Cyclospora

Cyclosporiasis Price Today & AI Analysis

Cyclospora
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 14, 2026

GjJsyLWFEHA4TCJBGpobM2tceM4wiQaD3ZPKDhDppump

$0.041022

+3.35%

FDV $10,211

LiveContract:GjJsyLWFEHA4TCJBGpobM2tceM4wiQaD3ZPKDhDppumpChain:SolanaHolders:619Market cap:$10,211

More tokens on Solana

SHIBEUS

SHIBEUS

Shibeus Maximus

$0.05349611.0%
MC $3.5K
LFG

LFG

Lets Fucking Go

$0.04120712.8%
MC $11.2K
CHALK

CHALK

chalk

$0.05290811.8%
MC $2.8K
HNUT

HNUT

Horsenut

$0.0540425.2%
MC $4.0K
LOBO

LOBO

The Black Maned Wolf

$0.0545821.8%
MC $4.5K
TRUMP

TRUMP

OFFICIAL TRUMP

$2.6715.8%
MC $2.67B

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Cyclospora

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 14, 10:17 PM
FDV

$65,429

Liquidity

$36,986

Holders

619

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Cyclosporiasis (Cyclospora) is a micro-cap meme/novelty token on Solana launched via PumpFun/PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of only ~$65K and total liquidity of ~$37K. The token experienced a sharp 24h price spike (+30.3%) but is showing heavy sell pressure (75.7% of 24h volume), extremely thin liquidity, and a suspicious holder count anomaly — the reported 619 holders with +608 in 24h is inconsistent with the historical series showing only ~10 holders as recently as July 13. The token carries very high risk and is suitable only for highly speculative participants who can afford total loss.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme micro-cap: FDV ~$65K, liquidity ~$37K
Massive 24h holder count anomaly: +608 holders in 24h vs. historical series showing ~10 holders on July 13
Heavily sell-dominated: 75.7% sell pressure, 2,269 sells vs. 917 buys in 24h
No top holder data available, supply concentration metrics show 0% — data gap raises transparency concerns
Mutable=false metadata but update authority unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) shows a sharp rejection from the open of $0.0000943 down to a close of $0.0000654, a ~31% intra-candle decline. The 5-minute price change is already -3.5%. With 75.7% sell pressure and sell volume ($109K) more than 3x buy volume ($35K), the short-term path of least resistance is downward. Liquidity is extremely thin at $37K, meaning even modest sell orders can move price significantly.

Target low$0.000030
Target high$0.000095
Support: $0.0000564 (candle [1] low), $0.0000300 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.0000950 (candle [1] open / candle [2] high ~$0.0000966), $0.0000966 (candle [2] all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The historical holder series shows the token was dormant at 13 holders for most of June, declined to 10 by July 13, then allegedly surged to 619 in 24h. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump. Without sustained organic demand, new utility, or community growth, the token is likely to retrace toward pre-pump levels. The FDV of $65K leaves little room for meaningful appreciation without significant new capital inflows.

Catalysts
  • Any viral social media moment could temporarily spike price given low float
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally could lift all micro-caps
  • Sustained holder growth beyond the current anomalous spike would be a positive signal

Bullish factors

  • 30.3% 24h price gain demonstrates some buying interest
  • 917 buy transactions in 24h shows non-trivial trader participation
  • Mutable=false reduces risk of metadata manipulation

Bearish factors

  • 75.7% sell pressure — sellers dominate overwhelmingly
  • Sell volume ($109K) is 3.1x buy volume ($35K)
  • Total liquidity only $37K — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful position
  • Holder count anomaly (+608 in 24h) is inconsistent with historical data and may indicate wash activity
  • No top holder transparency — supply concentration data shows 0% which is a data gap, not a healthy distribution
  • Token has been dormant for most of its history (13 holders for ~30 days)
  • FDV of $65K with no verified contract and unknown update authority
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, the holder data contains a major anomaly (619 current vs. 10 on July 13), top holder data is entirely missing, and sniper data is unavailable. These data gaps severely limit analytical confidence.

Cyclospora call history

Full track record →
Jul 14bearish
24h-26.7%
7d-74.3%
30d-80.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (21:00 UTC): O=$0.0000329, H=$0.0000966, L=$0.0000300, C=$0.0000884 — a massive bullish engulfing/spike candle with a range of ~222% from low to high, closing near the upper portion. Candle [1] (22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000943, H=$0.0000950, L=$0.0000564, C=$0.0000654 — a bearish candle opening near the prior close, making a marginal new high, then selling off sharply to close near the low. This two-candle sequence is a classic 'pump and dump' pattern: explosive spike followed by immediate rejection and distribution.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 24%Sell 76%

Short-term trend has turned bearish after the rejection candle. The medium-term trend is effectively sideways/dormant given the token's inactivity for most of its history. The two-candle pump-and-reject pattern is a strong bearish short-term signal.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000564 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000300 (candle [2] low — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000950 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.0000966 (candle [2] all-time high in dataset)

The pre-pump base around $0.0000300 represents the major support level. The candle [1] low of $0.0000564 is the immediate support. Resistance sits at the recent highs of $0.0000950–$0.0000966. A break below $0.0000564 opens a path back to $0.0000300.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-reject two-candle pattern: explosive spike followed by immediate bearish reversal
  • Bearish engulfing on candle [1] relative to candle [2] close
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline on candle [1] — classic distribution signal
  • Long upper wick on candle [1] indicating strong selling pressure at highs

Total holders619
24h Δ+608
7d Δ+607
30d Δ+606
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The reported +608 holders in 24h coincides with the 30.3% price spike, suggesting the holder surge and price pump are concurrent events. However, the historical series shows only 10 holders as of July 13 (the day before), making the jump to 619 highly anomalous. This is inconsistent with organic growth and may reflect wash trading, bot activity, or a data artifact.

The holder data presents a major anomaly. The historical daily series shows the token had 13 holders from June 14 through June 29, peaked at 22 on July 1, then declined back to 10 by July 13. The current reported count of 619 with +608 in 24h is a 6,090% single-day increase that is entirely inconsistent with the prior 30-day history. This pattern is a significant red flag — it may indicate coordinated wallet creation to simulate organic growth, a data pipeline issue, or a sudden coordinated pump event. The acquisition breakdown (617 via swap, 2 via transfer) is plausible for a pump scenario but the magnitude is suspicious. Investors should treat the holder count with extreme skepticism.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is a data gap rather than a genuine indication of perfectly distributed supply. With only 619 reported holders (itself anomalous) and a total supply of ~999.95M tokens, the actual distribution is unknown. The absence of whale/shark/dolphin/fish classifications in the distribution breakdown further confirms the data gap. This lack of transparency is itself a risk factor — investors cannot assess concentration risk, potential dump risk from large holders, or whether the team/deployer retains a significant position.

Liquidity$36,990
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$35,130
Sell$109,380
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers407
Unique sellers857

Liquidity is extremely shallow at ~$37K on a single PumpSwap pool (2qujxSBhjbzKSg8E9ekoe2r6M85BNHSZVk3xzskXrh4K). The FDV of $65K is only 1.76x the liquidity pool size, indicating the token is almost entirely illiquid relative to its market cap. Any position larger than a few hundred dollars will experience significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($109K) is 3.1x buy volume ($35K), with 857 unique sellers vs. 407 unique buyers. Total 24h volume of ~$144K is nearly 4x the total liquidity, indicating high turnover but predominantly in the sell direction. This is a clear outflow/distribution market structure.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,950,982.647141
FDV$65,428.84

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.95M tokens with an FDV of ~$65K, implying a price of ~$0.0000654 per token. The metadata shows 'Mutable: false' which is a positive signal suggesting metadata cannot be changed. However, the update authority is listed as 'unknown', preventing a definitive assessment of mint and freeze authority status. Since the update authority cannot be confirmed as the burn address (11111...) or otherwise renounced, authority risk remains unknown. The token was launched via PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism. The contract is not verified. Investors should exercise caution given the unknown authority status.

Volatility
high

The token moved ~222% from low to high within a single hour (candle [2]), then immediately rejected ~32% in the following hour. Extreme intraday volatility with only 2 candles of history available.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only ~$37K on a single PumpSwap pool. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~56.5%, meaning the pool is thin relative to market cap. Any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. Supply concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — this is a data gap, not healthy distribution. With only ~619 reported holders (itself anomalous), actual concentration is unknown and potentially extreme.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available. The 24h sell dominance (75.7%, $109K sell vs. $35K buy) and 857 unique sellers vs. 407 buyers strongly suggests early participants are distributing. Profit-taking risk is assessed as high.

Authority
medium

Metadata is set to mutable=false which is positive. However, update authority is 'unknown', preventing confirmation that mint and freeze authorities are renounced. This creates residual rug risk that cannot be dismissed.

Key risks

  • Extreme illiquidity: $37K total liquidity makes large positions impossible without severe slippage
  • Holder count anomaly: +608 holders in 24h vs. 10 holders on July 13 is highly suspicious and may indicate coordinated activity
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 75.7% of 24h volume is sells, 857 sellers vs. 407 buyers
  • No top holder transparency: cannot assess whale concentration or team holdings
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority: rug pull risk cannot be ruled out
  • Token was dormant for ~30 days with only 10-13 holders before sudden pump
  • Unverified contract with no audit
  • Micro-cap FDV of $65K with no clear utility or use case beyond speculative meme trading

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false metadata reduces risk of post-launch metadata manipulation
  • Token launched on PumpFun which has some standardized launch mechanics
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some level of project presence
  • 617 of 619 holders acquired via swap (not airdrop), suggesting genuine purchase activity
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits multiple very-high-risk characteristics simultaneously.

Cyclosporiasis (Cyclospora) is an extremely high-risk micro-cap meme token on Solana that experienced a sharp pump event on July 14, 2026. The token was dormant for ~30 days before a sudden price spike and anomalous holder surge. The market structure is overwhelmingly bearish in the short term, with sell pressure dominating at 75.7% and liquidity too thin to support meaningful positions. The investment case is almost entirely speculative.

Bull case (low)

Viral social media traction drives sustained new buyer inflow, the holder count growth proves genuine, and the token rides a broader Solana meme-coin wave to a higher FDV.

  • Viral moment on Twitter/social media given the unusual token name
  • Broader Solana ecosystem meme-coin rally
  • Genuine community formation around the 619 new holders
  • Low FDV ($65K) means even small capital inflows produce large percentage gains

Base case

The token experiences continued volatility with intermittent pumps and dumps typical of micro-cap meme tokens. Price oscillates between $0.000030 and $0.000095 with no sustained trend. Most participants lose money due to slippage and timing disadvantage.

  • Liquidity remains thin, limiting position sizes
  • No major catalyst emerges to drive sustained demand
  • Sell pressure gradually overwhelms buy pressure as pump participants exit
  • Token remains a speculative vehicle with no fundamental value drivers

Bear case (high)

The pump was coordinated by early holders who are now distributing. Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity is drained, and the price retraces to pre-pump levels (~$0.000030 or lower). The anomalous holder count normalizes downward.

  • 75.7% sell pressure with $109K in 24h sell volume vs. $35K buy volume
  • Holder count anomaly suggests coordinated/artificial activity
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days with no organic growth
  • No verified contract, no top holder transparency, unknown authority status
  • Thin liquidity ($37K) cannot absorb sustained selling

GeneratedJul 14, 10:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers only 2 hourly candles. Historical holder series covers 30 days but shows a major anomaly in the most recent 24h. Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: GjJsyLWFEHA4TCJBGpobM2tceM4wiQaD3ZPKDhDppump)
  • PumpSwap pool data (pair: 2qujxSBhjbzKSg8E9ekoe2r6M85BNHSZVk3xzskXrh4K)
  • Hourly OHLC candles (2 candles, July 14 2026 21:00–23:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and acquisition breakdown
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (no data returned)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top holder data available — whale/concentration analysis is severely limited
  • Sniper data unavailable — smart money signals cannot be properly assessed
  • Update authority is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed
  • Holder count anomaly (+608 in 24h vs. 10 on July 13) raises data integrity questions
  • Supply concentration shows 0% for top 10/100 — likely a data gap rather than true distribution
  • No verified contract or audit available
  • Only a single liquidity pool with $37K depth

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party providers and may contain errors or gaps. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,950,982.647141

Key Risks

•Extreme illiquidity: $37K total liquidity makes large positions impossible without severe slippage
•Holder count anomaly: +608 holders in 24h vs. 10 holders on July 13 is highly suspicious and may indicate coordinated activity
•Overwhelming sell pressure: 75.7% of 24h volume is sells, 857 sellers vs. 407 buyers
•No top holder transparency: cannot assess whale concentration or team holdings

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for Cyclosporiasis. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The absence of sniper data, combined with the token's dormant history and sudden 24h activity spike, makes it impossible to assess early buyer positioning. The heavy sell pressure (75.7%) and 2,269 sell transactions vs. 917 buys in 24h suggests that whoever accumulated early may be distributing.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the 24h sell dominance (2,269 sells vs. 917 buys, $109K vs. $35K) strongly implies early holders or pump participants are taking profits or exiting.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Cyclosporiasis (Cyclospora)?

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) shows a sharp rejection from the open of $0.0000943 down to a close of $0.0000654, a ~31% intra-candle decline. The 5-minute price change is already -3.5%. With 75.7% sell pressure and sell volume ($109K) more than 3x buy volume ($35K), the short-term path of least resistance is downward. Liquidity is extremely thin at $37K, meaning even modest sell orders can move price significantly. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000030 to $0.000095.

Is Cyclospora a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits multiple very-high-risk characteristics simultaneously.

How are Cyclospora holders trending?

Cyclosporiasis currently has 619 holders and is growing (24h: 608, 7d: 607, 30d: 606). The holder data presents a major anomaly. The historical daily series shows the token had 13 holders from June 14 through June 29, peaked at 22 on July 1, then declined back to 10 by July 13. The current reported count of 619 with +608 in 24h is a 6,090% single-day increase that is entirely inconsistent with the prior 30-day history. This pattern is a significant red flag — it may indicate coordinated wallet creation to simulate organic growth, a data pipeline issue, or a sudden coordinated pump event. The acquisition breakdown (617 via swap, 2 via transfer) is plausible for a pump scenario but the magnitude is suspicious. Investors should treat the holder count with extreme skepticism.

What does sniper activity look like for Cyclospora?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Cyclospora?

Extreme illiquidity: $37K total liquidity makes large positions impossible without severe slippage • Holder count anomaly: +608 holders in 24h vs. 10 holders on July 13 is highly suspicious and may indicate coordinated activity • Overwhelming sell pressure: 75.7% of 24h volume is sells, 857 sellers vs. 407 buyers

← Back to all predictions

Track Cyclospora