GRASS

Grass Price Today & AI Analysis

GRASSSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 23, 2026

Price

$0.3648

+3.02% 24h · FDV $364,818,546

Contract

Live
Grass7B4RdKfBCjTKgSqnXkqjwiGvQyFbuSCUJr3XXjs

Chain

Solana

Holders

322,142

Market cap

$364,818,546

More tokens on Solana

MEWMEWcat in a dogs world$0.000450+8.6%MC $40.01MHEVHEVHeavier$0.002116-1.3%MC $2.05MUSEFULUSEFULUSEFUL COIN$0.001222+30.9%MC $1.21MOPENAIOPENAIOpenAI PreStock$1,676.16-3.5%MC $3.19MLEVERHEDGELEVERHEDGELeverHedge$0.001749+27.9%MC $1.46MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

Grass: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-23 22:19 UTC

Holder addresses

327,624

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$853,697.80
How concentrated is Grass ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 327,624 addresses (2026-06-23 22:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Grass?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Grass liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-23 22:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $853,697.80. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-23 22:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about GRASS

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 23, 10:19 PM UTC

FDV

$444,175,303

Liquidity

$853,697.80

Holders

327,624

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

GRASS (Grass) is a Solana-based token (mint: Grass7B4RdKfBCjTKgSqnXkqjwiGvQyFbuSCUJr3XXjs) currently priced at $0.4442, with a fully diluted valuation of ~$444M and total liquidity of ~$853.7K. The project describes itself as a bandwidth-sharing network rewarding users with tokens. With 327,624 holders and a 24h price gain of ~6.8%, the token shows short-term bullish momentum, but faces significant structural concerns: the top 10 holders control 55.74% of supply, the update authority has not been renounced (mutable metadata), and holder counts have been declining steadily for 30 days. Liquidity is thin relative to FDV, creating meaningful slippage risk for larger trades.

Key points

  • Large and established holder base of 327,624 wallets, predominantly acquired via transfer/airdrop
  • Top 10 holders control 55.74% of supply — high concentration risk
  • Metadata is mutable with a live update authority (31rYartQwHeBMjAe2MgGpffGV57fQY3kug4BDN8tLGqQ), which also holds 26.92% of supply
  • Liquidity of $853.7K is shallow relative to $444M FDV — ratio under 0.2%
  • Holder count has declined every month for 30 days (-1,583 net over 30d, -0.48%)

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24–72 hours

neutral

Price has recovered from intraday lows near $0.409 to $0.444, posting a 24h gain of ~6.8%. However, the most recent candles show a pullback from the $0.458 high, with the last close at $0.444. Sell pressure slightly dominates (51.8% sell volume). Short-term direction is neutral-to-slightly-bearish as the rally fades.

Target low

$0.410

Target high

$0.460

Support

$0.430 (intraday consolidation zone, candles 6–8), $0.410 (session low, candle 15/17), $0.409 (24h absolute low, candle 23)

Resistance

$0.458 (24h high, candle 3), $0.460 (round number / recent swing high), $0.470 (extension target if momentum resumes)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The 30-day holder trend is consistently negative (-1,583 holders, -0.48%), suggesting organic demand is waning. Thin liquidity relative to FDV and high supply concentration in the top 10 (55.74%) create downside vulnerability. A sustained recovery would require new catalysts or broader market tailwinds.

Catalysts

  • Broader Solana ecosystem rally lifting all tokens
  • New partnership or product announcement from the Grass network
  • Reduction in top-holder concentration through distribution events
  • Increased DEX liquidity provision improving market depth

Bullish factors

  • 24h price up ~6.8%, showing short-term buying interest
  • 5,421 buys vs 4,638 sells in 24h — more buy transactions despite slightly higher sell volume
  • 532 unique buyers vs 514 unique sellers — marginally more buyers
  • Token is verified (not flagged as spam) and has social presence (Reddit, Twitter, website)
  • 6h price change positive (+1.68%), suggesting intraday recovery

Bearish factors

  • Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days (-1,583 net, -0.48%)
  • Top 10 holders control 55.74% of supply — extreme concentration
  • Update authority (31rYartQwH...) holds 26.92% of supply and metadata is mutable
  • Liquidity ($853.7K) is extremely thin vs FDV ($444M) — ratio ~0.19%
  • 51.8% sell volume pressure in 24h
  • Most recent 1h price change is -2.07%, suggesting momentum fading

Confidence: low. Price prediction confidence is low due to: (1) thin liquidity ($853.7K) making price easily manipulated, (2) no sniper data available to assess early-buyer overhang, (3) mutable metadata and concentrated ownership introduce non-market risks, and (4) the 30-day holder decline trend is a structural headwind.

GRASS call history

Full track record →

Jun 23neutral
24h—
7d—
30d-19.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
Grass7...XXjs
Total Supply
999,993,179.61

Key Risks

  • Update authority holds 26.92% of supply AND controls mutable metadata — single point of failure/manipulation
  • Top 10 holders control 55.74% of supply — coordinated selling could collapse price
  • Liquidity ($853.7K) is critically thin vs FDV ($444M) — 0.19% ratio
  • Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days (-1,583 net, -0.48%)

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the 24 hourly candles analyzed (2026-06-22T23:00 to 2026-06-23T22:00), price trended from a session open near $0.419 to a low of $0.409 (candle 23, 00:00 UTC), then staged a recovery through the European/US session, reaching a 24h high of $0.458 (candle 3, 20:00 UTC) before pulling back to close at $0.444. The pattern shows a V-shaped intraday recovery followed by a fade — a classic 'pump and partial retrace' structure. Volume was heavily concentrated in candle 2 (21:00 UTC, $91K) coinciding with the peak, suggesting a volume spike at resistance rather than sustained accumulation.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is up from the $0.409 session low, forming higher lows across candles 23→17→15→12. However, the medium-term picture is sideways-to-bearish given the 30-day holder decline and price oscillating in the $0.41–$0.46 range without a clear breakout.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

48%

Sell

52%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.430 (intraday consolidation zone, candles 6–9)

Major support

$0.409 (session absolute low, candle 23)

Immediate resistance

$0.458 (24h high, candle 3)

Major resistance

$0.470 (psychological round number above recent swing high)

The $0.430 level acted as a pivot zone where price consolidated for several hours (candles 6–9) before breaking higher. The $0.409 level is the key support — a break below would signal a failed recovery. On the upside, $0.458 is the immediate resistance from the 24h high; a clean break and hold above this level would be needed to confirm bullish continuation.

Notable patterns

  • V-shaped intraday recovery from $0.409 low (candles 23→3)
  • Volume spike at the high (candle 2, $91K) followed by sharp volume collapse — bearish divergence
  • Higher lows sequence: $0.409 (candle 23) → $0.407 (candle 17 low) → $0.413 (candle 15 low) — short-term uptrend structure
  • Doji-like candle at candle 7 (O:0.4335, H:0.4336, L:0.4335, C:0.4336) — indecision at support
  • Bearish engulfing signal at candle 2→1: candle 2 opened at $0.457 and closed at $0.449; candle 1 opened at $0.450 and closed at $0.444 — two consecutive red candles from the high

Liquidity

Liquidity

$853,697.80

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $853.7K against a fully diluted valuation of $444M represents a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 0.19% — extremely thin. This means even moderate-sized trades will cause significant price impact. A $50K sell order could move price by several percent given current depth. The 24h net flow is slightly negative (sell volume $417.4K vs buy volume $387.9K, a $29.5K net outflow), confirming marginal sell pressure dominance. However, the transaction count favors buyers (5,421 buys vs 4,638 sells), suggesting more frequent but smaller buy orders against fewer but larger sell orders — a pattern consistent with retail accumulation being absorbed by larger sellers. The single Raydium pool (GTJ2S27UL7yZ3TdTwpKjfNcxeEZRkRPHjpj5Fubwb8Mk) is the sole liquidity venue identified, concentrating all market risk in one pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,993,179.61

FDV

$444,175,303

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price swung from $0.409 to $0.458 within 24 hours (~12% range). Thin liquidity amplifies volatility — a single $91K trade in candle 2 appears to have driven a significant portion of the intraday move.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of $853.7K against $444M FDV is a ratio of ~0.19%. Large holders (top 10 = 55.74%) could not exit meaningful positions without catastrophic price impact. Slippage risk is high for any trade above ~$10K.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Update authority holds 26.92% of supply AND controls mutable metadata — single point of failure/manipulation
  • Top 10 holders control 55.74% of supply — coordinated selling could collapse price
  • Liquidity ($853.7K) is critically thin vs FDV ($444M) — 0.19% ratio
  • Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days (-1,583 net, -0.48%)
  • Token description references 'ERC20' on a Solana token — potential misleading/copied description
  • Single liquidity pool on Raydium — pool removal would eliminate all trading liquidity
  • Mutable metadata allows post-deployment changes to token properties

Mitigating factors

  • Large holder base of 327,624 wallets provides some distribution breadth
  • Token is verified and not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • Social presence across Reddit, Twitter, and website suggests active community
  • 24h price performance (+6.8%) shows market interest
  • More buy transactions than sell transactions (5,421 vs 4,638) in 24h
  • Rate of holder decline has slowed in recent weeks (from -200/day in late May to -2 to -27/day in mid-June)

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for high-risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of concentrated ownership, thin liquidity, mutable token metadata, and declining holder trends. It is NOT suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders seeking capital preservation, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Position sizing should be minimal relative to portfolio.

GRASS presents a high-risk, speculative opportunity in the Solana ecosystem. The token has a large established holder base (~327K) and a recognizable brand with social presence, but is undermined by extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 55.74%), mutable metadata controlled by the largest holder (26.92%), critically thin liquidity vs FDV, and a persistent 30-day holder decline. The short-term price action is constructive (+6.8% 24h) but appears driven by low-volume activity rather than fundamental demand.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

GRASS successfully executes on its bandwidth-sharing network roadmap, attracting new institutional partners and driving organic demand for the token. A broader Solana bull market lifts all tokens, new exchange listings improve liquidity depth, and the project team demonstrates responsible token management by renouncing authorities and reducing concentration.

  • Successful product adoption of the bandwidth-sharing network
  • New CEX listings improving liquidity and price discovery
  • Authority renouncement reducing rug risk perception
  • Broader Solana/crypto market bull run
  • Reduction in top-holder concentration through vesting/distribution

Base Case

GRASS continues to trade in the $0.35–$0.50 range with high volatility and low sustained volume. Holder count continues to decline gradually (-0.3% to -0.5%/month). Price remains sensitive to broader market moves and occasional volume spikes. No major catalysts emerge in the near term.

  • Update authority does not sell large portions of its 26.92% holding
  • Raydium liquidity pool remains intact
  • No major positive or negative news catalysts
  • Broader crypto market remains range-bound
  • Holder decline continues at current moderate pace

Bear Case

Medium probability

The update authority / largest holder (26.92%) begins distributing tokens into the thin liquidity pool, causing cascading price decline. Holder attrition accelerates, liquidity providers exit, and the token enters a death spiral. Mutable metadata changes could further damage trust.

  • Large holder (26.92%) selling into thin liquidity
  • Continued holder decline accelerating beyond current -0.48%/month rate
  • Liquidity pool removal or significant LP withdrawal
  • Negative news about the Grass network or team
  • Broader crypto market downturn amplified by thin liquidity

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 23, 10:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-23 22:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana SPL)
  • Raydium DEX pair data (GTJ2S27UL7yZ3TdTwpKjfNcxeEZRkRPHjpj5Fubwb8Mk)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles)
  • Holder distribution and historical holder time series (30 days)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and profit-taking overhang cannot be assessed
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata — marked unknown
  • Top holder wallet classifications are inferred from on-chain patterns, not verified identities
  • Single 24-hour OHLC window limits medium/long-term technical analysis
  • Liquidity depth data is aggregate — order book depth at specific price levels not available
  • Token description references 'ERC20' which may indicate cross-chain context or misleading copy — not independently verified
  • FDV assumes full circulating supply; actual circulating supply may differ if tokens are locked

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an endorsement of this token. Cryptocurrency investments carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The analyst has no position in GRASS and receives no compensation related to this token.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Grass ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 327,624 addresses (2026-06-23 22:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Grass?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Grass liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-23 22:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $853,697.80. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Grass (GRASS)?

Price has recovered from intraday lows near $0.409 to $0.444, posting a 24h gain of ~6.8%. However, the most recent candles show a pullback from the $0.458 high, with the last close at $0.444. Sell pressure slightly dominates (51.8% sell volume). Short-term direction is neutral-to-slightly-bearish as the rally fades. Short-term outlook is neutral (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.410 to $0.460.

Is GRASS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for high-risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of concentrated ownership, thin liquidity, mutable token metadata, and declining holder trends. It is NOT suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders seeking capital preservation, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Position sizing should be minimal relative to portfolio.

What are the key risks of holding GRASS?

Update authority holds 26.92% of supply AND controls mutable metadata — single point of failure/manipulation • Top 10 holders control 55.74% of supply — coordinated selling could collapse price • Liquidity ($853.7K) is critically thin vs FDV ($444M) — 0.19% ratio

← Back to all predictions

Track GRASS