POKETCG

Pokemasters TCG Price Today & AI Analysis

POKETCGSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 8, 2026

Price

$0.053135

-0.31% 24h · FDV $3,130

Contract

Live
N9Curnf2ZQWBZWrjBkzP6xBe6n5WRhBhouRfiSqpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

169

Market cap

$3,130

More tokens on Solana

CHILLGPTCHILLGPTChill GPT$0.053095-0.9%MC $3.0KLaszloLaszloBitcoin Pizza Guy$0.052993+3.5%MC $3.0KClawdClawdClawd$0.041575+7.2%MC $12.9KEDWARDEDWARDThe Jeet Assassin$0.053174+17.5%MC $2.8Kmeowlmeowlmeowl$0.053054+9.6%MC $3.0KSTONKSTONKSTONK$0.3161-4.3%MC $260.36M

Pokemasters TCG: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-08 01:17 UTC

Holder addresses

331

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is Pokemasters TCG ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 331 addresses (2026-06-08 01:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Pokemasters TCG?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Pokemasters TCG liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-08 01:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about POKETCG

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 8, 01:17 AM UTC

FDV

$129,353

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

331

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Pokemasters TCG (POKETCG) is a very early-stage Solana meme/utility token launched on PumpSwap, describing itself as a fully working Pokemon TCG player with wagered matches and pump agent SDK booster pack purchases. The token has a ~$129K FDV, 331 total holders, and has experienced a dramatic 126% price surge in the past 24 hours. However, this pump is accompanied by extreme sell pressure (86.5% of 24h volume is sells), near-zero reported liquidity, and a holder base that was completely stagnant at 34 holders for over a month before exploding in the last 2 days. The token is unverified, the update authority is unknown, and on-chain signals point to a high-risk speculative asset.

Key points

  • Described as a functional Pokemon TCG game with wagered matches using the token
  • Launched on PumpSwap with pump agent SDK integration for booster pack purchases
  • Explosive 126% 24h price gain from a very low base (~$0.000065 to ~$0.000129)
  • Holder base grew from 34 (stagnant for ~30 days) to 331 in just 2 days — entirely new activity
  • Extreme sell-side dominance: 86.5% sell pressure, 1,295 sells vs 218 buys in 24h

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has pumped 126% in 24h and is currently sitting near its recent high of ~$0.0001337. With 86.5% sell pressure, 1,295 sells vs 218 buys, and near-zero reported liquidity, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp retracement. The most recent candle (candle [1]) shows price closing at the high ($0.0001294), suggesting short-term momentum, but the overwhelming sell volume makes a sustained move higher unlikely without a significant influx of new buyers.

Target low

$0.000065

Target high

$0.000134

Support

$0.000068 (candle [3] close / recent consolidation floor), $0.000050 (candle [6] range), $0.000044 (candle [5] low — recent swing low)

Resistance

$0.000134 (candle [2] high — recent peak), $0.000093 (candle [5] high — intermediate resistance), $0.000087 (candle [4] high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Given the token's extremely thin liquidity, unverified contract, unknown update authority, and the fact that the holder base was dormant for ~30 days before this pump, medium-term prospects are highly uncertain. Sustained price appreciation would require genuine product traction (working TCG game, active wagering), continued new buyer inflow, and improved liquidity depth. Without these, the token is likely to retrace toward pre-pump levels.

Catalysts

  • Launch or demonstration of a working Pokemon TCG game with real wagered matches
  • Listing on a higher-liquidity DEX or CEX
  • Viral social media traction driving new holder acquisition
  • Pump agent SDK integration generating organic buy pressure from booster pack purchases

Bullish factors

  • 126% 24h price gain with upward momentum in the most recent hourly candles
  • Holder count grew 90% in 7 days (from 34 to 331), showing rapid new interest
  • Unique concept combining Pokemon TCG gameplay with on-chain wagering
  • Social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis) suggests some level of project development
  • Price making higher highs in the last 2 candles ($0.000127 → $0.000129)

Bearish factors

  • 86.5% sell pressure — 1,295 sells vs only 218 buys in 24h
  • Total reported liquidity is $0.00, making large trades extremely high slippage risk
  • Contract is unverified and update authority is unknown — rug risk cannot be ruled out
  • Holder base was completely stagnant at 34 for ~30 days before this pump — suspicious dormancy
  • Top 10 holders control 37.58% of supply; top 100 control 91.36% — extreme concentration
  • FDV of only ~$129K with no confirmed working product

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) near-zero reported on-chain liquidity making price discovery unreliable, (2) the token is only 2 days into active trading after a month of dormancy, (3) no sniper data is available, (4) the contract is unverified with unknown update authority, and (5) extreme sell-side dominance suggests the pump may be driven by a small number of actors.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
N9Curn...pump
Total Supply
999,720,350.97

Key Risks

  • Near-zero reported liquidity ($0.00) — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority status
  • 86.5% sell pressure in 24h — clear distribution by early holders
  • Token was dormant at 34 holders for 26+ days — suspicious pre-pump accumulation pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Reviewing the 7 most recent hourly candles (oldest to newest): Candle [7] (19:00) was a wide-range bearish candle — opened at $0.0000604, reached a high of $0.0000812, but closed at $0.0000484, indicating strong selling into the spike. Candle [6] (20:00) was a small bullish candle with a tight range ($0.0000493–$0.0000501), suggesting consolidation. Candle [5] (21:00) was a volatile candle — low of $0.0000444, high of $0.0000931, closing at $0.0000755 — a strong bullish recovery with a long lower wick. Candle [4] (22:00) opened at $0.0000755, reached $0.0000867, but closed at $0.0000667 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Candle [3] (23:00) was a tight bearish candle, open and high both at $0.0000682, closing at $0.0000680 — a near-doji with no upside. Candle [2] (00:00) was the breakout candle — opened at $0.0000698, surged to a high of $0.0001337 (the session high), and closed at $0.0001266 — a strong bullish engulfing with massive volume ($30,178). Candle [1] (01:00) continued higher, opening at $0.0001256 and closing at the high of $0.0001294 with lower volume ($4,310) — a small bullish continuation. Overall pattern: sharp V-shaped recovery from $0.0000444 lows, followed by a breakout candle making a new high, with the most recent candle holding near the top. The high volume on candle [2] vs low volume on candle [1] suggests momentum may be fading.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is bullish following the breakout candle at 00:00 UTC, with price making higher highs ($0.0001337 peak) and holding above $0.0001256. Medium-term trend is sideways/uncertain given the prior month of dormancy and the volatile, low-liquidity price action.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

14%

Sell

87%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000126 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open)

Major support

$0.000044 (candle [5] absolute low — recent swing low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000134 (candle [2] high — session high)

Major resistance

$0.000093 (candle [5] high — intermediate level from prior session)

The immediate support at $0.000126 is the candle [1] open and candle [2] close — a break below this would signal the breakout is failing. Major support sits at $0.000044, the recent swing low. Immediate resistance is the session high of $0.000134 from candle [2]. A clean break above $0.000134 on strong volume would be bullish; failure to hold $0.000126 would likely see a retest of $0.000068–$0.000050.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish shooting star / inverted hammer in candle [7] — selling into the spike
  • Bullish hammer in candle [5] — long lower wick recovery from $0.0000444 low
  • Bearish shooting star in candle [4] — rejection at $0.0000867
  • Strong bullish engulfing breakout candle in candle [2] with high volume ($30,178)
  • Declining volume on continuation (candle [1] vs candle [2]) — potential momentum exhaustion
  • Higher highs and higher lows in candles [5] through [1] — short-term uptrend structure

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,720,350.97

FDV

$129,353

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price surged 126% in 24h from a dormant base. The token has demonstrated extreme intraday volatility — swinging from $0.0000444 to $0.0001337 within hours. With near-zero liquidity, even small trades can cause massive price swings in either direction.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Near-zero reported liquidity ($0.00) — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority status
  • 86.5% sell pressure in 24h — clear distribution by early holders
  • Token was dormant at 34 holders for 26+ days — suspicious pre-pump accumulation pattern
  • Top 100 holders control 91.36% of supply — extreme concentration
  • FDV of only ~$129K — easily manipulated by small actors
  • No confirmed working product — Pokemon TCG game utility is unverified on-chain
  • Pokemon IP usage may create legal/IP risk for the project

Mitigating factors

  • Token launched via pump.fun standard contract — some baseline standardization
  • 'Mutable: false' metadata flag reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • Rapid holder growth (34 → 331 in 2 days) shows genuine new interest
  • Social presence (Twitter, website) suggests some level of active development
  • Unique concept (Pokemon TCG + on-chain wagering) has narrative appeal in crypto gaming space
  • Price is making higher highs in the most recent candles, suggesting short-term momentum

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with high-risk micro-cap Solana tokens. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). This is NOT financial advice.

POKETCG is an extremely high-risk, early-stage Solana token that has experienced a sharp pump after 26+ days of dormancy. The bull case rests on the novelty of its Pokemon TCG gaming concept and rapid holder acquisition. The bear case is supported by overwhelming sell pressure, near-zero liquidity, unknown authority status, and a suspicious pre-pump accumulation pattern. The base case is a retracement from current levels as early holders continue to distribute.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The project delivers a genuinely functional Pokemon TCG game with on-chain wagered matches, attracting a gaming community. Viral social media traction drives continued holder growth beyond 1,000+, liquidity deepens on PumpSwap, and the token becomes a recognized gaming token in the Solana ecosystem. Price could 5–10x from current levels if FDV grows toward $500K–$1M.

  • Delivery of working Pokemon TCG game with real wagered matches
  • Viral social media campaign driving mass holder acquisition
  • Deepening liquidity on PumpSwap or listing on additional DEXs
  • Pump agent SDK integration generating organic recurring buy pressure
  • Broader Solana gaming narrative tailwind

Base Case

The token retraces 40–60% from current highs as sell pressure overwhelms new buyers, settling in the $0.000050–$0.000080 range. Holder count stabilizes around 400–600 as initial excitement fades. The project continues development but struggles to gain traction without a major catalyst. Price remains highly volatile with low liquidity.

  • Sell pressure gradually normalizes but remains sell-side dominant
  • Holder growth slows significantly after the initial pump excitement
  • No major product launch or viral event in the near term
  • Liquidity remains thin, keeping slippage risk high
  • Early holders continue to take partial profits at elevated prices

Bear Case

High probability

Early holders (the original 34 who accumulated during 26 days of dormancy) continue to distribute into the pump. Liquidity remains near zero, new buyer interest fades, and the price retraces 70–90% from current highs back toward $0.000040–$0.000065. The project fails to deliver a working product, and the token becomes dormant again.

  • Continued 86.5% sell pressure from early holders distributing
  • Near-zero liquidity amplifying downside moves
  • No verifiable working product to sustain buyer interest
  • Unknown authority status creating rug risk overhang
  • Small FDV ($129K) making the token easy to manipulate downward

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 8, 01:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-08 01:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain token metadata (mint: N9Curnf2ZQWBZWrjBkzP6xBe6n5WRhBhouRfiSqpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (74P4ay5xozZdETrBygZ8jugM3bDMbNb5c2eR6kMSz6Xa)
  • Moralis token analytics API
  • Hourly OHLC price data (7 candles)
  • Holder distribution and historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)

Limitations

  • No sniper data available — early buyer PnL and concentration cannot be precisely assessed
  • Reported total liquidity is $0.00 — actual liquidity depth on PumpSwap cannot be verified from this data
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — rug risk cannot be fully quantified
  • Contract is unverified — smart contract code has not been audited
  • Only 7 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Historical holder data shows only 30 days but the token appears to have been launched before May 9 with no activity
  • No order book depth data available
  • Pokemon IP usage legality is not assessable from on-chain data alone

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Pokemasters TCG ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 331 addresses (2026-06-08 01:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Pokemasters TCG?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Pokemasters TCG liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pokemasters TCG (POKETCG)?

The token has pumped 126% in 24h and is currently sitting near its recent high of ~$0.0001337. With 86.5% sell pressure, 1,295 sells vs 218 buys, and near-zero reported liquidity, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp retracement. The most recent candle (candle [1]) shows price closing at the high ($0.0001294), suggesting short-term momentum, but the overwhelming sell volume makes a sustained move higher unlikely without a significant influx of new buyers. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000065 to $0.000134.

Is POKETCG a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with high-risk micro-cap Solana tokens. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). This is NOT financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding POKETCG?

Near-zero reported liquidity ($0.00) — extreme slippage and exit risk • Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority status • 86.5% sell pressure in 24h — clear distribution by early holders

← Back to all predictions

Track POKETCG