Not in Labor Force Price Today & AI Analysis

NILFSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 20, 2026

$0.0₅2904

+9.58% 24h

Contract

Live

Dw6JXJC3EVCKN8MWu3G2ewCmRFkPCNnh5VCuz5qdpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

177

Market cap

$2,902

At a $1M market cap, $NILF would be $0.001001 (345x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is NILF a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 18

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.05%1 bundler still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about NILF

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

MUMUMumu the Bull$0.0₇6414+0.8%MC $149.4K

LFOWNLFOWN$0.001946-8.2%MC $25.1K

MARTIANSTheMarsSociety$0.0₄1971-3.0%MC $19.2K

JETPACKJETPACK$0.0₅3930+12.2%MC $3.8K

grokazongrokazon$0.0₅2219+2.0%MC $2.2K

EterniaEternia$0.000247+475.7%MC $240.9K

Not in Labor Force: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-20 21:47 UTC

Holder addresses

672

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$36,113.62

How concentrated is Not in Labor Force ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 672 addresses (2026-07-20 21:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Not in Labor Force?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Not in Labor Force liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-20 21:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $36,113.62. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-20 21:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 20, 09:47 PM UTC

FDV

$56,283

Liquidity

$36,113.62

Holders

672

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

NILF (Not in Labor Force) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~999.7M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$56.3K. The token exhibits extreme supply concentration — a single wallet holds 99.50% of all tokens — making it one of the most concentrated and highest-risk token structures observable on-chain. Trading activity surged dramatically within the last 24 hours, with holders jumping from 30 to 672 (+96%), but sell pressure dominates heavily at 74.9% of volume. The token is unverified, has no description, and its update authority is a non-renounced external wallet.

Key points

Extreme supply concentration: top holder controls 99.50% of all tokens
Explosive holder growth from 30 to 672 in under 24 hours (+96%)
Severe sell pressure: 74.9% of 24h volume is selling ($299.24K sells vs $100.14K buys)
Very low liquidity ($36.11K) relative to FDV ($56.28K) and trading volume ($399K+)
Token is unverified with no description and a non-renounced update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) shows a dramatic collapse from open $0.000153 to close $0.0000563 — a ~63% intra-candle drop — with the high at $0.000154 and low at $0.0000466. The prior candle (candle [2]) opened at $0.0000331, spiked to $0.000198, and closed at $0.000147, indicating a pump-and-dump pattern. Current price is near the recent low. With 74.9% sell pressure, dominant selling activity (5,023 sells vs 2,048 buys), and a single wallet holding 99.5% of supply, the short-term outlook is strongly bearish.

Target low

$0.000033 (recent candle low)

Target high

$0.000154 (recent candle high / resistance)

Support: $0.0000466 (candle [1] low), $0.0000323 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.000154 (candle [1] open / candle [2] high area), $0.000198 (candle [2] all-time high)

Medium term · 1–30 days

bearish

The token was dormant at 30 holders for the entire prior 30-day period before exploding to 672 holders in a single day. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated launch pump. With the dominant wallet holding 99.5% of supply, any distribution event would be catastrophic for price. Sustained recovery is unlikely without a fundamental change in supply distribution or renewed speculative interest.

Catalysts

Dominant wallet (99.5%) selling even a fraction of holdings would collapse price
Lack of verified contract or project description limits organic adoption
Continued sell pressure from early buyers taking profits
Potential renewed speculative pump if meme narrative gains traction

Bullish factors

Strong 24h price gain of +16.3% despite heavy sell pressure
Rapid holder growth from 30 to 672 (+96%) in 24 hours signals speculative interest
5-minute price change of +3.28% suggests very short-term buying momentum
Social links (Twitter, website) suggest some level of project promotion

Bearish factors

Single wallet holds 99.50% of total supply — extreme rug risk
74.9% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($299.24K sells vs $100.14K buys)
5,023 sells vs 2,048 buys in 24h — sellers outnumber buyers 2.5:1
1h price change of -33.6% indicates sharp recent decline
Total liquidity of only $36.11K is dangerously thin relative to volume
Token was dormant for 30+ days before sudden activity — suspicious launch pattern
Update authority not renounced; metadata is mutable risk vector
Unverified contract with no description

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly candles of OHLC data are available, no sniper data exists, and the token is extremely new (effectively launched within the last 24 hours based on holder data). The extreme supply concentration by a single wallet introduces unpredictable binary outcomes. Price prediction confidence is therefore low.

NILF call history

Full track record →

Jul 20bearish@ $0.0000563

24h-86.1%

7d-87.0%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: Dw6JXJ...pump
Total Supply: 999,661,784.24

Key Risks

CRITICAL: Single wallet holds 99.50% of supply — any sell event would collapse price
Extreme sell pressure: 74.9% of 24h volume is selling ($299.24K vs $100.14K buys)
Critically thin liquidity ($36.11K) relative to trading volume ($399K+)
Token was dormant for 30+ days before sudden launch — coordinated pump pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0000331, H=$0.000198, L=$0.0000323, C=$0.000147 — a massive bullish spike with a long upper wick, suggesting a pump with partial retracement. Candle [1] (21:00 UTC): O=$0.000153, H=$0.000154, L=$0.0000466, C=$0.0000563 — opened near the prior close, immediately rejected at $0.000154, then collapsed ~63% to close near the low. This is a classic 'pump and dump' two-candle pattern: spike followed by sharp reversal. The close of $0.0000563 is well below the open of $0.000153, forming a large bearish engulfing/red candle.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is clearly bearish based on the most recent candle's sharp decline from $0.000153 open to $0.0000563 close (-63%). Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given the token was dormant for 30 days prior to this single-day activity burst.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

25%

Sell

75%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000466 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000323 (candle [2] low — absolute recent floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000154 (candle [1] high / open area)

Major resistance

$0.000198 (candle [2] all-time high)

The token has established a clear range between $0.0000323 (candle [2] low) and $0.000198 (candle [2] high) within just 2 hours of trading data. Current price of $0.0000563 is near the lower end of this range. A break below $0.0000323 would signal further capitulation. Recovery above $0.000154 would require significant buying pressure to overcome.

Notable patterns

Pump-and-dump two-candle pattern: spike candle followed by bearish engulfing collapse
Long upper wick on candle [2] indicating strong rejection at $0.000198 high
Candle [1] closes near its low ($0.0000563 vs low of $0.0000466) — bearish close
Price opened candle [1] at the prior candle's close level, then immediately failed — no follow-through buying
Volume declining from candle [2] to candle [1] as pump momentum fades

Liquidity

$36,113.62

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $36.11K on PumpSwap (pair: 4uoE7zRs5R9U9ugGgatdqMBLKrHy3KUyM8uhLTxq8gyr). This represents only ~64% of the FDV ($56.28K) and less than 9% of the 24h trading volume ($399.38K total). Any moderately sized trade will cause significant slippage. The net flow is strongly negative: $299.24K in sells vs $100.14K in buys — a net outflow of ~$199.1K in 24 hours. Sellers outnumber buyers by 2.55:1 (1,680 sellers vs 660 buyers) and sell transactions outnumber buy transactions by 2.45:1 (5,023 vs 2,048). The 6h and 24h price change showing 0% in the analytics data (while 24h shows +16.3% elsewhere) may reflect data timing inconsistencies. Overall market health is poor: thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a single wallet holding 99.5% of supply creates extreme exit risk.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,661,784.24

FDV

$56,282.60

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price swung from $0.0000323 to $0.000198 and back to $0.0000563 within 2 hours — a range of ~513% peak-to-trough. The 1h price change of -33.6% confirms extreme volatility. With only $36.11K in liquidity, even small trades cause large price movements.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $36.11K is critically thin. 24h volume of $399K+ is 11x the available liquidity pool. High slippage on any meaningful position entry or exit. Exit liquidity for the dominant 99.5% wallet holder is effectively non-existent at current pool depth.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

CRITICAL: Single wallet holds 99.50% of supply — any sell event would collapse price
Extreme sell pressure: 74.9% of 24h volume is selling ($299.24K vs $100.14K buys)
Critically thin liquidity ($36.11K) relative to trading volume ($399K+)
Token was dormant for 30+ days before sudden launch — coordinated pump pattern
Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
Unverified contract with no project description
Price already collapsed 63% within a single hour after the pump peak
1h price change of -33.6% indicates active distribution in progress

Mitigating factors

Token metadata marked as mutable:false, limiting some authority risks
Social links (Twitter, website) suggest some level of project promotion effort
Rapid holder growth to 672 shows speculative demand exists
Token launched on PumpSwap with a verifiable on-chain pair address
24h price still up +16.3% despite heavy sell pressure

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. The extreme supply concentration (99.5% in one wallet), dominant sell pressure, thin liquidity, and pump-and-dump price pattern make this unsuitable for any investor seeking capital preservation. This is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely.

NILF presents an extremely high-risk speculative profile dominated by a single structural red flag: one wallet controls 99.50% of all tokens. The token experienced a classic pump-and-dump pattern within its first 2 hours of active trading, with price spiking to $0.000198 before collapsing 72% to $0.0000563. Sell pressure overwhelmingly dominates at 74.9% of volume. While rapid holder growth and social media presence suggest some speculative interest, the fundamental tokenomics make sustained value creation nearly impossible without a dramatic redistribution of supply.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The dominant wallet is a project treasury that gradually distributes tokens through a structured vesting or airdrop program, the meme narrative gains viral traction on social media, and renewed speculative buying pushes price back toward the $0.000154–$0.000198 resistance zone.

Viral meme narrative around 'Not in Labor Force' economic theme gaining social media traction
Dominant wallet commits to a transparent distribution schedule rather than dumping
Renewed retail FOMO buying driven by social media promotion
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all tokens

Base Case

Price continues to trade in a volatile range between $0.0000323 and $0.000154, with periodic pump attempts driven by social media activity, but overall trending lower as early holders distribute and the dominant wallet's overhang suppresses sustained recovery.

Dominant wallet does not immediately dump but creates ongoing price uncertainty
Speculative trading continues at reduced volume as initial excitement fades
Price stabilizes near current levels ($0.0000466–$0.0000563) in the near term
No major new catalyst emerges to drive sustained buying interest
Liquidity pool remains thin, keeping volatility high and exit options limited

Bear Case

High probability

The dominant wallet (99.5% of supply) begins selling into the thin $36.11K liquidity pool, price collapses to near zero, and the token becomes effectively worthless. This is the most likely outcome given the structural setup.

Dominant wallet sells even 1% of holdings (~9.9M tokens) into $36.11K liquidity pool
Continued sell pressure from the 1,680 unique sellers already active in 24h
Retail buyers who purchased near the $0.000198 high capitulate
No verified contract, no description, and non-renounced authority erode confidence
Token was dormant for 30+ days — no evidence of organic community development

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 20, 09:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-20 21:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Solana)
PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair: 4uoE7zRs5R9U9ugGgatdqMBLKrHy3KUyM8uhLTxq8gyr)
OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles available)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Holder metrics and distribution data (top 20 holders)
Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
Moralis on-chain data aggregation

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
No sniper data available — smart money signals are inferred from general analytics only
Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from provided metadata
Token is extremely new (effectively launched within last 24 hours) — limited price history
The 6h and 24h price change showing 0% in analytics may indicate data timing inconsistencies
Holder classifications are inferred from on-chain behavior, not verified identities
No project description or whitepaper available to assess fundamentals
Update authority wallet (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) not further identified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk of total loss. The extreme supply concentration, thin liquidity, and pump-and-dump price pattern identified in this token represent very high risk factors. Always conduct your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Not in Labor Force (NILF) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Not in Labor Force (NILF)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Not in Labor Force ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 672 addresses (2026-07-20 21:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Not in Labor Force?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Not in Labor Force liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-20 21:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $36,113.62. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Not in Labor Force (NILF)?

Is NILF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. The extreme supply concentration (99.5% in one wallet), dominant sell pressure, thin liquidity, and pump-and-dump price pattern make this unsuitable for any investor seeking capital preservation. This is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely.

What are the key risks of holding NILF?

CRITICAL: Single wallet holds 99.50% of supply — any sell event would collapse price • Extreme sell pressure: 74.9% of 24h volume is selling ($299.24K vs $100.14K buys) • Critically thin liquidity ($36.11K) relative to trading volume ($399K+)