NINA

Nina The Monkey Price Today & AI Analysis

NINA
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 13, 2026

H22aquDouZNFyfykwnXmY5Y9z5sMQtLFy5tUKR99pump

$0.000428

+915.80%

FDV $421,862

LiveContract:H22aquDouZNFyfykwnXmY5Y9z5sMQtLFy5tUKR99pumpChain:SolanaHolders:3,073Market cap:$421,862

More tokens on Solana

FLAME

FLAME

Flame

$0.002219145.5%
MC $2.22M
OTC

OTC

OTC

$0.00827335.4%
MC $5.82M
CHILLGUY

CHILLGUY

Just a chill guy

$0.01253.4%
MC $12.55M
ALLINU

ALLINU

ALLINU

$0.00078758.1%
MC $787.4K
MDOG

MDOG

Privacy Dog

$0.000744993.6%
MC $734.2K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.26218.3%
MC $222.68M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about NINA

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Sep 13, 05:16 PM
FDV

$421,862

Liquidity

$31,073

Holders

0

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Nina The Monkey (NINA) is a Solana pump.fun/PumpSwap micro-cap meme token trading at $0.000428, up an extreme +915.8% in 24h. The token has only $31.07K in total liquidity against a $421.86K fully diluted valuation, and 2 hourly candles show violent intra-candle swings (one hour's range spanned from $0.0000034 to $0.00048, a >140x intra-candle move). Buy/sell volume is heavy and near 50/50 ($1.32M buy vs $1.29M sell over 24h) but liquidity depth is very thin relative to that volume, implying high slippage and manipulation risk. No holder distribution or sniper data is available, which is itself a major transparency gap for a token exhibiting this kind of volatility.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Neutral
Extreme 24h price move (+915.8%) against very shallow liquidity ($31.07K)
Volume-to-liquidity ratio is enormous ($1.3M+ daily volume vs $31K liquidity), signaling likely wash trading, thin order books, or reflexive pump activity
No holder concentration or sniper data available to verify distribution health
Metadata fields (update authority, mutable status, verified contract) are all unknown, removing standard rug-risk checks
5m price change is already negative (-17.9%) despite the 24h number being wildly positive, suggesting the pump may already be reversing

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term

neutral
24h-7d

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Target lowunknown
Target highunknown
Support: —
Resistance: —

Medium term

neutral
30d-90d

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Catalysts

—

Bullish factors

—

Bearish factors

—

Confidence: low. No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

NINA call history

Full track record →
Sep 13neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (16:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000034, spiked to a high of $0.000485, and closed at $0.000446 — a massive bullish expansion candle with volume of ~2.29M (in token/quote units). Candle 2 (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.000446, spiked further to a high of $0.000713, then fell back to a low of $0.000338 before closing at $0.000425 — effectively a large upper-wick 'shooting star'-like candle showing the rally was rejected and mostly round-tripped intra-hour, with volume falling sharply to ~500K, a bearish divergence (price near-flat, volume collapsing).

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 51%Sell 49%

Medium-term (24h) trend is up given the +915.8% move, but the short-term intra-hour structure shows the second candle failing to hold its highs and volume drying up, pointing to short-term downward pressure/consolidation after the initial spike.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000338 (candle 2 low)
Major$0.0000034 (candle 1 low, likely an illiquid wick/outlier)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000713 (candle 2 high)
Major$0.000485 (candle 1 high, since breached)

Price is currently trapped between the $0.000338 intra-hour low and the $0.000713 intra-hour high established in the most recent candle. A break below $0.000338 would open room toward the deeper wick low near $0.0000034, though that level looks like an extreme illiquidity artifact rather than a durable support. A reclaim of $0.000713 would be needed to resume the uptrend.

Notable patterns

  • Large bullish expansion candle followed by an upper-wick rejection candle (shooting-star-like structure)
  • Volume drying up (~78% decline) on the attempted breakout, a bearish divergence
  • Extreme intra-candle range (low of $0.0000034 to high of $0.00048 within one hour) indicative of a very illiquid, thinly traded market
  • 5-minute reversal (-17.9%) immediately following a strong 1h gain (+31.8%), suggesting momentum exhaustion

Liquidity$31.07K
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$1.32M
Sell$1.29M
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers7,603
Unique sellers5,900

Total liquidity of just $31.07K is extremely shallow relative to a fully diluted valuation of $421.86K and especially relative to the ~$2.61M in combined 24h buy+sell volume — an ~84x volume-to-liquidity ratio. This mismatch is a strong indicator that trades are experiencing significant slippage and that price is highly susceptible to manipulation by relatively small orders, consistent with the observed multi-hundred-percent intra-hour swings. Buy volume ($1.32M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($1.29M), and there are more unique buyers (7,603) than sellers (5,900), giving a net inflow bias, but this does not offset the structural fragility created by the thin liquidity pool.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply985,574,993.97 NINA
FDV$421,862

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, mutability, and verification status are all listed as 'unknown' in the provided metadata. This is a pump.fun-originated token (mint suffix 'pump') now trading on PumpSwap, which typically implies bonding-curve-based mint/freeze revocation upon migration, but this cannot be confirmed from the data provided. Total supply is ~985.57M tokens with a fully diluted valuation of ~$421.86K at current price. Without confirmation of renounced authorities, there remains a residual risk that supply could be altered or that freeze functionality could be used against holders, though this is speculative given the pump.fun origin.

Volatility
high

24h price change of +915.8% and intra-hour swings ranging from a low of $0.0000034 to a high of $0.000713 demonstrate extreme volatility, with a -17.9% reversal in just the last 5 minutes.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $31.07K against $2.61M in 24h combined volume and a $421.86K FDV creates a highly fragile market prone to large slippage and price manipulation from relatively small trades.

Concentration
high

No holder or whale distribution data is available, and in the absence of verification, concentration risk must be assumed high by default for a low-liquidity micro-cap token of this nature.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available to rule out concentrated early-buyer positions; combined with the extreme, already-reversing price spike, the risk of a sharp dump from early holders/snipers cannot be excluded and should be assumed elevated.

Authority
medium

Mint/freeze authority status and update authority are all listed as unknown. While pump.fun-origin tokens often have revoked authorities post-migration, this cannot be confirmed here, leaving residual uncertainty.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Parabolic +915.8% 24h move with signs of exhaustion (falling volume, upper-wick rejection candle, -17.9% 5m move) suggesting a sharp pullback is plausible
  • Total absence of holder concentration and sniper data removes key due-diligence signals typically used to assess rug/dump risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status leaves open the possibility of supply manipulation, though pump.fun tokens commonly have these revoked
  • Meme-coin nature with no real utility described (description field is 'none'), reliant purely on speculative/social momentum

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($1.32M) modestly exceeds sell volume ($1.29M), and unique buyers (7,603) outnumber unique sellers (5,900), showing net positive demand over the last day
  • Token trades on PumpSwap with active, high-frequency trading activity (22,903 buys / 21,521 sells in 24h), indicating the market is not completely dead or abandoned
  • Pump.fun origin (mint suffix) typically implies automated liquidity migration mechanics that reduce (but do not eliminate) certain classic rug mechanisms
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss. This token exhibits classic thin-liquidity meme-coin characteristics — extreme volatility, an 84x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and a complete absence of holder/sniper transparency data. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, retirement or long-horizon portfolios, or anyone unable to withstand a sudden 50-90% drawdown.

NINA is a highly speculative pump.fun-derived meme token that has seen a violent, likely unsustainable +915.8% 24h rally on extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K). While near-term buy/sell flow is marginally positive, the combination of shallow liquidity, an already-reversing intra-hour candle structure, and a total lack of holder/sniper transparency data makes this a high-risk, momentum-driven trade rather than an investment with a durable thesis.

Bull case (low)

If social/community momentum continues (the token has an active Twitter presence) and new liquidity/buyers enter faster than early holders exit, price could extend gains further, especially given the still-modest $421.86K FDV leaves room for re-rating if attention increases.

  • Sustained viral/social attention driving continuous new buyer inflow
  • More unique buyers than sellers in the past 24h (7,603 vs 5,900)
  • Low FDV relative to some other meme tokens leaves theoretical upside room if narrative catches on
  • Possible liquidity additions reducing slippage and stabilizing trading

Base case

Price consolidates with continued high volatility, giving back a significant portion of the 24h gain (potentially 30-60%) as momentum fades, while trading remains active but choppy given the persistent liquidity/volume mismatch.

  • No major new liquidity injections occur in the short term
  • Buy/sell flow remains roughly balanced (currently 50.7%/49.3%) without a decisive directional catalyst
  • Thin liquidity continues to amplify both up and down price swings
  • Social attention neither fully dies nor meaningfully escalates from current levels

Bear case (high)

The parabolic move reverses sharply as early buyers and any concentrated holders (unverifiable due to missing data) take profits into the thin order book, causing a fast, high-slippage crash back toward pre-spike levels.

  • Volume collapsed ~78% between the two most recent candles even as price attempted new highs — bearish divergence
  • 5-minute price change already -17.9%, showing the rally losing steam immediately
  • $31.07K liquidity cannot absorb meaningful sell pressure without severe price impact
  • No data to confirm distribution is healthy; concentrated ownership could trigger a cascading dump
  • Meme coin with no stated utility/description, purely narrative/speculation driven

GeneratedSep 13, 05:16 PM
Data freshnessData reflects the most recent available snapshot as of the last hourly candle (2026-09-13T17:00 UTC); price/volume figures are within the last 24 hours of that timestamp.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap price and pair data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust technical pattern confirmation
  • No holder distribution data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are placeholders reflecting a total absence of data, not actual measurements
  • No sniper data available — smart money signals could not be computed and are marked unknown/zero
  • Metadata fields (update authority, mint/freeze authority, verification, mutability) are all listed as unknown, preventing full rug-risk verification
  • Extremely thin liquidity means quoted prices may not be achievable for meaningful trade sizes, reducing the reliability of price-based conclusions

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited on-chain and market data for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency, and especially micro-cap meme tokens like NINA, carry a high risk of total loss due to extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and potential for manipulation. Sections with missing source data (holder trends, whale distribution, sniper signals) are explicitly marked as unavailable rather than estimated. Always conduct independent research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply985,574,993.97 NINA

Key Risks

•Extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
•Parabolic +915.8% 24h move with signs of exhaustion (falling volume, upper-wick rejection candle, -17.9% 5m move) suggesting a sharp pullback is plausible
•Total absence of holder concentration and sniper data removes key due-diligence signals typically used to assess rug/dump risk
•Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status leaves open the possibility of supply manipulation, though pump.fun tokens commonly have these revoked

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data was provided for this token (endpoint returned no data), so no sniper concentration, PnL, or sell-through metrics can be computed. This is a data gap, not a signal of safety or danger, and should be treated with caution given the token's extreme volatility.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

unknown - no sniper data available

Unable to assess directly due to lack of sniper/holder data; however, 24h analytics show more unique buyers (7,603) than sellers (5,900), a mildly positive breadth signal, though this does not equate to early-buyer profitability data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is NINA a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss. This token exhibits classic thin-liquidity meme-coin characteristics — extreme volatility, an 84x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and a complete absence of holder/sniper transparency data. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, retirement or long-horizon portfolios, or anyone unable to withstand a sudden 50-90% drawdown.

What does sniper activity look like for NINA?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding NINA?

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Parabolic +915.8% 24h move with signs of exhaustion (falling volume, upper-wick rejection candle, -17.9% 5m move) suggesting a sharp pullback is plausible • Total absence of holder concentration and sniper data removes key due-diligence signals typically used to assess rug/dump risk

← Back to all predictions

Track NINA