GHOSTKITTY

GHOSTKITTY Price Today & AI Analysis

GHOSTKITTY
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 13, 2026

GXrRDTMJ8w3h8xh4cftQunC3yAafhHRPF5enUegSiKDw

$0.000191

+378.07%

FDV $190,575

LiveContract:GXrRDTMJ8w3h8xh4cftQunC3yAafhHRPF5enUegSiKDwChain:SolanaHolders:789Market cap:$190,575

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about GHOSTKITTY

Report snapshotas of Sep 13, 08:16 AM
FDV

$190,575

Liquidity

$18,969

Holders

0

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

GHOSTKITTY (GXrRDTMJ8w3h8xh4cftQunC3yAafhHRPF5enUegSiKDw) is a newly-active Solana token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool with extremely thin liquidity (~$18.97K) and a fully diluted valuation of ~$190.57K. Price action over the last 5 hourly candles is extraordinarily volatile, with the token spiking from ~$0.0000037 to a high of ~$0.00045 within hours (378% 24h gain) before retracing sharply (-57.8% in the last 1h, -15.4% in the last 5m). 24h volume is substantial relative to liquidity ($317.7K buy vs $301.2K sell), suggesting heavy speculative churn rather than organic demand. No metadata verification, social links, or authority renouncement status is confirmed, and no holder or sniper data is available, leaving major blind spots in due diligence.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme intraday volatility with 378% 24h price swing followed by rapid retracement
Total liquidity of only ~$18.97K against a $190.57K FDV, indicating a very thin, easily-moved market
No verifiable metadata: update authority, mutability, verified contract status, and social links are all unknown
No holder or sniper distribution data available, removing key tools for assessing concentration/rug risk
High-frequency two-sided trading (4,349 buys vs 2,992 sells; 1,760 buyers vs 1,372 sellers) indicating active speculative interest but also churn/dump risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1-6 hours

After a parabolic spike to ~$0.00045 (candle 4 high), price has fallen sharply, down 57.8% in the last hour and 15.4% in the last 5 minutes, closing the most recent candle at $0.0001907. This pattern is consistent with a classic pump-and-dump wick followed by rejection and profit-taking. Given the shallow $18.97K liquidity pool, further sharp moves in either direction are likely.

Target low$0.00012
Target high$0.00024
Support: $0.0001666 (candle 5 low), $0.0000882 (candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.000300 (candle 3 close), $0.000452 (candle 4 high, all-time recent high)

Medium term

neutral
1-7 days

With no holder or sniper data to confirm accumulation vs distribution, and only 5 hours of candle history available, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Sustained interest will depend on whether buy pressure (currently 51.3% of 24h volume) persists and whether liquidity is added to stabilize the shallow pool.

Catalysts
  • Potential liquidity additions or removals from the thin $18.97K pool
  • Continued retail speculative interest or abandonment typical of newly launched low-liquidity tokens
  • Any confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement affecting trust

Bullish factors

Bearish factors

Confidence: low. Only 5 hourly candles are available, liquidity is extremely thin, and there is no holder, sniper, or verified metadata to corroborate directional signals. The token's extreme volatility (378% up, then -57.8% in an hour) makes any price target highly speculative.

GHOSTKITTY call history

Full track record →
Sep 13bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 5 available hourly candles show a violent pump-and-partial-dump structure: candle 1 opened at $0.0000037 and closed near $0.0000169 with a long upper wick to $0.0000299; candle 2 exploded intraday to a high of $0.000298 before closing at $0.0000337; candle 3 continued higher, closing at $0.000301; candle 4 spiked to the sequence's high of $0.000452 but closed much lower at $0.0001667, forming a large bearish upper-wick rejection candle; candle 5 opened at $0.0001667 and closed slightly higher at $0.0001908 with a tight range, suggesting consolidation after the dump.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 51%Sell 49%

Medium-term (across the 5-hour window) the token is still up massively from its starting price, but the short-term trend within the last 1-2 hours is clearly down, with a sharp rejection from the $0.000452 high and a -57.8% 1h decline.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0001666 (candle 5 low / recent floor)
Major$0.0000335 (candle 3 open/candle 2 close area)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000301 (candle 3 close)
Major$0.000452 (candle 4 high, session peak)

Price is currently trapped between the $0.0001666 immediate support and $0.000301 immediate resistance after rejecting from the $0.000452 major resistance. A break below $0.0000882-$0.0000335 would signal a deeper retracement toward pre-pump levels; reclaiming above $0.000301 would suggest renewed bullish momentum toward the recent high.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick rejection candle (candle 4) signaling exhaustion at highs near $0.000452
  • Rapid parabolic advance across candles 1-3 typical of a low-liquidity pump
  • Volume spike-then-fade pattern (peak volume in candle 2, declining into candle 5) suggesting waning momentum
  • Tight-range consolidation candle (candle 5) after the sharp dump, potentially a pause before further downside or a base for recovery

Liquidity$18.97K
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$317.73K
Sell$301.16K
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,760
Unique sellers1,372

Liquidity is extremely shallow at only ~$18.97K against a 24h trading volume exceeding $618K combined (buy+sell), implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of over 30x in a single day. This mismatch means even moderate-sized trades can cause severe slippage and price impact, as evidenced by the wild intra-hour swings in the OHLC data (e.g., a move from $0.0000037 to $0.000452 within a few hours). Buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (51.3% vs 48.7%), and unique buyers (1,760) outnumber unique sellers (1,372), pointing to a mild net inflow, but the sheer volatility suggests this is a highly speculative, casino-like trading environment rather than a stable market.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,850.41 GHOSTKITTY
FDV$190.57K

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Update authority, mutability, verified contract status, and master edition status are all listed as unknown in the source metadata, meaning mint and freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed. This is a material gap: without confirmation that authorities are renounced, there remains a non-trivial risk that the token contract could be altered, supply inflated, or accounts frozen by a privileged authority. Combined with the total absence of social links and description, this token exhibits classic characteristics of an unverified, freshly-deployed speculative asset.

Volatility
high

24h price change of +378% followed by a -57.8% 1h decline and -15.4% 5m decline demonstrates extreme volatility inconsistent with a stable or maturing asset.

Liquidity
high

Only ~$18.97K in total liquidity against $190.57K FDV and over $618K in 24h volume creates severe slippage risk and vulnerability to liquidity removal or large sell orders.

Concentration
high

No holder distribution data is available to verify concentration, but the combination of a brand-new low-liquidity pool and a massive speculative pump is a common signature of concentrated early holdings; absence of data itself is treated as a risk factor.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available to rule out bot-driven pump-and-dump activity, and the observed candle pattern (parabolic spike then sharp rejection) is highly consistent with sniper/bot-driven dumping, even though it cannot be confirmed directly.

Authority
high

Update authority, mint authority renouncement, and freeze authority renouncement are all unknown/unconfirmed, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by a privileged party.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($18.97K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanisms unverified
  • No holder or sniper data available, removing critical tools to assess concentration and bot activity
  • Violent parabolic price action (+378% then -57.8% within hours) typical of pump-and-dump schemes on new low-liquidity tokens
  • No social links, description, or verification -- classic hallmarks of an anonymous, unaudited token launch

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($317.73K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($301.16K), and buyers (1,760) outnumber sellers (1,372), indicating some net positive demand at present
  • High number of unique participants (over 3,000 buyers+sellers combined) suggests some organic retail interest rather than a single-wallet operation
  • Most recent candle shows a tight consolidation range rather than continued freefall, which could indicate short-term stabilization
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the potential for total capital loss. This token shows extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unverified contract/authority status, and a complete absence of holder and sniper analytics. It is unsuitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to withstand a rapid and total loss of invested funds.

GHOSTKITTY presents a high-risk, high-volatility speculative trading opportunity rather than a fundamentals-based investment. The token has demonstrated the capacity for explosive short-term gains (378% in 24h) but with equally severe drawdowns (-57.8% in the last hour), all within an extremely shallow liquidity environment ($18.97K) that lacks verified contract authority status, holder data, and sniper analytics. Any position should be sized as a small, speculative allocation with strict risk management given the very high overall risk profile.

Bull case (low)

If buy-side momentum re-accelerates and liquidity is added to the pool, GHOSTKITTY could retest or exceed its recent high of $0.000452, especially if driven by continued retail FOMO and social attention around the 'GHOSTKITTY' branding.

  • Renewed buy pressure exceeding the current 51.3%/48.7% buy/sell split
  • Fresh liquidity injections reducing slippage and enabling larger positions
  • Viral social/meme attention typical of cat/ghost-themed meme tokens on Solana

Base case

Price continues to consolidate in a wide, volatile range between roughly $0.00012 and $0.00024 as the market digests the initial pump, with periodic sharp swings driven by the thin liquidity pool until either fresh catalysts emerge or interest fades.

  • Liquidity remains near current levels (~$18.97K) without major additions or removals
  • Buy/sell volume stays roughly balanced (currently 51.3%/48.7%)
  • No new verified information emerges on contract authorities or holder distribution in the near term

Bear case (high)

The token continues its post-spike decline, breaking below the $0.0001666 immediate support and retracing toward pre-pump levels near $0.0000335-$0.0000882, as early buyers and any snipers take profit into thin liquidity.

  • Shallow $18.97K liquidity amplifying downside moves
  • Lack of confirmed mint/freeze authority renouncement raising rug-pull concerns
  • Absence of holder/sniper data preventing confirmation of healthy distribution, increasing likelihood of concentrated dumping
  • Already-observed -57.8% 1h decline signaling active profit-taking

GeneratedSep 13, 08:16 AM
Data freshnessMost recent candle timestamp 2026-09-13T08:00:00.000Z; data appears near-real-time as of analysis
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m percent change data
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (5 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers, liquidity)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (no data returned)

Limitations

  • No holder distribution or holder growth data available (endpoint retired)
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available
  • No verification of contract authority status (mint/freeze authority, update authority, mutability all unknown)
  • Only 5 hourly candles provided, limiting technical analysis depth and historical context
  • No social/community data available to assess qualitative sentiment or legitimacy

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (holder data, sniper data, contract authority verification). Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity, newly-launched tokens, carries a very high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,850.41 GHOSTKITTY

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($18.97K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanisms unverified
No holder or sniper data available, removing critical tools to assess concentration and bot activity
Violent parabolic price action (+378% then -57.8% within hours) typical of pump-and-dump schemes on new low-liquidity tokens

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data was available for this token, so sniper concentration, PnL state, and sell-through rate cannot be determined. This is a significant blind spot given the token's parabolic price action, which is a pattern commonly associated with sniper bots on new low-liquidity pools.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

unknown - no sniper data available

Unknown due to lack of sniper/early-buyer data; the extreme volatility and high buy/sell counts (4,349 buys, 2,992 sells) suggest active speculative rotation but cannot be attributed to specific early-buyer cohorts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for GHOSTKITTY (GHOSTKITTY)?

After a parabolic spike to ~$0.00045 (candle 4 high), price has fallen sharply, down 57.8% in the last hour and 15.4% in the last 5 minutes, closing the most recent candle at $0.0001907. This pattern is consistent with a classic pump-and-dump wick followed by rejection and profit-taking. Given the shallow $18.97K liquidity pool, further sharp moves in either direction are likely. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-6 hours), with a target range of $0.00012 to $0.00024.

Is GHOSTKITTY a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the potential for total capital loss. This token shows extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unverified contract/authority status, and a complete absence of holder and sniper analytics. It is unsuitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to withstand a rapid and total loss of invested funds.

What does sniper activity look like for GHOSTKITTY?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding GHOSTKITTY?

Extremely thin liquidity ($18.97K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanisms unverified • No holder or sniper data available, removing critical tools to assess concentration and bot activity

Track GHOSTKITTY