bullishsol

mysteriously bullish sol Price Today & AI Analysis

bullishsol
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 10, 2026

J7DBGxjJnp67it4TubeMMBZGus4LUhBbnNA3GCDgpump

$0.051864

FDV $1,863

LiveContract:J7DBGxjJnp67it4TubeMMBZGus4LUhBbnNA3GCDgpumpChain:SolanaHolders:117Market cap:$1,863

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about bullishsol

Report snapshotas of Jul 10, 07:17 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$58,967

Holders

816

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

bullishsol (J7DBGxjJnp67it4TubeMMBZGus4LUhBbnNA3GCDgpump) is an extremely anomalous Solana token with a total supply of only 1 token and a formatted FDV of $0.00 (analytics show $277.67K). The token sat dormant at 12 holders for 30 days before an explosive single-day spike to 816 holders (+804 in 24h), accompanied by a 91.4% price surge. However, 93.3% of 24h volume is sell-side ($240.24K sells vs $17.12K buys), liquidity is razor-thin at $58.97K, and the token is unverified with mutable metadata and unknown update authority. The supply concentration data shows 0% for top 10 and top 100, which is inconsistent and likely a data artifact given the total supply of 1. Multiple red flags suggest this is a high-risk, potentially manipulated or experimental token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of 1 token — extreme rarity or data anomaly
804 new holders acquired in a single day after 30 days of complete stagnation at 12 holders
93.3% sell pressure ($240.24K sells vs $17.12K buys) despite a 91.4% 24h price gain — highly contradictory
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk present
Unverified contract, no top holder data available, and zero supply concentration data — severe data gaps

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just posted a 91.4% 24h gain but is already showing reversal signals: the most recent 5-minute change is -6.39%, sell pressure is 93.3% of volume, and liquidity is only $58.97K. The candle at 19:00 UTC opened at $0.000245, reached a high of $0.000321, and closed at $0.000275 — a bearish upper wick suggesting rejection at highs. With 1,849 sell transactions vs 269 buys, downward pressure is dominant.

Target low$0.000035
Target high$0.000321
Support: $0.000222 (hourly candle low, 19:00 UTC), $0.000035 (prior open/base, 18:00 UTC candle open)
Resistance: $0.000275 (current price / recent close), $0.000321 (hourly high, 19:00 UTC candle)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Given the extreme sell-side dominance, thin liquidity ($58.97K), mutable/unverified contract, and the sudden suspicious spike in holders after 30 days of dormancy, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Without sustained buy-side demand or a credible catalyst, the price is likely to retrace toward pre-spike levels near $0.000035.

Catalysts
  • Any further sell-off by early holders could collapse price given shallow liquidity
  • Mutable metadata change or authority action could trigger panic selling
  • Absence of verified contract or credible project fundamentals limits organic demand

Bullish factors

  • 91.4% price gain in 24h demonstrates short-term momentum
  • 804 new holders acquired in a single day shows rapid community growth (though origin is unclear)
  • Price held above the 18:00 UTC candle open ($0.000035) and closed higher at $0.000275

Bearish factors

  • 93.3% of 24h volume is sell-side ($240.24K sells vs $17.12K buys)
  • 1,849 sell transactions vs only 269 buy transactions in 24h
  • 5-minute price change already -6.39% indicating immediate reversal
  • Total liquidity only $58.97K — any moderate sell order causes severe slippage
  • 30 days of complete dormancy at 12 holders before sudden spike is highly suspicious
  • Mutable metadata and unknown update authority — rug risk
  • Unverified contract, no top holder transparency
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severe data gaps: no top holder data, no sniper data, zero supply concentration metrics, a total supply of 1 (likely a data anomaly), and only 2 hourly OHLC candles available. The contradictory signals (price up 91% yet 93% sell pressure) make directional prediction unreliable.

bullishsol call history

Full track record →
Jul 10bearish
24h-99.1%
7d-99.4%
30d-99.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (18:00 UTC): O=$0.0000352, H=$0.000261, L=$0.0000352, C=$0.000246 — a massive bullish candle with a 641% range from open to high, closing near the top. Candle 2 (19:00 UTC): O=$0.000245, H=$0.000321, L=$0.000223, C=$0.000275 — a bearish candle with a significant upper wick (high $0.000321, close $0.000275), indicating rejection at the top. The sequence shows a violent pump followed by early signs of distribution.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 7%Sell 93%

Short-term trend is technically up given the 91.4% 24h gain, but the most recent candle shows a bearish upper wick and a -6.39% 5-minute move. Medium-term is sideways/unknown given 30 days of dormancy prior to this single-day event. Insufficient candle history to establish a reliable medium-term trend.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000222 (19:00 UTC candle low)
Major$0.000035 (18:00 UTC candle open — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000275 (current price / 19:00 UTC close)
Major$0.000321 (19:00 UTC candle high — intraday peak)

The pre-pump base of $0.000035 represents the major support level and likely the 'fair value' before the spike. The 19:00 UTC candle low of $0.000222 is the nearest support. Resistance sits at the recent close of $0.000275 and the intraday high of $0.000321. A break below $0.000222 would signal accelerating distribution toward the $0.000035 base.

Notable patterns

  • Massive bullish engulfing candle at 18:00 UTC (open = low, close near high) — classic pump initiation pattern
  • Bearish upper wick on 19:00 UTC candle — rejection at highs, early distribution signal
  • Volume declining on second candle despite elevated price — bearish volume divergence
  • 30-day dormancy followed by single-day explosion — classic pump-and-dump setup pattern
  • Price up 91.4% yet 93.3% sell pressure — contradictory signal suggesting coordinated pump with immediate exit

Total holders816
24h Δ+804
7d Δ+804
30d Δ+804
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at 12 for the entire 30-day historical period (June 10 – July 9, 2026), then exploded by +804 holders (+6,700%) in a single day coinciding with the 91.4% price spike. This is a near-perfect correlation between the price pump and holder acquisition, suggesting the holder growth is driven entirely by the price event rather than organic adoption.

Historical holder data shows absolute stagnation at 12 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change. On July 10, 2026, holders surged from 12 to 816 (+804, +6,700%) in a single day. All 815 of the new holders acquired via swap (only 1 via transfer). This pattern is highly anomalous — it suggests either a coordinated airdrop/distribution event, a bot-driven holder inflation, or a genuine viral pump. The acquisition method (815 swaps) indicates these are real on-chain swap transactions, but the sudden nature after 30 days of dormancy is a major red flag.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

No top holder data available

Data unavailable — top holders endpoint returned no results

0.00%

No top holder data is available for this token. The supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is inconsistent with a token that has 816 holders and a total supply of 1. This is almost certainly a data artifact or API limitation rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. The total supply of 1 (with 0 decimals) is itself anomalous — it may indicate this is a non-fungible or semi-fungible token rather than a standard fungible token, which would explain the unusual concentration metrics. Without top holder data, whale sentiment cannot be reliably assessed. Given the 93.3% sell pressure and 788 unique sellers, distribution behavior is inferred.

Liquidity$58,970
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$17,120
Sell$240,240
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers76
Unique sellers788

Liquidity is critically shallow at $58.97K on a single PumpSwap pair (46tf5VLq3eaart8se1iym7kHhQm4ByXFiFGSpq4qYzGu). The FDV of $277.67K is nearly 5x the available liquidity, meaning any significant sell order will cause severe price impact. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $240.24K in sells vs $17.12K in buys — a 14:1 sell-to-buy ratio. There are 788 unique sellers vs only 76 unique buyers, and 1,849 sell transactions vs 269 buy transactions. Despite this overwhelming sell pressure, the price is up 91.4% in 24h, which is contradictory and suggests the price spike occurred in a very short window (likely the 18:00 UTC candle) before distribution began. Market health is poor — shallow liquidity, extreme sell dominance, and high slippage risk make this a dangerous trading environment.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1
FDV$277,670 (per analytics; metadata shows $0.00)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of 1 with 0 decimals, which is highly unusual for a fungible token and may indicate this is a non-standard or experimental token structure. The metadata is mutable (Mutable: true) and the update authority is listed as 'unknown' — this means the creator retains the ability to modify token metadata, which is a significant rug risk vector. The contract is unverified (Verified contract: false). Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The FDV discrepancy ($0.00 in metadata vs $277.67K in analytics) further suggests data inconsistencies. The combination of mutable metadata, unknown authority, unverified contract, and anomalous supply structure places this token in the high rug-risk category.

Volatility
high

91.4% price gain in 24h followed by -6.39% in 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles available, showing a 641% intracandle range. Extreme volatility with thin liquidity amplifies price swings in both directions.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $58.97K on a single PumpSwap pair. FDV is ~4.7x liquidity. Any moderate sell order will cause severe slippage. 93.3% of 24h volume is already sell-side.

Concentration
high

No top holder data available. Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous. Supply concentration shows 0% for top 10/100 which is a data artifact. The original 12 holders from the 30-day dormancy period are likely highly concentrated and appear to be distributing.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the trading pattern (30 days dormancy → sudden pump → 93.3% sell pressure from 788 unique sellers) is consistent with coordinated early-holder distribution. The 14:1 sell-to-buy volume ratio indicates active dumping.

Authority
high

Metadata is mutable (Mutable: true), update authority is unknown, contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The creator retains ability to modify token metadata, posing a rug risk.

Key risks

  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — creator can modify token properties
  • Unverified contract with no transparency on mint/freeze authorities
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — anomalous structure, possible data artifact or non-standard token
  • 93.3% sell pressure ($240.24K) vs 6.7% buy pressure ($17.12K) — active distribution event
  • Only $58.97K liquidity — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful position
  • 30 days of dormancy at 12 holders followed by sudden 804-holder spike — highly suspicious pattern
  • No top holder data available — cannot assess concentration or whale behavior
  • Price up 91.4% yet overwhelmingly sell-dominated — contradictory signals suggest coordinated pump-and-dump
  • Single trading pair on PumpSwap — no diversified liquidity

Mitigating factors

  • Token is flagged as 'Possible spam: false' by the data provider
  • 815 of 816 holders acquired via swap (not airdrop) — suggests some genuine market participation
  • Price has held above the pre-pump base ($0.000035) so far
  • Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) exist, suggesting some project presence
Suitable for: This token is NOT suitable for most investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline should consider any exposure. The combination of very_high overall risk, active distribution signals, shallow liquidity, mutable/unverified contract, and anomalous token structure makes this extremely dangerous. Any position should be considered speculative gambling rather than investment.

bullishsol presents an extremely high-risk profile with multiple simultaneous red flags: a 30-day dormant token that suddenly pumped 91.4% while experiencing 93.3% sell pressure, razor-thin $58.97K liquidity, mutable unverified contract, anomalous total supply of 1, and no top holder transparency. The contradictory signals (price up yet overwhelmingly sell-dominated) are consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump. There is no identifiable fundamental value proposition beyond speculative momentum.

Bull case (low)

The price spike represents genuine viral discovery of a novel token structure. The 804 new holders represent real community formation, and buy pressure stabilizes as sellers are absorbed. The token finds a new equilibrium above $0.000200.

  • Sustained new buyer inflow exceeding current sell pressure
  • Credible project announcement or utility reveal via social channels
  • Liquidity deepening through additional LP provision
  • Broader Solana memecoin market momentum

Base case

Sell pressure gradually overwhelms the thin liquidity, price retraces 60–80% from current levels toward $0.000055–$0.000110. A small residual holder base remains but trading activity drops sharply. Token enters another dormancy period.

  • No new major catalyst or viral event emerges
  • Current sell pressure (93.3%) persists for the next 24–48 hours
  • Liquidity remains at ~$58.97K without significant LP additions
  • The original early holders continue gradual distribution

Bear case (high)

The original 12 dormant holders continue distributing into retail buyers. Liquidity is drained, price collapses back toward the pre-pump base of $0.000035 or lower. Mutable metadata is exploited for a rug pull.

  • 93.3% sell pressure continues or accelerates
  • Only $58.97K liquidity cannot absorb ongoing distribution
  • No fundamental value or utility to sustain demand
  • Mutable metadata authority acts maliciously
  • Retail buyers exhaust — 76 unique buyers vs 788 sellers is unsustainable

GeneratedJul 10, 07:17 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-07-10T19:00 UTC. OHLC data covers only 2 hourly candles (18:00–19:00 UTC). Historical holder data covers June 10 – July 9, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis token metadata API (mint, supply, decimals, mutability, authority)
  • Price feed (USD spot price, 24h change)
  • OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles available)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics (total holders, acquisition method, distribution tiers)
  • Historical holder series (30-day daily snapshots)
  • Top holders endpoint (returned no data)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • PumpSwap pair data (liquidity, pair address)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top holder data returned — cannot assess whale concentration or behavior
  • No sniper data available — early buyer PnL and concentration unknown
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous — may indicate data error or non-standard token type
  • Supply concentration showing 0% for top 10/100 is inconsistent and likely a data artifact
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm if authorities are renounced
  • FDV discrepancy ($0.00 in metadata vs $277.67K in analytics) suggests data inconsistency
  • Price % change showing 0% for 1h/6h/24h in analytics contradicts the 91.4% 24h change from price feed — possible data lag
  • No order book depth data available to assess slippage precisely

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. The token analyzed exhibits multiple very high-risk characteristics. Past price performance does not guarantee future results. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in micro-cap and unverified tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1

Key Risks

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — creator can modify token properties
Unverified contract with no transparency on mint/freeze authorities
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — anomalous structure, possible data artifact or non-standard token
93.3% sell pressure ($240.24K) vs 6.7% buy pressure ($17.12K) — active distribution event

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals must be inferred from trading analytics alone. The 24h data shows 788 unique sellers vs 76 unique buyers, with sell volume ($240.24K) dwarfing buy volume ($17.12K) by a ratio of ~14:1. This strongly suggests that early holders (possibly the original 12 holders from the dormancy period) are aggressively distributing into the pump-driven retail buying. The pattern of 30 days dormancy → sudden price spike → overwhelming sell pressure is a textbook distribution event.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Early holders (the 12 wallets present during 30 days of dormancy) appear to be distributing aggressively. The 93.3% sell pressure and 788 unique sellers vs 76 buyers strongly implies early participants are exiting into new retail demand.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for mysteriously bullish sol (bullishsol)?

The token just posted a 91.4% 24h gain but is already showing reversal signals: the most recent 5-minute change is -6.39%, sell pressure is 93.3% of volume, and liquidity is only $58.97K. The candle at 19:00 UTC opened at $0.000245, reached a high of $0.000321, and closed at $0.000275 — a bearish upper wick suggesting rejection at highs. With 1,849 sell transactions vs 269 buys, downward pressure is dominant. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000035 to $0.000321.

Is bullishsol a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is NOT suitable for most investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline should consider any exposure. The combination of very_high overall risk, active distribution signals, shallow liquidity, mutable/unverified contract, and anomalous token structure makes this extremely dangerous. Any position should be considered speculative gambling rather than investment.

How are bullishsol holders trending?

mysteriously bullish sol currently has 816 holders and is growing (24h: 804, 7d: 804, 30d: 804). Historical holder data shows absolute stagnation at 12 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change. On July 10, 2026, holders surged from 12 to 816 (+804, +6,700%) in a single day. All 815 of the new holders acquired via swap (only 1 via transfer). This pattern is highly anomalous — it suggests either a coordinated airdrop/distribution event, a bot-driven holder inflation, or a genuine viral pump. The acquisition method (815 swaps) indicates these are real on-chain swap transactions, but the sudden nature after 30 days of dormancy is a major red flag.

What does sniper activity look like for bullishsol?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding bullishsol?

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — creator can modify token properties • Unverified contract with no transparency on mint/freeze authorities • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — anomalous structure, possible data artifact or non-standard token

Track bullishsol