GHOSTKITTY Price Today & AI Analysis

GHOSTKITTYSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 13, 2026

$0.0₅4044

Contract

Live

GXrRDTMJ8w3h8xh4cftQunC3yAafhHRPF5enUegSiKDw

Chain

Solana

Holders

283

Market cap

$4,043

At a $1M market cap, $GHOSTKITTY would be $0.001000 (247x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is GHOSTKITTY a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Launch wallets hold

0.1%1 sniper, 4 insiders still holding

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about GHOSTKITTY

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

DOPEDoge Pepe$0.0₄1240+0.0%MC $1

MrBeastMrBeast$0.0₇3392+0.0%MC $3.4K

FCKYEAFck Yea Guy$0.0₅2391+0.0%MC $2.4K

PekachuPekachu$0.0₅2891+0.0%MC $2.9K

JELLYCATJELLYCAT$0.0₅3168-0.2%MC $3.2K

FrongusFrongus$0.000223+439.8%MC $215.3K

GHOSTKITTY: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-13 08:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$18,969.00

How concentrated is GHOSTKITTY ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling GHOSTKITTY?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is GHOSTKITTY liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-13 08:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $18,969.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-13 08:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 13, 08:16 AM UTC

FDV

$190,575

Liquidity

$18,969.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GHOSTKITTY (GXrRDTMJ8w3h8xh4cftQunC3yAafhHRPF5enUegSiKDw) is a newly-active Solana token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool with extremely thin liquidity (~$18.97K) and a fully diluted valuation of ~$190.57K. Price action over the last 5 hourly candles is extraordinarily volatile, with the token spiking from ~$0.0000037 to a high of ~$0.00045 within hours (378% 24h gain) before retracing sharply (-57.8% in the last 1h, -15.4% in the last 5m). 24h volume is substantial relative to liquidity ($317.7K buy vs $301.2K sell), suggesting heavy speculative churn rather than organic demand. No metadata verification, social links, or authority renouncement status is confirmed, and no holder or sniper data is available, leaving major blind spots in due diligence.

Key points

Extreme intraday volatility with 378% 24h price swing followed by rapid retracement
Total liquidity of only ~$18.97K against a $190.57K FDV, indicating a very thin, easily-moved market
No verifiable metadata: update authority, mutability, verified contract status, and social links are all unknown
No holder or sniper distribution data available, removing key tools for assessing concentration/rug risk
High-frequency two-sided trading (4,349 buys vs 2,992 sells; 1,760 buyers vs 1,372 sellers) indicating active speculative interest but also churn/dump risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-6 hours

bearish

After a parabolic spike to ~$0.00045 (candle 4 high), price has fallen sharply, down 57.8% in the last hour and 15.4% in the last 5 minutes, closing the most recent candle at $0.0001907. This pattern is consistent with a classic pump-and-dump wick followed by rejection and profit-taking. Given the shallow $18.97K liquidity pool, further sharp moves in either direction are likely.

Target low

$0.00012

Target high

$0.00024

Support: $0.0001666 (candle 5 low), $0.0000882 (candle 2 low)
Resistance: $0.000300 (candle 3 close), $0.000452 (candle 4 high, all-time recent high)

Medium term · 1-7 days

neutral

With no holder or sniper data to confirm accumulation vs distribution, and only 5 hours of candle history available, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Sustained interest will depend on whether buy pressure (currently 51.3% of 24h volume) persists and whether liquidity is added to stabilize the shallow pool.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or removals from the thin $18.97K pool
Continued retail speculative interest or abandonment typical of newly launched low-liquidity tokens
Any confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement affecting trust

Confidence: low. Only 5 hourly candles are available, liquidity is extremely thin, and there is no holder, sniper, or verified metadata to corroborate directional signals. The token's extreme volatility (378% up, then -57.8% in an hour) makes any price target highly speculative.

GHOSTKITTY call history

Full track record →

Sep 13bearish@ $0.000191

24h-91.3%

7d-95.8%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: GXrRDT...iKDw
Total Supply: 999,999,850.41 GHOSTKITTY

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($18.97K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanisms unverified
No holder or sniper data available, removing critical tools to assess concentration and bot activity
Violent parabolic price action (+378% then -57.8% within hours) typical of pump-and-dump schemes on new low-liquidity tokens

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 5 available hourly candles show a violent pump-and-partial-dump structure: candle 1 opened at $0.0000037 and closed near $0.0000169 with a long upper wick to $0.0000299; candle 2 exploded intraday to a high of $0.000298 before closing at $0.0000337; candle 3 continued higher, closing at $0.000301; candle 4 spiked to the sequence's high of $0.000452 but closed much lower at $0.0001667, forming a large bearish upper-wick rejection candle; candle 5 opened at $0.0001667 and closed slightly higher at $0.0001908 with a tight range, suggesting consolidation after the dump.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (across the 5-hour window) the token is still up massively from its starting price, but the short-term trend within the last 1-2 hours is clearly down, with a sharp rejection from the $0.000452 high and a -57.8% 1h decline.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0001666 (candle 5 low / recent floor)

Major support

$0.0000335 (candle 3 open/candle 2 close area)

Immediate resistance

$0.000301 (candle 3 close)

Major resistance

$0.000452 (candle 4 high, session peak)

Price is currently trapped between the $0.0001666 immediate support and $0.000301 immediate resistance after rejecting from the $0.000452 major resistance. A break below $0.0000882-$0.0000335 would signal a deeper retracement toward pre-pump levels; reclaiming above $0.000301 would suggest renewed bullish momentum toward the recent high.

Notable patterns

Long upper-wick rejection candle (candle 4) signaling exhaustion at highs near $0.000452
Rapid parabolic advance across candles 1-3 typical of a low-liquidity pump
Volume spike-then-fade pattern (peak volume in candle 2, declining into candle 5) suggesting waning momentum
Tight-range consolidation candle (candle 5) after the sharp dump, potentially a pause before further downside or a base for recovery

Liquidity

$18,969.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at only ~$18.97K against a 24h trading volume exceeding $618K combined (buy+sell), implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of over 30x in a single day. This mismatch means even moderate-sized trades can cause severe slippage and price impact, as evidenced by the wild intra-hour swings in the OHLC data (e.g., a move from $0.0000037 to $0.000452 within a few hours). Buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (51.3% vs 48.7%), and unique buyers (1,760) outnumber unique sellers (1,372), pointing to a mild net inflow, but the sheer volatility suggests this is a highly speculative, casino-like trading environment rather than a stable market.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,850.41 GHOSTKITTY

FDV

$190.57K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +378% followed by a -57.8% 1h decline and -15.4% 5m decline demonstrates extreme volatility inconsistent with a stable or maturing asset.
Liquidityhigh
Only ~$18.97K in total liquidity against $190.57K FDV and over $618K in 24h volume creates severe slippage risk and vulnerability to liquidity removal or large sell orders.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($18.97K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanisms unverified
No holder or sniper data available, removing critical tools to assess concentration and bot activity
Violent parabolic price action (+378% then -57.8% within hours) typical of pump-and-dump schemes on new low-liquidity tokens
No social links, description, or verification -- classic hallmarks of an anonymous, unaudited token launch

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($317.73K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($301.16K), and buyers (1,760) outnumber sellers (1,372), indicating some net positive demand at present
High number of unique participants (over 3,000 buyers+sellers combined) suggests some organic retail interest rather than a single-wallet operation
Most recent candle shows a tight consolidation range rather than continued freefall, which could indicate short-term stabilization

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the potential for total capital loss. This token shows extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unverified contract/authority status, and a complete absence of holder and sniper analytics. It is unsuitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to withstand a rapid and total loss of invested funds.

GHOSTKITTY presents a high-risk, high-volatility speculative trading opportunity rather than a fundamentals-based investment. The token has demonstrated the capacity for explosive short-term gains (378% in 24h) but with equally severe drawdowns (-57.8% in the last hour), all within an extremely shallow liquidity environment ($18.97K) that lacks verified contract authority status, holder data, and sniper analytics. Any position should be sized as a small, speculative allocation with strict risk management given the very high overall risk profile.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum re-accelerates and liquidity is added to the pool, GHOSTKITTY could retest or exceed its recent high of $0.000452, especially if driven by continued retail FOMO and social attention around the 'GHOSTKITTY' branding.

Renewed buy pressure exceeding the current 51.3%/48.7% buy/sell split
Fresh liquidity injections reducing slippage and enabling larger positions
Viral social/meme attention typical of cat/ghost-themed meme tokens on Solana

Base Case

Price continues to consolidate in a wide, volatile range between roughly $0.00012 and $0.00024 as the market digests the initial pump, with periodic sharp swings driven by the thin liquidity pool until either fresh catalysts emerge or interest fades.

Liquidity remains near current levels (~$18.97K) without major additions or removals
Buy/sell volume stays roughly balanced (currently 51.3%/48.7%)
No new verified information emerges on contract authorities or holder distribution in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues its post-spike decline, breaking below the $0.0001666 immediate support and retracing toward pre-pump levels near $0.0000335-$0.0000882, as early buyers and any snipers take profit into thin liquidity.

Shallow $18.97K liquidity amplifying downside moves
Lack of confirmed mint/freeze authority renouncement raising rug-pull concerns
Absence of holder/sniper data preventing confirmation of healthy distribution, increasing likelihood of concentrated dumping
Already-observed -57.8% 1h decline signaling active profit-taking

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 13, 08:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-13 08:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
USD price and 24h/1h/5m percent change data
Hourly OHLCV candle data (5 most recent candles)
Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers, liquidity)
Sniper analysis endpoint (no data returned)

Limitations

No holder distribution or holder growth data available (endpoint retired)
No sniper/early-buyer data available
No verification of contract authority status (mint/freeze authority, update authority, mutability all unknown)
Only 5 hourly candles provided, limiting technical analysis depth and historical context
No social/community data available to assess qualitative sentiment or legitimacy

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (holder data, sniper data, contract authority verification). Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity, newly-launched tokens, carries a very high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GHOSTKITTY a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell GHOSTKITTY?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is GHOSTKITTY ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling GHOSTKITTY?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is GHOSTKITTY liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-13 08:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $18,969.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for GHOSTKITTY (GHOSTKITTY)?

Is GHOSTKITTY a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the potential for total capital loss. This token shows extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unverified contract/authority status, and a complete absence of holder and sniper analytics. It is unsuitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to withstand a rapid and total loss of invested funds.

What are the key risks of holding GHOSTKITTY?

Extremely thin liquidity ($18.97K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract, leaving rug-pull mechanisms unverified • No holder or sniper data available, removing critical tools to assess concentration and bot activity