How concentrated is JELLYCAT ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 994 holder addresses (2026-07-02 12:19 UTC).

Are large holders selling JELLYCAT?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is JELLYCAT liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $64,842.23 (2026-07-02 12:19 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

JELLYCAT Price Today & AI Analysis

JELLYCATSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 2, 2026

$0.0₅2687

Contract

Live

GYPB3McmpMpeLQcckoSTQ6KKAE8NL6QvkYaocy48pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

338

Market cap

$2,685

At a $1M market cap, $JELLYCAT would be $0.001001 (372x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is JELLYCAT a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 11

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about JELLYCAT

3 free answers a day

JELLYCAT: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-07-02 12:19 UTC

Holder addresses

994

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$64,842.23

How concentrated is JELLYCAT ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 994 holder addresses (2026-07-02 12:19 UTC).
Are large holders selling JELLYCAT?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is JELLYCAT liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $64,842.23 (2026-07-02 12:19 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-02 12:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 2, 12:19 PM UTC

FDV

$144,936

Liquidity

$64,842.23

Holders

994

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

JELLYCAT (JELLYCAT) is a meme/novelty token on Solana launched via the Pump.fun launchpad (mint suffix: 'pump'), currently trading at $0.0001449 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$144.9K and total liquidity of only $64.8K. The token experienced a dramatic 60.7% price spike in the last 24 hours, but this is accompanied by extreme red flags: a single wallet (ifKKQJY5...) holds 100.01% of the total supply, sell pressure dominates at 72.5% of volume, and the holder base only emerged in the last 24–48 hours after being completely dormant for over a month. The update authority is not renounced and is held by an external wallet. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk, potentially manipulated micro-cap launch.

Key points

Extreme supply concentration: top holder controls ~100% of circulating supply
Explosive but very recent holder growth — 963 new holders in 24h after 30+ days of zero activity
Severe sell-side dominance: 72.5% sell pressure ($397K sell vs $150K buy volume in 24h)
Tiny liquidity pool ($64.8K) relative to 24h sell volume ($397K), creating extreme slippage risk
Pump.fun origin with non-renounced update authority — elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token just posted a 60.7% pump but is already showing a -25.4% retrace in the last 5 minutes. With 72.5% sell pressure, only $64.8K in liquidity, and a single wallet holding ~100% of supply, the price is highly vulnerable to a sharp dump. The most recent hourly candle (H: $0.000220, C: $0.000145) shows a significant upper wick — a classic rejection pattern. Short-term outlook is bearish.

Target low

$0.000030

Target high

$0.000220

Support: $0.000124 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.000031 (hourly candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.000179 (hourly candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000220 (hourly candle [2] high — recent spike top)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Given the extreme concentration of supply in one wallet, near-zero liquidity depth, and the pattern of 30 days of dormancy followed by a sudden pump, the medium-term outlook is bearish. If the dominant holder begins distributing, the price could collapse toward near-zero. Sustained growth would require genuine community adoption and liquidity injection, neither of which is evidenced in the data.

Catalysts

Dominant holder beginning to sell/distribute supply
Liquidity withdrawal from the PumpSwap pool
Broader Solana meme coin market downturn
Potential for a short-lived secondary pump if social momentum builds

Bullish factors

60.7% price gain in 24h demonstrates short-term momentum
Rapid holder growth (+963 in 24h) could signal viral social interest
Pump.fun tokens occasionally see multi-day momentum runs

Bearish factors

Single wallet holds ~100% of supply — extreme dump risk
72.5% sell pressure dominates 24h volume ($397K sells vs $150K buys)
Only $64.8K liquidity against $397K sell volume — severe slippage
5-minute price already down -25.4% from recent high
30+ days of zero holder activity before sudden pump — suspicious pattern
Update authority not renounced
FDV of $144.9K with no verified contract or utility

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme supply concentration (one wallet = ~100% supply), very limited OHLC history (only 2 hourly candles available), no sniper data, and the highly manipulable nature of this micro-cap token. Price action is driven almost entirely by a single actor.

JELLYCAT call history

Full track record →

Jul 2bearish@ $0.000145

24h+19.2%

7d-96.4%

30d-97.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: GYPB3M...pump
Total Supply: 999,904,922.36

Key Risks

Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk
Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract
Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume
72.5% sell pressure — active distribution pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (11:00 UTC): O=$0.0000352, H=$0.000220, L=$0.0000307, C=$0.000179 — a massive bullish engulfing/spike candle with a very wide range, indicating a violent pump. Candle [1] (12:00 UTC): O=$0.000179, H=$0.000179, L=$0.000124, C=$0.000145 — a bearish candle that opened at the prior close, failed to make a new high (flat top = resistance at open), and closed lower with a notable lower wick. The pattern is a 'shooting star / bearish reversal' following the spike, with price failing to hold the $0.000179 level.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is turning bearish after the spike — the most recent candle is a down-close with a lower high and lower close vs the prior candle's close. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of history and 30+ days of dormancy prior.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

28%

Sell

73%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000124 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000031 (candle [2] low — launch/spike origin)

Immediate resistance

$0.000179 (candle [1] open = candle [2] close)

Major resistance

$0.000220 (candle [2] all-time high spike)

The $0.000124 level is the nearest support from the most recent candle's low. A break below this opens the path to the $0.000031 area where the initial pump originated. Resistance sits at $0.000179 (the open of candle [1], which price failed to reclaim) and $0.000220 (the spike high).

Notable patterns

Bullish spike candle followed by bearish rejection candle — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Flat top on candle [1] (open = high) indicating immediate selling pressure at open
Upper wick on candle [2] suggesting distribution near the $0.000220 high
Volume declining on the pullback candle — but sell pressure still dominates overall 24h flow
5-minute -25.4% move confirms rapid momentum reversal

Liquidity

$64,842.23

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $64.8K is dwarfed by 24h sell volume of $397.5K — meaning the pool has been turned over approximately 6x in sell volume alone. The buy/sell ratio is severely imbalanced: 72.5% sell pressure, 2,232 unique sellers vs 1,083 unique buyers, and 5,840 sell transactions vs 2,837 buy transactions. Net flow is clearly outflow. The shallow liquidity pool means even moderate sell orders will cause significant price impact and slippage. The PumpSwap pair (HDdUE9Sz...) is the sole venue. There is no evidence of deep liquidity or market maker support. Any large sell from the dominant wallet would be catastrophic to price.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,904,922.36

FDV

$144,935.82

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
60.7% price spike in 24h followed by -25.4% in 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles of price history. Extreme micro-cap volatility with FDV of $144.9K.
Liquidityhigh
Only $64.8K total liquidity against $397.5K in 24h sell volume. High slippage risk on any meaningful position. Single PumpSwap pool with no alternative venues.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk
Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract
Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume
72.5% sell pressure — active distribution pattern
30+ days of dormancy followed by sudden pump — suspicious launch pattern
Only 2 top holders listed despite 994 total holders — extreme Gini coefficient
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown
Pump.fun token with no verified utility or team identity

Mitigating factors

Metadata marked as Mutable=false, limiting metadata manipulation
Rapid holder growth (+963 in 24h) shows genuine retail interest
Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
Social links (Twitter, Moralis) exist, suggesting some community presence
Pump.fun graduation to PumpSwap provides a basic liquidity mechanism

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they could lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The extreme supply concentration alone makes this one of the highest-risk tokens possible.

JELLYCAT is a Pump.fun meme token that experienced a sudden viral pump after 30+ days of complete dormancy. The core thesis is entirely speculative: either the dominant wallet (holding ~100% of supply) is a legitimate early holder who will gradually distribute as community grows, or this is a coordinated pump-and-dump where retail FOMO buyers are the exit liquidity. The data strongly favors the latter interpretation given the sell pressure dominance, supply concentration, and suspicious dormancy pattern.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

JELLYCAT catches viral social momentum (e.g., trending on CT/TikTok), the dominant holder distributes gradually rather than dumping, liquidity deepens, and the token rides a broader Solana meme coin cycle to a higher FDV.

Sustained viral social media traction beyond the initial pump
Dominant holder choosing gradual distribution over a dump
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Liquidity injection from new market participants
Community-driven utility or narrative development

Base Case

Price continues to retrace from the $0.000220 spike high, stabilizing somewhere in the $0.000050–$0.000100 range as initial FOMO fades. The token persists as a low-activity micro-cap with a small holder base but never achieves meaningful adoption or liquidity depth.

Dominant holder does not immediately dump entire position
Some retail buyers continue to provide bid support
No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
Liquidity remains at current shallow levels

Bear Case

High probability

The dominant wallet begins selling its ~100% supply position into the thin $64.8K liquidity pool. Price collapses 90%+ toward zero. The 994 recent holders who bought during the pump are left holding near-worthless tokens.

Dominant wallet initiating large sell orders
Continued 72.5%+ sell pressure exhausting buy-side liquidity
Retail FOMO fading as price retraces
No fundamental value or utility to support price floor
Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 2, 12:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-02 12:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply)
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (volume, liquidity, buy/sell pressure)
OHLC price candles (hourly, 2 candles available)
Historical holder count series (30-day daily)
Top holder distribution data (top 20 wallets)
Holder acquisition method breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be assessed
Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly confirmed in metadata
Top holder wallet classification is inferred — no on-chain labels or verified identities
The 100.01% top-10 concentration figure may reflect a data artifact or rounding
Price % change fields for 5m/1h/6h/24h show conflicting data (24h shows 0% but price data shows +60.7%) — possible data pipeline inconsistency
No order book depth data available
Social sentiment data not available beyond link existence

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data analyzed here suggests very high risk. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is JELLYCAT a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell JELLYCAT?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for JELLYCAT (JELLYCAT)?

Is JELLYCAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they could lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The extreme supply concentration alone makes this one of the highest-risk tokens possible.

What are the key risks of holding JELLYCAT?

Single wallet controls ~100% of supply — existential dump risk • Non-renounced update authority with unverified contract • Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.8K) relative to trading volume