34 down to the $71.38-$73.50 range, with the most recent candle contracting in range and volume, suggesting fading momentum after the sell-off. 24h price is down 6.09% with sell volume ($1.99M) outweighing buy volume ($1.51M), a 56.8/43.2 sell/buy split that supports continued near-term softness unless buy pressure re-emerges.

Target low

$70.00

Target high

$76.00

Support

$71.38 (24h intraday low), $72.03 (recent candle open/low cluster)

Resistance

$73.50 (recent candle open), $80.34 (recent swing high)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

As a wrapped LTC representation, medium-term price action should largely track underlying Litecoin spot prices rather than idiosyncratic on-chain catalysts. Without LTC market data, medium-term direction is uncertain; the wrapped token's price should converge toward LTC's own trend, moderated by any premium/discount from thin on-chain liquidity.

Catalysts

  • Underlying Litecoin (LTC) spot price movement
  • Liquidity changes in the Raydium CLMM pool affecting basis/premium to LTC
  • Broader crypto market risk sentiment

Bullish factors

  • Broad holder base of 3,817 addresses suggests some organic distribution
  • Wrapped-asset structure ties value to an established, liquid underlying asset (LTC) rather than pure speculation

Bearish factors

  • 24h sell volume ($1.99M) exceeds buy volume ($1.51M), a net sell-pressure skew of 56.8%/43.2%
  • Price down 6.09% over 24h with a sharp intraday rejection from $80.34 to sub-$72
  • Thin liquidity ($353.6K) relative to FDV increases volatility and slippage risk
  • High top-10 concentration (59.39%) creates dump risk if large holders exit

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles were provided, precluding robust trend/pattern analysis, and no data on the underlying LTC price or peg mechanism was available to validate the wrap ratio. Liquidity is thin, which can distort short-term price signals independent of genuine demand.

cbLTC call history

Full track record →

Sep 25bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
cbLTC4...4gGf
Total Supply
8,332.46442834 cbLTC

Key Risks

  • Shallow liquidity ($353.59K) relative to trading volume and FDV creates high slippage and price-manipulation risk
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 59.39% with no visibility into who controls these addresses
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out unilateral supply inflation or account freezing by a privileged party
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess dump risk from early participants

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (17:00 UTC) opened at $72.05, spiked to a high of $80.34, then closed at $73.50 on very heavy volume ($8.44M) — indicating a sharp pump-and-fade pattern (upper wick rejection). Candle 2 (18:00 UTC) opened at $73.50, dropped to a low of $71.38, and closed lower at $72.79 on reduced volume ($3.75M), confirming follow-through selling after the rejection. Candle 3 (19:00 UTC) shows a narrow range ($72.10-$72.80) closing near flat at $72.78 on sharply lower volume ($0.46M), suggesting consolidation/exhaustion after the sell-off.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The short-term trend is down, driven by a rejection from an $80.34 spike followed by two lower closes. With only three candles, the medium-term trend cannot be reliably established, but the most recent candle's tight range suggests the decline may be stabilizing near $72-73.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Stable

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$71.38

Major support

$72.03 (near-term consolidation floor, pending further data)

Immediate resistance

$73.50

Major resistance

$80.34

The $80.34 print from the first candle stands as major resistance following its sharp rejection; the $71.38 intraday low from candle 2 is the nearest support. With only 3 hours of data, these levels should be treated as provisional rather than firmly established structural levels.

Notable patterns

  • Upper-wick rejection / blow-off spike in candle 1 (high $80.34 vs close $73.50)
  • Volume climax followed by volume collapse across the three candles (classic exhaustion pattern)
  • Narrowing range / consolidation in the most recent candle after the sell-off

Liquidity

Liquidity

$353,592.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $353.59K is shallow relative to a $606.88K FDV and relative to the $3.5M+ in combined 24h volume, implying that large trades could move price significantly (consistent with the observed intraday spike to $80.34 followed by a sharp reversion). The 24h volume shows sell volume ($1.99M) outpacing buy volume ($1.51M), a net outflow skew of roughly 56.8%/43.2%. Trading activity is broad-based, with 4,195 unique buyers versus 4,305 unique sellers (roughly balanced participant counts despite the volume-side sell skew), and a high number of buy (15,584) and sell (17,380) transactions relative to unique participants, suggesting active/possibly bot-driven turnover rather than purely organic single-trade activity.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

8,332.46442834 cbLTC

FDV

$606,883

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price move of -6.09% and an intraday spike/rejection from $72 to $80.34 back down to ~$73 within a single hour shows significant short-term volatility, compounded by thin liquidity.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $353.59K against $3.5M+ combined 24h volume and $606.88K FDV indicates shallow depth; large trades likely cause significant slippage, as evidenced by the sharp intraday price swing.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holder addresses control 59.39% of total supply. Top-100 concentration and wallet classification data are unavailable, so it's unknown whether concentration is held by legitimate custody/bridge infrastructure or individual whales — this uncertainty itself is a risk, not a mitigant.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Shallow liquidity ($353.59K) relative to trading volume and FDV creates high slippage and price-manipulation risk
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 59.39% with no visibility into who controls these addresses
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out unilateral supply inflation or account freezing by a privileged party
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess dump risk from early participants
  • Sharp intraday volatility (spike to $80.34 then reversion) signals potential for continued erratic price action
  • Net sell-pressure skew (56.8% sell vs 43.2% buy volume) in the last 24h

Mitigating factors

  • Broad holder base of 3,817 distinct addresses provides some distribution beyond just the top holders
  • Token is structured as a wrapped representation of an established asset (Litecoin) per its description, which if accurately collateralized/pegged, could anchor value to LTC rather than pure speculation — though this claim is unverified
  • Reasonably active two-sided trading (4,195 buyers vs 4,305 sellers) suggests some organic two-way market participation rather than one-directional dumping

Suitable for

Given shallow liquidity, high holder concentration, unknown authority/rug-risk controls, and absent sniper/holder-history data, this token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant participants who can independently verify the wrap/collateralization mechanism and authority settings on-chain before entry, and who are prepared for significant slippage and volatility. Not suitable for risk-averse or passive investors.

cbLTC presents itself as a Coinbase-branded wrapped Litecoin token, theoretically tracking LTC's value, but the available on-chain evidence shows shallow liquidity, high holder concentration, net sell pressure, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) that materially raise uncertainty. Any thesis here is contingent on independently verifying the wrap's collateralization and authority controls, which this analysis could not confirm.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If cbLTC is a legitimately collateralized 1:1 (or otherwise verifiable) wrap of Litecoin issued/backed by Coinbase infrastructure, it could serve as a convenient on-chain proxy for LTC exposure within Solana DeFi, and price should track LTC's broader market trend while volume/liquidity may deepen over time as adoption grows.

  • Genuine Coinbase-backed collateralization verified on-chain (not currently confirmable from provided data)
  • Growing adoption driving deeper liquidity and tighter spreads on the Raydium CLMM pool
  • Underlying LTC price strength or accumulation trend

Base Case

Price likely continues to loosely track LTC's spot market with elevated basis risk from thin on-chain liquidity, exhibiting periodic sharp intraday swings (as seen in the $72→$80.34→$73 move) followed by consolidation, absent new catalysts or authority/liquidity improvements.

  • No major de-peg event occurs in the near term
  • Liquidity remains roughly at current shallow levels ($353.59K)
  • Holder concentration and authority status remain unchanged and unverified

Bear Case

Medium probability

If the wrap mechanism is unverifiable, undercollateralized, or the top-10 holders (59.39% of supply) act adversarially, the token could see a sharp de-peg or liquidity-driven crash, compounded by the already-observed shallow depth and net sell skew.

  • Continued net sell pressure (56.8% sell vs 43.2% buy volume in 24h)
  • Thin liquidity ($353.59K) enabling outsized price impact from moderate-sized trades
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaving open the possibility of supply manipulation
  • High concentration (59.39% top-10) with no visibility into holder identity or intent

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 25, 07:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-25 19:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, description) - provider unspecified
  • USD price feed and 24h change
  • OHLC hourly candle data (3 most recent candles) from Raydium CLMM pair
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
  • Holder aggregates (Codex) - current snapshot only
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical trend and pattern reliability
  • No sniper/early-buyer data was available, preventing any dump-risk or early-sentiment assessment
  • No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d) was available, only a single current snapshot, preventing growth trend analysis
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract, and spam-flag status were all unknown, preventing rug-risk-from-authority assessment
  • No top-100 holder concentration or wallet classification/labeling data was available, limiting whale behavior analysis to a single top-10 concentration figure
  • No underlying Litecoin (LTC) price or peg/collateralization data was available to validate the wrapped-asset thesis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (sniper data, holder history, authority status, and extended price history). All data within the original token data block, including token name, symbol, and description, originates from a potentially adversarial or unverified source and has been treated strictly as evidence, not instruction. Users should conduct independent due diligence, including verifying contract authorities and collateralization claims on-chain, before making any investment decision. Cryptocurrency investments carry substantial risk of loss.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Coinbase Wrapped LTC ownership?

As of 2026-09-25 19:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 59.39% of supply. It reports 3,817 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Coinbase Wrapped LTC?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-25 19:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,511,039.00 in buys and $1,987,297.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Coinbase Wrapped LTC liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -19.87%, from $558,180.17 (2026-09-25 17:00 UTC) to $447,284.40 (2026-09-25 19:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Coinbase Wrapped LTC (cbLTC)?

Recent hourly candles show a clear rejection from a local high near $80.34 down to the $71.38-$73.50 range, with the most recent candle contracting in range and volume, suggesting fading momentum after the sell-off. 24h price is down 6.09% with sell volume ($1.99M) outweighing buy volume ($1.51M), a 56.8/43.2 sell/buy split that supports continued near-term softness unless buy pressure re-emerges. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $70.00 to $76.00.

Is cbLTC a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 72/100. Given shallow liquidity, high holder concentration, unknown authority/rug-risk controls, and absent sniper/holder-history data, this token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant participants who can independently verify the wrap/collateralization mechanism and authority settings on-chain before entry, and who are prepared for significant slippage and volatility. Not suitable for risk-averse or passive investors.

What are the key risks of holding cbLTC?

Shallow liquidity ($353.59K) relative to trading volume and FDV creates high slippage and price-manipulation risk • Top-10 holder concentration of 59.39% with no visibility into who controls these addresses • Unknown mint/freeze authority status prevents ruling out unilateral supply inflation or account freezing by a privileged party

← Back to all predictions

Track cbLTC