Heavier Price Today & AI Analysis

HEVSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 12, 2026

$0.0₄2047

+2.79% 24h

Contract

Live

4tkupXEGfbYPCVN37CagviJd3tgWnudT9avKZvouT3Dm

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,787

Market cap

$19,829

At a $1M market cap, $HEV would be $0.001032 (50.4x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is HEV a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

Transfer fee

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks; every transfer pays a fixed 3% fee.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell

Creator holds

0.0%

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about HEV

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TRKThe Roaring Kitty$0.0₄7045-0.0%MC $70.4K

WCORWorld Collective Oil Reserve$0.0₄8806+0.2%MC $88.1K

ATTENTIONAttention$0.0₅5347-4.5%MC $5.2K

CASHTAGCashtag$0.0₅3517-5.3%MC $3.4K

uncdogunc dog$0.0₅2703-7.8%MC $2.6K

FrongusFrongus$0.000112+170.0%MC $107.7K

Heavier: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-12 18:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$88,826.00

How concentrated is Heavier ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Heavier?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Heavier liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-12 18:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $88,826.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-12 18:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 12, 06:16 PM UTC

FDV

$1,820,595

Liquidity

$88,826.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

HEV ('Heavier') is a Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CLMM pool that has experienced an extreme +33,888% price move over the last 24 hours, rising from roughly $0.0000055 to $0.00188, with an intracandle high of $0.00229. Despite this dramatic rally and $1.82M fully diluted valuation, the token trades with only $88.83K in total liquidity, and critical data — holder distribution, sniper/early-buyer wallets, and mint/freeze authority status — is entirely unavailable, leaving major due-diligence gaps.

Key points

Extreme 24h price appreciation (+33,888%) far exceeding typical volatility even for speculative tokens
Very shallow liquidity ($88.83K) relative to $1.82M FDV and ~$1.57M in 24h trading volume, implying high slippage risk
More unique buyers (2,511) than sellers (1,614) in the last 24h with a 53.4%/46.6% buy/sell volume split, suggesting broad demand during the rally
Complete absence of holder, whale, and sniper data, and unknown mint/freeze authority status, preventing full risk verification

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48h

neutral

Price has exploded ~33,888% over the past 24h (largely a function of starting from a near-zero base around $0.0000055 and rallying to $0.00188), with the most recent 3 candles showing a strong breakout from ~$0.0009 to a high of $0.00229 before pulling back to $0.00188. Momentum is decelerating slightly into the last candle (upper wick rejection at $0.00204-$0.00229), suggesting near-term consolidation or a pullback is likely before any continuation.

Target low

$0.0013

Target high

$0.0023

Support: $0.00178 (last candle low), $0.00150 (candle 22 close/candle 23 open zone), $0.00092 (candle 21-22 base)
Resistance: $0.00204 (recent intracandle high), $0.00229 (24h high, candle 23)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only 24 hourly candles of history and a total liquidity pool of just $88.8K against a $1.82M FDV, this token is extremely early-stage and thinly traded. Medium-term direction is highly uncertain and will likely be dictated by whether new buyers continue to enter or whether early holders (including any snipers, though no sniper data is available) begin distributing into strength.

Catalysts

Continued social/marketing traction (Twitter, website presence)
Liquidity growth reducing slippage and attracting larger buyers
Risk: profit-taking by early buyers who caught the move from ~$0.0000055
Risk: shallow $88.8K liquidity pool amplifies both upside and downside swings

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($839.24K) exceeds sell volume ($731.78K), a 53.4%/46.6% buy-pressure skew
More unique buyers (2,511) than sellers (1,614) in the last 24h, suggesting broader distribution of demand
Strong momentum with price up over 33,000% in 24h, indicating high current speculative interest

Bearish factors

Extremely shallow liquidity ($88.8K) relative to $1.82M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic move of this magnitude in 24h is historically prone to sharp mean-reversion / dumps
Recent candles show upper-wick rejections near $0.00204-$0.00229, hinting at exhaustion
No holder distribution or sniper data available to confirm whether this rally is organic or concentrated

Confidence: low. Only 24 hourly candles are available, liquidity is very shallow ($88.8K), no holder or sniper data exists to corroborate distribution risk, and the token has an extremely short trading history. This severely limits forecast reliability.

HEV call history

Full track record →

Sep 12neutral@ $0.00188

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4tkupX...T3Dm
Total Supply: 969,976,854.43 HEV

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($88.83K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic +33,888% 24h price move with no prior established trading history, typical of pump-and-dump patterns
Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper wallet data, preventing verification of decentralization or early-buyer dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the 24 tracked hourly candles, HEV opened near $0.0000055 and spiked immediately in candle 1 to $0.00051, then continued higher through candles 2-4 up to a local peak of $0.00129 (candle 4). Price then drifted down and consolidated in a $0.0007-$0.0010 range through candles 5-21 (roughly 16 hours), before a second, larger breakout occurred in candles 22-23, spiking from ~$0.00091 to an intracandle high of $0.00229, before the most recent candle (24) closed at $0.00188 with a high of $0.00204 and low of $0.00178 — showing some rejection from the highs but still closing well above the prior consolidation range.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short-term (last 3 candles) and medium-term (full 24h window) trends are up, but the move is highly parabolic and punctuated by a long sideways consolidation (candles 5-21) followed by a sharp second leg up (candles 22-24). This two-stage pattern (spike, consolidate, spike again) is typical of low-liquidity speculative tokens.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

53%

Sell

47%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00178

Major support

$0.00092

Immediate resistance

$0.00204

Major resistance

$0.00229

Immediate support sits at the low of the most recent candle ($0.00178); a break below could retest the $0.00092-$0.00150 zone that preceded the latest breakout. Immediate resistance is the recent high near $0.00204, with the 24h absolute high of $0.00229 (candle 23) serving as major resistance that has already been tested and rejected once.

Notable patterns

Long lower wick spike-and-recovery on candle 1 (opened near zero, huge intracandle range)
Extended sideways consolidation range between candles 5-21 (~$0.0007-$0.0010)
Sharp breakout with large green candles (22-23) on outsized volume
Upper-wick rejection / shooting-star-like character on candle 23 (high $0.00229 vs close $0.00196)
Most recent candle 24 shows a smaller-bodied pullback candle with rejection near $0.00204

Liquidity

$88,826.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $88.83K is extremely thin relative to both the $1.82M FDV and the $839K+$732K = ~$1.57M in 24h trading volume — implying the pool has likely turned over more than 17x its own depth in a single day, which is a strong indicator of high slippage and potential for sharp price dislocations. Net flow is a mild inflow (53.4% buy vs 46.6% sell), and buyers (2,511) outnumber sellers (1,614) by roughly 1.55x, suggesting more wallets are accumulating than distributing so far, but the shallow liquidity means even modest sell orders could move price significantly in either direction.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

969,976,854.43 HEV

FDV

$1.82M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +33,888% and intraday swings from $0.0000055 to $0.00229 represent extreme volatility, far beyond typical even for speculative crypto assets.
Liquidityhigh
Only $88.83K in total liquidity against $1.82M FDV and ~$1.57M in 24h volume creates high slippage risk and vulnerability to large price swings from relatively small trade sizes.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($88.83K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic +33,888% 24h price move with no prior established trading history, typical of pump-and-dump patterns
Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper wallet data, preventing verification of decentralization or early-buyer dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
Very short overall trading history (only 24 hourly candles), limiting confidence in any technical or fundamental read

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume modestly exceeds sell volume (53.4%/46.6%), and buyers outnumber sellers (2,511 vs 1,614), suggesting broad-based demand rather than a single large buyer driving the move
Token has visible social presence (Twitter, website), which provides at least a minimal community/marketing layer
Recent candle (24) shows a controlled pullback rather than a collapse, suggesting some price stability is being tested at current levels

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority/security status, and total absence of holder/sniper verification data, this token is not appropriate for conservative or medium-risk investors, and position sizing should be minimal even for risk-seeking participants.

HEV is a newly-surged meme token that has rallied over 33,000% in 24 hours on the back of retail buying interest, but it trades with extremely shallow liquidity ($88.83K) against a $1.82M FDV, and critical due-diligence data (holder distribution, sniper wallets, mint/freeze authority status) is entirely unavailable. This combination of parabolic price action and data opacity makes it a high-risk, speculative-only proposition.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum continues (buyers already outnumber sellers 2,511 to 1,614, with 53.4% buy-volume share) and liquidity grows to support larger trade sizes, HEV could see a continuation leg toward and beyond the recent high of $0.00229, especially if social attention (Twitter/website) compounds into wider retail awareness.

Sustained net buy pressure and growing unique buyer count
Improved liquidity depth attracting larger participants
Viral meme/social momentum on Twitter

Base Case

Price likely consolidates within the recent $0.0015-$0.0023 range over the next day or two as the initial parabolic move digests, with continued high volatility and elevated slippage risk due to the thin liquidity pool, before either a renewed breakout or a retracement toward the prior $0.0007-$0.0010 consolidation zone.

No major new catalyst emerges to reignite parabolic buying
Liquidity remains near current $88.83K levels without significant new deposits
Buy/sell pressure remains roughly balanced (near the current 53.4%/46.6% split)

Bear Case

High probability

Given the token's parabolic +33,888% 24h move, shallow $88.83K liquidity pool, and complete lack of verifiable holder/authority data, a sharp reversal or liquidity-driven collapse is a real possibility as early buyers take profits into a thin market.

Profit-taking from wallets that bought near the $0.0000055-$0.0009 lows
Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure into large downside price moves
Unknown mint/freeze authority status raising rug-pull or supply-dilution risk
Lack of holder/sniper transparency preventing confirmation of healthy distribution

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 12, 06:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-12 18:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain OHLC candle data (24 hourly candles, Raydium CLMM pair)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
Token metadata (supply, FDV, decimals, social links)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available (endpoint retired) — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are placeholder-only
No sniper wallet data available — smart money signals section is largely unverifiable
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and verified-contract status are all unknown
Only 24 hours of hourly candle history available, limiting longer-term technical analysis
Extremely shallow liquidity ($88.83K) makes reported prices highly susceptible to manipulation and low-volume distortion

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, potentially incomplete on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency markets, especially micro-cap and meme tokens with shallow liquidity, carry a substantial risk of total loss. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before investing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Heavier (HEV) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks; every transfer pays a fixed 3% fee. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Heavier (HEV)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Heavier ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Heavier?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Heavier liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-12 18:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $88,826.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Heavier (HEV)?

Is HEV a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority/security status, and total absence of holder/sniper verification data, this token is not appropriate for conservative or medium-risk investors, and position sizing should be minimal even for risk-seeking participants.

What are the key risks of holding HEV?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($88.83K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Parabolic +33,888% 24h price move with no prior established trading history, typical of pump-and-dump patterns • Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper wallet data, preventing verification of decentralization or early-buyer dump risk