How concentrated is ReeveLabs ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 308 holder addresses (2026-06-02 03:47 UTC).

Are large holders selling ReeveLabs?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is ReeveLabs liquidity falling?

Not measured: this report has no liquidity reading.

ReeveLabs Price Today & AI Analysis

$ReeveSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 2, 2026

$0.0₅2807

Contract

Live

HrkKpjDdgMGCA16LsgkK2a4kQYznv8Sjx5LM5Ad3pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

199

Market cap

$2,783

At a $1M market cap, $$REEVE would be $0.001009 (359x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

$Reeve support and resistance today

From 1-hour candles

$Reeve trades at $0.000002807 as of Nov 8, 04:53 UTC, +0.0% in 24 hours. No trade has moved the price in 15 days, so there is no fresh support or resistance to mark.

Is $Reeve a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 6

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.21%3 bundlers, 3 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about $Reeve

3 free answers a day

ReeveLabs: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-02 03:47 UTC

Holder addresses

308

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available

How concentrated is ReeveLabs ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 308 holder addresses (2026-06-02 03:47 UTC).
Are large holders selling ReeveLabs?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is ReeveLabs liquidity falling?: Not measured: this report has no liquidity reading.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-02 03:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 2, 03:47 AM UTC

FDV

$73,953

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

308

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

ReeveLabs ($Reeve) is a newly launched Solana memecoin/AI-agent narrative token (mint: HrkKpjDdgMGCA16LsgkK2a4kQYznv8Sjx5LM5Ad3pump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$73,953. The token launched on PumpSwap and experienced a dramatic 136% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from ~$0.0000312 to ~$0.0000740. However, the token is extremely early-stage: it had only 9 holders for the entire month of May 2026, exploding to 308 holders in the last 24 hours. Sell pressure dominates at 65% of 24h volume, liquidity is reported at $0, and concentration is high with the top 10 holding 39.27% of supply. The project describes AI agents that trade and place prediction markets autonomously, with profitable agents able to 'reproduce and create family trees' — a novel but unverified narrative.

Key points

Explosive 136% 24h price pump on extremely low FDV (~$73.9K), suggesting early speculative momentum
AI agent + prediction market narrative with a unique 'agent reproduction/family tree' concept
Token launched on PumpSwap (pump.fun ecosystem) with 'pump' suffix in mint address
Holder base grew from 9 to 308 in a single day — entirely new community
Mutable metadata is false, reducing one vector of rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

After a 136% spike, the most recent candle (candle [1]) shows a significant upper wick from H:$0.0001076 down to C:$0.0000740, indicating strong rejection at the high. Sell pressure is 65% of 24h volume ($99.3K sells vs $53.5K buys), and holders dropped 12 in the last hour (-3.9%). The token is likely to retrace toward the $0.0000400–$0.0000580 range in the near term unless fresh buying emerges.

Target low

$0.0000240

Target high

$0.0001076

Support: $0.0000580 (candle [1] low area / prior close zone), $0.0000386 (candle [2]–[3] open/close cluster), $0.0000240 (candle [5] low — major support)
Resistance: $0.0000740 (current price / candle [1] close), $0.0001076 (candle [1] all-time high wick), $0.0001200 (psychological round number above ATH)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

Medium-term trajectory depends entirely on whether the AI-agent narrative gains traction and whether the project delivers any working product. The token has no liquidity depth, a tiny holder base, and no verified contract. If the team executes and community grows, a re-test of the $0.0001076 high is plausible. Without catalysts, the token risks fading back toward launch prices or lower.

Catalysts

Product demo or working AI agent deployment
Influencer or KOL promotion on Twitter/X
Listing on a DEX aggregator or broader Solana ecosystem visibility
Broader Solana memecoin/AI narrative market cycle

Bullish factors

136% 24h price surge demonstrates strong initial speculative demand
Holder count grew +299 (97%) in 24 hours — rapid community formation
AI agent + prediction market narrative is currently in vogue
Mutable=false reduces metadata manipulation risk
Token launched via PumpSwap with social links (Twitter, website) suggesting some project infrastructure

Bearish factors

Sell pressure dominates at 65% of 24h volume ($99.3K sells vs $53.5K buys)
Reported total liquidity is $0.00 — extreme slippage and exit risk
Top 10 holders control 39.27%, top 100 control 92.66% of supply
Holder count dropped 12 in the last hour (-3.9%) after the pump
Token had only 9 holders for the entire month of May 2026 — very pre-launch stealth period
No verified contract; update authority unknown
20 snipers present from launch; majority of snipers by dollar volume are at a loss, suggesting early buyers are selling into the pump
FDV of only ~$73.9K means even small sells can move price significantly

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token being less than 48 hours old with only 308 holders, $0 reported liquidity, missing sniper USD amounts, and highly volatile price action. The 24h price change data from the analytics section shows 0% across all timeframes (conflicting with the 136% figure from the price section), suggesting data inconsistencies. Predictions are based on limited OHLC data (5 hourly candles) and on-chain metrics only.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: HrkKpj...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 (1 billion tokens)

Key Risks

$0 reported liquidity — inability to exit positions without extreme slippage
Top 100 holders control 92.66% of supply — extreme concentration and dump risk
Token was dormant with 9 holders for 29 days before launch — suggests coordinated insider pre-positioning
Sell pressure at 65% of 24h volume with 2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Five hourly candles are available (2026-06-01T23:00 through 2026-06-02T03:00 UTC). The sequence shows a clear upward impulse: candle [5] (23:00) opened at $0.0000324 and closed at $0.0000277 (bearish), candle [4] (00:00) opened at $0.0000283 and closed at $0.0000403 (strong bullish engulfing, +42.6%), candle [3] (01:00) was a doji/inside bar (O=C=$0.0000407/$0.0000386, tight range), candle [2] (02:00) was a small bullish candle (O:$0.0000384, C:$0.0000407), and candle [1] (03:00) was a high-volatility candle with a massive upper wick (H:$0.0001076, C:$0.0000740) — a classic 'shooting star' or 'inverted hammer' pattern suggesting a pump-and-partial-rejection. Volume peaked in candle [4] ($44,054) and candle [2] ($30,611), then dropped sharply in candle [1] ($12,499), indicating declining volume on the price spike — a bearish divergence.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 136% 24h move and series of higher lows from candle [5] to candle [1]. However, the shooting star candle at the top with declining volume and dominant sell pressure suggests the uptrend is exhausted in the very near term. Medium-term trend is sideways/unknown given the token's age of less than 48 hours.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

35%

Sell

65%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000580 (candle [1] low / mid-range of the spike candle)

Major support

$0.0000240 (candle [5] low — the lowest point in the 5-candle series)

Immediate resistance

$0.0001076 (candle [1] all-time high wick)

Major resistance

$0.0001200 (psychological level above ATH)

The most critical support is the $0.0000386–$0.0000407 cluster (candles [2]–[3] open/close zone), which served as the consolidation base before the spike. A break below this zone would target the $0.0000240–$0.0000283 range (candle [5] lows). Resistance is the $0.0001076 wick high; a clean close above this level would signal continuation.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / inverted hammer on candle [1] — bearish reversal signal at the top of the spike
Bullish engulfing on candle [4] — initiated the breakout move
Volume divergence: highest price candle ([1]) has the lowest volume of the series ($12,499 vs $44,054 peak)
Higher lows sequence from candle [5] ($0.0000240) to candle [4] ($0.0000256) to candle [3] ($0.0000386) — short-term uptrend structure
Doji/inside bar on candle [3] — consolidation before the final spike

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 (1 billion tokens)

FDV

$73,953.19

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
136% price move in 24 hours on a micro-cap FDV of ~$73.9K. The token is less than 48 hours old with only 5 hourly candles of price history. Extreme volatility is inherent at this stage.
LiquidityNot assessed
A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

$0 reported liquidity — inability to exit positions without extreme slippage
Top 100 holders control 92.66% of supply — extreme concentration and dump risk
Token was dormant with 9 holders for 29 days before launch — suggests coordinated insider pre-positioning
Sell pressure at 65% of 24h volume with 2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
No verified contract; update authority unknown
Shooting star candle pattern at price peak with declining volume — technical reversal signal
Holder count already declining (-12 in last hour) post-pump
Micro-cap FDV (~$73.9K) makes price easily manipulable
No working product confirmed — AI agent narrative is unverified

Mitigating factors

Mutable: false — metadata cannot be altered post-deployment
Pump.fun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority at bonding curve completion
Social presence exists (Twitter, website, Moralis links) suggesting some project infrastructure
AI agent + prediction market narrative has genuine market interest
Some snipers are in profit and still holding, suggesting not all early buyers have exited
136% price pump demonstrates real market demand exists, however speculative

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi/memecoin traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, newly launched tokens with no liquidity, extreme concentration, and unverified contracts. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). Not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose 100% of their investment.

ReeveLabs ($Reeve) is a high-risk, high-speculation micro-cap AI narrative token in its first 48 hours of public trading. The bull case rests entirely on narrative momentum and community growth in a favorable market environment. The bear case — which is more probable given the data — centers on the classic pump-and-dump pattern: dormant insider pre-positioning, explosive pump, dominant sell pressure, and early holder exit. The base case is a volatile consolidation followed by a slow bleed unless the team delivers tangible product milestones.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The AI agent + prediction market narrative gains significant traction on Solana Twitter/X. The team delivers a working demo of autonomous trading agents, attracting developer and speculator attention. Holder count grows to 1,000+ organically, liquidity deepens, and the token re-tests and breaks above the $0.0001076 ATH, potentially reaching $0.0003–$0.0005 (4x–7x from current) on a narrative wave.

Viral social media moment or KOL endorsement
Working product demo or testnet launch
Broader Solana AI/agent narrative market cycle
Sustained holder growth beyond the initial pump

Base Case

The token experiences a post-pump retracement of 40–60% from the current price, settling in the $0.0000300–$0.0000500 range. A small but active community forms around the AI narrative. The token trades sideways with low volume for 1–4 weeks. Price action depends entirely on whether the team provides any product updates or marketing catalysts.

Some genuine community interest in the AI agent narrative sustains a floor above launch price
Team is active and provides periodic updates via social channels
No major whale dump occurs in the immediate term
Broader Solana market remains stable

Bear Case

High probability

The 136% pump was a coordinated insider/sniper event. The 9 pre-launch holders distribute their supply into the new retail buyers. Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity remains negligible, and the token retraces 70–90% from the current price back toward or below the pre-pump levels ($0.0000240–$0.0000320). The project goes silent and the token becomes illiquid.

29-day dormant period with only 9 holders suggests coordinated pre-positioning
65% sell pressure and 2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio already evident
Top 100 holders control 92.66% of supply — massive distribution overhang
No verified contract, no working product, no confirmed authority renouncement
Holder count already declining post-pump (-12 in last hour)

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 2, 03:47 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-02 03:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, mutability)
PumpSwap DEX price feed and OHLC candle data (hourly)
Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, transaction counts)
Holder metrics and historical holder time series (30-day daily)
Top 20 holder distribution data
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
Moralis token API data

Limitations

Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — likely a data feed issue; actual liquidity depth unknown but presumed very low
Sniper USD amounts sniped are all 'unknown' — precise sniper concentration % cannot be calculated
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
Price change fields in analytics show 0% across all timeframes, conflicting with the 136% 24h change from the price section — possible API lag or data inconsistency
Only 5 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Token is less than 48 hours old — all metrics are extremely preliminary
No on-chain program/contract verification data available
Sniper balance fields are largely 'unknown' — current sniper holdings cannot be assessed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap newly launched tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in $Reeve. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ReeveLabs ($Reeve) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 6, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell ReeveLabs ($Reeve)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 6, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for ReeveLabs ($Reeve)?

Is $Reeve a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi/memecoin traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, newly launched tokens with no liquidity, extreme concentration, and unverified contracts. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). Not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose 100% of their investment.

What are the key risks of holding $Reeve?

$0 reported liquidity — inability to exit positions without extreme slippage • Top 100 holders control 92.66% of supply — extreme concentration and dump risk • Token was dormant with 9 holders for 29 days before launch — suggests coordinated insider pre-positioning