$GULL

Mumbling Seagull Price Today & AI Analysis

$GULLSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.004503

+9286.56% 24h · FDV $4,345,316

Contract

Live
XQvVFz2jrrqFvhdG4NRd2o9xCQci9Xn9nGYVumBpump

Chain

Holders

2,078

Market cap

$4,345,316

More tokens on Solana

Mumbling Seagull: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 23:18 UTC

Holder addresses

2,078

Top 10 supply share

20.67%

Reported liquidity

$96,094.00
How concentrated is Mumbling Seagull ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 23:18 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.67% of supply. It reports 2,078 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Mumbling Seagull?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 23:18 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $195,112.00 in buys and $110,794.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Mumbling Seagull liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +2888.99%, from $3,216.24 (2026-09-23 19:00 UTC) to $96,133.17 (2026-09-23 23:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 23:18 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 19:00 UTC$3,216.24
2026-09-23 20:00 UTC$12,263.33
2026-09-23 21:00 UTC$47,264.71
2026-09-23 22:00 UTC$85,509.64
2026-09-23 23:00 UTC$96,133.17

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about $GULL

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 11:19 PM UTC

FDV

$4,345,316

Liquidity

$96,094.00

Holders

2,078

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

$GULL (Mumbling Seagull) is a very recently launched Solana meme token trading on PumpSwap that has undergone an extreme parabolic price surge of +9,286.6% in the past 24 hours, reaching a current price of $0.0045026 and a fully diluted valuation of $4.35M. The move is backed by real but shallow liquidity ($96.09K) and a clear buy-side imbalance (2,037 buyers vs 528 sellers, 63.8% buy volume share), but critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper/bot concentration, and holder history — is unavailable, leaving significant blind spots in the analysis.

Key points

  • Extreme short-term price appreciation (+9,286.6% 24h) concentrated within just 5 observed hourly candles, indicating a very recent, possibly first-hour-of-trading token
  • Shallow liquidity ($96.09K) relative to $4.35M FDV creates outsized slippage and volatility risk
  • Multiple key risk inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper data, holder history) are completely unavailable, unlike more mature tokens with full data coverage
  • Top-10 holders control 20.67% of supply per current snapshot, with no visibility into deeper concentration or holder identities

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

Given the extreme, likely unsustainable parabolic move (+9,286.6% 24h, +196.3% 1h) and signs of volume deceleration in the most recent candle, a short-term pullback or consolidation is more probable than continued vertical appreciation. However, given the thin liquidity, moves in either direction could be exaggerated.

Target low

$0.0009 (near candle 4 low, a potential retracement zone)

Target high

$0.0060 (modest extension above current all-time high if momentum persists briefly)

Support

$0.00353 (candle 5 low), $0.00096 (candle 4 low), $0.00073 (candle 3 low)

Resistance

$0.00451 (current all-time high / candle 5 high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the token's very recent launch and lack of sustained trading history. Outcome will likely hinge on whether liquidity deepens and whether buy-side interest is sustained beyond the initial speculative pump, or whether it follows the typical steep decline pattern common to freshly launched meme tokens.

Catalysts

  • Whether liquidity providers add meaningfully to the $96.09K pool
  • Continued social/Twitter attention and community growth
  • Resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status (positive if renounced, negative if not)
  • Sniper/bot selling pressure if such wallets exist and begin exiting positions

Bullish factors

  • Strong current buyer/seller imbalance (2,037 vs 528) and 63.8% buy-volume share
  • Rising volume trend across recent candles indicating real capital participation
  • Active social presence (Twitter) that can sustain meme-driven attention

Bearish factors

  • Extremely overbought short-term momentum (+196.3% in 1h) increases probability of mean reversion
  • Shallow liquidity ($96.09K vs $4.35M FDV) makes the price highly susceptible to sharp drops on modest sell pressure
  • Slight deceleration in hourly volume (candle 4 ~$148.5K to candle 5 ~$97.1K) despite continued price rise
  • Unresolved authority and sniper risks could trigger sudden negative catalysts

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because only 5 hourly candles of price history are available, covering a single uninterrupted parabolic move with no prior consolidation or retracement to validate technical levels. Additionally, critical risk inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper concentration, holder history) are all unavailable, materially limiting the reliability of any directional call.

$GULL call history

Full track record →

Sep 23bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
XQvVFz...pump
Total Supply
965,069,267.44 $GULL

Key Risks

  • Extreme, likely unsustainable parabolic price move (+9,286.6% in 24h) typical of early-stage speculative pumps that often reverse sharply
  • Shallow liquidity ($96.09K) relative to $4.35M FDV creates high slippage and price-manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper/bot detection data available despite launch-like price behavior, obscuring potential coordinated sell risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 5 most recent hourly candles show an extreme, near-vertical uptrend: price rose from an open of $0.0000072125 (candle 1) to a close of $0.0045063 (candle 5) — roughly a 624x move within 5 hours. Each candle closes near its high with progressively higher lows and highs (candle 1 low $0.0000072 -> candle 5 low $0.00353), indicating sustained one-directional buying with almost no pullback. Volume expanded sharply from ~$5.3K in candle 1 to a peak of ~$148.5K in candle 4 before easing slightly to ~$97.1K in candle 5, suggesting the parabolic move is losing some momentum even as price still closed higher.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short-term (hourly) and the limited medium-term window available show an aggressive uptrend with each candle posting higher highs and higher lows. This is a classic early-stage parabolic pump pattern rather than a stable, sustained trend, and such moves are historically prone to sharp mean-reversion.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

64%

Sell

36%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00352870 (candle 5 low)

Major support

$0.00096109 (candle 4 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.00450633 (candle 5 high / current price, all-time high in this window)

Major resistance

No established resistance above current price yet — token is trading at its local all-time high within the observed window

Because the entire visible price history is a single parabolic run, support levels are essentially the lows of each preceding candle (most recent being ~$0.00353 and ~$0.00096), while resistance is effectively the current all-time high (~$0.00451) since no prior high has been tested and rejected. This makes technical levels unusually unreliable — a break below $0.0035 could quickly cascade toward $0.00096 given thin liquidity.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic/vertical breakout across all 5 candles with no pullback candles
  • Each candle closing at or near its high (bullish continuation pattern)
  • Volume climax in candle 4 (~$148.5K) followed by a slight pullback in volume in candle 5 despite higher close — potential early exhaustion signal
  • Extremely low starting price (~$0.0000072) suggests this is a very recent token launch experiencing initial price discovery, not a mature trend

Liquidity

Liquidity

$96,094.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $96.09K is very shallow relative to the $4.35M fully diluted valuation (roughly 2.2% of FDV), meaning even moderately sized trades can cause significant slippage and price swings — consistent with the extreme hourly candle ranges observed. 24h buy volume ($195.11K, 63.8% of flow) outpaces sell volume ($110.79K, 36.2%), and buyers (2,037) vastly outnumber sellers (528), a ~3.9:1 ratio, indicating strong net inflow and speculative buying pressure. However, this buyer/seller imbalance combined with thin liquidity is also a classic pattern seen in early-stage pump phases on PumpSwap-listed tokens, where rapid inflows can reverse quickly once buying momentum stalls.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

965,069,267.44 $GULL

FDV

$4,345,316

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +9,286.6% and 1h change of +196.3% represent extreme volatility. The token moved ~624x within the 5 most recent hourly candles alone, indicating a highly speculative, possibly unsustainable price trajectory.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $96.09K against a $4.35M FDV. This shallow liquidity pool means large trades can cause significant slippage and the price can be moved substantially by relatively small capital, in either direction.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 20.67% of supply per the current Codex snapshot. Top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, so the full concentration picture (including whether top holders are insiders, exchanges, or LPs) cannot be determined. Given the limited visibility, this could understate true concentration risk.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme, likely unsustainable parabolic price move (+9,286.6% in 24h) typical of early-stage speculative pumps that often reverse sharply
  • Shallow liquidity ($96.09K) relative to $4.35M FDV creates high slippage and price-manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper/bot detection data available despite launch-like price behavior, obscuring potential coordinated sell risk
  • Top-10 holders control 20.67% of supply with no visibility into top-100 concentration or holder identity
  • No holder history available to assess whether the current buyer surge represents durable adoption or short-term speculation

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($195.11K) exceeds sell volume ($110.79K), and unique buyers (2,037) substantially outnumber sellers (528), suggesting broad-based current demand rather than a single actor selling
  • 2,078 holder addresses indicates some distribution of supply across many wallets, though this does not confirm genuine unique investor count

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history). It is not suitable for conservative or inexperienced investors, or anyone who cannot tolerate a potential rapid and severe loss of capital.

$GULL is a very recently launched, extremely speculative meme token on PumpSwap that has just experienced a parabolic price surge (+9,286.6% in 24h) on shallow liquidity ($96.09K) and a $4.35M FDV. Current 24h flow data shows more buyers (2,037) than sellers (528) and net positive buy pressure (63.8%), but multiple critical data points — mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history — are unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative setup rather than a fundamentally analyzable investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued speculative momentum and social attention (the project has an active Twitter presence) drive further buyer inflow, pushing price higher as more traders chase the parabolic move; if liquidity deepens alongside volume, the token could sustain a higher valuation plateau.

  • Strong current buy-side imbalance (2,037 buyers vs 528 sellers, 63.8% buy volume share)
  • Meme-driven virality can sustain short-term attention and volume on PumpSwap-style launches
  • Rapid volume growth across the observed candles (from ~$5.3K to ~$148.5K) shows real capital inflow, not just price drift

Base Case

Price experiences high two-way volatility with elevated risk of a significant pullback from current all-time-high levels, while remaining a highly illiquid, thinly-traded speculative asset where outcomes are dominated by short-term trading flows rather than fundamentals.

  • No new liquidity is added materially beyond the current $96.09K pool in the near term
  • Sniper and authority risk remain unresolved/unknown, keeping the risk profile elevated
  • Trading activity continues to be dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders given the token's launch-like profile

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic move exhausts itself as early holders and any undetected snipers take profit into thin liquidity, causing a sharp reversal back toward or below the levels seen in candle 3-4 (roughly $0.0007–$0.0011), consistent with typical pump-and-dump lifecycle patterns for very young, low-liquidity tokens.

  • Extreme, likely unsustainable +9,286.6% 24h and +196.3% 1h price appreciation
  • Shallow $96.09K liquidity pool cannot absorb large sell orders without severe price impact
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and unknown sniper concentration remove key safety checks
  • Slight volume deceleration in the most recent candle (from ~$148.5K to ~$97.1K) despite continued price rise may signal early buyer exhaustion

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 11:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 23:18 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m price change data
  • 5 most recent hourly OHLCV candles from PumpSwap pair
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

  • No sniper/bot wallet detection data was available; sniper concentration and PnL metrics could not be computed and are marked unknown
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and verified-contract status are all unknown; on-chain authority checks were not provided
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) or wallet classification data is available, only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Top-100 holder concentration is unavailable, limiting the concentration risk picture to only the top-10
  • Only 5 hourly candles of price history were provided, covering a single uninterrupted parabolic move, which severely limits the reliability of technical support/resistance and trend analysis
  • 24h $ change, native price, and 6h % change were reported as unknown in the source data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history). Cryptocurrency and meme token investments carry substantial risk of total loss, particularly for tokens exhibiting extreme volatility and shallow liquidity such as this one. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Mumbling Seagull ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 23:18 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.67% of supply. It reports 2,078 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Mumbling Seagull?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 23:18 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $195,112.00 in buys and $110,794.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Mumbling Seagull liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +2888.99%, from $3,216.24 (2026-09-23 19:00 UTC) to $96,133.17 (2026-09-23 23:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Mumbling Seagull ($GULL)?

Given the extreme, likely unsustainable parabolic move (+9,286.6% 24h, +196.3% 1h) and signs of volume deceleration in the most recent candle, a short-term pullback or consolidation is more probable than continued vertical appreciation. However, given the thin liquidity, moves in either direction could be exaggerated. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.0009 (near candle 4 low, a potential retracement zone) to $0.0060 (modest extension above current all-time high if momentum persists briefly).

Is $GULL a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history). It is not suitable for conservative or inexperienced investors, or anyone who cannot tolerate a potential rapid and severe loss of capital.

What are the key risks of holding $GULL?

Extreme, likely unsustainable parabolic price move (+9,286.6% in 24h) typical of early-stage speculative pumps that often reverse sharply • Shallow liquidity ($96.09K) relative to $4.35M FDV creates high slippage and price-manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track $GULL