Nina The Monkey Price Today & AI Analysis

NINASolanaAnalysis as of Sep 13, 2026

$0.0₅4951

+0.37% 24h

Contract

Live

H22aquDouZNFyfykwnXmY5Y9z5sMQtLFy5tUKR99pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,787

Market cap

$4,875

At a $1M market cap, $NINA would be $0.001016 (205x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is NINA a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 81% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

81%2 bundlers, 50 insiders still holding

Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about NINA

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

PEPEMONPepémon$0.0₅2259-2.1%MC $2.3K

PROMPROM$0.0₅3036-2.3%MC $3.0K

:pbleh cat$0.0₅3447-0.3%MC $3.4K

ZeusAnsems Dog$0.0₄1034+0.9%MC $10.3K

WENDYWendy The Coyote$0.0₅5561+1.8%MC $4.9K

FrongusFrongus$0.000209+404.5%MC $201.2K

Nina The Monkey: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-13 17:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$31,073.00

How concentrated is Nina The Monkey ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Nina The Monkey?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Nina The Monkey liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-13 17:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $31,073.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-13 17:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 13, 05:16 PM UTC

FDV

$421,862

Liquidity

$31,073.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Nina The Monkey (NINA) is a Solana pump.fun/PumpSwap micro-cap meme token trading at $0.000428, up an extreme +915.8% in 24h. The token has only $31.07K in total liquidity against a $421.86K fully diluted valuation, and 2 hourly candles show violent intra-candle swings (one hour's range spanned from $0.0000034 to $0.00048, a >140x intra-candle move). Buy/sell volume is heavy and near 50/50 ($1.32M buy vs $1.29M sell over 24h) but liquidity depth is very thin relative to that volume, implying high slippage and manipulation risk. No holder distribution or sniper data is available, which is itself a major transparency gap for a token exhibiting this kind of volatility.

Key points

Extreme 24h price move (+915.8%) against very shallow liquidity ($31.07K)
Volume-to-liquidity ratio is enormous ($1.3M+ daily volume vs $31K liquidity), signaling likely wash trading, thin order books, or reflexive pump activity
No holder concentration or sniper data available to verify distribution health
Metadata fields (update authority, mutable status, verified contract) are all unknown, removing standard rug-risk checks
5m price change is already negative (-17.9%) despite the 24h number being wildly positive, suggesting the pump may already be reversing

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle shows price spiking to a high of $0.000713 then closing back down at $0.000425, essentially round-tripping the entire gain within the hour. The 5m change is already -17.9%, indicating momentum is fading immediately after the parabolic move. With only $31K of liquidity, further downside volatility is likely as early buyers and any sniper-like actors take profit.

Target low

0.00020

Target high

0.00060

Support: 0.000337 (hour 2 low), 0.0000034 (hour 1 low, extreme low outlier)
Resistance: 0.000713 (hour 2 high), 0.000485 (hour 1 high)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Tokens exhibiting this magnitude of 24h gain on such thin liquidity typically mean-revert sharply once speculative momentum fades, unless sustained new demand (e.g., social virality, listings) continues to appear. Without holder or sniper data to confirm broad distribution, the base case leans toward a retracement of a large portion of the run-up.

Catalysts

Continued social/Twitter momentum could sustain further upside
Any liquidity additions could reduce slippage and stabilize price
A large holder or sniper dump would accelerate downside
Thin liquidity means even modest sell orders could crash price disproportionately

Bullish factors

Very high 24h buy volume ($1.32M) with more unique buyers (7,603) than sellers (5,900), suggesting broad-based demand at least over the past day
Buy pressure (50.7%) slightly exceeds sell pressure (49.3%) in the 24h window

Bearish factors

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K) relative to daily volume (~$2.6M combined) and FDV ($421.86K), a classic setup for high slippage and rapid crashes
Most recent hourly candle closed near its open after spiking 68% intra-hour and then round-tripping, a bearish reversal/exhaustion signature
5-minute price change is sharply negative (-17.9%) even as 24h change remains positive, indicating the pump is already rolling over
No holder concentration, sniper, or authority data available to rule out concentrated ownership or rug risk

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles were provided, metadata fields are almost entirely unknown, and there is no holder or sniper data. This severely limits the ability to project price with confidence; conclusions rely mainly on the visible extreme volatility and liquidity/volume mismatch.

NINA call history

Full track record →

Sep 13neutral@ $0.000428

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: H22aqu...pump
Total Supply: 985,574,993.97 NINA

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic +915.8% 24h move with signs of exhaustion (falling volume, upper-wick rejection candle, -17.9% 5m move) suggesting a sharp pullback is plausible
Total absence of holder concentration and sniper data removes key due-diligence signals typically used to assess rug/dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status leaves open the possibility of supply manipulation, though pump.fun tokens commonly have these revoked

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (16:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000034, spiked to a high of $0.000485, and closed at $0.000446 — a massive bullish expansion candle with volume of ~2.29M (in token/quote units). Candle 2 (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.000446, spiked further to a high of $0.000713, then fell back to a low of $0.000338 before closing at $0.000425 — effectively a large upper-wick 'shooting star'-like candle showing the rally was rejected and mostly round-tripped intra-hour, with volume falling sharply to ~500K, a bearish divergence (price near-flat, volume collapsing).

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) trend is up given the +915.8% move, but the short-term intra-hour structure shows the second candle failing to hold its highs and volume drying up, pointing to short-term downward pressure/consolidation after the initial spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000338 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000034 (candle 1 low, likely an illiquid wick/outlier)

Immediate resistance

$0.000713 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000485 (candle 1 high, since breached)

Price is currently trapped between the $0.000338 intra-hour low and the $0.000713 intra-hour high established in the most recent candle. A break below $0.000338 would open room toward the deeper wick low near $0.0000034, though that level looks like an extreme illiquidity artifact rather than a durable support. A reclaim of $0.000713 would be needed to resume the uptrend.

Notable patterns

Large bullish expansion candle followed by an upper-wick rejection candle (shooting-star-like structure)
Volume drying up (~78% decline) on the attempted breakout, a bearish divergence
Extreme intra-candle range (low of $0.0000034 to high of $0.00048 within one hour) indicative of a very illiquid, thinly traded market
5-minute reversal (-17.9%) immediately following a strong 1h gain (+31.8%), suggesting momentum exhaustion

Liquidity

$31,073.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $31.07K is extremely shallow relative to a fully diluted valuation of $421.86K and especially relative to the ~$2.61M in combined 24h buy+sell volume — an ~84x volume-to-liquidity ratio. This mismatch is a strong indicator that trades are experiencing significant slippage and that price is highly susceptible to manipulation by relatively small orders, consistent with the observed multi-hundred-percent intra-hour swings. Buy volume ($1.32M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($1.29M), and there are more unique buyers (7,603) than sellers (5,900), giving a net inflow bias, but this does not offset the structural fragility created by the thin liquidity pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

985,574,993.97 NINA

FDV

$421,862

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +915.8% and intra-hour swings ranging from a low of $0.0000034 to a high of $0.000713 demonstrate extreme volatility, with a -17.9% reversal in just the last 5 minutes.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $31.07K against $2.61M in 24h combined volume and a $421.86K FDV creates a highly fragile market prone to large slippage and price manipulation from relatively small trades.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic +915.8% 24h move with signs of exhaustion (falling volume, upper-wick rejection candle, -17.9% 5m move) suggesting a sharp pullback is plausible
Total absence of holder concentration and sniper data removes key due-diligence signals typically used to assess rug/dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status leaves open the possibility of supply manipulation, though pump.fun tokens commonly have these revoked
Meme-coin nature with no real utility described (description field is 'none'), reliant purely on speculative/social momentum

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($1.32M) modestly exceeds sell volume ($1.29M), and unique buyers (7,603) outnumber unique sellers (5,900), showing net positive demand over the last day
Token trades on PumpSwap with active, high-frequency trading activity (22,903 buys / 21,521 sells in 24h), indicating the market is not completely dead or abandoned
Pump.fun origin (mint suffix) typically implies automated liquidity migration mechanics that reduce (but do not eliminate) certain classic rug mechanisms

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss. This token exhibits classic thin-liquidity meme-coin characteristics — extreme volatility, an 84x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and a complete absence of holder/sniper transparency data. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, retirement or long-horizon portfolios, or anyone unable to withstand a sudden 50-90% drawdown.

NINA is a highly speculative pump.fun-derived meme token that has seen a violent, likely unsustainable +915.8% 24h rally on extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K). While near-term buy/sell flow is marginally positive, the combination of shallow liquidity, an already-reversing intra-hour candle structure, and a total lack of holder/sniper transparency data makes this a high-risk, momentum-driven trade rather than an investment with a durable thesis.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If social/community momentum continues (the token has an active Twitter presence) and new liquidity/buyers enter faster than early holders exit, price could extend gains further, especially given the still-modest $421.86K FDV leaves room for re-rating if attention increases.

Sustained viral/social attention driving continuous new buyer inflow
More unique buyers than sellers in the past 24h (7,603 vs 5,900)
Low FDV relative to some other meme tokens leaves theoretical upside room if narrative catches on
Possible liquidity additions reducing slippage and stabilizing trading

Base Case

Price consolidates with continued high volatility, giving back a significant portion of the 24h gain (potentially 30-60%) as momentum fades, while trading remains active but choppy given the persistent liquidity/volume mismatch.

No major new liquidity injections occur in the short term
Buy/sell flow remains roughly balanced (currently 50.7%/49.3%) without a decisive directional catalyst
Thin liquidity continues to amplify both up and down price swings
Social attention neither fully dies nor meaningfully escalates from current levels

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic move reverses sharply as early buyers and any concentrated holders (unverifiable due to missing data) take profits into the thin order book, causing a fast, high-slippage crash back toward pre-spike levels.

Volume collapsed ~78% between the two most recent candles even as price attempted new highs — bearish divergence
5-minute price change already -17.9%, showing the rally losing steam immediately
$31.07K liquidity cannot absorb meaningful sell pressure without severe price impact
No data to confirm distribution is healthy; concentrated ownership could trigger a cascading dump
Meme coin with no stated utility/description, purely narrative/speculation driven

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 13, 05:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-13 17:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
PumpSwap price and pair data
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust technical pattern confirmation
No holder distribution data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are placeholders reflecting a total absence of data, not actual measurements
No sniper data available — smart money signals could not be computed and are marked unknown/zero
Metadata fields (update authority, mint/freeze authority, verification, mutability) are all listed as unknown, preventing full rug-risk verification
Extremely thin liquidity means quoted prices may not be achievable for meaningful trade sizes, reducing the reliability of price-based conclusions

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited on-chain and market data for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency, and especially micro-cap meme tokens like NINA, carry a high risk of total loss due to extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and potential for manipulation. Sections with missing source data (holder trends, whale distribution, sniper signals) are explicitly marked as unavailable rather than estimated. Always conduct independent research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Nina The Monkey (NINA) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 81% of the supply. Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Nina The Monkey (NINA)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Nina The Monkey ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Nina The Monkey?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Nina The Monkey liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-13 17:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $31,073.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Nina The Monkey (NINA)?

Is NINA a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss. This token exhibits classic thin-liquidity meme-coin characteristics — extreme volatility, an 84x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and a complete absence of holder/sniper transparency data. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, retirement or long-horizon portfolios, or anyone unable to withstand a sudden 50-90% drawdown.

What are the key risks of holding NINA?

Extremely thin liquidity ($31.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Parabolic +915.8% 24h move with signs of exhaustion (falling volume, upper-wick rejection candle, -17.9% 5m move) suggesting a sharp pullback is plausible • Total absence of holder concentration and sniper data removes key due-diligence signals typically used to assess rug/dump risk