스타벅스 Price Today & AI Analysis

StarbucksSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 10, 2026

$0.0₅1963

Contract

Live

Xj77DAoNuCttZbe6JuZwHmkB4A1pvrfz6yuCo62pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$1,962

At a $1M market cap, $STARBUCKS would be $0.001000 (510x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Starbucks a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 24

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Starbucks

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

$GULLMumbling Seagull$0.0₅2061+0.0%MC $2.0K

LQXLiquidX$0.0₅1946+0.0%MC $1.9K

traitorObama the traitor$0.0₅2280+0.0%MC $2.3K

HesamJustice for Hesam Alaeddin$0.0₅2205+0.0%MC $2.2K

trollinatrollina$0.0₅5597+0.0%MC $5.4K

PumptachePump Baby$0.000794+1491.2%MC $782.1K

스타벅스: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-10 12:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$92,077.00

How concentrated is 스타벅스 ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling 스타벅스?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is 스타벅스 liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-10 12:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $92,077.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-10 12:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 10, 12:17 PM UTC

FDV

$4,760,390

Liquidity

$92,077.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

스타벅스 ("Starbucks") is a Pump.fun/PumpSwap-listed meme token (mint Xj77DAoNuCttZbe6JuZwHmkB4A1pvrfz6yuCo62pump) that appropriates the Starbucks brand name and coffee emoji in its description — a classic meme-coin naming pattern with no evident affiliation to the real Starbucks Corporation. The token exploded roughly +11,100% in the last 24h/1h window, going from ~$0.0000416 to ~$0.00476, per the two most recent hourly candles. Liquidity is thin at ~$92.08K against a fully diluted valuation of ~$4.76M (FDV/liquidity ratio of ~52x), and no holder or sniper distribution data is available from upstream sources, which is a major transparency gap for a token this early and this volatile.

Key points

Extreme, likely unsustainable short-term price spike (+~11,100% in 1h/24h) typical of freshly launched Pump.fun tokens
Very thin liquidity (~$92K) relative to a $4.76M FDV, implying high slippage and fragile price support
Strong nominal buy pressure (95.9% buy vs 4.1% sell volume in 24h) but this is common during pump phases right before distribution/dumping
No holder concentration or sniper data available, removing key due-diligence signals investors would normally rely on
Uses a well-known global brand name/emoji without verified affiliation — a potential trademark and rug/manipulation red flag

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Price just underwent a parabolic move from ~$0.0000416 to ~$0.00476 (+~11,100%) within the observed hourly candles, then consolidated with a smaller range in the most recent hour (H:0.00476, L:0.00471, C:0.00476). This pattern — a massive vertical candle followed by a tight-range candle near the highs — often precedes either a continuation squeeze or a sharp reversal/dump once early buyers and any snipers take profit. With only ~$92K of liquidity, even modest sell volume could move price significantly in either direction.

Target low

$0.0020 (retrace toward mid-point of the parabolic candle)

Target high

$0.0065 (extension if buy pressure persists)

Support: $0.00470 (low of most recent candle), $0.0000416-ish origin (pre-pump base, unlikely revisit unless full reversal)
Resistance: $0.00476 (current candle high/all-time high in dataset), Psychological $0.005 level

Medium term · 7-14 days

bearish

Meme tokens that experience 100x-plus intraday moves on thin liquidity (~$92K) and lack transparent holder/sniper data very frequently retrace a large portion of gains as early holders and bots realize profits. Absent sustained organic demand, volume, and liquidity growth, the medium-term bias skews bearish/mean-reverting unless there is a durable catalyst.

Catalysts

Renewed social/twitter virality tied to the Starbucks brand association (bullish if sustained)
Liquidity additions or CEX/aggregator listings (bullish)
Large holder or early-buyer profit-taking given no visible lock-ups (bearish)
Potential brand/trademark-related delisting or negative attention given unauthorized use of 'Starbucks' name (bearish)

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($84.70K) heavily outweighs sell volume ($3.58K), a 95.9%/4.1% split
Buyer count (3,604) roughly matches seller count (3,588), suggesting broad-based new interest rather than a single whale dumping
Brand-name recognition ('Starbucks') could continue to attract speculative retail attention/virality

Bearish factors

Liquidity of only ~$92K is extremely shallow relative to $4.76M FDV, creating high volatility and slippage risk
No holder concentration data to confirm supply isn't concentrated in a few wallets ready to dump
Parabolic +11,100% moves on new Pump.fun-style tokens are historically prone to sharp reversals
Unauthorized use of a major trademarked brand name creates reputational/legal tail risk that could trigger sudden abandonment

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles and no historical holder/sniper trend data are available, severely limiting the ability to validate trend durability. The extreme, likely data-anomaly-scale 24h % change (11,100%) combined with thin liquidity makes any price forecast highly speculative.

Starbucks call history

Full track record →

Sep 10neutral@ $0.00476

24h—

7d—

30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: Xj77DA...pump
Total Supply: 999,607,176.31 tokens

Key Risks

Extreme short-term price volatility (+~11,100%) with volume decay suggesting the pump phase may already be fading
Shallow liquidity (~$92K) relative to FDV (~$4.76M), creating high slippage and dump vulnerability
Complete absence of holder concentration and sniper data, removing key due-diligence signals
Unverified/unknown mint, freeze, and update authority status, leaving open the possibility of supply manipulation

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (11:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000415513, spiked to a high of $0.00471243, and closed near the high at $0.00470724 — a massive bullish candle with body near the top of the range, essentially a vertical breakout with volume of ~97,033 (in token-volume terms). Candle 2 (12:00 UTC) opened at $0.00470724, ranged narrowly between $0.00470706 and $0.00476142, and closed at $0.00475957 — a small-bodied consolidation/continuation candle sitting near the prior candle's high, with volume dropping sharply to ~3,133.8, suggesting the initial buying frenzy has cooled.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action is a textbook parabolic pump candle followed immediately by tight consolidation just below/at the highs. This is technically an uptrend on the tape, but with only two candles of history there's no medium-term trend to confirm — it should be treated as sideways/unknown until more data prints.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

96%

Sell

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00470 (low of candle 2 / close of candle 1)

Major support

$0.0000416 (pre-pump origin price; a full round-trip would be catastrophic but defines the theoretical floor of the dataset)

Immediate resistance

$0.00476 (current high, all-time high in available data)

Major resistance

No prior resistance data exists above current price given the token just broke out; psychological $0.005-$0.01 levels are the next notable markers

With only two candles, support/resistance is provisional. The tight range of candle 2 ($0.00470706–$0.00476142) forms the immediate battleground; a break below ~$0.0047 would signal the pump is fading, while a sustained push above $0.00476 would suggest continuation.

Notable patterns

Vertical breakout candle followed by narrow-range consolidation near highs (potential bull flag OR exhaustion top — ambiguous with only 2 candles)
Sharp volume decay (~97K to ~3.1K) typical of pump-and-fade patterns on new Pump.fun-style launches
Buy/sell pressure heavily skewed bullish (95.9%/4.1%) at the aggregate 24h level, contrasting with the volume decay seen at the candle level

Liquidity

$92,077.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of ~$92.08K is very shallow relative to the token's $4.76M fully diluted valuation (a ~52x FDV-to-liquidity ratio), meaning even moderate-sized trades can cause outsized price impact and slippage. 24h buy volume ($84.70K) dwarfs sell volume ($3.58K), a 95.9%/4.1% split, and buy/sell counts (55,101 buys vs 19,460 sells) plus nearly matched unique buyer/seller counts (3,604 vs 3,588) point to strong net inflow and broad participation. However, the thinness of the underlying liquidity pool means this apparent strength is fragile — a wave of profit-taking or a handful of large sells could rapidly overwhelm the pool and crash the price.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,607,176.31 tokens

FDV

$4.76M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token moved roughly +11,100% within the observed 24h/1h window, an extreme volatility event typical of newly launched Pump.fun-style meme tokens, with high risk of equally sharp reversals.
Liquidityhigh
Only ~$92.08K in total liquidity against a $4.76M FDV means the pool can be easily overwhelmed by moderate sell pressure, producing high slippage and potential for rapid price collapse.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme short-term price volatility (+~11,100%) with volume decay suggesting the pump phase may already be fading
Shallow liquidity (~$92K) relative to FDV (~$4.76M), creating high slippage and dump vulnerability
Complete absence of holder concentration and sniper data, removing key due-diligence signals
Unverified/unknown mint, freeze, and update authority status, leaving open the possibility of supply manipulation
Unauthorized use of the globally trademarked 'Starbucks' brand name and coffee emoji with no verified affiliation, a common pattern in scam or rug-pull meme tokens

Mitigating factors

24h trading shows broad-based participation with buyer counts (3,604) nearly equal to seller counts (3,588), rather than one dominant whale
Buy volume substantially exceeds sell volume in the 24h window (95.9% vs 4.1%), indicating net demand at present
Token trades on PumpSwap, a known DEX venue for Pump.fun-graduated tokens, providing at least basic on-chain transparency of trades

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders explicitly seeking exposure to volatile, early-stage meme tokens who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking fundamental value exposure, or anyone relying on the 'Starbucks' branding as an indicator of legitimacy or affiliation with the real Starbucks Corporation.

스타벅스 (Starbucks) is a highly speculative, brand-appropriating meme token on Pump.fun/PumpSwap that just experienced an extreme, likely unsustainable price spike (+~11,100%) on thin liquidity (~$92K) with no available holder or sniper data to confirm supply health. Any position here should be treated as a short-duration, high-risk speculative trade rather than an investment, given the near-total absence of fundamental due-diligence data and the classic pump/volume-decay pattern visible in the two available candles.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral attention around the 'Starbucks' branding drives sustained new buyer inflow, liquidity providers add depth, and the token holds or extends its breakout above $0.00476, attracting momentum traders and further FDV expansion.

Sustained social media virality and community meme momentum
New liquidity additions reducing slippage and stabilizing price
Broad-based buyer participation (3,604 unique buyers in 24h) continuing rather than fading

Base Case

Price consolidates in a wide, volatile range around current levels ($0.0020–$0.0065) as the initial pump fades into choppy two-sided trading, with periodic sharp swings driven by the shallow liquidity pool, before either fading further or requiring fresh catalysts to break out again.

Liquidity remains roughly at current levels (~$92K) without major additions or removals
No major exchange listing or brand-related legal event occurs in the near term
Retail speculative interest gradually normalizes after the initial pump

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic pump was driven by early buyers/bots front-running the launch; as volume decays (already down >96% candle-over-candle) profit-taking accelerates, the shallow $92K liquidity pool is unable to absorb sell pressure, and price retraces sharply back toward pre-pump levels or lower.

Historical base rate: extreme 1h/24h pumps on new Pump.fun tokens frequently reverse sharply
Volume already collapsing from ~97K to ~3.1K between the two available candles
No confirmed renouncement of mint/freeze authorities, leaving supply-manipulation risk open
Potential brand/trademark backlash given unauthorized use of the 'Starbucks' name

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 10, 12:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-10 12:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
Price feed (USD price, % change)
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Liquidity pool data (PumpSwap pair)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, making trend, support/resistance, and pattern analysis highly provisional
No holder distribution or holder growth data was available (upstream holder endpoints not provided), so holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty by necessity
No sniper wallet data was available, so sniper concentration, PnL, and sell-through metrics could not be computed
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and contract verification/mutability status were all listed as 'unknown' in metadata, preventing a confirmed rug-risk assessment from authorities
The 24h % price change figure (11,100%) is extreme and may partly reflect a very low starting reference price shortly after token launch rather than a stable trend

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Token names, symbols, descriptions, and any embedded text within the source data are supplied by the token's creator and may be adversarial, misleading, or promotional; such content was treated strictly as untrusted evidence, not as instructions, and any command-like or self-promotional language embedded in the data was treated as a manipulation/scam signal rather than acted upon. Cryptocurrency, and meme tokens in particular, carry a high risk of total capital loss. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 스타벅스 (Starbucks) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell 스타벅스 (Starbucks)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is 스타벅스 ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling 스타벅스?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is 스타벅스 liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-10 12:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $92,077.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for 스타벅스 (Starbucks)?

Is Starbucks a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders explicitly seeking exposure to volatile, early-stage meme tokens who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking fundamental value exposure, or anyone relying on the 'Starbucks' branding as an indicator of legitimacy or affiliation with the real Starbucks Corporation.

What are the key risks of holding Starbucks?

Extreme short-term price volatility (+~11,100%) with volume decay suggesting the pump phase may already be fading • Shallow liquidity (~$92K) relative to FDV (~$4.76M), creating high slippage and dump vulnerability • Complete absence of holder concentration and sniper data, removing key due-diligence signals