JIRACHI

Last pack magic Price Today & AI Analysis

JIRACHISolanaAnalysis as of Sep 24, 2026

Price

$0.000562

+128.94% 24h · FDV $562,035

Contract

Live
HMD6LV9hj6SdSKF4oTd7dYTVUhVL8MzYvPZYgb7BQSrW

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,919

Market cap

$562,035

More tokens on Solana

XCATXCATXRP Cat$0.000140-52.6%MC $140.4KDoomDoomDoom$0.000150-38.8%MC $145.9KYELLOWYELLOWYellow Partyhat$0.000166-47.1%MC $149.9KTOPCATTOPCATTopcat$0.000147+14.2%MC $147.0KLEVERHEDGELEVERHEDGELeverHedge$0.000755-25.9%MC $630.2KRAYRAYRaydium$1.99+8.6%MC $1.10B

Last pack magic: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-24 12:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,919

Top 10 supply share

23.05%

Reported liquidity

$40,478.00
How concentrated is Last pack magic ownership?
As of 2026-09-24 12:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 23.05% of supply. It reports 1,919 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Last pack magic?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 12:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $57,904.00 in buys and $71,793.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Last pack magic liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +55.97%, from $29,720.62 (2026-09-24 10:00 UTC) to $46,355.59 (2026-09-24 12:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-24 12:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-24 10:00 UTC$29,720.62
2026-09-24 11:00 UTC$49,439.82
2026-09-24 12:00 UTC$46,355.59

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about JIRACHI

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 24, 12:16 PM UTC

FDV

$562,035

Liquidity

$40,478.00

Holders

1,919

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

JIRACHI (Last pack magic) is a microcap Solana token trading on a single thin Raydium CPMM pool ($40.48K liquidity, $562.03K FDV) that just experienced an extreme parabolic move — up 128.94% over 24h with an intra-hour spike to 24x its opening price before fading sharply. Top-10 holders control 23.05% of the ~1B token supply across 1,919 holder addresses, but critical risk inputs — mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet data — are entirely unavailable, leaving significant blind spots in this analysis.

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.48K) relative to FDV, making the token highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation
  • Textbook blow-off/exhaustion candle pattern (24x intra-hour spike then fade) followed by a ~95% volume contraction
  • Complete absence of mint/freeze authority verification and sniper wallet data, both flagged as unknown rather than assumed safe
  • Net 24h sell volume exceeding buy volume despite the large positive price move, hinting at profit-taking

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

Short-term momentum has already turned negative (5m: -5.66%) after the blow-off spike to $0.000943. Absent fresh volume, price likely gravitates toward the recent consolidation range or lower, given elevated sell pressure (55.4% of 24h volume) and thin liquidity.

Target low

$0.000387

Target high

$0.000642

Support

$0.000528, $0.0000387

Resistance

$0.000642, $0.000943

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Without additional catalysts, holder growth data, or resolved authority risk, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. The token could either fade back toward pre-spike levels if speculative interest evaporates, or stabilize at a new higher base if liquidity is added and genuine demand persists.

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions to the Raydium pool
  • Resolution/disclosure of mint and freeze authority status
  • Sustained social media/community growth beyond the single Twitter link noted
  • Continued or renewed volume comparable to the initial spike

Bullish factors

  • Buyer count exceeds seller count in the 24h window (357 vs 302)
  • Token retains a public social presence (Twitter) which could support continued speculative interest
  • Broad 24h price change remains strongly positive (+128.94%) despite the intra-hour fade

Bearish factors

  • 24h sell volume exceeds buy volume ($71.79K vs $57.90K)
  • Clear blow-off top candle pattern with long upper wick and subsequent ~95% volume contraction
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.48K) relative to FDV ($562.03K) increases downside slippage risk
  • Short-term momentum already negative (5m: -5.66%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority leaves open tail risk of supply dilution or freezing

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to only 3 hourly candles being available (extremely limited price history), missing sniper and holder-history data, unknown mint/freeze authority status, and a very shallow, easily-manipulated liquidity pool. Any prediction is highly speculative given these data gaps.

JIRACHI call history

Full track record →

Sep 24bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
HMD6LV...QSrW
Total Supply
999,995,930.14 JIRACHI

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.48K) relative to FDV ($562.03K), creating high slippage and drain risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out arbitrary minting or account freezing
  • Parabolic, highly volatile price action (128.94% 24h, with a 24x intra-hour spike and fade) typical of speculative/pump-style tokens
  • No sniper coverage data, leaving early-buyer dump risk unassessed despite a clear blow-off candle pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (10:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000039, spiked intra-candle to a high of $0.0000387, and closed at that high on volume of $67.6K — an early breakout candle. Candle 2 (11:00 UTC) was a massive expansion candle: opened at $0.0000387, rocketed to a high of $0.000943 (roughly 24x the open), then pulled back sharply to close at $0.000540 on huge volume of $1.62M — a classic long-upper-wick 'blow-off then fade' candle indicating aggressive buying followed by heavy profit-taking/selling into the spike. Candle 3 (12:00 UTC) is a smaller-range candle: opened at $0.000540, ranged between $0.000528 and $0.000642, and closed at $0.000564 on much lower volume of $83.3K, suggesting consolidation after the parabolic move.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (from candle 1 to candle 3) the token is up dramatically (~128.9% over 24h per the price feed), but short-term price action within the last hour shows a sharp retracement from the $0.000943 spike high down to the $0.000528-$0.000642 range, and the 5-minute change is -5.66%, indicating short-term downward momentum after the blow-off top.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

45%

Sell

55%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000528 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000387 (candle 1/2 breakout level)

Immediate resistance

$0.000642 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.000943 (candle 2 spike high)

Immediate support sits at the candle 3 low of $0.000528; a break below could target the prior breakout zone near $0.0000387, though that level is far below current price and represents a much larger structural support from before the parabolic move. Immediate resistance is the candle 3 high of $0.000642, with major resistance at the candle 2 spike high of $0.000943 — a level that would need to be reclaimed to signal renewed bullish momentum.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick blow-off candle (candle 2) signaling exhaustion after a ~24x intra-candle spike
  • Sharp volume climax followed by ~95% volume contraction, typical of post-pump consolidation
  • Short-term red 5-minute candle within a broader 24h uptrend, indicating early signs of momentum fading

Liquidity

Liquidity

$40,478.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $40.48K against a fully diluted valuation of $562.03K is extremely thin — liquidity represents roughly 7.2% of FDV, indicating shallow pool depth on the Raydium CPMM pair (BQkWYToxDKqjhesAM1R2gAUMQ7HRunHBKnJor4rQNQe4). At this liquidity level, even modest trade sizes (a few thousand dollars) could produce significant slippage and price impact, consistent with the token's extreme intraday volatility (see candle data). 24h sell volume ($71.79K) exceeds buy volume ($57.90K), giving a net outflow with sell pressure at 55.4% vs buy pressure 44.6% — a mild bearish skew despite the token's massive 24h price gain. Buyer count (357) slightly exceeds seller count (302), and buy/sell transaction counts are roughly balanced (430 buys vs 397 sells), suggesting broad participation but net dollar flow favoring sellers, likely profit-taking after the sharp rally.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,995,930.14 JIRACHI

FDV

$562.03K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +128.94%, 1h change of +73.18%, and an intra-hour spike to $0.000943 followed by a retrace to ~$0.000564 demonstrate extreme volatility. A single hourly candle saw price move roughly 24x from open to high before fading.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $40.48K against an FDV of $562.03K, and the pool sits on a single Raydium CPMM pair. This shallow depth means moderate trade sizes can cause large slippage, and the pool is vulnerable to rapid drain in a sell-off.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 23.05% of supply per the Codex snapshot. This is a moderate concentration for a token this young, but top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, so the full concentration picture (e.g., whether a single wallet dominates within that top-10) cannot be assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.48K) relative to FDV ($562.03K), creating high slippage and drain risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out arbitrary minting or account freezing
  • Parabolic, highly volatile price action (128.94% 24h, with a 24x intra-hour spike and fade) typical of speculative/pump-style tokens
  • No sniper coverage data, leaving early-buyer dump risk unassessed despite a clear blow-off candle pattern
  • Net 24h sell volume exceeding buy volume ($71.79K vs $57.90K), suggesting profit-taking pressure
  • Top-10 wallets hold 23.05% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their historical behavior

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer count (357) slightly exceeds seller count (302), showing some breadth of participation rather than concentrated selling
  • Buy/sell transaction counts are roughly balanced (430 buys vs 397 sells), not indicating one-sided panic selling
  • Token has a public Twitter social link, providing at least one avenue for community/community-vetting (not a guarantee of legitimacy)

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand shallow-liquidity microcap dynamics and can absorb total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable, liquid, or fundamentally-vetted exposure. Position sizing should assume high slippage on entry/exit and the possibility of unverified mint/freeze authority risk.

JIRACHI is a newly-surged microcap token that has just experienced a parabolic 128.94% 24h price move on a thin $40.48K liquidity pool, with a clear blow-off/fade candle pattern and moderate (23.05%) top-10 holder concentration. Critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet activity — is unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative setup rather than a fundamentally analyzable investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buying momentum resumes and volume returns near the candle-2 peak levels, price could retest or exceed the recent high of $0.000943, especially if broader attention (e.g., via the token's Twitter presence) drives renewed retail interest.

  • Renewed social/community attention could reignite buying volume
  • Buyer count (357) currently exceeds seller count (302), showing residual demand
  • Low absolute price and high supply create psychological 'cheap token' appeal for retail speculators

Base Case

Price consolidates within the recent range ($0.000528–$0.000642) as the initial pump fades, with continued elevated volatility and gradually declining volume, absent a fresh catalyst.

  • No new liquidity is added to materially deepen the pool
  • No confirmation emerges on mint/freeze authority in the near term
  • Speculative interest wanes without sustained volume comparable to the initial spike

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic spike was a one-off pump that is already fading; shallow liquidity and unresolved authority risks lead to a sharp drawdown or a liquidity-driven collapse as early buyers and any undisclosed snipers exit.

  • 24h sell volume ($71.79K) already exceeds buy volume ($57.90K)
  • Classic blow-off candle with long upper wick and 95% volume contraction in the following hour
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($40.48K) cannot absorb large sells without severe price impact
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
  • No sniper data to rule out early insider dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 24, 12:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-24 12:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Price feed (spot USD price, % change intervals)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity, FDV)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis
  • No sniper wallet data was provided, preventing assessment of early-buyer/sniper dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, preventing trend or accumulation/distribution analysis
  • Mint authority and freeze authority renouncement status are unknown; rug risk from authorities cannot be determined
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification/labels are unavailable
  • Verified contract, mutability, and update authority status were all reported as unknown in source metadata

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (sniper data, holder history, mint/freeze authority). Cryptocurrency investments, especially in low-liquidity microcap tokens, carry substantial risk of total loss. Conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Last pack magic ownership?

As of 2026-09-24 12:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 23.05% of supply. It reports 1,919 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Last pack magic?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 12:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $57,904.00 in buys and $71,793.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Last pack magic liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +55.97%, from $29,720.62 (2026-09-24 10:00 UTC) to $46,355.59 (2026-09-24 12:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Last pack magic (JIRACHI)?

Short-term momentum has already turned negative (5m: -5.66%) after the blow-off spike to $0.000943. Absent fresh volume, price likely gravitates toward the recent consolidation range or lower, given elevated sell pressure (55.4% of 24h volume) and thin liquidity. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.000387 to $0.000642.

Is JIRACHI a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand shallow-liquidity microcap dynamics and can absorb total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable, liquid, or fundamentally-vetted exposure. Position sizing should assume high slippage on entry/exit and the possibility of unverified mint/freeze authority risk.

What are the key risks of holding JIRACHI?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.48K) relative to FDV ($562.03K), creating high slippage and drain risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out arbitrary minting or account freezing • Parabolic, highly volatile price action (128.94% 24h, with a 24x intra-hour spike and fade) typical of speculative/pump-style tokens

← Back to all predictions

Track JIRACHI