Reginald Skulinski Price Today & AI Analysis

REGINALDSolanaAnalysis as of May 1, 2026

$0.0₅5056

Contract

Live

GuWqNuKbaG1m84SbXBXBy9wmuepk5s7kYXRAkMeypump

Chain

Solana

Holders

282

Market cap

$5,051

At a $1M market cap, $REGINALD would be $0.001001 (198x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is REGINALD a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

2.4%1 bundler, 4 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about REGINALD

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

MMMMemes Make Millions$0.0₅2500+0.0%MC $2.5K

GrumpyGrumpy Cat$0.0₅3112+0.0%MC $3.1K

CACTCACT$0.0₅2011+0.0%MC $1.9K

SLOPDOMEThe Iron Slopdome$0.0₅3756+0.0%MC $3.3K

crimecatcrimecat$0.0₅2451+0.0%MC $2.4K

ZECZcash$1,266.59+1.1%MC $130.09M

Reginald Skulinski: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-01 16:47 UTC

Holder addresses

684

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$36,102.46

How concentrated is Reginald Skulinski ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 684 addresses (2026-05-01 16:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Reginald Skulinski?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Reginald Skulinski liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-01 16:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $36,102.46. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-01 16:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 1, 04:47 PM UTC

FDV

$244,417

Liquidity

$36,102.46

Holders

684

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Reginald Skulinski (REGINALD) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana memecoin trading at $0.000244 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$244K. The token has experienced a sharp 24h price surge of ~58-65% but faces significant sell pressure (71.3% of 24h volume), shallow liquidity ($36.1K), and a highly fragmented but growing holder base of 684 wallets. The token was dormant for the first ~3 weeks of its existence before a sudden burst of activity beginning April 21, 2026.

Key points

Explosive 30-day holder growth of 91% (from 63 to 684 holders), concentrated almost entirely in the last 10 days
Extremely shallow liquidity pool of $36.1K on PumpSwap, creating high slippage risk for any meaningful position
Top 10 holders control only 25.02% of supply — relatively distributed for a memecoin of this size
Strong 24h price appreciation (+57.9%) despite dominant sell pressure (71.3%), suggesting aggressive buying from new entrants
20 identified snipers with mixed PnL outcomes, indicating no single dominant sniper controlling the narrative

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

The token is showing immediate bearish signals: -5.1% in the last 5 minutes and -19.95% in the last hour after a sharp spike to $0.000341 (candle [1] high). Sell pressure dominates at 71.3% of 24h volume with 2,485 sells vs 1,194 buys. The most recent candle closed well below its open, forming a bearish reversal after the spike high. Short-term retracement toward the $0.000155–$0.000182 range is likely.

Target low

$0.000125

Target high

$0.000280

Support: $0.000182 (candle [9] open / prior consolidation), $0.000155 (candle [19] close / mid-range support), $0.000125 (candle [10] low / candle [16] low zone)
Resistance: $0.000280 (candle [1] close / current price area), $0.000341 (candle [1] open = 24h high / spike resistance), $0.000227 (candle [9] high / candle [3] high zone)

Medium term · 7-30 days

neutral

Medium-term outlook is neutral-to-bearish. Holder growth has been explosive (+91% in 30 days) but the token lacks utility, verified contract status, or a described use case. Sustained price appreciation requires continued new buyer inflow against persistent sell pressure. If holder growth continues and liquidity deepens, a retest of the $0.000300+ range is possible; however, thin liquidity and memecoin dynamics make sustained upside fragile.

Catalysts

Continued viral social media momentum on Twitter/website
New exchange listings or aggregator visibility
Broader Solana memecoin market rally
Whale accumulation reducing circulating sell pressure

Bullish factors

57.9% 24h price gain demonstrating strong buying momentum from new entrants
Holder count growing rapidly: +80 in 24h (+12%), +328 in 7d (+48%), +621 in 30d (+91%)
Relatively distributed supply — top 10 hold only 25.02%
Active social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis links)
Most snipers show positive realized PnL, suggesting early buyers are not aggressively dumping

Bearish factors

Dominant sell pressure: 71.3% of 24h volume is sells ($225K sells vs $90.6K buys)
Extremely shallow liquidity at $36.1K — large trades will cause severe slippage
Price already down -19.95% in the last hour after spike, suggesting the pump may be exhausting
No contract verification, no token description, unknown update authority
Fully diluted valuation of only $244K limits institutional interest
Token was dormant for 3 weeks (Apr 1–20) with exactly 63 holders — suspicious early distribution pattern

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's memecoin nature with no described utility, extremely shallow liquidity ($36.1K), unverified contract, unknown update authority, and highly volatile price action driven by sentiment rather than fundamentals. The 24h candle data shows erratic price swings with no clear trend structure.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: GuWqNu...pump
Total Supply: 999,792,287.07

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($36.1K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and exit liquidity crises
Dominant sell pressure (71.3% of volume, 2.65:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) may overwhelm buying interest as momentum fades
No token description, unverified contract, and unknown authority status reduce transparency and increase rug risk
Token was dormant for 20 days with exactly 63 holders — this unusual pattern warrants scrutiny of early distribution

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Reviewing the 24 hourly candles (Apr 30 17:00 – May 1 16:00 UTC): The token traded in a tight range of $0.000090–$0.000186 for the first ~20 candles before a sharp breakout in candle [2] (15:00 UTC May 1) where price surged from $0.000142 to a high of $0.000341, closing at $0.000341 — a strong bullish engulfing candle with the highest volume of the period (59,224 USD). Candle [1] (16:00 UTC) opened at $0.000341 (the prior close) but immediately sold off, closing at $0.000244 on volume of $32,991 — a bearish reversal candle (shooting star / bearish engulfing from the high). Prior to the breakout, candles [17]–[11] showed a gradual uptrend from $0.000132 to $0.000208, with higher lows forming between candles [22] and [10].

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

The medium-term trend (past 24h) is an uptrend from the $0.000090 lows (candle [21] low) to the $0.000341 spike high, representing a ~278% move from trough to peak. However, the short-term trend (last 2 candles) has reversed sharply, with price falling from $0.000341 to $0.000244 (-28%) and continuing to decline (-19.95% in the last hour per analytics). The immediate short-term trend is bearish.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

29%

Sell

71%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000182 (candle [9] open, prior consolidation zone)

Major support

$0.000125 (candle [10] low / candle [16] low — multi-candle support cluster)

Immediate resistance

$0.000280 (current price area / candle [1] close)

Major resistance

$0.000341 (candle [1] open = 24h spike high)

The $0.000341 level represents the 24h high and a major resistance zone — any recovery rally will face heavy overhead supply from buyers who entered during the spike. The $0.000182–$0.000208 zone (candles [9]–[10]) served as a consolidation area before the breakout and may act as the first meaningful support on a pullback. The $0.000125 level represents the multi-candle low cluster from candles [10], [16], and [18] and is the key structural support.

Notable patterns

Bullish engulfing / breakout candle at 15:00 UTC May 1 (candle [2]) — highest volume candle, price doubled
Shooting star / bearish reversal at 16:00 UTC May 1 (candle [1]) — opened at the high, sold off sharply, classic distribution signal
Higher lows pattern from candles [22] through [10] ($0.000090 → $0.000125 → $0.000137) indicating accumulation before breakout
Volume climax at breakout followed by declining volume on reversal — bearish divergence
Doji-like candles [17] and [11] at key consolidation points suggesting indecision before directional moves

Liquidity

$36,102.46

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $36.1K on a single PumpSwap pool. With a 24h trading volume of ~$315K (buy + sell), the liquidity-to-volume ratio is approximately 0.11x — meaning the pool turns over nearly 9x its liquidity daily, indicating extreme price sensitivity to large trades. Any single trade above ~$1,000–$2,000 will likely cause significant slippage. The net flow is strongly negative: $225K in sells vs $90.6K in buys, a 2.48:1 sell-to-buy ratio. Unique sellers (918) outnumber unique buyers (346) by 2.65:1, confirming broad distribution pressure. Despite this, the price is up 57.9% in 24h, suggesting that a smaller number of aggressive buyers are absorbing sell pressure at higher prices — a dynamic that can reverse quickly. The FDV of $244K vs $178K (discrepancy likely due to price movement during data collection) is consistent with a micro-cap token with no institutional liquidity support.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,792,287.07

FDV

$244,416.88

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price swung from $0.000090 to $0.000341 within 24 hours (~278% range), then reversed -28% within 2 hours. The 1h change of -19.95% and 5m change of -5.09% confirm extreme short-term volatility. This is characteristic of low-liquidity memecoin trading.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $36.1K on a single PumpSwap pool is critically shallow. The pool turns over ~9x its liquidity daily. Any position above ~$1,000 faces meaningful slippage, and a large sell order could crash the price significantly.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($36.1K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and exit liquidity crises
Dominant sell pressure (71.3% of volume, 2.65:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) may overwhelm buying interest as momentum fades
No token description, unverified contract, and unknown authority status reduce transparency and increase rug risk
Token was dormant for 20 days with exactly 63 holders — this unusual pattern warrants scrutiny of early distribution
Memecoin with no utility — price is entirely sentiment-driven and can collapse to near-zero rapidly
Single liquidity pool on PumpSwap — no diversified liquidity sources

Mitigating factors

'Mutable: false' metadata flag reduces metadata manipulation risk
Relatively distributed top-10 holdings (no single whale dominates beyond the LP)
Rapid and accelerating holder growth (+91% in 30d, +12% in 24h) suggests genuine community interest
Active social presence (Twitter, website) provides some community infrastructure
Mixed sniper PnL suggests no coordinated early-buyer dump scheme
Pump.fun launch mechanism provides some standardized tokenomics structure

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced memecoin traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). Not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or those unfamiliar with Solana memecoin dynamics. Any entry should have a clear exit strategy given the shallow liquidity.

REGINALD is a high-risk, high-volatility Solana memecoin in the early stages of community formation. The token has demonstrated explosive holder growth and a significant price pump, but faces severe structural headwinds: shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, no utility, and an unverified contract. The investment case is purely speculative and momentum-driven.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral memecoin momentum continues: the Reginald Skulinski brand gains traction on Crypto Twitter, driving a new wave of buyers. Holder count surpasses 1,500+ within 7 days, liquidity deepens as more LPs are added, and the FDV reaches $500K–$1M (2x–4x from current levels). Early community formation proves sticky.

Sustained viral social media campaign driving new buyer inflow
Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all boats
Whale accumulation from the 2.26% holder and similar wallets
Liquidity deepening through additional LP providers
Listing on memecoin aggregators or influencer promotion

Base Case

REGINALD consolidates in the $0.000130–$0.000200 range over the next 7 days as the initial pump cools. Holder count continues growing modestly (+5–10% per week) driven by organic community interest. Price remains volatile with 30–50% daily swings. The token survives but does not achieve significant breakout without a new catalyst.

Sell pressure moderates as weak hands exit and a core holder base stabilizes
Liquidity remains at $30K–$50K, sufficient for small trades but limiting institutional interest
No major negative events (rug, authority exploit, or whale dump)
Social media presence maintains baseline activity without going viral
Broader Solana ecosystem remains active and supportive of memecoin trading

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure overwhelms buying interest as the pump exhausts. The 71.3% sell dominance continues, liquidity drains, and the price retraces to the pre-pump range of $0.000090–$0.000125 or lower. Holder count stagnates or declines as speculative traders exit. The token fades into obscurity with sub-$50K FDV.

Continued 71.3% sell pressure with no new catalyst to attract buyers
Shallow liquidity amplifying downside moves
Sniper profit-taking from the 14/20 profitable sniper wallets
No utility or narrative to sustain holder interest beyond initial speculation
Broader market risk-off sentiment reducing memecoin appetite

Analysis details

Generated

May 1, 04:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-01 16:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: GuWqNuKbaG1m84SbXBXBy9wmuepk5s7kYXRAkMeypump)
PumpSwap DEX price and OHLC data (pair: 7X9UwB8dkbaBMmjkhknwhS11oiEYJnaVKZen3nhZUFKj)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
Top 20 holder distribution data
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
Moralis token analytics platform

Limitations

Sniper balances and total sniped USD amounts are unknown, preventing precise sniper concentration calculation
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be definitively assessed
No token description or whitepaper — fundamental analysis is not possible
Historical holder data shows zero change for 20 consecutive days (Apr 1–20), which may indicate data gaps or a pre-launch locked state
Single liquidity pool data only — no cross-DEX liquidity aggregation
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($244,416) and analytics ($178,010) suggests price movement during data collection
Social media content and community quality not assessable from on-chain data alone
30-day holder history only — longer-term context unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Reginald Skulinski (REGINALD) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Reginald Skulinski (REGINALD)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Reginald Skulinski ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 684 addresses (2026-05-01 16:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Reginald Skulinski?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Reginald Skulinski liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-01 16:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $36,102.46. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Reginald Skulinski (REGINALD)?

Is REGINALD a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced memecoin traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Position sizing should be minimal (well under 1% of portfolio). Not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or those unfamiliar with Solana memecoin dynamics. Any entry should have a clear exit strategy given the shallow liquidity.

What are the key risks of holding REGINALD?

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($36.1K) makes the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and exit liquidity crises • Dominant sell pressure (71.3% of volume, 2.65:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) may overwhelm buying interest as momentum fades • No token description, unverified contract, and unknown authority status reduce transparency and increase rug risk