TeraWulf - Backpack Securities Price Today & AI Analysis

WULFSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

$11.7

-7.75% 24h

Contract

Live

WULFeyfrj1VJKD9HhRTcW8R4g5HefUA11HDEdBv2WxD

Chain

Solana

Holders

634

Market cap

$59,208

At a $1M market cap, $WULF would be $197.57 (16.9x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is WULF a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 17

Issuer token

No scam signals. As a tokenized stock, its issuer can freeze, pause and move tokens.

Can you sell?

YesThe issuer can pause or freeze transfers, as stock tokens allow

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about WULF

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

ALNOORAlNoor Token$0.0101-1.0%MC $10.05M

trenchcattrenchcat$0.0₅7587-24.9%MC $7.3K

ニーナNina$0.0₄1913-33.5%MC $18.6K

OPTIMUSOptimus Prime$0.0₅5462+19.3%MC $5.4K

SPLICESPLICE$0.0₄2234+15.1%MC $21.6K

EterniaEternia$0.000222+418.9%MC $217.1K

TeraWulf - Backpack Securities: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-17 16:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$28,493.00

How concentrated is TeraWulf - Backpack Securities ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling TeraWulf - Backpack Securities?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is TeraWulf - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-17 16:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $28,493.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-17 16:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 04:16 PM UTC

FDV

$170,344

Liquidity

$28,493.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

WULF (TeraWulf - Backpack Securities) is a small-cap Solana token trading around $16.51 with a fully diluted valuation of just $170.34K and a very small on-chain liquidity pool of $28.49K. The token name and pairing suggest it may be a synthetic/wrapped exposure product referencing TeraWulf via a 'Backpack Securities' branding, but no verified contract status, social links, or description were provided, making provenance unclear. Trading activity is heavy relative to liquidity (~$2.58M combined 24h volume vs $28.49K liquidity), with sell pressure (59%) outweighing buy pressure (41%) over the past 24h, consistent with the -7.87% 24h price decline.

Key points

Extremely low liquidity ($28.49K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$2.58M), implying very high volume/liquidity turnover and slippage risk
Unverified contract status and missing update authority/mutability data raise provenance concerns
No holder or sniper data available, severely limiting distribution and early-buyer risk assessment
Small total supply (10,317.73 tokens) and low FDV ($170.34K) indicate a micro-cap, highly speculative asset

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48h

bearish

Price has declined -7.87% over the past 24h and continues to show negative momentum in the 5m (-0.32%) and 1h (-0.65%) windows. The most recent hourly candle shows a lower high and lower low compared to the prior candle, with price closing near the candle's low, suggesting continued near-term weakness. Given sell volume (59%) exceeds buy volume (41%), downside pressure appears dominant.

Target low

$15.50

Target high

$17.50

Support: $16.48 (recent candle low), $16.29 (approx -1% below current)
Resistance: $17.01 (prior candle close), $19.12 (recent candle high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles and no multi-day OHLC history provided, medium-term directional conviction is low. The extremely thin liquidity ($28.49K) means price could swing sharply in either direction on relatively small trade sizes, and sustained sell pressure could compound downside, while any renewed buying interest could produce outsized upside moves given the shallow order book.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or removals given the shallow $28.49K pool
Any clarification on contract verification and authority status could shift sentiment
Broader market moves in TeraWulf-related or crypto mining-themed tokens, if this token tracks that theme

Bullish factors

High trading volume ($2.58M combined 24h) relative to FDV ($170.34K) indicates active speculative interest
3,680 unique buyers in 24h shows some breadth of demand

Bearish factors

24h price down -7.87% with sell volume ($1.52M) exceeding buy volume ($1.06M)
Most recent candle closed near its low with a lower high than the prior candle
Extremely low liquidity ($28.49K) makes the token vulnerable to sharp downside moves and high slippage
Unverified contract and missing authority/social data reduce confidence in legitimacy

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles were provided, which is insufficient for robust trend or pattern analysis. No holder or sniper data exists to corroborate directional bias, and liquidity is extremely thin, making price action prone to noise and manipulation. Confidence in any directional call is therefore low.

WULF call history

Full track record →

Sep 17bearish@ $16.51

24h-0.8%

7d-2.3%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: WULFey...2WxD
Total Supply: 10,317.7335 WULF

Key Risks

Severe liquidity/volume mismatch ($28.49K liquidity vs ~$2.58M 24h volume) creates high slippage and manipulation potential
Unknown/unverified contract, mint authority, and freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanics
No holder or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing distribution and early-buyer dump risk
Sharp intraday price rejection (from $19.12 high to $16.48) with dominant sell volume (59%) suggests active distribution/selling pressure

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (15:00 UTC) opened at $17.92, spiked to a high of $19.12, then sold off to close at $16.99, near its low of $16.51 — a bearish candle with a long upper wick indicating rejection at higher prices. Candle 2 (16:00 UTC) opened at $16.99, made a marginal high of $17.01, then declined to close at $16.48, essentially at its low ($16.48) — another bearish candle showing continued selling and inability to sustain any bounce.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both available candles show lower highs (19.12 -> 17.01) and lower closes (16.99 -> 16.48), confirming a short-term downtrend. With only 2 hours of data, the medium-term trend cannot be independently verified, but is inferred as downtrend given the -7.87% 24h change aligns with the observed pattern.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

41%

Sell

59%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$16.48

Major support

$16.29 (est. based on recent low with modest buffer)

Immediate resistance

$17.01

Major resistance

$19.12

Immediate support sits at $16.48, the low of the most recent candle and the current trading level. A break below could expose the token to further downside given thin liquidity. Immediate resistance is at $17.01, the prior candle's close/high; a reclaim of this level would be needed to signal any near-term reversal. Major resistance sits at $19.12, the recent swing high, which now also serves as a rejection point after the sharp sell-off.

Notable patterns

Bearish rejection candle with long upper wick on candle 1 (high $19.12 vs close $16.99)
Lower highs and lower closes across both candles, consistent with a short-term downtrend
Sharp volume drop-off (>98%) between candle 1 and candle 2, suggesting the selling climax may be tapering

Liquidity

$28,493.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $28.49K is extremely thin relative to the 24h trading volume of roughly $2.58M combined (a turnover ratio exceeding 90x liquidity), which is a major red flag for slippage and price manipulation risk. Sell volume ($1.52M) outpaces buy volume ($1.06M), producing a net outflow bias consistent with the day's -7.87% price decline. Despite the imbalance, there is meaningful participation breadth with 3,680 unique buyers and 3,291 unique sellers in 24h, indicating this is not a completely illiquid or abandoned token, but the shallow liquidity pool means even moderate trade sizes could move price significantly in either direction.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

10,317.7335 WULF

FDV

$170.34K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price swung from a high of $19.12 to a low of $16.48 within two hours and is down -7.87% over 24h, indicating substantial short-term volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Only $28.49K in total liquidity against ~$2.58M in 24h volume creates a severe liquidity/volume mismatch, exposing traders to high slippage and making the price highly manipulable with relatively small capital.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Severe liquidity/volume mismatch ($28.49K liquidity vs ~$2.58M 24h volume) creates high slippage and manipulation potential
Unknown/unverified contract, mint authority, and freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanics
No holder or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing distribution and early-buyer dump risk
Sharp intraday price rejection (from $19.12 high to $16.48) with dominant sell volume (59%) suggests active distribution/selling pressure
Micro-cap FDV ($170.34K) and small total supply make the token susceptible to large price swings from modest trade sizes
Token branding references a real company (TeraWulf) and 'Backpack Securities' without any verifiable social links, description, or verification — a common pattern in name-riding or impersonation schemes

Mitigating factors

Reasonable 24h participation breadth with 3,680 unique buyers and 3,291 unique sellers, suggesting some organic trading interest rather than a single-wallet operation
Trading is occurring on Raydium CLMM, a known and audited DEX infrastructure, which reduces (but does not eliminate) smart contract execution risk at the venue level

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. The combination of unknown contract authorities, extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume, and complete absence of holder/whale/sniper transparency data makes this unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors. Any position sizing should be minimal and treated as high-risk speculation, not a core holding.

WULF presents a highly speculative, data-scarce profile: a micro-cap token ($170.34K FDV) with heavy trading volume relative to its shallow $28.49K liquidity pool, currently in a short-term downtrend (-7.87% 24h) with sell pressure dominating (59% vs 41% buy). Critical transparency gaps — unknown mint/freeze authority status, no verified contract confirmation, and a complete absence of holder and sniper data — mean this thesis rests on incomplete information and should be treated with significant caution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the token's branding connection to TeraWulf and 'Backpack Securities' reflects a legitimate tokenized security or synthetic exposure product with growing adoption, renewed buy volume could reverse the current downtrend, especially given the strong 24h participation (3,680 buyers) and the fact that hourly volume already dropped sharply after the initial sell-off, potentially signaling seller exhaustion.

Confirmation of contract verification and renounced authorities would materially de-risk the token
A reclaim of the $17.01 immediate resistance level could technically signal short-term reversal
Continued strong unique buyer counts despite the price drop could indicate underlying demand

Base Case

The token likely continues to exhibit high volatility within a broad range roughly between $15.50 and $19.00, driven by its thin liquidity and speculative trading activity, with a mild bearish tilt in the near term given current sell-side dominance, absent any new catalysts or authority confirmations.

Liquidity remains near current shallow levels ($28.49K) without significant new deposits or withdrawals
No new information emerges on contract verification or authority renouncement in the near term
Trading volume and volatility remain elevated relative to the token's small FDV

Bear Case

High probability

Given the unknown authority status, thin liquidity, and dominant sell volume, the token could continue to decline sharply or become subject to a rug-pull style event (mint inflation, freezing) if authorities are not actually renounced. The extreme volume-to-liquidity ratio also raises manipulation concerns.

Sell volume ($1.52M) exceeding buy volume ($1.06M) over 24h with the trend continuing in the most recent 1h and 5m windows
Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
Extremely low liquidity ($28.49K) relative to volume makes large price swings and potential exit liquidity traps likely
No holder or sniper transparency data available to rule out concentrated ownership or coordinated dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 04:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-17 16:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
USD price feed and 24h/1h/5m price change data
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles) from Raydium CLMM pair
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Total liquidity figure ($28.49K)

Limitations

No holder data available — holder counts, growth trends, and concentration could not be assessed and were set to placeholder zero values per methodology
No sniper data available — sniper concentration, PnL state, and dump risk could not be assessed and were set to unknown/zero per methodology
Only two hourly OHLC candles provided, severely limiting technical trend and pattern analysis reliability
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified contract status, and mutability are all listed as unknown in metadata, preventing confirmation of rug-pull risk from authorities
No social links or description provided, limiting ability to verify the token's legitimacy or connection to any real-world entity referenced in its name

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data that may not reflect the full picture of the token's risk profile. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly in micro-cap and low-liquidity tokens, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Users should conduct their own independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TeraWulf - Backpack Securities (WULF) a scam?

No scam signals. As a tokenized stock, its issuer can freeze, pause and move tokens. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell TeraWulf - Backpack Securities (WULF)?

Nothing in the token blocks a sell today, but as a tokenized stock its issuer can freeze, pause or move tokens. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is TeraWulf - Backpack Securities ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling TeraWulf - Backpack Securities?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is TeraWulf - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-17 16:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $28,493.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for TeraWulf - Backpack Securities (WULF)?

Is WULF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. The combination of unknown contract authorities, extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume, and complete absence of holder/whale/sniper transparency data makes this unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors. Any position sizing should be minimal and treated as high-risk speculation, not a core holding.

What are the key risks of holding WULF?

Severe liquidity/volume mismatch ($28.49K liquidity vs ~$2.58M 24h volume) creates high slippage and manipulation potential • Unknown/unverified contract, mint authority, and freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanics • No holder or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing distribution and early-buyer dump risk