Magnolia

catwifmask Price Today & AI Analysis

Magnolia
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 15, 2026

HGLycrs4DnhNw62bDr5Bhup21g9w11ptqPccuos9pump

$0.052136

FDV $2,134

LiveContract:HGLycrs4DnhNw62bDr5Bhup21g9w11ptqPccuos9pumpChain:SolanaHolders:107Market cap:$2,134

More tokens on Solana

THEBLOOP

THEBLOOP

The Bloop

$0.0527950.0%
MC $2.8K
Clarus the

Clarus the

Clarus the Dogcow

$0.0517650.0%
MC $1.8K
ANDV-26

ANDV-26

Andv-26

$0.0519620.0%
MC $2.0K
ESD

ESD

Exploding Swimming Dolphin

$0.0520400.0%
MC $2.0K
MOZY

MOZY

MOZY

$0.0521660.0%
MC $2.2K
TRUMP

TRUMP

OFFICIAL TRUMP

$2.784.3%
MC $2.78B

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Magnolia

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 15, 07:17 AM
FDV

$99,502

Liquidity

$41,819

Holders

705

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

catwifmask (symbol: Magnolia) is a PumpSwap-listed Solana meme token with a ~$99.5K FDV and ~$41.8K total liquidity. The token experienced a dramatic price surge of ~45% in 24h (and +66% in the last 5 minutes), driven almost entirely by a single explosive candle in the 06:00 UTC hour. However, the data reveals severe anomalies: holder metrics show 690 of 705 total holders were added within the last hour (98% of all holders), the historical holder series was flat at 15 for the entire prior 30 days, top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration figures report 0% for top 10 and top 100 (likely a data artifact), and sell pressure dominates at 71.7% of 24h volume. These signals collectively indicate extremely high manipulation and rug-pull risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive single-candle price pump: +~240% low-to-high in the 06:00 UTC candle before partial retracement
Holder count jumped from 15 to 705 within the last hour — a 4,600% spike in a single hour
Sell pressure overwhelmingly dominates at 71.7% of 24h volume ($176.4K sells vs $69.5K buys)
Liquidity is extremely shallow at $41.8K against $245.9K in 24h combined volume
No top holder data available and supply concentration reports 0% — data integrity is questionable
Token launched via Discord (discord.gg/uxento) with unverified contract and unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just experienced a violent pump-and-dump pattern. The 06:00 UTC candle showed a low of $0.0000275 and a high of $0.0001011 — a ~268% intra-candle range — before closing at $0.0000957. The most recent candle (07:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001000 and closed lower at $0.0000995, suggesting the pump is losing momentum. With 71.7% sell pressure, 4,541 sells vs 1,793 buys, and only $41.8K liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome.

Target low$0.000027 (retest of 06:00 UTC candle low)
Target high$0.000101 (06:00 UTC candle high resistance)
Support: $0.0000950 (recent close / 07:00 UTC low), $0.0000275 (06:00 UTC candle low — major support)
Resistance: $0.0001005 (07:00 UTC open / 06:00 UTC high cluster), $0.0001011 (06:00 UTC absolute high)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Given the token was dormant at 15 holders for 30+ days before a sudden 1-hour explosion to 705 holders, the medium-term outlook is strongly bearish. Tokens exhibiting this pattern — prolonged dormancy followed by a coordinated pump — almost universally retrace to near-zero. Without sustained organic buying and with dominant sell pressure, price is likely to collapse back toward pre-pump levels.

Catalysts
  • Any whale or early holder exit will cascade given shallow $41.8K liquidity
  • Continued sell pressure dominance (71.7%) will erode price support
  • Lack of verified contract or known team reduces confidence in project continuity
  • If the 690 new holders are bots or wash-trade accounts, real demand is near zero

Bullish factors

  • Price is up ~45% in 24h showing short-term momentum
  • 5-minute price change of +66.45% suggests very recent buying activity
  • 1,793 buy transactions in 24h indicates some genuine buyer interest
  • 563 unique buyers participated in 24h trading

Bearish factors

  • 71.7% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($176.4K sells vs $69.5K buys)
  • Holder count was flat at 15 for 30 consecutive days before a suspicious 1-hour spike to 705
  • Liquidity of $41.8K is extremely shallow relative to $245.9K daily volume
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority, Discord-only launch
  • Token name/symbol mismatch (name: catwifmask, symbol: Magnolia) is a red flag
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, 0% reported supply concentration (likely a data error), unknown update authority, and only 2 OHLC candles available for technical analysis. The anomalous holder spike and data gaps make precise price modeling unreliable.

Magnolia call history

Full track record →
Jul 15bearish
24h-94.2%
7d-98.1%
30d-98.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (06:00 UTC) is the defining event: Open $0.0000297, High $0.0001011, Low $0.0000275, Close $0.0000957 — an enormous bullish body with a massive upper wick, indicating a violent pump followed by partial sell-off. Volume was $123,886. Candle [1] (07:00 UTC): Open $0.0001000, High $0.0001000, Low $0.0000995, Close $0.0000995 — a very tight bearish candle with minimal range, suggesting the pump has stalled and price is consolidating just below the high. The pattern is consistent with a 'pump and stall' setup, which frequently precedes a sharp reversal.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 28%Sell 72%

Short-term price is technically in an uptrend from the pre-pump baseline (~$0.0000297 open) to current ~$0.0000995. However, the medium-term context (30 days of dormancy at ~15 holders, near-zero price activity) and the dominant sell pressure suggest the underlying trend is bearish. The 'uptrend' is entirely pump-driven.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000950 (07:00 UTC candle low / recent close cluster)
Major$0.0000275 (06:00 UTC candle absolute low — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0001005 (07:00 UTC open, tested and rejected)
Major$0.0001011 (06:00 UTC absolute high)

The $0.0000995–$0.0001011 zone is a strong resistance cluster formed by the pump candle's high and the subsequent open. The $0.0000275 level represents the pre-pump price floor and is the major support if the token retraces. There is very little structural support between $0.0000950 and $0.0000275 given the near-vertical pump.

Notable patterns

  • Massive bullish engulfing / spike candle (06:00 UTC) with upper wick — classic pump pattern
  • Volume climax followed by volume decline — bearish divergence
  • Doji-like tight candle (07:00 UTC) at the top of a spike — potential reversal signal
  • No prior price history to establish meaningful trend structure — token was dormant
  • Name/symbol mismatch in metadata is an anomaly flag

Total holders705
24h Δ+690
7d Δ+690
30d Δ+690
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at 15 for the entire 30-day historical period (June 15 – July 14, 2026), then spiked by 690 holders within a single hour coinciding with the price pump. This is not organic growth — it is a near-perfect correlation between a coordinated price pump and a sudden holder count explosion, which is a hallmark of bot activity or wash trading.

The historical holder data is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days (June 15 to July 14), the holder count was exactly 15 with zero net change. Then, within the last hour, 690 new holders were added — representing 97.9% of all current holders. This pattern is inconsistent with organic adoption and strongly suggests either: (1) coordinated bot wallets acquiring tokens to simulate growth, (2) a pre-planned pump event where insiders held 15 wallets for weeks before executing, or (3) a data anomaly. The 98% single-hour acquisition rate is a severe red flag.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A — no top holder data available

unknown — top holder data not provided by data source

0.00%

Top holder data is explicitly unavailable ('No top holders available'). The reported supply concentration of 0% for both top 10 and top 100 holders is almost certainly a data artifact or API error, not a genuine reflection of distribution. Given the token was held by only 15 wallets for 30 days before the pump, actual concentration is likely extremely high among those original 15 wallets. Without on-chain holder data, whale behavior cannot be assessed. The distribution is classified as 'very_concentrated' based on the 15-wallet pre-pump history, despite the 0% reported figure. Investors should treat the missing data as a risk amplifier, not a green flag.

Liquidity$41,820
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$69,480
Sell$176,400
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers563
Unique sellers1,225

Liquidity is critically shallow at $41.82K against $245.88K in combined 24h volume — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~5.9x. This means the pool is being churned at nearly 6x its depth daily, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. The net flow is strongly negative: $176.4K in sells vs $69.5K in buys represents a $106.9K net outflow. With 1,225 unique sellers vs 563 unique buyers (2.17:1 ratio), market health is poor. The PumpSwap pair (CJ4ZjfPgjVsFr4Xbj5h4FUyJZcb5DwqWuJzcuqGXzUqq) is the sole liquidity venue, meaning there is no alternative exit route if this pool is drained or manipulated.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,979.39
FDV$99,502.39

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1 billion tokens (999,999,979.39), a standard PumpFun/PumpSwap meme token supply. FDV is ~$99.5K. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified. Mutable is set to 'false', which is a mild positive (metadata cannot be changed), but mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The 'unknown' update authority is a concern — if mint authority has not been renounced, the supply could be inflated. The unverified contract and Discord-only launch (discord.gg/uxento) further reduce confidence in the tokenomics integrity. The name 'catwifmask' and symbol 'Magnolia' mismatch is unusual and may indicate a hastily deployed or deceptive token.

Volatility
high

The token pumped ~268% intra-candle (06:00 UTC) and has a 45% 24h price change. With only $41.8K liquidity, even small sell orders cause significant price impact. The 5-minute price change of +66.45% indicates extreme ongoing volatility.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $41.82K against $245.88K in 24h volume (5.9x turnover ratio) creates severe slippage risk. A single large sell order could collapse the price. There is only one liquidity pool on PumpSwap.

Concentration
high

The token was held by only 15 wallets for 30 consecutive days before the pump. Despite the reported 0% top-10 concentration (likely a data error), the pre-pump holder structure strongly implies extreme concentration among original holders. Top holder data is unavailable, preventing direct verification.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, but the trading pattern — 71.7% sell pressure, 4,541 sells vs 1,793 buys, 2.17:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — is consistent with early holders dumping into a coordinated pump. The 690-holder spike in one hour may represent bot wallets facilitating distribution.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is mutable=false (mild positive) but the overall authority picture is opaque. Unverified contract on a Discord-launched token with unknown authority is a significant rug-pull risk factor.

Key risks

  • Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant at 15 holders, then 690 new holders in 1 hour
  • 71.7% sell pressure with $106.9K net outflow in 24h
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($41.8K) relative to volume ($245.9K)
  • Unknown update authority and unverified contract
  • No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Token name/symbol mismatch (catwifmask / Magnolia) suggests deceptive or rushed deployment
  • Discord-only launch with no verifiable team or roadmap
  • Possible wash trading or bot activity inflating holder and transaction counts

Mitigating factors

  • Metadata mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with a verifiable on-chain pair address
  • 563 unique buyers in 24h suggests some genuine retail interest
  • FDV of ~$99.5K is low, limiting absolute loss exposure for small positions
  • Possible spam flag is 'false' per metadata
Suitable for: This token is unsuitable for any risk-averse investor. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline should consider any exposure, and only with capital they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of anomalous holder growth, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and pump-and-dump price action places this in the highest risk category.

catwifmask (Magnolia) presents a classic high-risk meme token pump scenario with multiple severe red flags. The token was dormant for 30+ days at 15 holders before a coordinated pump drove price up ~268% intra-candle and added 690 holders in a single hour. Sell pressure dominates at 71.7%, liquidity is critically shallow, and key data (top holders, authority status, sniper data) is missing or anomalous. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices.

Bull case (low)

If the pump is the beginning of a genuine viral meme cycle (similar to early PumpFun launches), continued social media momentum from the Discord community could attract new buyers, sustain price above $0.0001, and push FDV toward $200K–$500K.

  • Viral spread of the 'catwifmask' meme concept on social media
  • Discord community (discord.gg/uxento) driving coordinated buying campaigns
  • Broader Solana meme season providing market tailwinds
  • Low FDV ($99.5K) making percentage gains appear accessible to retail

Base case

Price retraces 50–70% from the pump high over the next 24–72 hours as early holders continue distributing. The token stabilizes at a lower level ($0.000040–$0.000060) with reduced trading activity, joining the long tail of dormant PumpSwap meme tokens.

  • Sell pressure continues to dominate but does not immediately drain all liquidity
  • Some retail buyers hold positions hoping for a second pump
  • No additional coordinated buying campaigns are executed
  • Liquidity pool remains intact but shrinks as LPs withdraw

Bear case (high)

The 15 original holders dump their concentrated positions into the 690 new buyers, collapsing price back to pre-pump levels (~$0.000027–$0.000030) or lower. Liquidity is drained, the token becomes illiquid, and most of the 705 current holders are left holding near-worthless tokens.

  • Dominant sell pressure (71.7%) already indicating active distribution
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($41.8K) unable to absorb large sell orders
  • No verified team, roadmap, or utility to sustain long-term demand
  • Anomalous holder spike pattern consistent with coordinated pump-and-dump
  • Unknown authority status leaving open the possibility of mint or freeze actions

GeneratedJul 15, 07:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of 2026-07-15T07:00 UTC. OHLC data covers only the last 2 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers June 15 – July 14, 2026 (30 days daily). Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana token mint: HGLycrs4DnhNw62bDr5Bhup21g9w11ptqPccuos9pump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (CJ4ZjfPgjVsFr4Xbj5h4FUyJZcb5DwqWuJzcuqGXzUqq)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, 2026-07-15 06:00–07:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, transaction counts)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series, June 15 – July 14, 2026)
  • Holder distribution metrics (acquisition method, concentration data)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top holder data is completely unavailable — whale concentration cannot be directly measured
  • Supply concentration reports 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data error, not genuine distribution
  • Sniper analysis endpoint returned no data — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed on-chain
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint and freeze authority cannot be confirmed
  • Holder spike of 690 in 1 hour may include bot/wash-trade wallets, inflating real holder count
  • No price history prior to the 06:00 UTC pump candle is available in the provided data
  • Token name (catwifmask) and symbol (Magnolia) mismatch may indicate data integrity issues

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data used contains significant gaps and anomalies that reduce analytical confidence. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This report is based solely on the on-chain data provided and does not account for off-chain developments, team communications, or future market conditions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,979.39

Key Risks

•Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant at 15 holders, then 690 new holders in 1 hour
•71.7% sell pressure with $106.9K net outflow in 24h
•Critically shallow liquidity ($41.8K) relative to volume ($245.9K)
•Unknown update authority and unverified contract

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals must be inferred from trading analytics alone. The 24h data shows 4,541 sells vs 1,793 buys across 1,225 sellers and 563 buyers — a ratio of ~2.2 sellers per buyer. This strongly suggests early participants (likely coordinated wallets or insiders) are distributing into retail buying. The 690-holder spike in a single hour is highly anomalous and may represent bot-generated or wash-trade activity designed to simulate organic growth.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Likely distributing. The dominant sell pressure (71.7% of volume) and the 2.2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio suggest early holders are aggressively exiting into the pump. With no sniper data available, this cannot be confirmed on-chain, but the trading pattern is consistent with coordinated distribution.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for catwifmask (Magnolia)?

The token just experienced a violent pump-and-dump pattern. The 06:00 UTC candle showed a low of $0.0000275 and a high of $0.0001011 — a ~268% intra-candle range — before closing at $0.0000957. The most recent candle (07:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001000 and closed lower at $0.0000995, suggesting the pump is losing momentum. With 71.7% sell pressure, 4,541 sells vs 1,793 buys, and only $41.8K liquidity, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000027 (retest of 06:00 UTC candle low) to $0.000101 (06:00 UTC candle high resistance).

Is Magnolia a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for any risk-averse investor. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline should consider any exposure, and only with capital they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of anomalous holder growth, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and pump-and-dump price action places this in the highest risk category.

How are Magnolia holders trending?

catwifmask currently has 705 holders and is growing (24h: 690, 7d: 690, 30d: 690). The historical holder data is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days (June 15 to July 14), the holder count was exactly 15 with zero net change. Then, within the last hour, 690 new holders were added — representing 97.9% of all current holders. This pattern is inconsistent with organic adoption and strongly suggests either: (1) coordinated bot wallets acquiring tokens to simulate growth, (2) a pre-planned pump event where insiders held 15 wallets for weeks before executing, or (3) a data anomaly. The 98% single-hour acquisition rate is a severe red flag.

What does sniper activity look like for Magnolia?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Magnolia?

Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant at 15 holders, then 690 new holders in 1 hour • 71.7% sell pressure with $106.9K net outflow in 24h • Critically shallow liquidity ($41.8K) relative to volume ($245.9K)

← Back to all predictions

Track Magnolia