SV151

Scarlet & Violet 151 Price Today & AI Analysis

SV151SolanaAnalysis as of Jun 4, 2026

Price

$0.3112

+3.19% 24h

Contract

Live
SV151D5pjygAKA8aJJcKzm4wFnRX5G92Fye94jQJk7g

Chain

Solana

Holders

7,137

Market cap

$311,064

At a $1M market cap, $SV151 would be $1 (3.21x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is SV151 a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 17

Verified

Marked legitimate after a manual review.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

4.8%1 bundler, 1,000 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about SV151

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Solana

RAWRRAWRJurassic$0.0293+14.3%MC $757.1KPUMPATARPUMPATARThe Pumpatar$0.041518+35.3%MC $14.7KRUNUPRUNUPRUNUP$0.000128-7.1%MC $94.8KSAMSAMSelf-Aware Meme$0.041827-14.2%MC $15.6KPENISPENISPeniscoin$0.000132-24.4%MC $132.0KEterniaEterniaEternia$0.000247+475.7%MC $240.9K

Scarlet & Violet 151: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-04 14:17 UTC

Holder addresses

2,475

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$466,470.10
How concentrated is Scarlet & Violet 151 ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 2,475 addresses (2026-06-04 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Scarlet & Violet 151?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Scarlet & Violet 151 liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-04 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $466,470.10. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-04 14:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 4, 02:17 PM UTC

FDV

$1,620,011

Liquidity

$466,470.10

Holders

2,475

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

SV151 (Scarlet & Violet 151) is a Solana-based token representing a reserve of SV151 Pokémon card packs custodied by BedrockFndn. With a total supply of 1,000,000 tokens and a current price of ~$1.62, the token has a fully diluted valuation of ~$2.05M. The token is experiencing an extraordinary 170.9% 24h price surge accompanied by a massive holder explosion from 85 to 2,475 in a single day — a pattern consistent with a viral launch event or coordinated promotion. The contract is mutable and not verified, and top holder data is unavailable, raising significant transparency concerns.

Key points

  • Real-world asset (RWA) backing concept — tokens represent custodied Pokémon SV151 card packs held by BedrockFndn
  • Explosive 170.9% 24h price gain on high trading volume ($3.7M combined)
  • Holder base grew 97% in 24h (from 85 to 2,475), suggesting viral momentum
  • Zero snipers detected in first 1,000 blocks — unusually clean launch
  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority introduces elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

After a 170.9% surge, the most recent 5-minute candle shows -12% retracement, signaling early profit-taking. The 13:00 UTC candle printed an enormous wick from $0.163 to $1.988 before closing at $1.477, indicating extreme volatility and potential exhaustion. Short-term price action is likely to be choppy with downside risk toward the $1.00–$1.20 range as new buyers face sell pressure from the 52.5% sell-side dominance.

Target low

$0.85

Target high

$1.99

Support

$1.41 (14:00 candle open), $1.00 (psychological round number), $0.60 (pre-pump baseline estimate)

Resistance

$1.55 (14:00 candle high), $1.99 (13:00 candle all-time high wick)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

Medium-term trajectory depends entirely on whether BedrockFndn delivers on the custodied pack redemption narrative and whether the holder base stabilizes. The token sat at 85 holders for 30 days before today's explosion — suggesting the underlying community was very small. Without sustained utility or redemption mechanics, price is likely to mean-revert significantly.

Catalysts

  • Successful demonstration of SV151 pack redemption/custody mechanism by BedrockFndn
  • Broader Pokémon card market momentum or viral social media coverage
  • Listing on additional DEXs or CEXs increasing liquidity depth
  • Continued holder growth sustaining buy pressure

Bullish factors

  • 170.9% 24h price appreciation with $3.7M in combined volume
  • 2,390 new holders acquired in 24h — strong viral momentum
  • Zero snipers detected, suggesting a relatively fair launch
  • RWA narrative (custodied Pokémon packs) provides a tangible value proposition
  • More unique buyers (3,238) than sellers (2,395) in 24h

Bearish factors

  • 52.5% sell pressure dominates buy pressure (47.5%) in 24h volume
  • 5-minute price already down -12% from recent peak
  • Contract is mutable with non-renounced update authority — rug risk present
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Token was dormant at 85 holders for 30 days before today — tiny original community
  • Liquidity of $466K is shallow relative to $2.05M FDV (22.7% ratio)
  • Unverified contract and 'possible spam: false' flag warrants caution

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, top holder data is missing, the contract is mutable, and the token has only been actively traded for ~24 hours. The extreme volatility (13:00 candle range: $0.163–$1.988) and data gaps make any price prediction highly speculative.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
SV151D...Jk7g
Total Supply
1,000,000 SV151

Key Risks

  • Mutable contract with active update authority — metadata can be changed at any time
  • Top holder concentration data unavailable — potential for hidden whale dumps
  • RWA custody claim (Pokémon packs) is unverified and unenforceable on-chain
  • Shallow liquidity ($466K) creates high slippage and exit risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. The 13:00 UTC candle (June 4, 2026) is the most significant: it opened at $0.197, surged to a high of $1.988, and closed at $1.477 on massive volume of $2.34M — a classic 'launch spike' candle with a long upper wick indicating sellers absorbed much of the move. The 14:00 UTC candle opened at $1.449, reached a high of $1.547, and closed at $1.547 on reduced volume of $571K — a bullish close but with dramatically lower volume, suggesting momentum is fading. The 5-minute data shows -12% from the 14:00 close, indicating early distribution.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically up given the 170.9% 24h gain, but the long upper wick on the launch candle and declining volume in the follow-up candle suggest the uptrend is fragile. Medium-term is classified as sideways given the 30-day dormancy at 85 holders prior to today's event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

48%

Sell

53%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$1.41 (14:00 candle open / prior close area)

Major support

$0.60 (estimated pre-pump baseline; no historical OHLC available beyond 2 candles)

Immediate resistance

$1.55 (14:00 candle high)

Major resistance

$1.99 (13:00 candle all-time high wick)

With only 2 candles of data, key levels are derived from the available OHLC. The $1.41 level represents the 14:00 open and acts as immediate support. The $1.99 wick high is the only identifiable major resistance. A break above $1.99 would be a new all-time high; a break below $1.41 opens the door to a deeper retracement toward the $1.00 psychological level.

Notable patterns

  • Launch spike candle (13:00): open $0.197 → high $1.988 → close $1.477 — long upper wick signals seller absorption at highs
  • Follow-through candle (14:00): bullish close at high ($1.547) but on 75.6% lower volume — volume divergence warning
  • 5-minute -12% retracement from 14:00 close — early distribution signal
  • No historical OHLC available beyond 2 hours — insufficient data for pattern confirmation

Liquidity

Liquidity

$466,470.10

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity of $466K on Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 (pair KKyUyWncRfakBZh2M318BFfdR6332WWu1NePd9amQtj) is shallow relative to the $2.05M FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~22.7%. This means large trades will cause significant price impact. The 24h sell volume ($1.94M) exceeds buy volume ($1.76M) by $180K, indicating a net outflow despite more unique buyers (3,238) than sellers (2,395). The discrepancy between buyer/seller counts and volume suggests sellers are transacting in larger average sizes ($810/sell) vs buyers ($544/buy) — a distribution pattern. The 17,890 sell transactions vs 14,042 buy transactions further confirms sell-side dominance. Slippage risk is HIGH for any position exceeding ~$10K–$20K given the shallow liquidity pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000 SV151

FDV

$2,050,000 (per trading analytics) / $1,620,011 (per metadata)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    170.9% 24h price gain with a single candle ranging from $0.163 to $1.988 (12x intracandle range). The 5-minute -12% drop confirms extreme short-term volatility. This token can lose 50%+ of its value in minutes.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of $466K against $2.05M FDV (22.7% ratio) on a single Meteora AMM pool. Large exits will cause severe price impact. No secondary liquidity venues identified.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Mutable contract with active update authority — metadata can be changed at any time
  • Top holder concentration data unavailable — potential for hidden whale dumps
  • RWA custody claim (Pokémon packs) is unverified and unenforceable on-chain
  • Shallow liquidity ($466K) creates high slippage and exit risk
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days before today's spike — original 85 holders may be distributing
  • Sell volume ($1.94M) exceeds buy volume ($1.76M) despite more buyers than sellers
  • Unverified contract increases smart contract risk
  • Extreme price volatility — 12x intracandle range in a single hour

Mitigating factors

  • Zero snipers in first 1,000 blocks — fair launch profile
  • More unique buyers (3,238) than sellers (2,395) suggests broad retail interest
  • Tangible RWA narrative provides a differentiated value proposition if custody is legitimate
  • Social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis) indicates some level of project infrastructure
  • Not flagged as possible spam by the data provider

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for high-risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, those without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi risks, or anyone investing more than a small speculative allocation. Due diligence on BedrockFndn's custody claims is essential before any investment.

SV151 is a high-risk, high-reward speculative play on the intersection of real-world asset tokenization and Pokémon card collectibles. The token represents custodied SV151 card packs held by BedrockFndn, but this claim is unverified on-chain. The token experienced a viral launch event on June 4, 2026, with 170.9% price gains and 2,390 new holders in 24 hours. The investment thesis hinges entirely on BedrockFndn's legitimacy and ability to deliver on the custody/redemption promise.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

BedrockFndn is a legitimate custodian with verifiable SV151 pack reserves. The token gains traction as a novel RWA collectibles instrument, attracting Pokémon card investors and crypto-native collectors. Holder growth continues, liquidity deepens, and the token trades at a premium to NAV as the market prices in scarcity and redemption optionality.

  • Verified proof of custody for SV151 packs by BedrockFndn
  • Redemption mechanism launch allowing token holders to claim physical packs
  • Continued viral social media momentum driving new holder acquisition
  • Broader RWA narrative tailwinds in the Solana ecosystem
  • Liquidity deepening through additional DEX listings or LP incentives

Base Case

The token stabilizes in the $0.80–$1.40 range after the initial pump cools. BedrockFndn maintains some community engagement but fails to deliver a fully functional redemption mechanism in the near term. The holder base plateaus around 3,000–5,000 as speculative interest fades. Price drifts lower over 30 days as early holders take profits.

  • BedrockFndn is a real project but faces execution challenges in delivering on-chain custody verification
  • Sell pressure from original 85 holders gradually absorbs new buyer demand
  • Liquidity remains shallow, limiting price discovery and institutional interest
  • No major catalysts (CEX listing, custody proof) materialize within 30 days

Bear Case

High probability

BedrockFndn fails to deliver verifiable custody proof, or the project is an outright scam. The original 85 holders (insiders) use the viral pump to distribute their holdings into retail demand. Price collapses back toward pre-pump levels ($0.10–$0.20) as momentum fades and sell pressure overwhelms thin liquidity.

  • Mutable contract allows rug pull via metadata manipulation or liquidity removal
  • Original 85 insider holders distributing into the pump
  • No on-chain verification of Pokémon pack custody
  • Shallow $466K liquidity cannot absorb large sell orders
  • Momentum-driven buyers exit quickly once price stalls

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 4, 02:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-04 14:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint: SV151D5pjygAKA8aJJcKzm4wFnRX5G92Fye94jQJk7g)
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 trading pair (KKyUyWncRfakBZh2M318BFfdR6332WWu1NePd9amQtj)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, June 4 2026 13:00–14:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • 30-day historical holder series (daily snapshots May 5 – June 3 2026)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Token metadata including update authority and mutability flags

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided
  • Sniper PnL and sell-through rate unknown due to zero snipers
  • RWA custody claim by BedrockFndn is unverifiable from on-chain data alone
  • The 0% top-10/top-100 concentration figures appear to be data artifacts
  • No historical price data beyond 24 hours available
  • 6h and 24h price change showing 0% in analytics may indicate a data reporting artifact

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. SV151 is an extremely high-risk speculative asset. The analyst has no position in SV151. Always conduct your own due diligence, verify BedrockFndn's custody claims independently, and never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Scarlet & Violet 151 (SV151) a scam?

Marked legitimate after a manual review. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Scarlet & Violet 151 (SV151)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 17, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Scarlet & Violet 151 ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 2,475 addresses (2026-06-04 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Scarlet & Violet 151?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Scarlet & Violet 151 liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-04 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $466,470.10. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Scarlet & Violet 151 (SV151)?

After a 170.9% surge, the most recent 5-minute candle shows -12% retracement, signaling early profit-taking. The 13:00 UTC candle printed an enormous wick from $0.163 to $1.988 before closing at $1.477, indicating extreme volatility and potential exhaustion. Short-term price action is likely to be choppy with downside risk toward the $1.00–$1.20 range as new buyers face sell pressure from the 52.5% sell-side dominance. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.85 to $1.99.

Is SV151 a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable ONLY for high-risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, those without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi risks, or anyone investing more than a small speculative allocation. Due diligence on BedrockFndn's custody claims is essential before any investment.

What are the key risks of holding SV151?

Mutable contract with active update authority — metadata can be changed at any time • Top holder concentration data unavailable — potential for hidden whale dumps • RWA custody claim (Pokémon packs) is unverified and unenforceable on-chain

New reports on Solana

All new tokens →

REXCOINREXCOINRex CoinNeutralPIPSPIPSPipsNeutralNormieNormieThe NormieNeutralHHellDonHell DonBearishMASSIVEMASSIVEMassive.ggNeutralFLUENCERFLUENCERfluencerBearishTSITSITetsuo Super IntelligenceNeutralALLOXALLOXAlloXNeutral

← Back to all predictions

Questions about SV151?