W

TeraWulf - Backpack Securities Price Today & AI Analysis

WULFSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

Price

$16.51

-7.87% 24h · FDV $170,344

Contract

Live
WULFeyfrj1VJKD9HhRTcW8R4g5HefUA11HDEdBv2WxD

Chain

Solana

Holders

675

Market cap

$170,344

More tokens on Solana

BOMEBOMEBOOK OF MEME$0.000954+9.2%MC $65.71MSKHYSKHYSK Hynix - Backpack Securities$178.95+1.6%MC $2.24MEMBEREMBERembercurve$0.0122-0.7%MC $12.07MKMNOKMNOKamino$0.0279+11.7%MC $279.19MbiketysonbiketysonBIKE TYSON$0.002906-10.7%MC $2.80MPAIDPAIDPaid$0.009146+22390.7%MC $8.90M
Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about WULF

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 04:16 PM UTC

FDV

$170,344

Liquidity

$28,493

Holders

0

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

WULF (TeraWulf - Backpack Securities) is a small-cap Solana token trading around $16.51 with a fully diluted valuation of just $170.34K and a very small on-chain liquidity pool of $28.49K. The token name and pairing suggest it may be a synthetic/wrapped exposure product referencing TeraWulf via a 'Backpack Securities' branding, but no verified contract status, social links, or description were provided, making provenance unclear. Trading activity is heavy relative to liquidity (~$2.58M combined 24h volume vs $28.49K liquidity), with sell pressure (59%) outweighing buy pressure (41%) over the past 24h, consistent with the -7.87% 24h price decline.

Key points

  • Extremely low liquidity ($28.49K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$2.58M), implying very high volume/liquidity turnover and slippage risk
  • Unverified contract status and missing update authority/mutability data raise provenance concerns
  • No holder or sniper data available, severely limiting distribution and early-buyer risk assessment
  • Small total supply (10,317.73 tokens) and low FDV ($170.34K) indicate a micro-cap, highly speculative asset

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48h

bearish

Price has declined -7.87% over the past 24h and continues to show negative momentum in the 5m (-0.32%) and 1h (-0.65%) windows. The most recent hourly candle shows a lower high and lower low compared to the prior candle, with price closing near the candle's low, suggesting continued near-term weakness. Given sell volume (59%) exceeds buy volume (41%), downside pressure appears dominant.

Target low

$15.50

Target high

$17.50

Support

$16.48 (recent candle low), $16.29 (approx -1% below current)

Resistance

$17.01 (prior candle close), $19.12 (recent candle high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles and no multi-day OHLC history provided, medium-term directional conviction is low. The extremely thin liquidity ($28.49K) means price could swing sharply in either direction on relatively small trade sizes, and sustained sell pressure could compound downside, while any renewed buying interest could produce outsized upside moves given the shallow order book.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or removals given the shallow $28.49K pool
  • Any clarification on contract verification and authority status could shift sentiment
  • Broader market moves in TeraWulf-related or crypto mining-themed tokens, if this token tracks that theme

Bullish factors

  • High trading volume ($2.58M combined 24h) relative to FDV ($170.34K) indicates active speculative interest
  • 3,680 unique buyers in 24h shows some breadth of demand

Bearish factors

  • 24h price down -7.87% with sell volume ($1.52M) exceeding buy volume ($1.06M)
  • Most recent candle closed near its low with a lower high than the prior candle
  • Extremely low liquidity ($28.49K) makes the token vulnerable to sharp downside moves and high slippage
  • Unverified contract and missing authority/social data reduce confidence in legitimacy

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles were provided, which is insufficient for robust trend or pattern analysis. No holder or sniper data exists to corroborate directional bias, and liquidity is extremely thin, making price action prone to noise and manipulation. Confidence in any directional call is therefore low.

WULF call history

Full track record →

Sep 17bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
WULFey...2WxD
Total Supply
10,317.7335 WULF

Key Risks

  • Severe liquidity/volume mismatch ($28.49K liquidity vs ~$2.58M 24h volume) creates high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown/unverified contract, mint authority, and freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanics
  • No holder or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing distribution and early-buyer dump risk
  • Sharp intraday price rejection (from $19.12 high to $16.48) with dominant sell volume (59%) suggests active distribution/selling pressure

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidenceLow risk

No sniper data was made available for this token, so sniper concentration, PnL state, and sell-through behavior cannot be assessed. This is a data gap rather than a confirmed absence of sniper activity.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration
0.00%
PnL state
Unknown
Sell-through rate
Unknown
Profit-taking risk
low

unknown

Unknown — no sniper or early-buyer data provided to gauge sentiment among initial purchasers.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (15:00 UTC) opened at $17.92, spiked to a high of $19.12, then sold off to close at $16.99, near its low of $16.51 — a bearish candle with a long upper wick indicating rejection at higher prices. Candle 2 (16:00 UTC) opened at $16.99, made a marginal high of $17.01, then declined to close at $16.48, essentially at its low ($16.48) — another bearish candle showing continued selling and inability to sustain any bounce.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both available candles show lower highs (19.12 -> 17.01) and lower closes (16.99 -> 16.48), confirming a short-term downtrend. With only 2 hours of data, the medium-term trend cannot be independently verified, but is inferred as downtrend given the -7.87% 24h change aligns with the observed pattern.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

41%

Sell

59%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$16.48

Major support

$16.29 (est. based on recent low with modest buffer)

Immediate resistance

$17.01

Major resistance

$19.12

Immediate support sits at $16.48, the low of the most recent candle and the current trading level. A break below could expose the token to further downside given thin liquidity. Immediate resistance is at $17.01, the prior candle's close/high; a reclaim of this level would be needed to signal any near-term reversal. Major resistance sits at $19.12, the recent swing high, which now also serves as a rejection point after the sharp sell-off.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish rejection candle with long upper wick on candle 1 (high $19.12 vs close $16.99)
  • Lower highs and lower closes across both candles, consistent with a short-term downtrend
  • Sharp volume drop-off (>98%) between candle 1 and candle 2, suggesting the selling climax may be tapering

Liquidity

Liquidity

$28.49K

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $28.49K is extremely thin relative to the 24h trading volume of roughly $2.58M combined (a turnover ratio exceeding 90x liquidity), which is a major red flag for slippage and price manipulation risk. Sell volume ($1.52M) outpaces buy volume ($1.06M), producing a net outflow bias consistent with the day's -7.87% price decline. Despite the imbalance, there is meaningful participation breadth with 3,680 unique buyers and 3,291 unique sellers in 24h, indicating this is not a completely illiquid or abandoned token, but the shallow liquidity pool means even moderate trade sizes could move price significantly in either direction.

Flow (24h)

Buy volume

$1.06M

Sell volume

$1.52M

Net flow

Outflow

Unique buyers

3,680

Unique sellers

3,291

Supply & authorities

Total supply

10,317.7335 WULF

FDV

$170.34K

Mint authority

Active

Freeze authority

Active

Total supply is a small 10,317.7335 tokens (6 decimals), producing a fully diluted valuation of only $170.34K at the current $16.51 price — a genuine micro-cap. Update authority status, mint authority, and freeze authority are all listed as 'unknown' in the provided metadata, meaning it cannot be confirmed whether these authorities have been renounced. This is a meaningful transparency gap: unrenounced mint/freeze authorities would allow the deployer to mint additional supply or freeze holder accounts at will. Verified contract status, mutability, and master edition status are also unknown, further limiting confidence in the token's structural safety. Given the branding referencing 'TeraWulf' and 'Backpack Securities' with no official social links or description, this token profile is consistent with either a tokenized/synthetic wrapper product or a name-riding speculative token; without verification, rug risk from authorities is rated unknown but should be treated cautiously (effectively elevated) until confirmed otherwise.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price swung from a high of $19.12 to a low of $16.48 within two hours and is down -7.87% over 24h, indicating substantial short-term volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $28.49K in total liquidity against ~$2.58M in 24h volume creates a severe liquidity/volume mismatch, exposing traders to high slippage and making the price highly manipulable with relatively small capital.

  • Concentrationhigh

    No holder distribution data is available, but the combination of a tiny FDV ($170.34K), micro total supply (~10,317 tokens), and unknown authority status makes concentration risk impossible to rule out and prudent to assume as elevated by default.

  • Sniper Dumpmedium

    No sniper data was available to directly assess dump risk from early snipers; however, the sharp price rejection from $19.12 to $16.48 within the observed candles is consistent with early holders or snipers taking profit, though this cannot be confirmed.

  • Authorityhigh

    Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified contract status, and mutability are all listed as unknown. Without confirmation that mint/freeze authorities are renounced, there is a real possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer.

Key risks

  • Severe liquidity/volume mismatch ($28.49K liquidity vs ~$2.58M 24h volume) creates high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown/unverified contract, mint authority, and freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanics
  • No holder or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing distribution and early-buyer dump risk
  • Sharp intraday price rejection (from $19.12 high to $16.48) with dominant sell volume (59%) suggests active distribution/selling pressure
  • Micro-cap FDV ($170.34K) and small total supply make the token susceptible to large price swings from modest trade sizes
  • Token branding references a real company (TeraWulf) and 'Backpack Securities' without any verifiable social links, description, or verification — a common pattern in name-riding or impersonation schemes

Mitigating factors

  • Reasonable 24h participation breadth with 3,680 unique buyers and 3,291 unique sellers, suggesting some organic trading interest rather than a single-wallet operation
  • Trading is occurring on Raydium CLMM, a known and audited DEX infrastructure, which reduces (but does not eliminate) smart contract execution risk at the venue level

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. The combination of unknown contract authorities, extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume, and complete absence of holder/whale/sniper transparency data makes this unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors. Any position sizing should be minimal and treated as high-risk speculation, not a core holding.

WULF presents a highly speculative, data-scarce profile: a micro-cap token ($170.34K FDV) with heavy trading volume relative to its shallow $28.49K liquidity pool, currently in a short-term downtrend (-7.87% 24h) with sell pressure dominating (59% vs 41% buy). Critical transparency gaps — unknown mint/freeze authority status, no verified contract confirmation, and a complete absence of holder and sniper data — mean this thesis rests on incomplete information and should be treated with significant caution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the token's branding connection to TeraWulf and 'Backpack Securities' reflects a legitimate tokenized security or synthetic exposure product with growing adoption, renewed buy volume could reverse the current downtrend, especially given the strong 24h participation (3,680 buyers) and the fact that hourly volume already dropped sharply after the initial sell-off, potentially signaling seller exhaustion.

  • Confirmation of contract verification and renounced authorities would materially de-risk the token
  • A reclaim of the $17.01 immediate resistance level could technically signal short-term reversal
  • Continued strong unique buyer counts despite the price drop could indicate underlying demand

Base Case

The token likely continues to exhibit high volatility within a broad range roughly between $15.50 and $19.00, driven by its thin liquidity and speculative trading activity, with a mild bearish tilt in the near term given current sell-side dominance, absent any new catalysts or authority confirmations.

  • Liquidity remains near current shallow levels ($28.49K) without significant new deposits or withdrawals
  • No new information emerges on contract verification or authority renouncement in the near term
  • Trading volume and volatility remain elevated relative to the token's small FDV

Bear Case

High probability

Given the unknown authority status, thin liquidity, and dominant sell volume, the token could continue to decline sharply or become subject to a rug-pull style event (mint inflation, freezing) if authorities are not actually renounced. The extreme volume-to-liquidity ratio also raises manipulation concerns.

  • Sell volume ($1.52M) exceeding buy volume ($1.06M) over 24h with the trend continuing in the most recent 1h and 5m windows
  • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
  • Extremely low liquidity ($28.49K) relative to volume makes large price swings and potential exit liquidity traps likely
  • No holder or sniper transparency data available to rule out concentrated ownership or coordinated dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 04:16 PM UTC

Data freshness

Price and analytics data reflect the most recent available snapshot as of 2026-09-17T16:00:00Z; OHLC data limited to two most recent hourly candles.

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
  • USD price feed and 24h/1h/5m price change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles) from Raydium CLMM pair
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Total liquidity figure ($28.49K)

Limitations

  • No holder data available — holder counts, growth trends, and concentration could not be assessed and were set to placeholder zero values per methodology
  • No sniper data available — sniper concentration, PnL state, and dump risk could not be assessed and were set to unknown/zero per methodology
  • Only two hourly OHLC candles provided, severely limiting technical trend and pattern analysis reliability
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified contract status, and mutability are all listed as unknown in metadata, preventing confirmation of rug-pull risk from authorities
  • No social links or description provided, limiting ability to verify the token's legitimacy or connection to any real-world entity referenced in its name

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data that may not reflect the full picture of the token's risk profile. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly in micro-cap and low-liquidity tokens, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Users should conduct their own independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for TeraWulf - Backpack Securities (WULF)?

Price has declined -7.87% over the past 24h and continues to show negative momentum in the 5m (-0.32%) and 1h (-0.65%) windows. The most recent hourly candle shows a lower high and lower low compared to the prior candle, with price closing near the candle's low, suggesting continued near-term weakness. Given sell volume (59%) exceeds buy volume (41%), downside pressure appears dominant. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48h), with a target range of $15.50 to $17.50.

Is WULF a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. The combination of unknown contract authorities, extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume, and complete absence of holder/whale/sniper transparency data makes this unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors. Any position sizing should be minimal and treated as high-risk speculation, not a core holding.

What does sniper activity look like for WULF?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding WULF?

Severe liquidity/volume mismatch ($28.49K liquidity vs ~$2.58M 24h volume) creates high slippage and manipulation potential • Unknown/unverified contract, mint authority, and freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanics • No holder or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing distribution and early-buyer dump risk

← Back to all predictions

Track WULF