TAC

The Ansem Cycle Price Today & AI Analysis

TAC
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 5, 2026

HSNd1kqcd9HCS499RvtG3MqrKdkcWZiPNfXk1gHdpump

$0.053136

+1.06%

FDV $3,127

LiveContract:HSNd1kqcd9HCS499RvtG3MqrKdkcWZiPNfXk1gHdpumpChain:SolanaHolders:310Market cap:$3,127

More tokens on Solana

Analcoin

Analcoin

Analcoin

$0.0518170.0%
MC $1.8K
RUDO

RUDO

RUDO

$0.0525370.0%
MC $2.5K
BROKECAT

BROKECAT

Broke Cat

$0.0520690.0%
MC $2.0K
MICHAEL

MICHAEL

MICHAEL JECKSUN

$0.0522580.0%
MC $2.3K
Shumai

Shumai

しゅうまい

$0.0521070.0%
MC $2.0K
MSTR

MSTR

MicroStrategy

$0.000104863.0%
MC $10.35M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about TAC

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 5, 11:17 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$48,763

Holders

893

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

TAC (The Ansem Cycle) is an extremely new, micro-cap Solana meme token deployed via j7tracker.io with a total supply of 1 (likely 1 with 0 decimals, suggesting a fractional/NFT-style token or a very unusual supply structure). The token has experienced a massive 441% price spike in 24 hours, driven almost entirely by sell-side pressure (74.3% sell volume). Holder count surged from 46 to 893 in roughly 24 hours, suggesting a coordinated pump event. Liquidity is very shallow at $48.76K, the contract is unverified, mutable, and update authority is unknown — all significant red flags.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — highly unusual tokenomics suggesting possible fractional ownership or a novelty/meme structure
Holder count exploded from 46 to 893 (+847, +95%) in a single day, indicating a sudden viral or coordinated pump event
74.3% sell pressure vs 25.7% buy pressure despite a 441% 24h price gain — classic pump-and-dump signature
Deployed via j7tracker.io — a third-party deployment tool with no established reputation; contract is unverified and mutable
No top holder data available, no sniper data, and supply concentration shows 0% for top 10/100 — data anomalies that reduce analytical confidence

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is showing extreme sell pressure (74.3% of 24h volume is sells, 6,092 sell transactions vs 2,261 buys). The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) closed at $0.0000762, well below the session high of $0.0001429, forming a bearish upper-wick candle. The current price of $0.0001363 is above the recent candle close, suggesting a brief spike, but the dominant sell pressure and shallow liquidity ($48.76K) make a sharp reversal highly probable.

Target low$0.000023
Target high$0.000151
Support: $0.000076 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open), $0.000034 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000023 (candle [3] low — major support floor)
Resistance: $0.000143 (candle [1] high), $0.000151 (candle [2] high — session peak)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without sustained buy-side demand, meaningful liquidity depth, or a verified/immutable contract, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token spent 30 days dormant at 46 holders before the sudden pump, suggesting no organic community growth. A return toward pre-pump price levels (~$0.000023–$0.000034) is the most likely medium-term scenario.

Catalysts
  • Any renewed social media attention or influencer mention could trigger another short-lived spike
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally could provide temporary uplift
  • Absence of new buyers and continued sell pressure will accelerate price decline
  • Shallow liquidity means even modest sell orders will cause significant price impact

Bullish factors

  • 441% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative demand exists
  • Rapid holder growth from 46 to 893 in 24h shows viral spread potential
  • 5m price change of +42.2% and 1h change of +51.8% indicate very recent momentum
  • 2,261 buy transactions from 731 unique buyers shows some genuine interest

Bearish factors

  • 74.3% of 24h volume is sell-side ($326.15K sells vs $112.71K buys)
  • 6,092 sell transactions vs 2,261 buy transactions — sellers outnumber buyers nearly 3:1
  • Shallow liquidity of only $48.76K creates extreme slippage risk
  • Contract is unverified, mutable, and update authority is unknown
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days at 46 holders before sudden pump
  • Deployed via third-party tool j7tracker.io with no established credibility
  • No top holder transparency — whale behavior cannot be assessed
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics (data inconsistency) suggesting possible data lag or manipulation
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data preventing whale behavior analysis, (2) no sniper data, (3) anomalous supply/concentration metrics showing 0% for top 10/100 holders, (4) only 3 hourly candles available for technical analysis, and (5) extreme volatility making any price target unreliable.

TAC call history

Full track record →
Jul 5bearish
24h-71.0%
7d-98.0%
30d-97.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (21:00 UTC): O=$0.0000340, H=$0.0000803, L=$0.0000235, C=$0.0000764 — a bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting buyers stepped in at the lows. Candle [2] (22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000764, H=$0.0001511, L=$0.0000336, C=$0.0000340 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star candle with an extremely long upper wick and close near the low, a strong bearish reversal signal. Candle [1] (23:00 UTC): O=$0.0000340, H=$0.0001429, L=$0.0000732, C=$0.0000762 — another candle with a long upper wick, closing in the lower half of its range, confirming continued selling pressure at highs. The current price of $0.0001363 is above candle [1]'s close, suggesting a post-candle spike that has not yet been confirmed by a full candle.

Trend

Short-term
sideways
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 26%Sell 74%

The 3-candle window shows a volatile, whipsaw pattern. While the medium-term trend from the 30-day dormant base is technically an uptrend (price has risen dramatically from near-zero), the short-term candle structure shows repeated failures to hold highs, with closes consistently in the lower half of each candle's range — a bearish intraday pattern.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000076 (candle [1] close and candle [2] open)
Major$0.000023 (candle [3] absolute low — pre-pump floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000143 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.000151 (candle [2] high — session peak)

The $0.000151 level represents the session peak and is the key resistance. The $0.000076 level has acted as both support and resistance across multiple candles. A break below $0.000034 (candle [2] close) would signal a full reversal toward the $0.000023 floor.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [2] — strong reversal signal at the session high
  • Long upper wicks on candles [1] and [2] — repeated rejection at highs indicating distribution
  • Volume exhaustion: candle [2] volume ($303,914) collapsed to candle [1] volume ($52,033) — classic pump exhaustion
  • Price currently trading above candle [1] close suggesting a potential dead-cat bounce or continuation spike before reversal

Total holders893
24h Δ+847
7d Δ+847
30d Δ+847
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is perfectly correlated with the 24h price spike — the token sat at exactly 46 holders for the entire 30-day historical window with zero net change, then exploded to 893 holders (+847, +95%) coinciding with the 441% price pump. This is not organic growth; it is a sudden viral/coordinated event. The correlation is positive but the causality is ambiguous — the price pump likely attracted new holders rather than holder growth driving price.

The historical holder data is stark: exactly 46 holders with zero net change for every single day from June 5 to July 4, 2026 — 30 days of complete stasis. Then, in a single 24-hour window, 847 new holders were added (+95% growth to 893 total). This pattern is highly anomalous and consistent with a coordinated pump event where the token was seeded with 46 wallets, then promoted to attract retail buyers. The sudden holder surge with simultaneous dominant sell pressure (74.3%) strongly suggests the original holders are dumping on new entrants.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — the data source returned no top holders for this token

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100 holders, which is anomalous and likely reflects a data reporting issue rather than genuine equal distribution — a token with total supply of 1 and 0 decimals cannot realistically be held by 893 wallets in equal fractions under standard SPL token mechanics. This data gap is a significant red flag as it prevents any assessment of whale concentration, insider holdings, or distribution health. The 'very_concentrated' classification is assigned as a precautionary default given the token's unusual supply structure and the inability to verify distribution. The dominant sell pressure (74.3%) suggests whoever holds the majority supply is actively distributing.

Liquidity$48,760
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$112,710
Sell$326,150
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers731
Unique sellers1,832

Liquidity is critically shallow at $48.76K on a single PumpSwap pool (BcnbUGsfMQTUHCX5VmCuzG2XnD32VrL8TKuofq3bfV9K). The FDV of $134.53K is only ~2.76x the liquidity pool size, meaning any significant sell order will cause extreme price impact. The 24h sell volume of $326.15K is 6.7x the total liquidity — this level of sell throughput relative to pool size indicates the price has already been significantly impacted and further selling will be devastating. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): $326.15K sells vs $112.71K buys = net outflow of ~$213.44K. Unique sellers (1,832) outnumber unique buyers (731) by 2.5:1. Market health is poor — this is a one-sided distribution market, not a healthy two-sided market.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (with 0 decimals)
FDV$134,530

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics of TAC are highly unusual and concerning. The total supply is listed as 1 with 0 decimals — this is an extremely atypical structure for a tradeable SPL token. Standard meme tokens use supplies in the billions or trillions; a supply of 1 with 0 decimals suggests either: (1) a novelty/joke token structure, (2) a data reporting anomaly, or (3) a token designed to confuse analytics tools. The contract is explicitly marked as unverified and mutable (Mutable: true), meaning the token metadata can be changed by the update authority at any time. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' — this is a red flag as it means the entity with control over the token cannot be identified or verified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. Given the mutable contract, unknown authority, and unverified status, the rug risk from authorities is assessed as high. The FDV of $134.53K vs liquidity of $48.76K creates a fragile market structure.

Volatility
high

441% gain in 24 hours with 5m and 1h gains of 42% and 52% respectively. Candle analysis shows repeated rejection at highs with closes in the lower half of ranges. Extreme volatility in both directions is expected.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $48.76K on a single PumpSwap pool. 24h sell volume of $326.15K is 6.7x the pool liquidity. Any meaningful position exit will cause severe slippage. Shallow liquidity makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable, preventing concentration assessment. The token had exactly 46 holders for 30 consecutive days before the pump, suggesting a highly concentrated early holder base that is now distributing. Supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates additional analytical uncertainty.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available. However, the 30-day dormant period with 46 static holders followed by a sudden pump is consistent with a pre-seeded token awaiting a coordinated pump. The 74.3% sell pressure and 6,092 sell transactions strongly suggest early holders are dumping.

Authority
high

Contract is unverified, mutable (metadata can be changed), and update authority is unknown. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. These factors create significant rug pull and manipulation risk.

Key risks

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant at 46 holders → sudden 441% pump with 74.3% sell pressure
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($48.76K) relative to trading volume ($438.86K 24h total)
  • No top holder transparency — cannot assess insider/whale concentration
  • Anomalous supply structure (total supply: 1, decimals: 0) that may confuse analytics and mask true distribution
  • Deployed via third-party tool j7tracker.io — no established credibility or audit trail
  • Unverified contract with no social proof beyond Twitter/website links
  • Sell transactions (6,092) outnumber buy transactions (2,261) by 2.7:1

Mitigating factors

  • Token has attracted 893 holders and $438.86K in 24h trading volume, showing some genuine market interest
  • Listed on PumpSwap with a functioning liquidity pool
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some level of public presence
  • No confirmed rug pull has occurred yet at time of analysis
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits in low-liquidity environments. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative amount.

TAC (The Ansem Cycle) presents a classic high-risk meme token pump scenario. The token was dormant for 30+ days with 46 holders, then experienced a sudden 441% price spike with overwhelming sell pressure (74.3%). The combination of unknown/mutable authority, unverified contract, shallow liquidity, anomalous supply structure, and dominant sell-side activity creates a risk profile that is very high. Any investment thesis must be purely speculative and short-term.

Bull case (low)

Continued viral spread drives additional retail FOMO buying, temporarily pushing price toward or above the session high of $0.000151. A broader Solana meme coin market rally amplifies the move.

  • Viral social media spread (Twitter/website presence noted)
  • Broader Solana meme season momentum
  • Short-term FOMO from 441% 24h gain attracting momentum traders
  • Low absolute price ($0.000136) making it psychologically accessible to retail buyers

Base case

Price consolidates in the $0.000034–$0.000076 range as early holders finish distributing and new buyers absorb some supply. Token eventually fades into low-activity status similar to its pre-pump state, with a larger but disengaged holder base.

  • Some retail buyers hold their positions short-term, providing price floor
  • No additional coordinated promotion occurs
  • Liquidity pool remains intact (not drained)
  • No rug pull via authority manipulation

Bear case (high)

Early holders (original 46 wallets) complete their distribution, liquidity is drained, and the price collapses back toward pre-pump levels of $0.000023–$0.000034 or lower. Possible complete abandonment.

  • 74.3% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.5:1
  • Shallow $48.76K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling
  • Mutable contract with unknown authority creates rug pull risk
  • 30-day dormant pattern followed by sudden pump is a textbook pump-and-dump setup
  • Volume exhaustion: candle volume dropped 83% from peak

GeneratedJul 5, 11:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data appears current as of July 5, 2026 ~23:00 UTC. Historical holder data covers June 5 – July 4, 2026. Only 3 hourly candles available, limiting technical analysis depth.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain token metadata (Mint: HSNd1kqcd9HCS499RvtG3MqrKdkcWZiPNfXk1gHdpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading data (Pool: BcnbUGsfMQTUHCX5VmCuzG2XnD32VrL8TKuofq3bfV9K)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles, July 5 2026 21:00–23:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder acquisition and distribution metrics
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — whale concentration cannot be assessed
  • Sniper data unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be quantified
  • Supply concentration shows 0% for top 10/100 — likely a data anomaly, not genuine equal distribution
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot verify mint/freeze authority status
  • Anomalous supply structure (total supply: 1, decimals: 0) may indicate data reporting issues
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics despite clear price movement — possible data inconsistency
  • Token is extremely new with limited price history, making any prediction highly speculative

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed was provided externally and treated as untrusted evidence. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (with 0 decimals)

Key Risks

•Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant at 46 holders → sudden 441% pump with 74.3% sell pressure
•Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed
•Critically shallow liquidity ($48.76K) relative to trading volume ($438.86K 24h total)
•No top holder transparency — cannot assess insider/whale concentration

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. The broader trading pattern — 74.3% sell pressure, 6,092 sell transactions vs 2,261 buys, and a 441% price spike from a dormant base — is consistent with early holders (the original 46 wallets present for 30+ days) distributing into new retail buyers attracted by the pump. This is a behavioral pattern associated with coordinated pump-and-dump schemes.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — sniper analysis endpoint returned no data.

The 46 wallets that held the token for 30+ days during its dormant phase are the most likely early buyers. With the price up 441% in 24 hours and sell volume at 74.3%, these early holders appear to be actively distributing into the pump. Their sentiment is likely 'distributing' rather than 'holding'.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for The Ansem Cycle (TAC)?

The token is showing extreme sell pressure (74.3% of 24h volume is sells, 6,092 sell transactions vs 2,261 buys). The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) closed at $0.0000762, well below the session high of $0.0001429, forming a bearish upper-wick candle. The current price of $0.0001363 is above the recent candle close, suggesting a brief spike, but the dominant sell pressure and shallow liquidity ($48.76K) make a sharp reversal highly probable. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000023 to $0.000151.

Is TAC a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits in low-liquidity environments. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative amount.

How are TAC holders trending?

The Ansem Cycle currently has 893 holders and is growing (24h: 847, 7d: 847, 30d: 847). The historical holder data is stark: exactly 46 holders with zero net change for every single day from June 5 to July 4, 2026 — 30 days of complete stasis. Then, in a single 24-hour window, 847 new holders were added (+95% growth to 893 total). This pattern is highly anomalous and consistent with a coordinated pump event where the token was seeded with 46 wallets, then promoted to attract retail buyers. The sudden holder surge with simultaneous dominant sell pressure (74.3%) strongly suggests the original holders are dumping on new entrants.

What does sniper activity look like for TAC?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding TAC?

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant at 46 holders → sudden 441% pump with 74.3% sell pressure • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed • Critically shallow liquidity ($48.76K) relative to trading volume ($438.86K 24h total)

← Back to all predictions

Track TAC