JELLYCAT

JELLYCAT Price Prediction 2026

JELLYCAT
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 2, 2026

GYPB3McmpMpeLQcckoSTQ6KKAE8NL6QvkYaocy48pump

$0.054613

+0.43%

FDV $4,611

LiveContract:GYPB3McmpMpeLQcckoSTQ6KKAE8NL6QvkYaocy48pumpChain:SolanaHolders:408Market cap:$4,611

More tokens on Solana

PATAPIM

PATAPIM

Brrr Brrr Patapim

$0.0524580.2%
MC $2.5K
VITALY

VITALY

Vitaly Coin

$0.0534190.4%
MC $3.4K
TRALALERO

TRALALERO

Tralalero Tralala

$0.0560360.6%
MC $6.0K
Ape

Ape

Ape

$0.0517581.6%
MC $1.8K
toadtard

toadtard

toadtard

$0.0540321.8%
MC $3.9K
XST

XST

XST

$0.034842.8%
MC $34.82M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about JELLYCAT

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 2, 12:19 PM
FDV

$144,936

Liquidity

$64,842

Holders

994

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

JELLYCAT (JELLYCAT) is a meme/novelty token on Solana launched via the Pump.fun launchpad (mint suffix: 'pump'), currently trading at $0.0001449 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$144.9K and total liquidity of only $64.8K. The token experienced a dramatic 60.7% price spike in the last 24 hours, but this is accompanied by extreme red flags: a single wallet (ifKKQJY5...) holds 100.01% of the total supply, sell pressure dominates at 72.5% of volume, and the holder base only emerged in the last 24–48 hours after being completely dormant for over a month. The update authority is not renounced and is held by an external wallet. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk, potentially manipulated micro-cap launch.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme supply concentration: top holder controls ~100% of circulating supply
Explosive but very recent holder growth — 963 new holders in 24h after 30+ days of zero activity
Severe sell-side dominance: 72.5% sell pressure ($397K sell vs $150K buy volume in 24h)
Tiny liquidity pool ($64.8K) relative to 24h sell volume ($397K), creating extreme slippage risk
Pump.fun origin with non-renounced update authority — elevated rug risk

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just posted a 60.7% pump but is already showing a -25.4% retrace in the last 5 minutes. With 72.5% sell pressure, only $64.8K in liquidity, and a single wallet holding ~100% of supply, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp dump. The most recent hourly candle (H: $0.000220, C: $0.000145) shows a significant upper wick — a classic rejection pattern. Short-term outlook is bearish.

Target low$0.000030
Target high$0.000220
Support: $0.000124 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.000031 (hourly candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.000179 (hourly candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000220 (hourly candle [2] high — recent spike top)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the extreme concentration of supply in one wallet, near-zero liquidity depth, and the pattern of 30 days of dormancy followed by a sudden pump, the medium-term outlook is bearish. If the dominant holder begins distributing, the price could collapse toward near-zero. Sustained growth would require genuine community adoption and liquidity injection, neither of which is evidenced in the data.

Catalysts
  • Dominant holder beginning to sell/distribute supply
  • Liquidity withdrawal from the PumpSwap pool
  • Broader Solana meme coin market downturn
  • Potential for a short-lived secondary pump if social momentum builds

Bullish factors

  • 60.7% price gain in 24h demonstrates short-term momentum
  • Rapid holder growth (+963 in 24h) could signal viral social interest
  • Pump.fun tokens occasionally see multi-day momentum runs

Bearish factors

  • Single wallet holds ~100% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • 72.5% sell pressure dominates 24h volume ($397K sells vs $150K buys)
  • Only $64.8K liquidity against $397K sell volume — severe slippage
  • 5-minute price already down -25.4% from recent high
  • 30+ days of zero holder activity before sudden pump — suspicious pattern
  • Update authority not renounced
  • FDV of $144.9K with no verified contract or utility
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme supply concentration (one wallet = ~100% supply), very limited OHLC history (only 2 hourly candles available), no sniper data, and the highly manipulable nature of this micro-cap token. Price action is driven almost entirely by a single actor.

JELLYCAT call history

Full track record →
Jul 2bearish
24h+19.2%
7d-96.4%
30d-97.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (11:00 UTC): O=$0.0000352, H=$0.000220, L=$0.0000307, C=$0.000179 — a massive bullish engulfing/spike candle with a very wide range, indicating a violent pump. Candle [1] (12:00 UTC): O=$0.000179, H=$0.000179, L=$0.000124, C=$0.000145 — a bearish candle that opened at the prior close, failed to make a new high (flat top = resistance at open), and closed lower with a notable lower wick. The pattern is a 'shooting star / bearish reversal' following the spike, with price failing to hold the $0.000179 level.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 28%Sell 73%

Short-term trend is turning bearish after the spike — the most recent candle is a down-close with a lower high and lower close vs the prior candle's close. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of history and 30+ days of dormancy prior.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000124 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000031 (candle [2] low — launch/spike origin)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000179 (candle [1] open = candle [2] close)
Major$0.000220 (candle [2] all-time high spike)

The $0.000124 level is the nearest support from the most recent candle's low. A break below this opens the path to the $0.000031 area where the initial pump originated. Resistance sits at $0.000179 (the open of candle [1], which price failed to reclaim) and $0.000220 (the spike high).

Notable patterns

  • Bullish spike candle followed by bearish rejection candle — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Flat top on candle [1] (open = high) indicating immediate selling pressure at open
  • Upper wick on candle [2] suggesting distribution near the $0.000220 high
  • Volume declining on the pullback candle — but sell pressure still dominates overall 24h flow
  • 5-minute -25.4% move confirms rapid momentum reversal

Total holders994
24h Δ+97
7d Δ+97
30d Δ+97
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is almost entirely concentrated in the last 24–48 hours, perfectly coinciding with the 60.7% price spike. From June 2 to June 30, the holder count was completely flat at 31 holders for 29 consecutive days. On July 1, it jumped to 108 (+77), and by the analysis timestamp it reached 994 (+886 more). This is a near-vertical, event-driven holder surge that is tightly correlated with the price pump — a pattern consistent with viral social promotion or coordinated activity rather than organic growth.

The historical holder data reveals a deeply suspicious pattern. The token sat dormant with exactly 31 holders for the entire month of June (June 2–30, zero net change every single day). Then on July 1, holders jumped by 77 to 108, and within the next ~24 hours exploded to 994 — a 97% increase in 24h. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure (97%), confirming that essentially ALL holder growth happened in the last 1–2 days. Growth is technically 'accelerating' but this is not organic — it is a sudden, event-driven spike following a price pump, which is a classic FOMO-driven retail influx pattern.

Top 10 hold100.01%
Top 100 hold100.01%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

ifKKQJY5wDNxwgpSj5RQ6a3pGSRQv4xN4wH1TJruyWR

Project deployer / controlling entity (holds ~999.98M of ~999.9M total supply — effectively the entire float)

100.01%

8psNvWTrdNTiVRNzAgsou9kETXNJm2SXZyaKuJraVRtf

Dust holder (balance: 23,932 tokens — negligible)

0.00%

The whale map is the single most alarming data point in this entire analysis. Wallet ifKKQJY5... holds 999,976,067 tokens, which represents 100.01% of the reported total supply (the slight over-100% is likely a rounding artifact). There are only 2 wallets in the top 20 holder list, and the second holds a negligible dust amount. Despite 994 total holders existing, the top 10 and top 100 concentration is reported at 100.01% — meaning the vast majority of the 994 holders hold essentially zero supply. The dominant wallet has not yet distributed meaningful supply to the market. This creates an extreme, existential dump risk: if this single wallet begins selling, there is no price support. The 72.5% sell pressure in 24h trading may represent early distribution activity.

Liquidity$64,840
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$150,460
Sell$397,480
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,083
Unique sellers2,232

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $64.8K is dwarfed by 24h sell volume of $397.5K — meaning the pool has been turned over approximately 6x in sell volume alone. The buy/sell ratio is severely imbalanced: 72.5% sell pressure, 2,232 unique sellers vs 1,083 unique buyers, and 5,840 sell transactions vs 2,837 buy transactions. Net flow is clearly outflow. The shallow liquidity pool means even moderate sell orders will cause significant price impact and slippage. The PumpSwap pair (HDdUE9Sz...) is the sole venue. There is no evidence of deep liquidity or market maker support. Any large sell from the dominant wallet would be catastrophic to price.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,904,922.36
FDV$144,935.82

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~999.9M tokens (standard Pump.fun 1B supply with some burned/locked). The FDV is $144.9K — extremely small. The update authority is held by wallet TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM, which is NOT the burn address (1111...) and is NOT renounced. The token metadata states 'Mutable: false', which provides some protection against metadata changes, but mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced from the available data. The contract is unverified. Given the Pump.fun origin, mint authority is typically burned at graduation, but this cannot be confirmed. Freeze authority status is unknown. The combination of unverified contract, non-renounced update authority, and extreme supply concentration in one wallet creates a HIGH rug risk profile from authorities.

Volatility
high

60.7% price spike in 24h followed by -25.4% in 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles of price history. Extreme micro-cap volatility with FDV of $144.9K.

Liquidity
high

Only $64.8K total liquidity against $397.5K in 24h sell volume. High slippage risk on any meaningful position. Single PumpSwap pool with no alternative venues.

Concentration
high

Single wallet (ifKKQJY5...) holds 100.01% of total supply (~999.98M tokens). Top 10 and top 100 concentration both at 100.01%. This is the most extreme concentration possible — one entity controls the entire float.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data available. However, the dominant wallet's near-total supply control represents a far greater dump risk than typical snipers. The 72.5% sell pressure suggests active distribution is already underway.

Authority
high

Update authority is held by an external wallet (TSLvdd1...), not renounced. Contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status unknown. Mutable=false provides limited protection.

Key risks

  • Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk
  • Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume
  • 72.5% sell pressure — active distribution pattern
  • 30+ days of dormancy followed by sudden pump — suspicious launch pattern
  • Only 2 top holders listed despite 994 total holders — extreme Gini coefficient
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown
  • Pump.fun token with no verified utility or team identity

Mitigating factors

  • Metadata marked as Mutable=false, limiting metadata manipulation
  • Rapid holder growth (+963 in 24h) shows genuine retail interest
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • Social links (Twitter, Moralis) exist, suggesting some community presence
  • Pump.fun graduation to PumpSwap provides a basic liquidity mechanism
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they could lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The extreme supply concentration alone makes this one of the highest-risk tokens possible.

JELLYCAT is a Pump.fun meme token that experienced a sudden viral pump after 30+ days of complete dormancy. The core thesis is entirely speculative: either the dominant wallet (holding ~100% of supply) is a legitimate early holder who will gradually distribute as community grows, or this is a coordinated pump-and-dump where retail FOMO buyers are the exit liquidity. The data strongly favors the latter interpretation given the sell pressure dominance, supply concentration, and suspicious dormancy pattern.

Bull case (low)

JELLYCAT catches viral social momentum (e.g., trending on CT/TikTok), the dominant holder distributes gradually rather than dumping, liquidity deepens, and the token rides a broader Solana meme coin cycle to a higher FDV.

  • Sustained viral social media traction beyond the initial pump
  • Dominant holder choosing gradual distribution over a dump
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Liquidity injection from new market participants
  • Community-driven utility or narrative development

Base case

Price continues to retrace from the $0.000220 spike high, stabilizing somewhere in the $0.000050–$0.000100 range as initial FOMO fades. The token persists as a low-activity micro-cap with a small holder base but never achieves meaningful adoption or liquidity depth.

  • Dominant holder does not immediately dump entire position
  • Some retail buyers continue to provide bid support
  • No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels

Bear case (high)

The dominant wallet begins selling its ~100% supply position into the thin $64.8K liquidity pool. Price collapses 90%+ toward zero. The 994 recent holders who bought during the pump are left holding near-worthless tokens.

  • Dominant wallet initiating large sell orders
  • Continued 72.5%+ sell pressure exhausting buy-side liquidity
  • Retail FOMO fading as price retraces
  • No fundamental value or utility to support price floor
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure

GeneratedJul 2, 12:19 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of ~2026-07-02T12:00 UTC. Holder data reflects same-day snapshot. OHLC limited to 2 hourly candles. Historical holders cover June 2 – July 1, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (volume, liquidity, buy/sell pressure)
  • OHLC price candles (hourly, 2 candles available)
  • Historical holder count series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder distribution data (top 20 wallets)
  • Holder acquisition method breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be assessed
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly confirmed in metadata
  • Top holder wallet classification is inferred — no on-chain labels or verified identities
  • The 100.01% top-10 concentration figure may reflect a data artifact or rounding
  • Price % change fields for 5m/1h/6h/24h show conflicting data (24h shows 0% but price data shows +60.7%) — possible data pipeline inconsistency
  • No order book depth data available
  • Social sentiment data not available beyond link existence

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data analyzed here suggests very high risk. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,904,922.36

Key Risks

•Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk
•Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract
•Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume
•72.5% sell pressure — active distribution pattern

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for JELLYCAT. Sniper concentration, PnL state, and sell-through rate cannot be determined. However, the on-chain holder distribution is itself alarming: a single wallet (ifKKQJY5...) holds 100.01% of the total supply (~999.98M tokens out of ~999.9M total). This is not a sniper — this appears to be the token deployer or a controlling entity. The 24h trading activity (2,837 buys vs 5,840 sells; 1,083 buyers vs 2,232 sellers) suggests retail participants are being drawn in while the dominant holder or early entrants distribute.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

Cannot be determined from sniper data (unavailable). However, the dominant wallet's near-total supply control and the heavy sell-side volume suggest early/controlling holders are in a distribution phase.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for JELLYCAT (JELLYCAT)?

The token just posted a 60.7% pump but is already showing a -25.4% retrace in the last 5 minutes. With 72.5% sell pressure, only $64.8K in liquidity, and a single wallet holding ~100% of supply, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp dump. The most recent hourly candle (H: $0.000220, C: $0.000145) shows a significant upper wick — a classic rejection pattern. Short-term outlook is bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000030 to $0.000220.

Is JELLYCAT a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they could lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The extreme supply concentration alone makes this one of the highest-risk tokens possible.

How are JELLYCAT holders trending?

JELLYCAT currently has 994 holders and is growing (24h: 97, 7d: 97, 30d: 97). The historical holder data reveals a deeply suspicious pattern. The token sat dormant with exactly 31 holders for the entire month of June (June 2–30, zero net change every single day). Then on July 1, holders jumped by 77 to 108, and within the next ~24 hours exploded to 994 — a 97% increase in 24h. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure (97%), confirming that essentially ALL holder growth happened in the last 1–2 days. Growth is technically 'accelerating' but this is not organic — it is a sudden, event-driven spike following a price pump, which is a classic FOMO-driven retail influx pattern.

What does sniper activity look like for JELLYCAT?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding JELLYCAT?

Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk • Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract • Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume

← Back to all predictions

Track JELLYCAT