Starship

Starship will launch tomorrow Price Today & AI Analysis

Starship
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 15, 2026

HfLAiTgiP6MHTFFnsrXq7KBpQvhHLTrqDRG4H7eZpump

$0.052205

+7.36%

FDV $2,205

LiveContract:HfLAiTgiP6MHTFFnsrXq7KBpQvhHLTrqDRG4H7eZpumpChain:SolanaHolders:150Market cap:$2,205

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Starship

Report snapshotas of Jul 15, 08:47 PM
FDV

$1,907

Liquidity

$16,341

Holders

153

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Starship (symbol: Starship, mint: HfLAiTgiP6MHTFFnsrXq7KBpQvhHLTrqDRG4H7eZpump) is an unverified PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana. The token experienced a catastrophic price collapse of ~98.78% in 24 hours, dropping from a peak near $0.000300 to the current $0.00000191. Total liquidity stands at only $16.34K against a fully diluted valuation of $1.91K — meaning liquidity exceeds FDV, a deeply distressed signal. Sell pressure dominates at 93.1% of 24h volume ($271.18K sells vs $20.04K buys). The holder base sat at just 2 wallets for the entire prior 30-day period before exploding to 153 in the last 24 hours — almost certainly driven by the launch event and subsequent dump. Top holder data is unavailable, sniper data is unavailable, and the update authority is unknown. All signals point to a completed pump-and-dump lifecycle.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Catastrophic 98.78% price crash within 24 hours of apparent launch
Liquidity ($16.34K) exceeds fully diluted valuation ($1.91K) — deeply distressed
93.1% sell pressure with $271.18K in sell volume vs $20.04K buy volume
Holder count was exactly 2 for 30 consecutive days before jumping to 153 in 24h — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Unverified contract, unknown update authority, mutable=false but no authority transparency

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–72 hours

Price has already collapsed 98.78% from its peak (~$0.000300) to ~$0.00000191. The last 3 hourly candles show near-zero volume (under $26 combined) and flat price action, indicating the token is effectively dead with no meaningful buy-side interest. Any residual liquidity is at extreme risk of further erosion.

Target low$0.000000500
Target high$0.000002500
Support: $0.000001799 (candle [6] low), $0.000001121 (candle [7] low, ~$0.000112 adjusted — lowest wick seen)
Resistance: $0.000002217 (candle [4] open/high), $0.000002358 (candle [5] open/high), $0.000210 (candle [6] open — pre-crash level, effectively unreachable)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

With only $16.34K in liquidity, an FDV of $1.91K, 93.1% sell pressure, and a holder base that materialized entirely within 24 hours of the crash, there is no credible recovery thesis. The token is likely to trend toward zero or become illiquid/abandoned.

Catalysts
  • Any genuine Starship rocket launch news could briefly attract speculative attention
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally could provide marginal lift
  • No on-chain catalysts identified from available data

Bullish factors

  • Liquidity ($16.34K) technically exceeds FDV ($1.91K), meaning the pool has more value than the token's market cap — could theoretically support a small bounce
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting minimal infrastructure
  • 454 buys in 24h shows some residual interest

Bearish factors

  • 98.78% price crash in 24 hours
  • 93.1% sell pressure ($271.18K sells vs $20.04K buys)
  • Only 2 holders for 30 days prior to launch — pre-arranged pump-and-dump structure
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority
  • Near-zero volume in last 3 hourly candles ($0.44, $0.14, $25.44)
  • FDV of $1.91K is below typical minimum viable threshold
  • No top holder data available — opacity is a red flag
  • Token name/description ('will launch tomorrow', 'still tracking to fly tomorrow') is time-limited hype with no lasting utility
Confidence: low. Confidence is low because top holder data and sniper data are unavailable, limiting full on-chain visibility. However, the directional bias (bearish/near-zero) is supported by overwhelming sell pressure, near-zero volume in recent candles, and the completed pump-and-dump price structure.

Starship call history

Full track record →
Jul 15bearish
24h-3.2%
7d-12.2%
30d-17.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 7-hour OHLC series tells a clear pump-and-dump story. Candle [7] (13:00 UTC) opened at ~$0.000136 and reached a high of ~$0.000257 on massive volume ($162,803). Candle [6] (14:00 UTC) opened at ~$0.000211, spiked to ~$0.000300 (all-time high in this window), then crashed to a low of ~$0.0000018 — a 99.4% intra-candle collapse — on $123,515 volume. Candles [5] through [1] (15:00–19:00 UTC) show progressively declining price ($0.00000231 → $0.00000191) and dramatically falling volume ($106 → $25 → $0.44), confirming the dump is complete and the token is in a dead-cat phase with no recovery momentum.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 7%Sell 93%

Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish. The token peaked at ~$0.000300 in candle [6] and has since made consistent lower highs and lower lows across every subsequent candle. Volume has collapsed from $162,803 to under $1, confirming trend exhaustion on the sell side with no buy-side recovery.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000001799 (candle [6] intra-candle low)
Major$0.000001121 (candle [7] low — deepest wick in the dataset)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000002217 (candle [4] open/high)
Major$0.000300054 (candle [6] all-time high in this window)

Immediate support at $0.000001799 (candle [6] low) is the nearest floor. Major support at ~$0.000001121 represents the lowest price seen. Resistance at $0.000002217 (candle [4] open) is the first meaningful overhead level. The $0.000300 level is the all-time high from the pump and represents an essentially unreachable resistance given current conditions.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump candle structure: explosive volume spike followed by immediate collapse
  • Candle [6] is a massive bearish engulfing / shooting star: opened at $0.000211, spiked to $0.000300, closed at $0.0000023 — a 99%+ intra-candle reversal
  • Candles [5]–[1] form a descending staircase of lower closes with collapsing volume — classic post-dump bleed
  • Near-doji conditions in candles [1] and [2]: O=H=L=C, indicating complete price discovery exhaustion and zero liquidity-driven movement

Total holders153
24h Δ+151
7d Δ+151
30d Δ+151
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is inversely correlated with price — the 99% holder increase in 24h coincided with a 98.78% price crash. This is consistent with a pump-and-dump: the price spike attracted buyers (increasing holders), while early holders dumped, collapsing the price. New holders are almost entirely bag-holders acquired at or near the top.

The historical holder series is stark: exactly 2 holders for every single day from 2026-06-15 through 2026-07-14 (30 days of data). Then, in the 24-hour window of 2026-07-15, holders jumped from 2 to 153 — a +151 increase (+99%). This pattern is a near-perfect signature of a pre-staged pump-and-dump: the token sat dormant with only 2 wallets (deployer + associate) for a month before being promoted, pumped, and dumped. The 'growth' is not organic adoption — it represents retail victims acquiring a collapsing asset. Acquisition breakdown: 155 via swap, -2 via transfer, confirming all new holders bought in via DEX swaps during the event.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available from the data provider

0.00%

Top holder data is explicitly unavailable ('No top holders available'). The supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which likely reflects a data provider limitation rather than genuine equal distribution — given only 153 total holders exist. The absence of this data is itself a red flag, as it prevents assessment of insider concentration. Based on the trading pattern (93.1% sell pressure, 98.78% price crash, 2 pre-launch holders for 30 days), the dominant sentiment is almost certainly 'distributing' — early holders sold into retail demand during the pump. Distribution health is assessed as very_concentrated given the pre-launch 2-holder structure and lack of transparency.

Liquidity$16,340
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$20,040
Sell$271,180
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers142
Unique sellers1,138

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $16.34K is extremely shallow for any meaningful trading. Critically, this liquidity figure ($16.34K) exceeds the token's fully diluted valuation ($1.91K) — meaning the liquidity pool contains more value than the entire token supply is worth at current prices, a deeply distressed and anomalous condition. Net flow is strongly negative: $271.18K in sell volume vs $20.04K in buy volume (93.1% sell pressure). Unique sellers (1,138) outnumber unique buyers (142) by 8:1. The pair trades on PumpSwap (3edNPcyAtmeMgq7VezrrV7TsbzQuMFAx4U3FGNhYAwc4). Slippage risk is high — any meaningful sell order will move the price significantly given the shallow pool. The 24h price change showing 0% in the 1h and 5m windows (despite -16.6% over 6h) suggests the price has stabilized at near-zero with essentially no active trading.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,992,024.99
FDV$1,907.31

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1 billion tokens (999,992,024.99), consistent with a standard PumpFun launch. The FDV of $1,907.31 is negligibly small — below any threshold of economic significance. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, preventing assessment of mint or freeze authority status. The token is marked as 'mutable: false', which is a minor positive (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed authority renouncement, rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed. The contract is unverified. The token was launched on PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which uses a bonding curve mechanism — the token has apparently graduated to PumpSwap given the pair address. No vesting, allocation, or team token data is available.

Volatility
high

98.78% price decline in 24 hours. Intra-candle volatility of 99%+ observed in candle [6]. Price moved from ~$0.000300 to ~$0.0000018 within hours.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $16.34K on PumpSwap. FDV ($1.91K) is below liquidity — any significant sell order will cause extreme slippage. The market is effectively illiquid for any meaningful position size.

Concentration
high

Token had exactly 2 holders for 30 consecutive days before launch. Top holder data is unavailable, preventing direct concentration measurement, but the pre-launch structure strongly implies extreme insider concentration. 153 total holders is an extremely thin holder base.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the trading pattern (93.1% sell pressure, 98.78% crash, 2 pre-launch holders) is consistent with a coordinated dump by early/insider holders into retail demand. The dump appears to have already occurred.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint or freeze authority renouncement. Token is marked mutable=false (metadata immutable), which is a partial positive. Contract is unverified. Risk is medium rather than high only because the dump appears complete, reducing the marginal impact of authority-based rug actions.

Key risks

  • Completed pump-and-dump: 98.78% price collapse with 93.1% sell pressure
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($16.34K) — high slippage on any trade
  • Only 153 total holders, 151 of whom acquired in the last 24 hours during the crash
  • Unknown update authority — mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed
  • Unverified contract with no audit
  • Token name/description is time-limited hype ('launch tomorrow') with zero utility
  • FDV ($1.91K) is below liquidity pool value — deeply distressed valuation
  • No top holder transparency — cannot assess insider selling risk

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable=false, preventing metadata manipulation
  • The dump appears to have already occurred — downside from current price may be limited in percentage terms (though absolute value is near zero)
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist — minimal infrastructure present
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline liquidity access
Suitable for: This token is unsuitable for any investor. The data profile is consistent with a completed pump-and-dump scheme. Only highly experienced traders with full awareness of the extreme risks, willing to accept near-total loss of capital, should consider any interaction — and even then, no rational investment thesis exists at this time.

The data presents an overwhelmingly negative picture consistent with a completed pump-and-dump. The token sat dormant with 2 holders for 30 days, was pumped to ~$0.000300, and collapsed 98.78% to ~$0.0000019 within hours. Sell pressure is 93.1%, liquidity is $16.34K, and FDV is $1.91K. There is no credible bull case grounded in fundamentals.

Bull case (low)

Speculative dead-cat bounce driven by renewed meme/event attention if a real Starship rocket launch occurs and attracts fresh retail interest to the token.

  • Real-world Starship (SpaceX) launch event generating search traffic and meme interest
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-cap tokens
  • Thin order book means even small buy volume could move price significantly from current near-zero levels

Base case

Token remains at near-zero price ($0.0000015–$0.0000025) with minimal trading activity, slowly bleeding toward zero as liquidity is withdrawn and holders give up. No meaningful recovery occurs.

  • No major catalyst (real Starship launch, viral social media) emerges to reignite interest
  • Remaining liquidity ($16.34K) stays in pool but sees no significant new inflows
  • The 153 current holders gradually sell or abandon their positions
  • Token follows the typical PumpFun post-dump trajectory of slow decay to near-zero

Bear case (high)

Token trends to zero as remaining liquidity is withdrawn, holders abandon their positions, and the token becomes completely illiquid and forgotten.

  • Completed pump-and-dump with no recovery volume in last 3 candles
  • FDV of $1.91K is below any sustainable threshold
  • 93.1% sell pressure with 8:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • No utility, no verified contract, no transparent team
  • Time-limited name/description loses relevance immediately after any launch event passes

GeneratedJul 15, 08:47 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-07-15T19:00 UTC. Most recent OHLC candle is the 19:00 UTC hour. Holder metrics reflect a 24h snapshot.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • Moralis price and OHLC API (hourly candles)
  • Moralis trading analytics API (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Moralis holder metrics and historical holder series API
  • Moralis top holders API (returned no data)
  • Moralis sniper analysis API (returned no data)
  • PumpSwap on-chain pair data (3edNPcyAtmeMgq7VezrrV7TsbzQuMFAx4U3FGNhYAwc4)

Limitations

  • Top holder data unavailable — cannot directly assess insider/whale concentration
  • Sniper data unavailable — cannot quantify early buyer PnL or sell-through rate
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed
  • Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data provider limitations rather than true equal distribution
  • Only 7 hourly OHLC candles available — limited technical analysis window
  • Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows only 2 holders for the entire prior period, limiting trend analysis
  • Token is very new (launched ~2026-07-15) — all metrics reflect a single-day event

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The token analyzed shows characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Do not invest funds you cannot afford to lose entirely. Past price action is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,992,024.99

Key Risks

Completed pump-and-dump: 98.78% price collapse with 93.1% sell pressure
Extremely shallow liquidity ($16.34K) — high slippage on any trade
Only 153 total holders, 151 of whom acquired in the last 24 hours during the crash
Unknown update authority — mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals must be inferred entirely from trading analytics and holder history. The pattern of only 2 holders for 30 consecutive days before a sudden launch event strongly suggests pre-arranged insider coordination. The 93.1% sell pressure ($271.18K in sells) within 24 hours of the holder count jumping from 2 to 153 is consistent with early holders (likely the deployer and one associate) distributing to retail buyers attracted by the pump. This is a textbook pump-and-dump signal.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Extremely negative — early buyers (the 2 pre-launch holders) almost certainly sold into the pump given the 93.1% sell pressure and 98.78% price collapse. Retail buyers who entered during the pump are deeply underwater.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Starship will launch tomorrow (Starship)?

Price has already collapsed 98.78% from its peak (~$0.000300) to ~$0.00000191. The last 3 hourly candles show near-zero volume (under $26 combined) and flat price action, indicating the token is effectively dead with no meaningful buy-side interest. Any residual liquidity is at extreme risk of further erosion. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000000500 to $0.000002500.

Is Starship a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.5/100. This token is unsuitable for any investor. The data profile is consistent with a completed pump-and-dump scheme. Only highly experienced traders with full awareness of the extreme risks, willing to accept near-total loss of capital, should consider any interaction — and even then, no rational investment thesis exists at this time.

How are Starship holders trending?

Starship will launch tomorrow currently has 153 holders and is growing (24h: 151, 7d: 151, 30d: 151). The historical holder series is stark: exactly 2 holders for every single day from 2026-06-15 through 2026-07-14 (30 days of data). Then, in the 24-hour window of 2026-07-15, holders jumped from 2 to 153 — a +151 increase (+99%). This pattern is a near-perfect signature of a pre-staged pump-and-dump: the token sat dormant with only 2 wallets (deployer + associate) for a month before being promoted, pumped, and dumped. The 'growth' is not organic adoption — it represents retail victims acquiring a collapsing asset. Acquisition breakdown: 155 via swap, -2 via transfer, confirming all new holders bought in via DEX swaps during the event.

What does sniper activity look like for Starship?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Starship?

Completed pump-and-dump: 98.78% price collapse with 93.1% sell pressure • Extremely shallow liquidity ($16.34K) — high slippage on any trade • Only 153 total holders, 151 of whom acquired in the last 24 hours during the crash

Track Starship