JELLYCAT

JELLYCAT Price Today & AI Analysis

JELLYCATSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 2, 2026

Price

$0.058782

Contract

Live
GYPB3McmpMpeLQcckoSTQ6KKAE8NL6QvkYaocy48pump

Chain

Holders

356

Market cap

$8,777

Ask Unhosted AI about JELLYCAT

Continue in chat

More tokens on Solana

JELLYCAT: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-02 12:19 UTC

Holder addresses

994

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$64,842.23
How concentrated is JELLYCAT ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 994 addresses (2026-07-02 12:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling JELLYCAT?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is JELLYCAT liquidity falling?
As of 2026-07-02 12:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $64,842.23. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-02 12:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 2, 12:19 PM UTC

FDV

$144,936

Liquidity

$64,842.23

Holders

994

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

JELLYCAT (JELLYCAT) is a meme/novelty token on Solana launched via the Pump.fun launchpad (mint suffix: 'pump'), currently trading at $0.0001449 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$144.9K and total liquidity of only $64.8K. The token experienced a dramatic 60.7% price spike in the last 24 hours, but this is accompanied by extreme red flags: a single wallet (ifKKQJY5...) holds 100.01% of the total supply, sell pressure dominates at 72.5% of volume, and the holder base only emerged in the last 24–48 hours after being completely dormant for over a month. The update authority is not renounced and is held by an external wallet. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk, potentially manipulated micro-cap launch.

Key points

  • Extreme supply concentration: top holder controls ~100% of circulating supply
  • Explosive but very recent holder growth — 963 new holders in 24h after 30+ days of zero activity
  • Severe sell-side dominance: 72.5% sell pressure ($397K sell vs $150K buy volume in 24h)
  • Tiny liquidity pool ($64.8K) relative to 24h sell volume ($397K), creating extreme slippage risk
  • Pump.fun origin with non-renounced update authority — elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token just posted a 60.7% pump but is already showing a -25.4% retrace in the last 5 minutes. With 72.5% sell pressure, only $64.8K in liquidity, and a single wallet holding ~100% of supply, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp dump. The most recent hourly candle (H: $0.000220, C: $0.000145) shows a significant upper wick — a classic rejection pattern. Short-term outlook is bearish.

Target low

$0.000030

Target high

$0.000220

Support

$0.000124 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.000031 (hourly candle [2] low)

Resistance

$0.000179 (hourly candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000220 (hourly candle [2] high — recent spike top)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Given the extreme concentration of supply in one wallet, near-zero liquidity depth, and the pattern of 30 days of dormancy followed by a sudden pump, the medium-term outlook is bearish. If the dominant holder begins distributing, the price could collapse toward near-zero. Sustained growth would require genuine community adoption and liquidity injection, neither of which is evidenced in the data.

Catalysts

  • Dominant holder beginning to sell/distribute supply
  • Liquidity withdrawal from the PumpSwap pool
  • Broader Solana meme coin market downturn
  • Potential for a short-lived secondary pump if social momentum builds

Bullish factors

  • 60.7% price gain in 24h demonstrates short-term momentum
  • Rapid holder growth (+963 in 24h) could signal viral social interest
  • Pump.fun tokens occasionally see multi-day momentum runs

Bearish factors

  • Single wallet holds ~100% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • 72.5% sell pressure dominates 24h volume ($397K sells vs $150K buys)
  • Only $64.8K liquidity against $397K sell volume — severe slippage
  • 5-minute price already down -25.4% from recent high
  • 30+ days of zero holder activity before sudden pump — suspicious pattern
  • Update authority not renounced
  • FDV of $144.9K with no verified contract or utility

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme supply concentration (one wallet = ~100% supply), very limited OHLC history (only 2 hourly candles available), no sniper data, and the highly manipulable nature of this micro-cap token. Price action is driven almost entirely by a single actor.

JELLYCAT call history

Full track record →

Jul 2bearish
24h+19.2%
7d-96.4%
30d-97.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
GYPB3M...pump
Total Supply
999,904,922.36

Key Risks

  • Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk
  • Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume
  • 72.5% sell pressure — active distribution pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (11:00 UTC): O=$0.0000352, H=$0.000220, L=$0.0000307, C=$0.000179 — a massive bullish engulfing/spike candle with a very wide range, indicating a violent pump. Candle [1] (12:00 UTC): O=$0.000179, H=$0.000179, L=$0.000124, C=$0.000145 — a bearish candle that opened at the prior close, failed to make a new high (flat top = resistance at open), and closed lower with a notable lower wick. The pattern is a 'shooting star / bearish reversal' following the spike, with price failing to hold the $0.000179 level.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is turning bearish after the spike — the most recent candle is a down-close with a lower high and lower close vs the prior candle's close. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of history and 30+ days of dormancy prior.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

28%

Sell

73%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000124 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000031 (candle [2] low — launch/spike origin)

Immediate resistance

$0.000179 (candle [1] open = candle [2] close)

Major resistance

$0.000220 (candle [2] all-time high spike)

The $0.000124 level is the nearest support from the most recent candle's low. A break below this opens the path to the $0.000031 area where the initial pump originated. Resistance sits at $0.000179 (the open of candle [1], which price failed to reclaim) and $0.000220 (the spike high).

Notable patterns

  • Bullish spike candle followed by bearish rejection candle — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Flat top on candle [1] (open = high) indicating immediate selling pressure at open
  • Upper wick on candle [2] suggesting distribution near the $0.000220 high
  • Volume declining on the pullback candle — but sell pressure still dominates overall 24h flow
  • 5-minute -25.4% move confirms rapid momentum reversal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$64,842.23

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $64.8K is dwarfed by 24h sell volume of $397.5K — meaning the pool has been turned over approximately 6x in sell volume alone. The buy/sell ratio is severely imbalanced: 72.5% sell pressure, 2,232 unique sellers vs 1,083 unique buyers, and 5,840 sell transactions vs 2,837 buy transactions. Net flow is clearly outflow. The shallow liquidity pool means even moderate sell orders will cause significant price impact and slippage. The PumpSwap pair (HDdUE9Sz...) is the sole venue. There is no evidence of deep liquidity or market maker support. Any large sell from the dominant wallet would be catastrophic to price.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,904,922.36

FDV

$144,935.82

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    60.7% price spike in 24h followed by -25.4% in 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles of price history. Extreme micro-cap volatility with FDV of $144.9K.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $64.8K total liquidity against $397.5K in 24h sell volume. High slippage risk on any meaningful position. Single PumpSwap pool with no alternative venues.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk
  • Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume
  • 72.5% sell pressure — active distribution pattern
  • 30+ days of dormancy followed by sudden pump — suspicious launch pattern
  • Only 2 top holders listed despite 994 total holders — extreme Gini coefficient
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown
  • Pump.fun token with no verified utility or team identity

Mitigating factors

  • Metadata marked as Mutable=false, limiting metadata manipulation
  • Rapid holder growth (+963 in 24h) shows genuine retail interest
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • Social links (Twitter, Moralis) exist, suggesting some community presence
  • Pump.fun graduation to PumpSwap provides a basic liquidity mechanism

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they could lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The extreme supply concentration alone makes this one of the highest-risk tokens possible.

JELLYCAT is a Pump.fun meme token that experienced a sudden viral pump after 30+ days of complete dormancy. The core thesis is entirely speculative: either the dominant wallet (holding ~100% of supply) is a legitimate early holder who will gradually distribute as community grows, or this is a coordinated pump-and-dump where retail FOMO buyers are the exit liquidity. The data strongly favors the latter interpretation given the sell pressure dominance, supply concentration, and suspicious dormancy pattern.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

JELLYCAT catches viral social momentum (e.g., trending on CT/TikTok), the dominant holder distributes gradually rather than dumping, liquidity deepens, and the token rides a broader Solana meme coin cycle to a higher FDV.

  • Sustained viral social media traction beyond the initial pump
  • Dominant holder choosing gradual distribution over a dump
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Liquidity injection from new market participants
  • Community-driven utility or narrative development

Base Case

Price continues to retrace from the $0.000220 spike high, stabilizing somewhere in the $0.000050–$0.000100 range as initial FOMO fades. The token persists as a low-activity micro-cap with a small holder base but never achieves meaningful adoption or liquidity depth.

  • Dominant holder does not immediately dump entire position
  • Some retail buyers continue to provide bid support
  • No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels

Bear Case

High probability

The dominant wallet begins selling its ~100% supply position into the thin $64.8K liquidity pool. Price collapses 90%+ toward zero. The 994 recent holders who bought during the pump are left holding near-worthless tokens.

  • Dominant wallet initiating large sell orders
  • Continued 72.5%+ sell pressure exhausting buy-side liquidity
  • Retail FOMO fading as price retraces
  • No fundamental value or utility to support price floor
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 2, 12:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-02 12:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (volume, liquidity, buy/sell pressure)
  • OHLC price candles (hourly, 2 candles available)
  • Historical holder count series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder distribution data (top 20 wallets)
  • Holder acquisition method breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be assessed
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly confirmed in metadata
  • Top holder wallet classification is inferred — no on-chain labels or verified identities
  • The 100.01% top-10 concentration figure may reflect a data artifact or rounding
  • Price % change fields for 5m/1h/6h/24h show conflicting data (24h shows 0% but price data shows +60.7%) — possible data pipeline inconsistency
  • No order book depth data available
  • Social sentiment data not available beyond link existence

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data analyzed here suggests very high risk. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is JELLYCAT ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 994 addresses (2026-07-02 12:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling JELLYCAT?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is JELLYCAT liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-02 12:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $64,842.23. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for JELLYCAT (JELLYCAT)?

The token just posted a 60.7% pump but is already showing a -25.4% retrace in the last 5 minutes. With 72.5% sell pressure, only $64.8K in liquidity, and a single wallet holding ~100% of supply, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp dump. The most recent hourly candle (H: $0.000220, C: $0.000145) shows a significant upper wick — a classic rejection pattern. Short-term outlook is bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000030 to $0.000220.

Is JELLYCAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they could lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The extreme supply concentration alone makes this one of the highest-risk tokens possible.

What are the key risks of holding JELLYCAT?

Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk • Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract • Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume

← Back to all predictions

Questions about JELLYCAT?